Upload
yamanagold2016
View
1.321
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TSX: YRI | NYSE: AUY
True Value Proposition
Corporate Summary
February 2016
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-looking Statement
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS: This presentation contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and applicable Canadian securities legislation. Except for statements of historical fact relating to the Company,
information contained herein constitutes forward-looking statements, including any information as to the Company’s strategy, plans or future financial or operating
performance. Forward-looking statements are characterized by words such as “plan,” “expect”, “budget”, “target”, “project”, “intend,” “believe”, “anticipate”,
“estimate” and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions “may” or “will” occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the opinions,
assumptions and estimates of management considered reasonable at the date the statements are made, and are inherently subject to a variety of risks and
uncertainties and other known and unknown factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking
statements. These factors include the Company’s expectations in connection with the expected production and exploration, development and expansion plans at the
Company’s projects discussed herein being met, the impact of proposed optimizations at the Company’s projects, the impact of the proposed new mining law in
Brazil and the impact of general business and economic conditions, global liquidity and credit availability on the timing of cash flows and the values of assets and
liabilities based on projected future conditions, fluctuating metal prices (such as gold, copper, silver and zinc), currency exchange rates (such as the Brazilian Real,
the Chilean Peso, the Argentine Peso, and the Mexican Peso versus the United States Dollar), possible variations in ore grade or recovery rates, changes in the
Company’s hedging program, changes in accounting policies, changes in mineral resources and mineral reserves, risk related to non-core mine dispositions, risks
related to acquisitions, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, changes in project development, construction, production and commissioning
time frames, risk related to joint venture operations, the possibility of project cost overruns or unanticipated costs and expenses, higher prices for fuel, steel,
power, labour and other consumables contributing to higher costs and general risks of the mining industry, failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as
anticipated, unexpected changes in mine life, final pricing for concentrate sales, unanticipated results of future studies, seasonality and unanticipated weather
changes, costs and timing of the development of new deposits, success of exploration activities, permitting time lines, government regulation and the risk of
government expropriation or nationalization of mining operations, environmental risks, unanticipated reclamation expenses, title disputes or claims, limitations on
insurance coverage and timing and possible outcome of pending litigation and labour disputes, as well as those risk factors discussed or referred to in the Company’s
current and annual Management’s Discussion and Analysis and the Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31st, 2014 filed with the securities
regulatory authorities in all provinces of Canada and available at www.sedar.com, and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December
31st, 2014 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause
actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or
results not to be anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and
future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements if
circumstances or management’s estimates, assumptions or opinions should change, except as required by applicable law. The reader is cautioned not to place undue
reliance on forward-looking statements. The forward-looking information contained herein is presented for the purpose of assisting investors in understanding the
Company’s expected financial and operational performance and results as at and for the periods ended on the dates presented in the Company’s plans and
objectives and may not be appropriate for other purposes.
All amounts are expressed in United States dollars unless otherwise indicated.
3
Value Chain
High Quality Portfolio Poised For
Value Accretion
4
Delivered on production guidance in 2015 and well positioned for operational execution
in 2016 and beyond
Portfolio approach – every mine and asset
evaluated based on production, costs, potential
and planned returns
• Value underpinned by 3 cornerstone mines:
Chapada, El Peñón and Canadian Malartic
Americas focused – focus on mining friendly
jurisdictions where we can have critical mass
Focus on core assets – look at balance among size
and scale, costs, location, opportunity for
development and improvement
Maximize value of non-core – strive to maximize
value of assets, including monetization in the
right circumstances
Pursue organic growth – well positioned with
numerous opportunities including Cerro Moro,
Chapada expansion, Canadian Malartic
developments, Deep Carbonates project,
Monument Bay project and Kirkland Lake
opportunities
Strategic Focus
5
Protect Downside and Plan for Upside
Streamline Organizational Structure
Improve Quality of Management Especially in
– Exploration: LifeBlood of Mining is New Ounces
– Technical Services: Bringing those Ounces to Production
– Operations: Efficiently and Effectively Mining those Ounces
– Health, Safety, Communities and Environment: Protecting Our People
from Harm and Damage
Improve Mine Plans and Deliver Production at Reasonable and Improving
Costs
Increase Production and Better Costs
Spend Exploration Funds on Identified Ore Bodies or Areas of Known
Mineralization
Focus Exploration, Development and Operations on Cash Flow
Generation and Increasing Free Cash Flow
Improve Balance Sheet
Deliver Value to Shareholders
Operational Results Overview
6 1. A non-GAAP measure. A reconciliation of which can be found at www.yamana.com/Q32015
2. Includes cash costs, sustaining capital, corporate general and administrative expense, and exploration expense.
Preliminary
2015 2016E
Production
Gold (ounces) 1.275M 1.234M – 1.305M
Silver (ounces) 9.0M 6.915M – 7.153M
Copper (lbs Chapada) 131M 122 – 125M
Costs Gold Silver Gold Silver
Cash Costs(1) per ounce ~$596 ~$7.12 $525 $6.20
All-in Sustaining Costs(1,2) per ounce ~$844 ~$10.85 $800 $10.20
Co-Product Cash Costs per pound of copper
(Chapada) ~$1.46 $1.32
Projecting stable production at lower by-product cash costs year-over-year
2016-2018 Expectations
Gold Production
7
2015E 2016 2017 2018
Gold Ounces
Chapada 119k 116k – 122k 110k 90k
El Peñón 227k 235k – 250k 245k 245k
Canadian Malartic (50%) 286k 280k – 290k 300k 305k
Gualcamayo 181k 150k – 165k 155k 150k
Mercedes 84k 85k – 90k 88k 82k
Minera Florida 113k 110k – 115k 110k 110k
Jacobina 96k 110k – 115k 120k 130k
Pilar 83k 85k – 90k 100k 98k
Fazenda Brasileiro 61k 63k – 68k 65k 65k
Cerro Moro - - - 76k
Total Yamana 1.275M(1) 1.23M – 1.31M 1.29M 1.35M
Continue to project year over year gold production growth
(1) Includes 25k oz from Alumbrera
2016-2018 Expectations
Silver and Copper Production
8
2015E 2016 2017 2018
Silver Ounces
Total Yamana 9.0M 6.9M – 7.2M 6.9M 10.5M
2015E 2016 2017 2018
Copper Pounds
Chapada 131M 122M – 125M 122M 115M
Significant revenue contribution from copper and silver; meaningful silver production
increase in 2018
Cerro Moro to begin contributing in 2018 resulting in expected silver
production at or in excess of historic levels
Cost Guidance
2016 Co-Product Cash Costs(1)
Per Ounce
9 1. A non-GAAP measure. A reconciliation of which can be found at www.yamana.com/Q32015.
2. Includes Alumbrera
2015E 2016
Gold Silver Copper Gold Silver Copper
Cornerstone Assets $555 $8.20 $512 $7.00
Chapada $331 $3.19 $1.46 $280 $2.72 $1.32
El Peñón $621 $8.38 $540 $7.20
Canadian Malartic $596 - $585 -
Other Assets $776 $8.89 $697 $8.83
Total Yamana $662(2)
$8.28 $605 $7.25
Total Consolidated 2016E Yamana By-Product Cash Costs:
$525/oz. gold and $6.20/oz. silver
Cash flow generation underpinned by high margin Cornerstone Assets
Co-Product Site Level AISC Guidance
2016 AISC(1)
Per Ounce
10 1. A non-GAAP measure. A reconciliation of which can be found at www.yamana.com/Q32015.
2. Includes cash costs, corporate general and administrative expense, sustaining capital and exploration expense
Gold Silver Copper/
lb.
Cornerstone Assets $691 $9.70
Chapada $350 $3.35 $1.60
El Peñón $730 $10.00
Canadian Malartic $800 -
Other Assets $875 $11.47
Total Consolidated Yamana
Co-Product AISC(2):
$840/oz. gold and $10.75/oz. silver
Co-Product Site
Level AISC:
cash costs (incl.
site level G&A),
sustaining capital
and exploration
expense
Targeted Consolidated Yamana
By-Product AISC(2):
$800/oz. gold and $10.20/oz. silver
Quarterly Trend for 2016
11
0
60
120
180
240
300
360
Ounces
000s
Gold Production
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Pounds
M
Copper Production
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Chapada and Canadian Malartic account for most of the difference from Q1 to Q4: large, open pit
mines that are seasonally affected
Project Overview - Cerro Moro
12
Located in the Santa Cruz province
in southern Argentina, 70km inland
of Puerto Deseado
1,000 tpd mill feed rate
Combined open-pit and underground
mining operation
Conventional concentrator with CCD
and Merrill Crowe circuits
All necessary permits are in hand
Union agreements in place
Site infrastructure and underground
mining works to commence in
January 2016
Production expected to commence
in Q1 2018
-
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
Production - Gold (oz) Production - Silver (oz)
First 3 Full Years Average - Silver First 3 Full Years Average - Gold
Silver Oz Gold Oz
Potential to improve production profile with inclusion of mineral resources
LOM Production Profile – based on mineral
reserves only
LOM average mined grade:
10.8 g/t gold and 536 g/t silver
Project Overview - C1 Santa Luz
13
Outlook
Committed to the re-start of C1
Santa luz
Drill program currently underway –
six drills in operations
Major conversion of resources
to reserves expected by the
end of Q1 2016
Detailed construction engineering
underway
Plant modifications required for the
re-commissioning to be completed
in 2016
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Year 0 Year 1 Year 2
Production
Gold (koz)
re-start
PEA Highlights (1)
Annual gold production (LOM) of
approx. 100,000 oz
Ten year mine life
Expected average recoveries of 83.7%
Avg grade of 1.48 g/t gold (open pit)
After-tax IRR of 56% 2
NPV of $199 MM vs. $48 MM capital
1. As announced on August 13, 2015
2. Based on a long-term Brazilian Real to U.S. Dollar exchange rate of 3.40 and a flat gold price of $1,250 per ounce. NPV derived at 5% discount rate
Other Potential Future Growth Drivers
14
Chapada Expansion Project
• Opportunities to expand throughput are currently being studied
Odyssey zone at Canadian Malartic
• Evaluating the potential for additional production from North and South
zones of the Odyssey deposit
Monument Bay
• Exploration program ongoing to build on significant existing mineral
resource base in favourable jurisdiction with low cost electricity
Kirkland Lake
• Exploration success last year supports a planned 3,000 metre drill testing
program and field work to generate additional targets in 2016
Deep Carbonates
• Program for 2016 includes refinement of chosen mining alternatives and
identification of viable arsenic treatment technology
Financial Considerations
15
Manageable debt maturities with only $115M coming due in
2016 and 2017
Cash and available credit of $843M as of the end of Q3 2015
• Proceeds from the metal purchase agreement in Q4 were used
to reduce the outstanding balance on the credit facility
Continued commitment to deleveraging through free cash flow
generation including potential asset sales
Continued commitment to returning cash to shareholders