60
US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A David Shen Launch Capital October 2014

US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

  • Upload
    dshen

  • View
    2.233

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

I gave this presentation in Oct 2014 at the Silicon Valley Innovation Center to a group of visiting Kazakh entrepreneurs. They wanted to know about US based investors and what they look for, and how to get investment from them.

Citation preview

Page 1: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

David ShenLaunch CapitalOctober 2014

Page 2: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

SEED FUNDING TRENDS

Page 3: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Startups are Raising a LOT More Before Series A

Source: https://www.cbinsights.com/blog/series-a-seed-funding-companies/

Page 4: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Startups are Raising a LOT More Before Series A

Source: https://www.cbinsights.com/blog/series-a-seed-funding-companies/

Page 5: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Funding round $ vs. Runway

• Too many raising not enough

– Seed rounds going $1+M, upwards of $2-3M+

• Acquiring customers take too long

– Consumers deluged by apps; B2B sales cycles taking longer – 12+ months

• Takes 24-30 months to develop an idea.

– Get to breakeven or metrics worthy of the next round.

Page 6: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Early Stage Bubble

Source: https://twitter.com/DanielleMorrill/status/493255099846647808/photo/1

Page 7: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Early Stage Bubble

• Bubble exists in early stage only

• Risk vs. reward does not match– Estimate 1 in 20-40+ for

hit, most die

• Early stage VC doesn’t have great incentives with this kind of data

• Angels can still make some money if valuation is good enough but VERY hard to pick

• Acquihires are a great way to lose money –Entrepreneurs reap most of the winnings

Source: http://berkerynoyes.com/publication/trends/online/2014H.aspx

Page 8: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

ANGELS

Page 9: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

What Do Angels Invest In?

• Internet still dominates % of deals and dollars invested.

• Healthcare has less than half of deals of Internet but nearly same amount of money invested!

Source: http://www.svb.com/halo-report-q2-2014-infographic/

Page 10: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Where Do Angels Live and Invest?

Source: http://www.svb.com/halo-report-q2-2014-infographic/

Page 11: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

About Angels

• High net worth individuals– Can be family offices

• Except in CA, NYC, Boston, angels:– Can be very conservative.

– May require revenue and traction

– Are not used to investing in startups with less defined business models

• Angels can invest in all amounts, ranging from 25K to millions.

Page 12: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Reasons for Investing

• Make money!

• Fame

• Supporting something they are passionate about

• Relationship

– Friends and family?

– Worked together before?

• Building a portfolio to raise a fund with

Page 13: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

What They Like

• You!

• “Show me the product”

• Normal investor requirements like traction, business model, revenue.

Page 14: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

CROWDFUNDING AND NORMAL NOT SO RICH PEOPLE

Page 15: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Rise of CrowdfundingAllows more access to startups which were previously only seen by those in the right networks

Mostly you must be accredited to participate. Some are allowing non-accredited investors under the not-entirely-implemented JOBS Act.

Page 16: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Crowdfunding Part II: Kickstarter/Indiegogo/Medstartr

Page 17: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

JOBS Act• July 2013 Title II General Solicitation came into effect

– You can solicit funds publicly.– Many rules to follow. If you break them, you could be banned from

fund raising for a year.– Only accredited investors can invest– http://www.forbes.com/sites/chancebarnett/2013/09/23/the-

crowdfunders-guide-to-general-solicitation-title-ii-of-the-jobs-act/

• Title III Crowdfunding – get investment from non-accredited investors– Limits to what non-accredited investors can invest each year.– Many information disclosure rules for companies– http://www.forbes.com/sites/chancebarnett/2013/10/23/sec-jobs-

act-title-iii-investment-being-democratized-moving-online/– However Title III is still being discussed:– http://www.crowdfundinsider.com/2014/05/40308-crowdfunding-

bell-tolls-title-iii/

Page 18: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

ACCELERATORS/INCUBATORS

Page 19: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Accelerators vs. Incubators

• Accelerators– Join up for small investment, often at low valuation– Get lots of help: mentorship, advice– Demo Day for investor intros

• Incubator– Similar to accelerator– Often ideas are generated internally – Ownership/investment vary from accelerators

• Generally startups will all sit together in a single space.

Page 20: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Rise of the Accelerator

422 Accelerators in the US

Souce: http://www.f6s.com/programs/united-states?type=accelerator

Page 21: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Accelerator/Incubator Pros and Cons

• Pros– Get lots of help– Meet/interact with other startups– Exposure to investors at Demo Day– Valuation may jump simply because you graduated

from a certain accelerator/incubator

• Cons– Giving up that much ownership may not be acceptable

to you– You may be forced to move to the accelerator’s

location

Page 22: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Accelerator Trend

• Seeing more startups go through more than one accelerator program

– Ex. 500startups and Ycombinator

• Giving up ownership in exchange for brand association and exposure to more investors

• Valuations typically get raised when going through 2 programs, especially if the final one is YCombinator.

Page 23: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

SEED/MICRO VC (OR SEED+) FUNDS

Page 24: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

135+ Micro VCs (aka Seed Funds)212 Capital Partners500 StartupsAccelerator VenturesAdvancit CapitalA-GradeAIB Seed Capital FundAmplify PartnersArcus VenturesBaroda VenturesBase VenturesBaseline VenturesBee PartnersBlume VenturesBOLDstart VenturesBoston Seed CapitalBullpen CapitalCaixa Capital RiscChicago VenturesCincyTechCollaborative FundCommonAngelsConnect VenturesContour Venture PartnersCostanoa Venture CapitalCowboy VenturesCrossCut VenturesCrunchFundCue Ball CapitalCultivation CapitalDace Ventures

Data Point CapitalDeep Fork CapitalDetroit Venture PartnersDorm Room FundDouble M PartnersDraper AssociatesDundee Venture CapitalEarlybird Venture CapitalElaia PartnersENIAC VenturesExpansion VCFelicis VenturesFenox Venture Capitalff Venture CapitalFireStarter FundFirst Step FundFloodgateFlywheel VenturesForerunner VenturesFortify.vcFounder CollectiveFounders Co-opFreestyle CapitalGolden Gate VenturesGolden Venture PartnersGreat Oaks Venture CapitalHarrison MetalHigh Line Venture PartnersHigh Peaks Venture PartnersHyde Park Venture Partners

IA VenturesIllinoisVENTURESIlluminate VenturesInitial CapitalInitialized CapitalInventus Capital PartnersInvereadyK9 VenturesKae CapitalKapor CapitalKaszek VenturesKepha PartnersKibo VenturesLaunchCapitalLearn CapitalLerer VenturesLifeline VenturesLool VenturesLowercase CapitalLudlow VenturesMentorTech VenturesMerus CapitalMESA+Metamorphic VenturesMHS CapitalMidvenMorado Venture PartnersMoscow Seed FundMucker CapitalNeu Venture Capital

NewSchools Venture FundNextView VenturesOCA VenturesOkapi Venture CapitalO’Reilly AlphaTech VenturesPassion CapitalPivotNorth CapitalPlug and Play VenturesPoint Judith CapitalPoint Nine CapitalPROfounders CapitalPromus VenturesQuest Venture PartnersRaptor VenturesReal VenturesRed Dot VenturesRed Swan VenturesResolute.vcRincon Venture PartnersRomulus CapitalRothenberg VenturesS3 VenturesSarsia SeedScout VenturesSEED CapitalSherpa VenturesSiemer VenturesSignia Venture PartnersSilverton PartnersSK Ventures

Social LeverageSoftTech VCSOSventuresSubtraction CapitalSV AngelTEEC Angel FundTribeca Venture PartnersTugboat VenturesUnitus Seed FundValar VenturesVast VenturesVegasTech FundVenture51Version One VenturesXG Ventures

Source: https://www.cbinsights.com/blog/top-micro-venture-capital-firms/

Page 25: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Top Seed/Micro VC 2011-2014

Source: https://www.cbinsights.com/blog/top-micro-venture-capital-firms/

Page 26: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Which Micro VCs Yield the Biggest Series A Rounds?

Source: https://www.cbinsights.com/blog/micro-vcs-seed-series-a/

Page 27: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Which Get to Series A the Fastest?

Source: https://www.cbinsights.com/blog/micro-vcs-seed-series-a/

Page 28: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Seed/Micro VC

• The range of funds raised varies from $5M to $100M.• Usually are first or second money in.• New funds are OK with notes. Older funds only do equity

rounds.• Older, larger funds almost always demand traction metrics,

ie. At least $25K-50K/month• Have ownership strategies, ie. Must capture 10% at seed

round.• Larger funds tend to be less sensitive to valuation as long as

their ownership rule is met.• Larger Seed/Micro VC will have raised follow-on funds• Looking for multi-billions in market size.

Page 29: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Seed/Micro VC Pros and Cons

• Pros– Often have huge portfolios to network and do

business with– Can help you find money for the next round– Can support you if you need bridging– Less signaling issues if they do not follow on– Have a lot of experience to help you

• Cons– Your metrics for success can change once a

professional VC is involved, even at seed– Huge portfolios can mean no time to help

Page 30: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

LARGE VC DOING SEED

Page 31: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Top 20 Most Active Seed 2013

If you look at everyone who is doing seed, it includes many big VCs

Page 32: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Most Active Seed Investors 2013(includes Seed + VC doing seed)

Source: https://www.cbinsights.com/blog/2013-seed-venture-capital-investors/

Page 33: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Big VC Doing Seed

• Started when a ton of innovation began during this technology cycle.

• Didn’t want to miss out on early look at big opportunities.

• Started allocating funds to do seed.• Many pulled back because they are not staffed to

manage so many investments.– LPs expect management of their bigger investments

• Amount of funding can vary from 50K, to 250K, to leading the whole seed round.

Page 34: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Pros and Cons of Seed Funds from VCs

• Pros

– Provides potential for future funding

– Often is a large sum of money

– Access to VC’s personnel for help

• Cons

– Signalling issue if VC does not participate in next round or leads next round

– Actual help may vary greatly, often is zero

Page 35: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

STRATEGICS/CORPORATIONS INVESTING

Page 36: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Corp VC Sees 38% Growth Between 2010 and 2013

Source: https://www.cbinsights.com/blog/strategic-intent-corporate-venture-capital/

Page 37: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Corporate VC Goals

• Extend/Enhance Corporate capability– Sysco Ventures – invests in food related startups

• ROI– Hearst Ventures – as long as they are making

money, parent doesn’t care what they invest in

• Strategic learning

• Foster innovation in their industry– Intel Capital – leads to more sales in computers

and their chips

Page 38: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Corporate VC Pros/Cons

• Pros

– access to information, help, and partnerships

– Provides potential future exit

• Cons

– May limit your exit options

– Could limit who invests in you later

• Ex. Competitive corporate VC may not invest

• Signaling issues if previous corporate VC doesn’t re-invest

Page 39: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

SERIES A FUNDS

Page 40: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Series A

• First round after the seed round.

• Typically can be $4M-$10M

– Recent years Series A funds struggled with funding lower than $4M

– Want/need to put more money to work

• Try for 20%-33% of the company at this funding.

Page 41: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

There are a LOT of Series A Options.406 Ventures2B Angels500 StartupsABS Capital PartnersAccel PartnersAccess IndustriesAccess Venture PartnersAeris CapitalAlsop Louie PartnersAndreessen HorowitzARC Angel FundAtlantic BridgeAtlas VentureAugust CapitalAuriga PartnersAustin VenturesAvalon VenturesBain Capital VenturesBalderton CapitalBanexi VenturesBarwell PlcBaseline VenturesBattery VenturesBayern KapitalBen Franklin Technology Partners of Northeast PennsylvaniaBenchmarkBertelsmann Digital Media InvestmentsBessemer Venture PartnersBlumberg CapitalBorealis VenturesBoston Seed CapitalBright CapitalBullpen CapitalBusiness Development Bank of CanadaCambridge Capital GroupCanaan Partners

Cardinal PartnersCarmel VenturesCatamount VenturesCayuga Venture FundCedar FundCharles River VenturesContour Venture PartnersCrosscut VenturesCrosslink CapitalCrown Venture FundCrunchFundCultivation CapitalData CollectiveDCMDeep Fork CapitalDell VenturesDelta PartnersDetroit Venture PartnersDigital GarageDN CapitalDraper AssociatesDraper Fisher Jurvetson (DFJ)DreamIt VenturesEarlybird Venture CapitalEaston CapitalEdison VenturesElaia PartnersEmergence CapitalEnergy Technology VentureseVenture Capital PartnersExport Development CanadaFairhaven Capital PartnersFelicis VenturesFF Angelsff Venture CapitalFidelity Biosciences

First Round CapitalFirstMark CapitalFLOODGATEFlybridge Capital PartnersFM ManagementFounder CollectiveFounder's Co-opFoundry GroupFreestyle CapitalGeneral Catalyst PartnersGenesis PartnersGlengary VenturesGlobespan Capital PartnersGoogle VenturesGrandBanks CapitalGreat Oaks Venture CapitalGreycroft PartnersGreylock PartnersGreylock Partners IsraelGrotech VenturesGRP PartnersHallett CapitalHigh-Tech GruenderfondsHighland Capital PartnersI2A FundIA VenturesIDEA Fund PartnersIDG Capital PartnersIDG VenturesIDG Ventures IndiaImperial InnovationsIndian Angel NetworkInfocomm InvestmentsIngenious VenturesInnovation VenturesiNovia Capital

Insight Venture PartnersIntel CapitalInterWest PartnersInvesco PerpetualIris CapitalJAFCOJafco VenturesJavelin Venture PartnersKapor CapitalKhosla VenturesKima VenturesKinetic VenturesKite VenturesKleiner Perkins Caufield & ByersLaunch CapitalLearn Capital Venture PartnersLerer VenturesLife Sciences Greenhouse of PennsylvaniaLightspeed Venture PartnersLongworth Venture Partnerslool venturesLudlow VenturesLumira CapitalLux CapitalMadrona Venture GroupMagma Venture PartnersMangrove Capital PartnersMatrix PartnersMayfield FundMentorTech VenturesMercury FundMeritech Capital PartnersMHS CapitalMitsubishi UFJ CapitalMizuho Venture Capital

Monashees CapitalNEW Capital FundNew Enterprise AssociatesNew Markets Venture PartnersNewSchools Venture FundNextstage CapitalNextView VenturesNexus Venture PartnersNorth Coast Angel FundNorth Coast Technology InvestorsNorthgate CapitalNorthwater CapitalNorthwest Energy AngelsNorwest Venture PartnersOctopus InvestmentsOhio Tech Angel Fund IIIOMERS VenturesONSET VenturesOpen Prairie VenturesORIX VenturesOsage VenturesPangaea VenturesParkwalk Advisors LtdPartners Innovation FundPassion CapitalPelion Venture PartnersPiton CapitalPoint Judith CapitalPoint Nine CapitalPolaris PartnersPrincipia SGRPROfounders CapitalQED InvestorsQualcomm VenturesRand Capital

Redpoint VenturesRelay VenturesRembrandt Venture PartnersRho CanadaRibbit CapitalRobin Hood VenturesRoche Venture FundRockPort Capital PartnersRothenberg VenturesRRE VenturesRuna CapitalSAP VenturesSBD Global FundSchooner CapitalScottish Enterprise, Investment ArmSequoia CapitalShasta VenturesSiemer VenturesSierra VenturesSilicon Valley BankSJF VenturesSofinnova VenturesSoftBankSoftbank Ventures KoreaSoftTech VCSouthern Cross Venture PartnersSpark CapitalSpectrum EquityStage 1 VenturesStorm VenturesSummit PartnersSunstone CapitalSV AngelT-VentureTech Coast AngelsTekton VenturesThe Social+Capital Partnership

Source: http://www.daniellemorrill.com/2013/04/119-investors-actively-doing-series-a-deals-since-march-1st/

Page 42: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Seed is the new Series A?

• As mentioned before, seed rounds are approaching normal series A levels.

Page 43: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Series A Crunch is Real:Explosion of Seed Startups…

2009: 472

2010: 770

2011: 1065

2012: 1749

Source: https://www.cbinsights.com/blog/seed-investing-report

Page 44: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

…Leads to Not Enough Series As

2009: 418

2010: 515

2011: 703

2012: 692

…leading to more bridge rounds or death of startups who can’t land their A… Number of Series A VCs has not increased; if anything it has decreased.

Source: https://www.cbinsights.com/blog/seed-investing-report

Page 45: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

2013 Estimated “Series A Crunch”

45

Notes:

• Entire venture industry is now shifting due to this crunch.

• Companies raising much larger seed investment rounds to extend runway

• Seed investors forced to support companies longer

• Seed investors forced to proactively shut down underperforming cos.

Source: CrunchBase

Funding Gap 177 113 336 635 1681

799 821

1205

1558

2510

622 708869 923

829

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 YTD

Pending Series A Funding Gap

Seed + Angel Series A

Page 46: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Series A Funds

• Want startups ready to scale.

– Proven product/market fit

– Must have your metrics prepared well

– Marketing channels researched, discovered, costs known. Must be scalable channels.

• Search for 10X return potential

• Market size in the multi-billions

Page 47: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Some Current Series A Requirements

• Ecommerce - $1M/month

• Consumer – 50K/DAUs

• B2B SaaS – $1-1.5M Annual Run Rate

• The “bars” are rising – minimal requirements are getting harder

– Too many startups coming up for series A, filters keep getting more difficult to pass

Page 48: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

HOW TO MEET INVESTORS?

Page 49: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

How to Meet Investors?

• Network with entrepreneurs– Ask for intros to their investors

– Referrals are best

• Attend conferences– Premoney, Post-Seed, TC Disrupt

• Angellist– Send messages

– Look for similar startups and generate target list of investors

Page 50: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

How to Meet Investors?

• Reaching out through website email addresses can work

– Associates are often tasked with looking at emails

– Don’t be surprised if no one answers your email

• Join an accelerator

– Demo days are some of the best ways to meet investors

Page 51: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

HOW TO SELECT INVESTORS

Page 52: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

How to Select Investors?

• Research them

– What investments have they done in the past? Anything competitive to you?

– How are they helpful?

• Call references

– Ask for references in entrepreneurs who have worked with them before

– Are they *really* helpful?

Page 53: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

How to Select Investors?

• What are their investment criteria?

– Do you fit their criteria? If not it may be a waste of a meeting

• Are they investing actively now?

• For more traditional venture funds:

– How young is the current fund? Younger the better.

– Have they made an investment in the last 6 months?

– Are they busy fund raising?

– Are they only re-investing in their current portfolio?

Page 54: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

How to Select Investors?

• Alignment in vision

– Do you and he agree on the direction/vision for the company?

• Alignment in personality

– Would you be OK spending a lot of time with this person (because you will be)?

• Alignment in style

– Would you be OK working with this person?

Page 55: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

INTERNATIONAL STARTUPS

Page 56: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Raising Money for International Startups

• If you are based internationally, it can be very hard to raise money from US investors

– US investors like to be close to their startups

– Fund charters may limit/prevent investment outside US

– Tax laws discourage US investors

– Fear of bad things outside their normal areas of influence

Page 57: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Move to the US?

• First try: move the parent corporation to a DE corporation

– International company owned by US DE parent corporation

– Investment from US goes into DE corporation

– This is better than being fully international, but if you don’t move here physically, it still may limit investment

Page 58: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Move to the US?

• Second: Move some of your team to the US– This is better from an investor standpoint.

– But if your business is still overseas, can you effectively do business while over here?

• Third: Move some/all team to US, do business in the US– This is the best case, even if initially most of your

business is back overseas

– Investors see that you are serious about being in the US and staying here.

Page 59: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

Accelerators

• 500startups is well known in its international strategy.

– Consider applying to 500startups where you will meet investors who have invested in international startups in the past.

Page 60: US Investors: From Early Stage to Series A

QUESTIONS? COMMENTS?