14
1 Systematic and Routine Symptom Assessment and Management to Relieve Distress in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease Quality Forum 2015 February 20, 2015 Helen Chiu, MSc, MHA BC Renal Agency John Duncan, MD, FRCPC Kaillie Kangro, MSW, RSW Vancouver General Hospital

systematic and routine symptom assessment and management to relieve distress in patients with end stage renal disease. helen chiu

  • Upload
    bcpsqc

  • View
    72

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

Systematic and Routine Symptom Assessment and Management to Relieve Distress in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease

Quality Forum 2015February 20, 2015

Helen Chiu, MSc, MHABC Renal Agency

John Duncan, MD, FRCPC

Kaillie Kangro, MSW, RSWVancouver General Hospital

2

Disclosure

• Helen Chiu: Administrative Fellowship, BC Renal Agency • John Duncan and Kaillie Kangro: Nothing to disclose

3

Storyline

• Background and goal• What have we done?• How did we measure?• Challenges & lessons learned• Take home message

4

The Setting

• Operates 7 a.m.-11 p.m. daily• >50 renal care professionals• ~200 patients

– Mostly elderly– Multiple co-morbidities– Heavy symptom burden– On life-sustaining machine for 4 hours x 3 days/week

5

What is this about?

• High symptom burden

• Historically under recognized

• Symptom management is essential

6

Our Goal

To improve symptom care by reducing overall distress due to symptom burden in all

patients at the haemodialysis unit of the Vancouver General Hospital

7

Our Team• John Duncan, EOL Co-lead; Nephrologist• Kaillie Kangro, EOL Co-lead; Social Worker• Michael Copland, Medical Director, Kidney Services VCH/PHC• Jazek Jastrzebski, Director, Renal Program; Head, HD program• Kerri Berryman, Operations Manager, Renal Program• Karen Shalansky, Pharmacist• Mary Vander Hoek, Clinical Nurse Leader• Toni Trewern, Clinical Educator• Jane Chu, Dietitian• Florence Ng, Data Management Coordinator• Helen Chiu, Project Coordinator

8

Changes Tested in PDSA Cycles

• Presentation and administration

• Layout of form

• Preparing staff

• Data collection

• Screening and documentation

• Follow up

9

What we are measuring: Process

• All patients were approached• >70% of patients with assessment

Nov-2013

Nov-2013

Dec-2013

Jan-2014

Mar-2014

Jun-2014

Sep-2014

Jan-2015

Mar-2015

Jun-2015

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

# of assessment collected/ # of pts approached

10

What we are measuring: Outcome

Nov-2013

Nov-2013

Dec-2013

Jan-2014

Mar-2014

Jun-2014

Sep-2014

Jan-2015

Mar-2015

Jun-2015

-

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Average Distress Level

Aver

age

over

all a

sses

smen

t sco

re

11

From our patients…• More open about symptom burden with

self-reported assessment• Proof is in the pudding

– “What are you going to about it?”• Barriers

– Language– Visual and cognitive impairment

12

Lessons Learned

• Keep eyes on the prize • Inter-disciplinary team work • Ongoing review of process (PDSA)

• Challenges – Build trust and impart value – Maintain momentum– Ensure expected positive impact is realized

13

As good as it gets? Or, birth of a notion?

• Engagement best tailored for various frontline team members

• Iterative process

• Possible to change culture of care for and with the patients

14

Thank you!

• Questions?• For more information, please contact

– Kaillie [email protected]

– John [email protected]

– Helen [email protected]