View
2.193
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Interoperability:
What Will it Take to Achieve a Connected Future
Our Interoperability Panel
• Kenneth Kleinberg - Managing Director, the Advisory Board Company (Moderator)
• Brian Ahier – Director of Standards & Government Affairs, Medicity, an Aetna Business
• Anuj Desai – Vice President of Market Development, New York eHealth Collaborative
• Jacob Reider, MD – Deputy National Coordinator, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
• Mariann Yeager, MBA, CEO, Healtheway
So Much To Considerfor Interoperability!
Standards
Consent
Identity
Certification
Network of Networks
Source: The Advisory Board Company Research and Analysis
Health Information
Exchange
Interfaced Vs. Integration
Cost
Open Vs. Closed
APIs
Push Vs. Pull Public Vs. Private
Regulation
Incentives Vs. Penalties
At What Level isHealth Information Exchanged?
Hospital
Region
State
Nationwide
Integrated Delivery Systems
Physician Practice
Source: The Advisory Board Company Research and Analysis
Five W’s (and the Big H)of Interoperability
Description Tools/Approaches Issues/Challenges
Who
Who should be at the table: providers, payers, government, patients, employers, vendors
• RHIO• HIEs• EDI• Portals• Clearinghouses
• Clinically integrated networks• Data sharing networks
• Trust• Competition• Privacy• Governance• Data ownership
• Public vs. private• Federated, centralized, hybrid• Payment contribution
Wha
t What do we need to exchange: clinical, financial, demographic data
• Documents• Messages
• Transactions• Database updates
• Completeness • Granularity• Context• Volume
• Accuracy• Source• Consent
Whe
n
When does information need to be exchanged: push vs. pull/search, transitions of care
• Care coordination tools• Decision support
• Registries• Surveillance• Reporting• Analytics
• Real-time vs. periodicreporting periods
• Opt-in vs. opt-out
Whe
re
Where does information need to flow: care continuum - acute, ambulatory, extended care
• Local• Regional• State
• National• International
• Varying regulation• Geographic vs. political
boundaries
• IT readiness
Why
Why should we exchange: care coordination, quality, cost reduction, regulation, market forces
• Pay for performance • Readmission penalties• Bundled payments
• Meaningful use (MU)• Accountable care (ACOs)
• Varying incentives• Quality measurement
challenges
• Patient compliance
How
How will we accomplish interoperability: standards, testing, certification
• HL7, IHE, FHIR, Direct• Controlled Medical
Vocabularies,• DURSA
• “Rules of the road” • EMPI, record locator services, • Provider directories
• Open vs. closed• Proprietary vs. standardized• Point-to-point vs. hub• Terminology
• Content vs. transport• Patient matching• Jason task force
recommendations
Source: The Advisory Board Company Research and Analysis
Interoperability Levelsfrom Core to External
Data Integration
IHE2 XDS / XCA
Syntactic Interoperability (HL7
V2)
Semantic Interoperability
(HL7 v3)
DocumentExchange
InterfacedAmbulatory and Extended Care
Further from Center Based on Low Common Denominator Standards
Core Organization
Owned / Closely Affiliated
Affiliated / External
Integrated Ambulatory and Extended Care
Private HIEPublic HIE
CDA1 and Transactions
ProcessInteroperability
Enterprise Architecture
Single Database
1) Clinical Document Architecture.2) Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Cross Document Sharing.
Source: The Advisory Board Company Research and Analysis
Interoperability / HIE StandardsStill Evolving
Complementary, Competitive, or Confusing?
The EHR | HIE Interoperability Workgroup (IWG) is led by the New York e-Health Collaborative (NYeC); supported by 19 states, 20 EHR vendors, and 22 HIE vendors
The CommonWell Health Alliance is an effort led by a number of EHR vendors to take an industry lead in addressing interoperability issues, including patient matching and consent
The Care Connectivity Consortium, founded by provider organizations, is working with the eHealth Exchange and aimed at pioneering health information exchange in the US
Carequality, with over three dozen organizations pledging commitment, is a public/private collaborative taking a broader (non-services) approach to building consensus to enable networks to interconnect
The Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange (WEDI) recently released a 20-year update to its 1993 report, with ten recommendations for “next-generation” HIE grouped in four “megatrend” areas
Healtheway is a non-profit, public-private collaborative that provides support to the eHealth Exchange (a nationwide network of exchange partners with a trust agreement and implementation guides) and Carequality
HSPC, the Healthcare Services Platform Consortium, a group of providers, IT vendors, system integrators and venture-led firms dedicated to solving the industry-wide interoperability problem using SMART on FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources)
DirectTrust, a non-profit governance organization working under a Cooperative Agreement with the ONC that creates policy and business processes/practices for Direct exchange – it works with the Electronic Healthcare Network Accreditation Commission (EHNAC)
Source: The Advisory Board Company Research and Analysis
Panel Q&A
• Kenneth Kleinberg - Managing Director, the Advisory Board Company (Moderator)
• Brian Ahier – Director of Standards & Government Affairs, Medicity, an Aetna Business
• Anuj Desai – Vice President of Market Development, New York eHealth Collaborative
• Jacob Reider, MD – Deputy National Coordinator, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
• Mariann Yeager, MBA, CEO, Healtheway
That’s a Wrap
Thanks to our panelists, the NYeC, and your participation!