Upload
stefanus-snyman
View
97
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1 | P a g e
FIRST SYMPOSIUM FOR INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION IN AFRICA.
Africa Interprofessional Education Network (AfrIPEN) University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia
21-22 SEPTEMBER 2017
SYMPOSIUM PRESENTATIONS
www.afripen.org
2 | P a g e
PLENARY PRESENTATIONS
A-01 All together better health: Building strong partnerships for IPE
Prof John Gilbert (University of British Columbia & University of Dalhousie, Canada)
A-02 Capacity building for IPE and sharing educational resources
Prof Jill Thistlethwaite (University of Technology Sydney, Australia)
A-03 Organisational reform to facilitate IPECP (incl touching on policies)
Prof John Gilbert (University of British Columbia & University of Dalhousie, Canada)
ORAL PRESENTATIONS
B-01 Key influences to effective interprofessional collaborative child protection decision making and practice: social workers’ perceptions
Nhlanganiso Nyathi (Anglia Ruskin University, United Kingdom)
B-02 Interprofessional collaboration between speech-language and occupational therapy students in a low-resourced community
Maretha Bekker, Renata Mosca (University of Pretoria, South Africa)
B-03 The value of exposing students to Inter-Professional collaboration (IPC) activities at a community-based rehabilitation centre
Juanita Bester, Maatje Kloppers, Faeza Bardien-Salie, Liesbet Koornhof, Sue Statham(Stellenbosch University, South Africa)
B-04 A one year review of the impact of a rural Interprofessional Education collaborative platform on health professions student learning
René Botha, Annemarie Joubert, Dirk Hagemeister, Ms Heidi Morgan (University of the Free State, South Africa)
B-05 Reflections on implementing a community-based learning activity as part of an Interprofessional Education Programme at the University of Witwatersrand
Abigail Dreyer, Mpho Molete, Sonti Pilusa, Juliet Nyasulu, Gaolatlhe Mothoagae (University of Witswatersrand, South Africa)
B-06 How prepared are our students for IPE? Gérard Filies, Anthea Rhoda, José Frantz (University of the Western Cape, South Africa)
B-07 Health professional students’ readiness for Interprofessional Education at the University of the Witwatersrand
Gaolatlhe Mothoagae, Patricia McInerney, Shirra Moch (University of Witswatersrand, South Africa)
B-08 Designing interprofessional modules for undergraduate healthcare sciences’ students
Carin Maree, Pippa Bresser, Mable Kekana, Karien Mostert-Wentzel, Mariatha Yazbek, Lydia Engelbrecht, Christa Viviers (University of Pretoria, South Africa)
B-09 Lessons learnt from designing and implementing undergraduate interprofessional healthcare modules
Philippa Bresser, Carin Maree, Karien Mostert, Mable Kekana (University of Pretoria, South Africa)
B-10 Facilitators’ experiences regarding inter-professional education of third year health care science students at Sefako Makgatho University
Hanlie Pitout (Sefako Makgatho University, South Africa)
3 | P a g e
POSTER PRESENTATIONS
C-01 The research process followed to assess the IPEP-value of activities students participate in at a community-based rehabilitation centre
Maatje Kloppers, Juanita Bester, Faeza Bardien-Salie, Liesbet Koornhof, Sue Statham (Stellenbosch University, South Africa)
C-02 Faculty development: A need for successful implementation of Interprofessional Education
Anthea Rhoda, Gerard Fielies, José Frantz, Firdouza Waggie (University of the Western Cape, South Africa)
C-03 Aligning graduate attributes with the interprofessional core competencies in an interdisciplinary health science faculty
José Franz, Nondwe Mlenzana, Nicolette Roman, Gerard Filies, Anthea Rhoda (University of the Western Cape, South Africa)
C-04 Exposing students to IPE experiences - thinking out of the box
Gerda Reitsma (North-West University)
C-05 How to use community primary care clinical placements as a medium for Inter-professional Education in Botswana
Mmoloki Molwantwa, Detlef Prozesky, Mpho Mogodi (University of Botswana)
C-06 The Collaborative Care Project Jana Muller (Stellenbosch University, South Africa)
4 | P a g e
Surname First name Country Town Organisation / Institution Email address Mobile
Amalba Anthony Ghana Tamale University for Development Studies, School of Medicine and Health Sciences [email protected] '+233206940090
Angula Penehafo Namibia Oshakati University of Namibia [email protected] '+264812489408
Bekker Maretha South Africa Pretoria University of Pretoria [email protected] +27739467435
Bester Juanita South Africa Bellville Stellenbosch University [email protected] +27832344791
Boruett Norbert Kenya Nairobi Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology [email protected] +254722774221
Botha René South Africa Bloemfontein University of the Free State (UFS) [email protected] +27833819695
Botma Yvonne South Africa Bloemfontein University of the Free State [email protected] +27845803427
Bresser Philippa South Africa Pretoria University of Pretoria [email protected] '+27835367033
Dreyer Abigail South Africa Parktown University of the Witwatersrand [email protected] +27740845481
Filies Gerard South Africa Cape Town UWC [email protected] '+27836925923
Frantz Jose South Africa Bellville University of the Western Cape [email protected] '+27716073404
Gathoo Kaashifa South Africa Parktown University of the Witwatersrand [email protected] +27732638578
Gilbert John Canada Vancouver University of British Columbia/Dalhousie University [email protected] '+16045621492
Hedimbi Marius Namibia Windhoek University of Namibia [email protected] '+264812534870
Khanyola Judy Kenya Nairobi ICAP at Columbia University [email protected] '+254700100692
Kloppers Maatje South Africa Bellville Stellenbosch University [email protected] +27741420077
Lukolo Linda Ndeshipandula Namibia Windhoek UNAM [email protected] '+264812742772
Maree Carin South Africa Pretoria University of Pretoria [email protected] +27832866696
Meyer Lindsay-Michelle South Africa Cape Town Stellenbosch University, Ukwanda CRH [email protected] '+27833915250
Molwantwa Mmoloki Botswana Gabarone University of Botswana [email protected] +26774096000
Mosca Renata South Africa Pretoria University of Pretoria [email protected] '+27742659085
Mothoagae Gaolatlhe South Africa Johannesburg Wits University [email protected] +27722631164
Muller Jana South Africa Worcester Stellenbosch University [email protected] '+27835041046
Nuuyoma Vistolina Namibia Keetmanshoop University of Namibia [email protected] '+264811275709
Nyathi Nhlanganiso United Kingdom Peterborough Anglia Ruskin University [email protected] '+447905000000
Pitout Hanlie South Africa Pretoria Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University (SMU) [email protected] +27721710462
Reitsma Gerda South Africa Potchefstroom North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus [email protected] +27839900260
Rhoda Anthea South Africa Bellville University of the Western Cape [email protected] '+27827757748
Sibanda Bongi United Kingdom London Queen's University Belfast [email protected] '+4479040000000
Sibanda Lovemore Zimbabwe BULAWAYO HEALTHCARE [email protected] '+263774000000
Snyman Stefanus South Africa Cape Town Stellenbosch University [email protected] '+27825571056
Soko Grace Tahuna Malawi Lilongwe Christian Health Association of Malawi [email protected] +265991892941
Thistlethwaite Jill Australia Sydney University of Technology Sydney [email protected] '+61418629072
Waggie Firdouza South Africa Cape Town University of the Western Cape [email protected] +27827773568
5 | P a g e
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
All Together Better Health: Building Strong Partnerships for IPE
First Symposium for Interprofessional Education in Africa21-22 September 2017 UNIVERSITY OF
NAMIBIA, WINDHOEK, NAMIBIA
John H. V. Gilbert, C.M., Ph.D., LLD., FCAHS
Senior Scholar, WHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research, Dalhousie University.
Professor Emeritus, University of British Columbia.
DR. TMA Pai Endowment Chair in Interprofessional Education & Practice, Manipal University.
Adjunct Professor, University of Technology, Sydney
Founding Chair, Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
A Framework for What?
Implementation of Integrated Health Workforce Strategies
Education System
Health System
Health WorkforcePlanning & Policymaking
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Framework IAn Intersectoral Policy Platform for the Education of Health Professionals
Develop a clear work plan.
Use a robust evaluation framework.
Fund equitably, and accountably.
Collaborate with all concerned parties.
Provide space and complete administrative support for the initiative.
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Framework IISome Critical Success Factors
Promote IPE/IPP/IPC as a key health workforce strategy at governmental, institutional and organizational levels.
Seek out, and encourage, strategic and innovative partnerships.
Facilitate new knowledge creation, exchange and application about IPE, IPP & IPC across all constituencies.
Share responsibility between actors and agencies.
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Collaborative Practice-Ready
Health Workforce
Optimal Health Services
Governancemodels
Structuredprotocols
Shared operatingresources
Shared decision-making processes
Supportivemanagement
practices
Facilities
Spacedesign
Personnelpolicies
Collaborative Practice
Communicationsstrategies Built
environment
Conflictresolution
policies
ENVIRONMENTAL MECHANISMS
INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT MECHANISMS
WORKING CULTUREMECHANISMS
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Framework IIISome Procedures to Reach Objectives
Facilitate connections between important stakeholders.
Focus work in appropriate groups.
Establish networks to support multi-site research.
Use an IPE Competency Framework to develop a core for building IPP and IPC.
Create an active, virtual social network.
Support student led organizations.
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Framework IVCreating an Intersectoral IPE/IPP/IPC Policy Platform for Success
Engage, encourage, and reward the practice community.
Prioritize the wide range of complex activities associated with IPE/IPP/IPC.
Implement a clear business plan in order to ensure long-term sustainability.
Select strategic “homes” for start up and ongoing programs.
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Framework V: How we’ll get there
Adopt global definitions of IPE/IPP/IPC that encompasses every health and human service discipline. Leave no room for multiple interpretations.
Adopt a common set of principles to which every discipline can adhere.
Adopt one set of core competencies, regardless of discipline and geographic location.
Foster & build a strong research program.
Build IPE/IPP/IPC into accreditation programs.
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Present & Future Health
Workforce
Collaborative Practice-Ready
Health Workforce
Staff training
Champions
Institutionalsupport
Assessment
Learningoutcomes
Logistics &scheduling
Programmecontent
Compulsoryattendance
Contextuallearning
Adult learningprinciples
Sharedobjectives
Interprofessional Education
Managerialcommitment
EDUCATOR MECHANISMS
CURRICULAR MECHANISMS
Learningmethods
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Framework VI: Future Directions
Governments must recognize the importance of implementing meaningful interprofessional policies
Courses and projects specific to IPE/IPP/IPC should be offered in the workplace
Quality improvement approaches should be implemented to support IPE/IPP/IPC in enhancing practice, delivery of services and patient care
Practicing professionals should mentor students on IPE/IPP/IPC, and students should share their knowledge of IPE/IPP/IPC with mentors
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Develop IP leadership and planning groups
Build incentives for IP teaching/learning
Provide mechanisms for IP communication and coordination
Framework VII: Modify Structures to Support Collaboration
Answer the Question: What’s in it for me?
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
FragmentedHealth System
Strengthened Health System
Remunerationmodels
Riskmanagement
Accreditation Regulation
Professionalregistration
Capitalplanning
FinancingCommissioning
Fundingstreams
Health & EducationSystems
HEALTH SERVICES DELIVERY MECHANISMS
PATIENT SAFETY MECHANISMS
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Framework VIII: Future Collaborative Opportunities
Competencies
Curricula
Assessment
Faculty Development
Accreditation
Research & Evaluation
Joint IPE/IPP/IPC E-Library
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
IP Collaborative Strategies Practice Education (PE) An Old Idea - A Central Tenet?
“For the things we have to learn before we can do them, we learn by doing them.”
(Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics (350 B.C.E))
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
For a Framework to SucceedThe Major Lesson Learned
“Commit to sustain”
The Reality
The only cash flow is an institution’s cash flow, build on what exists
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Global IPE/IPP/IPC: Putting it together1997 All Together, Better Health, London, UK
2004 All Together, Better Health II, Vancouver, Canada
2006 All Together, Better Health III, London, UK
2007 Collaborating Across Borders I, Minneapolis, USA
2008 All Together, Better Health IV, Stockholm, Sweden
2009 Collaborating Across Borders II, Halifax, Canada
2010 All Together, Better Health V, Sydney, AUS
2011 Collaborating Across Borders III, Phoenix, USA.
2012 All Together Better Health VI, Kobe, Japan
2013 Collaborating Across Borders IV, Vancouver, Canada
2014 All Together Better Health, VII Pittsburgh, USA
2015 Collaborating Across Borders, V Roanoake, USA
2016 All Together Better Health, VIII, Oxford, USA
2017 Collaborating Across Borders VI Banff, Canada
Additional Regional meetings over the years in:SwedenFinlandNorwayDenmarkUnited KingdomAustraliaNew ZealandJapanSouth AfricaMiddle EastMalaysiaThailandIndiaand others
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Building a Framework Means
Sharing a Vision
“The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago, the second best time is now.” (Proverb)
Capacity building for IPE &
sharing educational resources
Professor Jill Thistlethwaite
Sydney, Australia
Are we ready….????
Capacity is…
The maximum amount that something can
contain
The amount that something can produce
Specific ability of an entity (person or
organisation) or resource, measured in
quantity and level of quality over an
extended period
The tipping point could be
A major patient safety incident
New national champion
Change in accreditation standards
Change of organisational leadership
What is yours?
When the tipping point is reached
Change is required
Need to consider capacity
Practice and education move together
Importance of faculty development
Resources required
• Blue sky thinking for IPE…?
• Perhaps….but quicker to learn
from each other
Design
thinking
Education
&
Personal Professional Organisational
Community
Learners
Practice
&
Patients
PERSONAL CAPACITY
Values and identity
Life experience
Resilience (?)
Commitment and motivation
Interpersonal skills
Leadership
(INTER)PROFESSIONAL
Identity & abilities
(IP)practice and (IP)education experience
Hierarchies & collaborations
Networks
Becoming/being
interprofessional
feelingthinking
doing values
Inspired by Hammick et al (2009)
ORGANISATIONAL
Rationale for change – why now?
Governance & infrastructure
Workforce quantity and quality
Culture change
Faculty development – skilled facilitators
Teamwork & collaborative skills
Interprofessional ethos & processes
Logistics & resources
ORGANISATION
Dedicated IPE unit?
How links to faculties and departments?
How to integrate…
IPE as a required component of the
curriculum
Similar processes and governance to other
learning/courses
Champions!
From each profession
COMMUNITY
Who/what is the community?
Awareness of stakeholders
Culture, beliefs & values
Learning opportunities & placements
LEARNERS
Capacity to learn in crowded curricula
Numbers and mix
Equitable experiences
Timing
Serve as change agents?
Education
Curricular space
Defined learning outcomes
Learning activities to meet outcomes
Reliable & valid assessment processes that
are FEASIBLE and have educational impact
Faculty recognised for IP work and research
Committees are interprofessional
Networking
Coordination
Collaboration
Teamwork
Differing forms of interprofessional work (Reeves et
al, 2010, p 44)
Changing a college curriculum is like
moving a graveyard--you never know how
many friends the dead have until you try to
move them!
Calvin Coolidge or Woodrow Wilson
SPACE….
PATIENTS
Shared decision making
Composition of healthcare team
Communication
Health literacy
Patient held records
‘No decision about me, without me’
Vancouver declaration
Involve patients:
In curriculum design
As active educators
As assessors
As evaluators
As partners
In research
TIPS
Avoid ignoring the dissenters – rather
engage
Embed IPE into existing courses/rotations
rather than adding extra - thread/spiral
through the curriculum
Not all students will have exactly the same
experiences – that is ok
Do not need to have all the professions
together every time
Educational resources
In this open era – many available free
online
Scenarios
Faculty development activities
Context important
Authenticity important
National Center for Interprofessional Practice
and Education
https://nexusipe.org
Assessment
‘International consensus statement on the
assessment of interprofessional learning
outcomes’
Rogers G, Thistlethwaite JE et al. (2017)
Medical Teacher
Collaborative Practice and Interprofessional Education
Transforming the Landscape of Healthcare - Ohomairangi te
Hauora Manaaki
All Together Better Health IX
Conference
in Auckland, New Zealand SAVE THE
DATE!
3-6 September
2018
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Organizational Reform to Facilitate IPECPFrom Practice to Policy - and Back Again: Doing things right, for the right reasons
First Symposium for Interprofessional Education in Africa21-22 September 2017 UNIVERSITY OF NAMIBIA, WINDHOEK, NAMIBIA
John H. V. Gilbert, C.M., Ph.D., LLD., FCAHS
Senior Scholar, WHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research, Dalhousie University.
Professor Emeritus, University of British Columbia.
DR. TMA Pai Endowment Chair in Interprofessional Education & Practice, Manipal University.
Adjunct Professor, University of Technology, Sydney
Founding Chair, Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Today’s Meta-narrative
• The Issue
•Key Principles of Policy Making
• Strategies for Implementing Policies
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
The Curricular Conundrum
“Changing a college curriculum is like moving a graveyard
- you never know how many friends the dead have until you try to move them”
Attributed to Calvin Coolidge
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Policy: A definition
Policy is a decision-making framework, or course of action, to achieve a desired effect or change.
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
The Fundamentals of Policy Making
It’s All About
Regulation & Legislation
Policy is Politics
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Policy MakingAlways Knight’s Move
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Key Principles of Policy Making 1
• Policy doesn’t follow a linear pathway.
• Policy is a battle among various actors who want to please distinct constituencies.
• Policy disputes include struggles about the relative influence of all the interested parties.
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Key Principles of Policy Making 2
• Policies are maintained by policy monopolies/networks
• Policy monopolies/networks include a diverse set of actors
• Conflict plays out in stalemate that allows only incremental reforms in the policy area.
• Efforts at reform launched from outside these networks are usually easily ignored.
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Key Principles of Policy Making 3
• Opportunities for policy reform, occur on schedules that only sometimes line up with the development of the problem trying to be solved.
• Changes in politics, policy, or problems can create an “open window”, but the key element to focus on is the possible reconfiguration of a policy monopoly.
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Key Principles of Policy Making 4
• Policies reflect, and then shape, dominant social constructs.
• By indicating that certain actors as “worthy”, organizations legitimize political and social action on their behalf; more important, it enables those actors to mobilize on their own behalf.
• The worthy are frequently the ones with the most money and the longest history
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
The Communication Problem of Policy Making
The struggle to be heard takes precedence
over the accuracy of what is being said.
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Policy Making - An Old Idea
“For the things we have to learn before we can do them, we learn by doing them.” (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics (350 B.C.E))
12
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Preparation:
Prepare well for changing policies.
Planning:
Plan carefully for policy change.
Strategies for Implementing Policies 1
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Strategies for Implementing Policies 2
Personal contact:
Establish and maintain contact with those who influence or make policy.
Pulse of the community:
Take the pulse of the community of interest to understand what colleagues will support, what they will resist, and how they can be persuaded.
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Strategies for Implementing Policies 3
Positivism:
Where you can, choose tactics that emphasize the positive.
Participation:
Involve as many people as possible in strategic planning and action.
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Strategies for Implementing Policies 4
Publicity:
Use the media, the Internet, your connections, and your imagination to keep colleagues informed of the effort and the issues, and to keep a high profile.
Persistence:
Policy change can take a long time.
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
From Principles to Implementing
With all the technology in the world – remembercheese cake making must come before cheese cake distribution.
********
� Articulate the issues
� Consult
� Mediate
� Compromise
� Agree
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
“And it ought to be remembered that there is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things. Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new”
Niccolò Machiavelli (1532), The Prince
Organizational Reform: “The more things change, the more they stay the same”
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning & Research
Making change is like riding a bicycle
if you stop peddling you will fall off.
19
Organizational Reform– The Policy Reality
Key influences to effective interprofessional child protection decision making and practice: social workers’ perceptions
Dr Nhlanganiso Nyathi
Senior Lecturer and Course Leader
Cambridge | Chelmsford
London | Peterborough
2
What this presentation aims to achieve:
1.To share research findings on key influences to effective interprofessional
collaborative child protection decision making and practice
2.To draw links between interprofessional collaboration and interprofessional
education.
3
What the background and context of the study was:
Failings in collaborative working between professionals and families – since Maria Colwell 1973
inquiry.
Lack of conceptual clarity about the collaborative approach.
Lead social worker statutory role the collaborative approach.
Ongoing social work reforms.
Personal inspiration
4
What the aim of the study was:• To explore social work practitioners’ knowledge and understanding of the
interprofessional collaborative child protection decision making and practice.
• To inform new directions for child protection practice and training, the lead social
worker role, and ongoing social work policy reforms.
What the research questions were:1. What factors do social workers perceive as key to effective interprofessional
collaborative child protection practice?
2. How do social workers perceive decision making during interprofessional collaborative
child protection practice?
5
Who the key contributors to existing literature are:
• Serious case reviews and the triennial analysis of serious case reviews in 2011-2014 (Sidebotham
et al, 2016)
• Models, impact and influences of multi-agency working (Atkinson, Jones and Lamont, 2007)
• Literature information sharing (Frost and Robinson, 2007)
• The relationship between the external environmental and other strategic influences (Anning et
al, 2010)
• Importance of trust, clear vision and aims, multi-level vision and goals - from meta-level;
individual agency goals to individual professional goals; collaborative advantage and meta-
strategy (Huxham, 1993; Huxham and Vangen, 2003; Vangen and Huxham, 2006)
6
Who the key contributors to existing literature are:
Collaborative partnership working between professionals and family members:
• The experience of family members involved child protection (Smithson and Gibson, 2016)
• Family members’ participation in the child protection system (Healy, Darlington and Yellowlees, 2012)
• Professionals’ use of power (Dunbrill, 2011)
• Relationship between professionals and family members (Healy and Darlington, (2009)
• Working with aggressive and violent family members (Ferguson, 2005; Littlechild, 1997; 2005; Neil,
2014; Stanley and Goddard, 2002)
Whole family focus (Featherstone, White and Morris, 2013; 2014; Morris, 2013; Falkov, 2013)
Needs and voice of the child (Archard and Skiveness, 2009; Allnock and Miller, 2013)
Involvement of fathers (Brandon, 2012; Featherstone, 2003; Ferguson, 2016; Scourfield, 2003; 2014)
7
Who the key contributors to existing literature are:
Lead social worker influences (McCray, 2010; Pawson et al, 2003; Sidebotham, et al, 2016; Trevithick, 2008)
External factors (Smith and Mogro-Wilson, 2007; Mattessich, Murray-Close and Monsey, 2001; Munro, 2005;
2011)
Decision making influences (Horwath and Morrison, 2004; 2007; Horwath, 2013; Broadhurst et al, 2010;
Stalker, 2015; Parton, 1998; Titterton, 2005; Goddard et al, 1999; White, 2009)
8
What conceptual framework(s) the study drew from:
Combined elements of two systems models:
Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE) learning together systems model (SCIE, 2012)
• used to identify factors in the work environment that support good practice, and those that
create unsafe conditions in which poor safeguarding practice is more likely to occur.
Falkov’s systemic family focussed model (Falkov, 2012) helps to understand the processes that underlie and
influence how:
• Adult/parental mental health illness affects children mental health and development,
• Adult/parental mental health illness can affect parenting and parent-child/family relationships,
• Parenting and parenting and parent-child/family relationships can influence adult/parental
mental health illness,
• Children’s mental health and development needs can influence adult/parental mental health
illness,
[Model influenced SCIE’s working together strategy: Think Child, Think Parent, Think Family: A Guide
to Parental Mental Health and Child Welfare].
9
How the study was designed:• Constructivist-interpretivist qualitative research design adopted in order to interpret and understand meanings
of social workers’ constructed perceptions
• Research methods involved - semi-structured interviews with social workers (16) and direct, non-participant,
observations of child protection meetings (20)
• Both samples were purposively selected through a saturation to enhance rigour and trustworthiness in this study
(Brown, et al, 2006; Lincoln and Guba, 1985; Shenton, 2004).
• Research ethics approval granted by a Local Authority Ethics Governance Research Committee
• Data analysis – interpretive descriptive thematic analysis (Bazeley, 2013; Sandelowski, 2000; Thorne, Reimer
Kirkham, and O’Flynn-Magee, 2004).
• Triangulation protocol used to compare findings for convergence/divergence and enable rigor and
trustworthiness
10
What the study found:1. Four broad influences to collaboration were identified, namely;
• Multi-level relationship influences – professionals, lead social workers and family members
• Multi-level organisational influences - professionals, lead social workers and family members
• External influences - multiple
• Decision-making - discretional intuitive multiple professional judgements and decision making
criteria
2. Centrality and predominance of relationship influences established
3. Barriers and enablers of each of the influences which can be systematically identified
5. Evidence of overlapping systemic interaction between various influences
6. Influences can be systematically identified and systemically understood [see the visual unified
conceptual model next slide] .
Overall convergence of interview and observation findings
11
A conceptual model for interprofessional collaboration
12
What participants said about
multi-level relationship
influences: Communication and information sharing
‘being open and honest’ (SW15); ‘working
together in an open and in a transparent
manner’(SW15)
Relationships between professionals, lead
social worker and family members:
‘other professionals have their own thresholds’
(SW16)
Clear and shared vision and goals:
‘not seeing the bigger picture’(SW06);
‘professionals who don’t have an understanding of child
protection’ (SW09)
Professionals’ relationship with family members
‘aggressive people coming to the meeting’ ( SW02);
‘sometimes it can feel a bit collusive’ (SW06)
‘paying attention to what they’re saying’ (SW13)
Professionals’ role clarity:
‘for other professionals it’s a secondary
function’ (SW11)
‘relevant joint training and closer
working’(SW10)‘
13
What social workers said about
lead social worker’s relationship
influences
Lead social worker ’s understanding and role
clarity
‘a lot of time doing the mundane chores’ (SW02);
‘just thrown in the deep end of the pool’ (SW15)
Lead social worker relationship with other professionals:
kind of be the glue that binds everyone together’ (SW12);
‘have different perspectives and see things differently’
(SW06)
Lead social worker communication and
information sharing with other professionals
‘sharing of information in a timely manner’
(SW08)
Professionals’ relationship with family members:
‘aggressive people coming to the meeting’ ( SW02);
‘sometimes it can feel a bit collusive’ (SW06)
‘paying attention to what they’re saying’ (SW13)
Lead social worker relationship with family
members:
‘I think there is sometimes an emotional resistance
to some element of a case’ (SW10)
14
What social workers said about family members’ relationship influences
Family members’ relationship with
professionals:
‘some professionals are over friendly, they
become too involved’ ( SW02)
Family members’ role clarity and understanding:
‘I suppose if they can’t acknowledge what the concerns are (SW07);
‘obviously there’s stigma with social services’ ( SW03)
Family members’ communication and
information sharing:
‘a working relationship which means that the
changes that you make are going to empower
them’( SW10)
What social workers said about external influences
Other external factors:
‘staff shortages; ’
‘bureaucracy and red tape’
‘amount of travelling Legislation, policies and procedure
‘sometimes policies and procedures can be quite
stringent and inflexible’ (SW06)
Lack of resources due to economic austerity:
‘have to do is think a bit more out of the box…we’re relying
more on charities to help us out’ (SW15)
‘But we have huge pockets of deprivation and
poverty’(SW06)
16
What social workers said about
decision making influences
Level of need and risk
‘the one that I think is going to reduce the risk first is
actioned first’( SW10)
‘risk is the biggest thing that influences what you need to
do’ (SW012)
‘what’s important will be driven by what’s risk and what’s
needed’ (SW05)
Multiple decision making criteria:
‘one’s the most urgent is the priority’ (SW09)
‘what’s feasible as well’ (SW05)
‘availability of resources’
‘Individual professional’s state of mind’
Consensus between professionals and
family members
‘the family knows best what needs to
improve first…it’s about coming to a
consensus’ (SW06)
17
What are the main conclusions that can be drawn from this study: The main conclusion that can be drawn from this study is that social workers’ perceptions (as the lead professionals) are
that:
• Multi-level relationship, organisational, external and decision making influences are key to effective collaboration
• Collaborative influences, can be systematically identified and systemically understood, conceptually, hence
conceptual model presented earlier.
• Joint interprofessional training is identified as one of the key enablers in order ensure positive multi-level
relationships, shared vision, role clarity and information sharing for effective collaboration to occur.
Key recommendations for future policy and practice:• Focus on barriers and enablers to multi-level relationships, organisational, external and decision making influences
in relation to professionals, lead social worker and service users.
• Interprofessional education and training should promoted as a pre-requisite for effective collaboration
• The visual systemic conceptual model can be used to integrate, illustrate and communicate the systemic
relationships and influences to ensure conceptual clarity.
• Further research is recommended in the following areas: views of non-social work professionals as well as service
users regarding the same question.
18
Key references:Anning, A., Cottrell, D., Frost, N., Green, J. and Robinson, M., 2010. Developing multi-professional teamwork for integrated
children's services: research, policy and practice. 2nd ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Open University Press.
Featherstone, B., White, S. and Morris, K., 2014. Re-imagining child protection: towards humane social with families. Bristol:
Policy Press
Falkov, A. 2012. The Family Model Handbook: an integrated approach to supporting mentally ill parents and their children.
Hove: Pavilion Publishing.
Huxham, C. and Vangen, S., 1996. Working together: Key themes in the management of relationships between public and
non-profit organizations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9 (7), pp.5-17.
Nyathi, N and Akister, J., 2016. A Practitioner’s perception of interprofessional collaboration influences in safeguarding
children. Childhood Remixed (6).
SCIE., 2012. Learning together to safeguard children: a ‘systems’ model for case reviews [online]. Available at:
http://www.scie.org.uk/ publications/ataglance/ataglance01.pdf
Sidebotham, P, Brandon, M, Bailey, S, Belderson, P, Dodsworth, J, Garstang, J, Harrison, E, Retzer, A and Sorensen, P.,
2016. Pathways to harm, pathways to protection: a triennial analysis of serious case reviews 2011 to 2014: Final report
1
How do you feel when you have to go to home affairs/licensing dept/municipality?Will it be a one stop for all your needs?
2
Interprofessional collaboration of speech-language
& occupational therapy students in a low-resourced
communityMaretha Bekker
Renata Mosca
UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA
Literature
• Terminology
• Three practice models of IPE (Bridges et al., 2011)
• MAGPIE Model (Cahill et al., 2013; Queensland-Health, 2008)
• Team members indicated the importance of
– joint communication
– each members contribution
• Attitudes of members towards themselves and others (Sheehan, Robertson & Ormond, 2007).
• Effective teamwork can lead to a better work environment especially when resources are lacking.
• IPC: responsibility, accountability, coordination, communication, cooperation, assertiveness, autonomy, mutual trust and respect (Bridges et al., 2011)
•3
Daspoort Poli Clinic
• Daspoort Clinic started as an UP Medical Student Initiative
• A clinic by students, for students and the community
• Daspoort opened 7 August 1964, 53 years ago
• In 1967 social workers, SLT and PT become involved
• Currently runs as an interdisciplinary clinic and COPC site.
• The clinic is supported by Tuks Rag (largest student driven charity organization in South Africa) and the Faculty of Health Science of the UP, in cooperation with Gauteng DoH
4
Daspoort Poli Clinic
5
Family
OT
SLT
SW
PT
Dr
Nurses
Dietician
CHW
Dentists
Dental
Hygienists
6
Supervisors’ views / context for change• To be truly CBR, change was needed
• Collaboration had to be more than referral and discussion
• The caseload is growing
• Complexity of the cases is increasing
• Time constraints: both families and professionals (Nugus et al., 2010)
• ICF considerations (WHO, 2001) & TRUE smart goals
• In a low resourced health environment, teamwork may be essential to maintain a motivated workforce (Sheehan, Robertson & Ormond, 2007)
• Quality of life outcomes
7
Case overview: J.L
• Date of birth: 21 August 2012
• Age: 5 years 1 month
• Diagnosis: Not available
• J.L’s mother works part time and is busy completing her law degree at Unisa. J.L’s father is absent. J.L. has a sister who is in Grade 1. The grandparents on the mother’s side are very involved with the family.
• Recently went for an evaluation to be admitted to a school for children with special needs.
8
Considerations before the session (J.L.)• GDD
• General movement difficulties
– oral muscles
– impact communicative intent
– speech production
– feeding
• Receptive language better than expressive
• Cognitive function should not be judged based on level of expressive language.
• Home programmes: functional and include the whole family (sibling)
• Low postural muscle tone → difficulties with proprioceptive feedback, gross and fine motor coordination, bilateral integration, postural endurance, balance, praxis and visual-motor integration
• Client needs additional support for stability → working controlled in the midline
• Visual difficulties with co-existing visual-perceptual deficits
• Enjoy exploration (destructive active) but is moving towards constructive action
10
11
Needs
• To introduce a therapeutic feeding program:
– positioning
– facilitating mouth closure
– oral movements: chewing and speech production
• Oral secretions and care
• Possible future use of AAC
• To facilitate/improve abilities (postural-motor, sensory and visual-perceptual) → improving occupations: ADLs, play, pre-school/education and social participation
• Facilitate the process of correct school placement
Activity – water gun
• SLT will provide strategies to facilitate
- Multi step directions (receptive language)
- Vocabulary expansion (receptive language)
- Requesting (expressive language and pragmatics)
- Sequencing (cognitive/executive function)
- Directional concepts (receptive and expressive language)
• OT will provide strategies to facilitate
- Positioning by facilitating postural tone through proprioceptive feedback (optimise swallowing and coordination by the SLT)
- Increased midline stability and bilateral integration
- A firm base of support for balance and functional mobility around the home
12
13
Activity – clothing pegs
SLT will provide strategies to facilitate
- Multi step directions (receptive language)
- Vocabulary expansion (receptive and expressive language)
- Requesting and responding (expressive language and pragmatics)
- Sequencing (cognitive/executive function)
- Joint attention
OT will provide strategies to facilitate
- Optimal positioning
- Midline stability to grasp the peg
- Crossing of the midline
- Visual sequencing (as part of spatial relations)
- Motor planning when positioning the peg
Case overview: G
Date of birth: 6/03/2013
Age: 4 years 6 months
Diagnosis: Severe Microcephaly, Learning Difficulties, Communication Delay, Hyperactivity and Club foot.
Both G’s parents are unemployed. His father is blind and the mother is partially sighted. G has an older brother in Grade 1
14
Considerations before the session (G) • Cognitive impairment → selection of activities,
importance of repetition
• Parents’ challenges limit carry over at home
• G’s mother is very positive and can assist in treatment session
• Very distractible → limits number of activities to be used in one session
• G tends to present with repetitive behaviour
• Postural stability is extremely important
• Spectacles were prescribed for G. but seldom wears them
15
Needs
• To experience sufficient destructive activities/elements in order to progress to more constructive actions
• For G’s parents to identify new ways of how to handle and stimulate G at home
• For G to use exploration so that he can learn more about his environment → communication
• For G’s parents to decide (in collaboration with the SLT and OT) on a school which would cater for G’s needs
16
Activity – body puzzle
• SLT will provide strategies to facilitate
- Shared attention (pragmatics)
- Increased reciprocity (verbal and non-verbal) (language and pragmatics)
- Receptive and expressive language expansion
- Word approximations (expressive language)
- Eye contact (pragmatics)
• OT will provide strategies to facilitate
- Eye contact (pragmatics)
- Correct positioning (initially on his Mother’s lap with increased proprioceptive feedback)
- Manipulation of objects in the midline
- Constructive use of objects
17
Activity - barley
• SLT will provide strategies to facilitate
- Exploratory play
- Commenting (expressive language)
- Shared attention (pragmatics)
- Sound production (speech)
- Vocabulary expansion (receptive and expressive language)
- Requesting (expressive language and pragmatics)
• OT will provide strategies to facilitate
- Sensory stimulation by introducing a different texture
- Sensory discrimination by G having to search for plastic animals in the barley.
- The use of both hands in the activity
18
19
Benefits of IP collaboration: SLT student (J.L. & G)• Two heads are better than one, four hands are better than
two!
• For: positioning, supporting, facilitating, behavioural challenges
• “Hands-on” collaborative sessions helped us to
- Better understand the needs and function level of the
the clients
- Increase professional skills
• Consistent: expectations
- Expectations across therapists and environments
- Facial expressions, language, approach
- For the parents and child
• Problem solving in real time
(Cahill et al., 2013; Copley et al., 2007)
Benefits of IP collaboration: OT student (J.L. & G)• Collaboration in planning the sessions was positive.
• It felt like ‘we were complimenting’ one another.
• The SLT ‘allowed’ the OT to continue with correcting positions, providing proprioceptive input and assisting with the activity, while she focussed on the speech and language.
• Both parties learned how to work towards a common goal, by
discussion and problem solving.
• Good IPC leads to effective service delivery
• Provides the opportunity to improve interpersonal and professional skills
(Queensland-Health, 2008)
20
21
Considerations after the session (J.L. & G)• Co-treating therapists must have a good working relationship
• Goals should be well known to all therapists so both parties can facilitate the desired behaviours (preparation and communication)
• The SLT was more strategy-focused and the OT was more activity based
• It was easier for the OT to select the physical activities and for the SLT to adapt these activities to reach the communication goals
• Both were focused on ensuring that the activities selected were functional and that carry-over to a home environment could be facilitated.
22
The way forward
• Challenges (Ho et al., 2008; Nisbet et al., 2008)
– Rotations differ
– Busy schedules
– Discrepancies in numbers between professions
– Divergent learning and assessment styles
– Limited resources
23
The way forward
• 2-hour joint team orientation (Copley et al., 2007)
• Extend application MAGPIE
• Individual and group treatment
• Educators to play a stronger role (IHL)
References
Bridges, DR., Davidson, RA., Odegard, PS., Maki, IV. and Tonkowiak, J. Interprofessional collaboration: three best practice models of interprofessional collaboration. Medical Education Online, 16:1. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v16io.6035
Cahill, M., O’Donnell, M., Warren, A., Taylor, A. and Gowan, O. (2013). Enhancing interprofessional student practice through a case-based model. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27.
Copley, Allison, Hill, Moran, Tait & Day. (2007). Making interprofessional education real: a university clinic model. Australian Health Review, 31(3).
Ho, Jarvis-Selinger, Borduas, Frank, Hall, Handfield-Jones, Hardwick, Lockyer, Sinclair, Novak Lauscher, Ferdinands, MacLeod, Robitaille & Rouleau. (2008). Making Interprofessional Education Work:
The Strategic Roles of the Academy. Academic Medicine, 83(10).
Nisbet, G, Hendry, GD, Rolls, G, & Field, MJ (2008). Inter-professional learning for pre-qualification health care students: An outcomes-based evaluation. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22(1), 57-68.
Nugus, P., Greenfield, D., Travaglia, J., Westbrook, J., and Braithwaite, J.( 2010). How and where clinicians exercise power: Interprofessional relations in health care. Social Science and Medicine.
Sheenan, D., Robertson, L., and Ormond, T. 2007. Comparison of language used and patterns of communication in interprofession and multidisciplinary teams. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 21(1),
24
THE VALUE OF EXPOSING STUDENTS TO INTER-PROFESSIONAL COLLABORATION
ACTIVITIES AT A COMMUNITY-BASED REHABILITATION CENTRE
Juanita Bester, Maatje Kloppers, Faeza Bardien, Liesbet Koornhof en Sue Statham
Stellenbosch University
AFRIPENWindhoek, Namibie21 September 2017
Fakulteit Geneeskunde en Gesondheidswetenskappe
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
Overview
Current IPEP literature
Why the research
Methodology
Results
Service delivery model
Take home lessons learned
Current IPEP literature
Primary Healthcare
Transformative learning
Community based education
Health prof education
ICF
Why do this research?
Informal feedback from students at BLRC
Centre management and the type of activities positive IPE experience
So we were interested to find out:measure the change in students’ perceptions and understanding of IPC after clinical placement
establish the perceived value of ICF-model based activities for IPE for students
Bishop Lavis Rehab Centre (BLRC)
• Community based out-patient physical rehabilitation centre in Western Cape, RSA
• Established 1993 in partnership with Department of Health, Stellenbosch University and the Bishop Lavis Community
• Inter-professional service-delivery @BLRC based on WHO ICF Model to ensure holistic patient centred treatment
• Training of four health professions at the centre with students participating in a variety of activities with fellow students
- Physiotherapy(3rd&4th years),- Occupational Therapy(3rd&4th years),- Speech,Language and Hearing Therapy(4th years) - Human Nutrition(4th years)
Management of student activities
Part of normal service delivery
Coordinated by staff
Methodology
First week of clinical
placement
Bef
ore
te
st
RIPLS
IEPS
Focu
s gr
ou
p in
terv
iew
Aft
er
test
Last week of clinical
placement
Within month of completion
of clinical placement
5-6 weeks
Case study
Reflection
IEPS
Case study
Activity rating
Informed consent
n=42
Results
Benefits of working in an IP-team
Benefits for service users
Benefits for team member
Benefits for the rehabilitation
team
Results
Benefits of working in an IP-team
Benefits for service users
Benefits for team member
Benefits for the rehabilitation
team
“I think the advantage is that through interdisciplinary teamwork you realize your role and the role of your team
members.”(OT4/1)“We learn a lot about each other’s professions and get a deeper
understanding on each other and also learn to work together...”(OT3/4)
“We see them working together in our interdisciplinary teams and they build each other as well and they give each other ideas ...we’ve also learned to respect each other in seeing how other people respect each other, and that’s one of the reasons where it comes from.”( PT4/1)
Daily Weekly Monthly/Once per clinical placement
Team discussion
Daily Weekly Monthly/Once per clinical placement
Team discussion
“…to listen to the other people’s perspectives and to speak about your patients not just in passing, but to
literally speak about what your target is for that week, what’s your plans for the future and where
you need help or where you think you can help someone else. So I think the discussions definitely
promote interdisciplinary team work.”(SLT4/4)
Daily Weekly Monthly/Once per clinical placement
One file per patient Team discussion
Daily Weekly Monthly/Once per clinical placement
One file per patient Team discussion
“...it almost feels as if at Bishop Lavis the lead was taken on a relay basis and I think the medical folder is
that almost like the stick you pass on because when the physiotherapist had her session and she wrote in the
file what she did and her plan for the next session, then the occupational therapist receives the file and
get that information...it felt to me that we handed it to each other and we do our bit and then we say “ok now
you do your bit”.(OT3/1)
Daily Weekly Monthly/Once per clinical placement
One file per patient Team discussion
Shared admin spaces
Daily Weekly Monthly/Once per clinical placement
One file per patient Team discussion
Shared admin spaces
“I think it’s not an activity, but just having all of us in one room the whole time, it creates a sort of group
coherence ...you know your team members on a more personal level and not just patient-work, you tend to work
better together .”(OT4/4 )
Daily Weekly Monthly/Once per clinical placement
One file per patient Team discussion Socials
Shared admin spaces
Daily Weekly Monthly/Once per clinical placement
One file per patient Team discussion Socials
Shared admin spaces
“… as much as I was willing to collaborate before I got there, now knowing the people better on a personal
level, I’m even more willing to do this. …, you are much more understanding and accommodating when you have the personal connection as well. It definitely promotes
team work.” (SLT4/4 )
Daily Weekly Monthly/Once per clinical placement
One file per patient Team discussion Socials
Shared admin spaces
Joint sessions (at Rehab and Home visits)
Daily Weekly Monthly/Once per clinical placement
One file per patient Team discussion Socials
Shared admin spaces
Joint sessions (at Rehab and Home visits)
“Also having joint sessions, I think that really promotes team work because you actually see what the other person is doing and how they are handling
the patient and giving input to each other in the same session…”(OT4/4)
Daily Weekly Monthly/Once per clinical placement
One file per patient Team discussion Socials
Shared admin spaces Groups Workshops
Joint sessions (at Rehab and Home visits)
Daily Weekly Monthly/Once per clinical placement
One file per patient Team discussion Socials
Shared admin spaces Groups Workshops
Joint sessions (at Rehab and Home visits)
“…also the groups, the stroke group or an amp group, the fact the occupational therapists, physios and
speechies facilitate together, force us to come together... So the planning that goes on behind that
force us to need one another and really use what each profession has to offer” (PT4/2)
Daily Weekly Monthly/Once per clinical placement
One file per patient Team discussion Socials
Shared admin spaces Groups Workshops
Joint sessions (at Rehab and Home visits)
Duration and scheduling of placements
Daily Weekly Monthly/Once per clinical placement
One file per patient Team discussion Socials
Shared admin spaces Groups Workshops
Joint sessions (at Rehab and Home visits)
Duration and scheduling of placements
Frustrations of working with others
Daily Weekly Monthly/Once per clinical placement
One file per patient Team discussion Socials
Shared admin spaces Groups Workshops
Joint sessions (at Rehab and Home visits)
Duration and scheduling of placements
Frustrations of working with others
Supervision
Take home message
• On-site role-models of IP-teamwork
• Plan and manage IPE activities as normal service delivery
• Not just sharing patients!
Acknowledgement
References
World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002. http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfbeginnersguide.pdf (accessed 27 September 2012)Kloppers, M., Koornhof, H.E.K., Bester, J. & Bardien, F. 2015. Students’ experiences of inter-professional education through International classification of functioning-based activities at a community-based rehabilitation centre. African Journal of Health Professions Education. 2015:7(1):22-25, doi:10.7196/AJHPE.289.RIPLS McFadyen, A. K., Webster, V., Strachan, K., Figgins, E., Brown, H. and McKechnie, J. (2005). The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale: A possible more stable sub--scale model for the original version of RIPLS. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(6), 595-603IEPS McFadyen, A. K., Maclaren, W. M., and Webster, V. S. (2007). The Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS): An alternative remodeled sub‐scale structure and its reliability. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 21(4), 433-‐443Declaration of Alma-Ata. International Conference on Primary Health Care, Alma-Ata, USSR, 6-12 September 1978. http://www.who.int/publications/almaata_declaration_en.pdfTalaat W, Ladhani Z. WHO, 2014. Community Based Education in Health Professions: Global Perspectives. http://www.hrhresourcecenter.org/node/5568 Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. The Lancet 2010;376(9756):1923-1958. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5] [PMID 21112623]Reeves S. Porque precisamos da educação interprofissional para um cuidado efetivoeseguro. Interface (Botucatu). 2016; 20(56):185-96. (Why we need interprofessionaleducation to improve the delivery of safe and effective care) DOI: 10.1590/1807-57622014.0092
A one year review of the impact of a rural Interprofessional Education collaborative platform on
health professions student learningDr René Botha, Prof Annemarie Joubert, Dr Dirk Hagemeister, Ms Heidi Morgan, Mrs Mimmie
Wilmot
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
CONTENT
• Contextualisation
• Literature
• Methodology
• Results and discussion
• Conclusions
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
KOPANANG LE FODISE
Community Outreach
CBECooperative Education/
Experiential training
VolunteerismInternship
Community BENEFICIARY StudentService GOAL Learning
WIL
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
KOPANANG LE FODISE
Community Outreach
CBECooperative Education/
Experiential training
VolunteerismInternship
Community BENEFICIARY StudentService GOAL Learning
WIL
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
PRIMARY HEALTHCARE
• Promotes equity;
• Community participation;
• Social and economic development; and
• Client-centred approach.
In a rural context • Resource availability,• Physical-, demographic-, economic-, social- and cultural obstacles• Shortage of healthcare service providers and • Minimal access to specialist care• Transport challenges,• Distances, and• Increased cost
Primary care is the first line of health care that a patient
receives, including disease treatment, referral to more
specialised care and prevention through individuals, families
and communities health education.
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION
“Interprofessional education occurs when two or more professionals learn about, from and with each other to enable effective collaboration and improve health outcomes.”
The key competencies:
1. Role clarification,
2. Patient/ client/ family/ community-centred care,
3. Team functioning and
4. Interprofessional communication.
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION
4x4h IPE orientation
Student groups
Group facilitators
1. Introduction to IPE
2. Key competencies
3. Role / Value clarification
4. Simulation
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
PIONEERS
4 March 2016:24 students3 facilitators
Trompsburg
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
PIONEERS
4 March 2016:24 students3 facilitators
Trompsburg
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
PIONEERS
4 March 2016:24 students3 facilitators
Trompsburg
MEZIKOLB / KOLMEZI
Personalising
Immediate
Concrete Experience
is the basis for
Observation and Reflection
which are assimilated into the
Formation of Abstract Concepts and Generalisation
from which Implications for actions are deduced
and followed by
Testing implications of Concepts in New
Situations
which leads to
Connecting learning (Kiely 2005:8)
Contextual border crossing
Dissonance
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
AIM AND RESEARCH QUESTION
To evaluate the impact of a rural IPE collaborative platform placement on health professions students’ learning.
What are students’ learning experiences of a rural IPE collaborative platform following a defined interprofessional programme?
Ethical approval
HSREC 201/2016
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
METHODOLOGY
• Student groups
• Digital story of rural IPE experiences, consisting of
– Images, video, text, and audio and
– A five-minute narrative
• Purposive sampling (at least three professions)
Digital storytellingBarrett (2005); Condy (2015)
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
WHY DIGITAL STORIES?
Paulo Freire's theory of education for critical consciousness:
Describes an individual's critical understanding of the world and how individual,
social and political circumstances influence the understanding of one's reality.
• Digital stories allows students to
– Expand their understanding of others,
– Build empathy,
– Advocacy
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
METHODOLOGY
• Student groups
• Digital story of rural IPE experiences, consisting of
– Images, video, text, and audio and
– A five-minute narrative
• Purposive sampling (at least three professions)
Digital storytellingBarrett (2005); Condy (2015)
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
VALUE OF DIGITAL STORIES?
• Ill structured question vs. ……
Digital story of rural IPE experiences…
• Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey
(ICCAS)
– Assess self-reported competencies
– Combination of different IPE assessment tools
– 20 elements
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
METHODOLOGY
A qualitative content and thematicBless et al. (2013: 352); Frey et al. (1999)
Direct analysis of textual and audio dataBless et al. (2013: 352); Brink et al. (2012: 201); Du Plooy-Cilliers (2014: 191, 232-245)
Steps of content analysis were used proposed by Du Plooy et al. 2014:170-171; Cresswell (2009: 184)
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
RESULTS: THEMES
• Metaphor - Use of metaphors to describe student
experiences
• Critical consciousness - Used to describe an individual's
critical understanding of the world and how individual,
social and political circumstances influence the
understanding of one's reality.
• Professional socialisation – Uses socialisation in a broad
sense as “the process by which persons acquire the
knowledge, skills, and disposition that makes them more
or less effective members of society”.
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
RESULTS: THEMES AND CATEGORIES
Themes CategoryMetaphor Tree
JourneyTravellersPopulationsIgnite the fireFrozen landWindmillWaterStrangersAvengersDr ZeusPuzzleAdventureFlight
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
RESULTS: THEMES AND CATEGORIES
Themes CategoryCritical consciousness Professional development
PraxisTransformationPersonal developmentChallengesCommunity responseEthical dilemmaExpectationsCommunity perceptionEmpathy (anger)Assumption
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
RESULTS: THEMES AND CATEGORIES
Themes CategoryProfessional socialisation Interprofessional learning
Common goalsValuesFacilitationCommunity empowermentAchievementReflective practiceKey competency
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
21
20
34
10
22
13
11
11
12
11
0 10 20 30 40
Achievements
Challenges
Collaboration
Common goals
Community response
Key competencies
Professional growth
Personal growth
Reflective practice
Transformation
STATEMENTS PER CATEGORY
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
RESULTS KEY COMPETENCIES
“Communication where we were instructed to collaborate and to make a
poster combining vital opinions. Lastly on our fertiliser molecule was the
community centred approach we had to have during the screening of the
locals ensuring any referrals were not to be missed. While screening the
learners we, as an interdisciplinary team can use our strengths to our
advantage. It was an exciting space to be in. We were reminded of how
important it is to have a holistic approach when treating a patient, and
that everyone is equally important. We now also have a better
understanding about what each professional’s role is in the multi-
disciplinary team”.
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
RESULTS ACADEMIC
“We realised that not all students know about diabetic diet so it was nice
that they could learn from me.”
“The medical students let go of their stethoscopes, started exercising
muscles and got a glance in the world of optometry.”
“To be able to learn new skills from our peers, even if it was something
simple as how to take blood pressure, how to assess posture…”
“By combining our knowledge, skills and our screening tools, we reached
new heights professionally as well as personally.”
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
DISCUSSION: CREATING THE HOLISTIC GRADUATE
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
CONCLUSIONS
• Gain key interprofessional competencies
• Interprofessional academic learning
Cognitive learning Psycomotor learningAffective learning
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
CONCLUSIONS
• Gain key interprofessional competencies
• Interprofessional academic learning
Cognitive learning Psycomotor learningAffective learningA holistically developed
student
T: 051 401 9111 [email protected] www.ufs.ac.za
Framework for Action on Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice (Adopted from WHO 2010
CONCLUSIONS
Questions?
Reflections on implementing a
community-based learning activity
as part of an interprofessional
education programme
Kaashifa Gathoo, Abigail Dreyer, Mpho Molete, Juliet Nyasulu, Gaolatlhe
Mothoagae, Amme Tshabalala, and Sonti Pilusa
Objectives and learning outcomes
1. Team work
2. Ability to conduct a community mapping
exercise
3. Ability to execute a community needs
assessment
4. Community feedback and demonstration of
accountability
Choice of sites
◦ Close proximity to medical school
◦ Represent the diverse community
◦ Reflect inequity
◦ Explore a long term relationship
Wits Medical School
Reflection on Implementation
Was “everything awesome” ?
Reflection after the design
◦ Poor communication
◦ Coping with complexities
“It’s really difficult holding this all together, there is so much to do, there are so many tools we could use,
how do we decide what is best?” [Faculty]
◦ Collaborating widely
“All teamwork is not collaboration and collaboration is multidimensional” [Faculty]
Reflection during preparation
◦ Expectations
“Who is supposed to do this?” [Faculty]
◦ Availability
“So, when can they meet? …I can’t do that time”[Faculty]
◦ Generosity
“…absolutely! we can provide that, and make sure they get some tea and are welcome” [Site]
Reflection after the learning activity
Faculty Experience
Growth/Learning (from each other + from students)
CommunicationStrengths
Site Experience
Growth/Learning (from faculty + from students)
CollaborationValues and interest
Student Key competencies/ Outcomes
TeamworkShared leadership
ValuesInsight
Responses from Faculty and Site
“I also discovered a lot of sites that I was not aware of within a very close proximity of the university.” [Faculty]
“ I was surprised at the creative suggestions that students proposed. We can use this in our proposal to the Board” [Site]
“A key element to the success was that we brought together our strengths. It was so refreshing to work together and contribute your part to the whole.” [Faculty]
Conclusions
◦ One activity – one day
◦ Value vs values
◦ The learning organisation
◦ Team learning
Take Home Message
“Reflection begins at
home”
How Prepared are Students for IPE?
By: Gérard C. Filies, José Frantz & Anthea Rhoda
Background:
• It is the responsibility of training institutions to prepare a workforce that is ready to work collaboratively and the vehicle advocated for this is interprofessional education(WHO, 2010)
• In response, the Faculty of Community and Health Sciences at a university in South Africa, developed a model that would systematically prepare students from first to final year for interprofessional education activities and build the relevant competencies (Frantz & Rhoda, 2017 ).
Study Population:
• 1st year students –Primary Health Care module
• Pharmacy, Nursing, Social Work, Sports Sciences, Dietetics, Natural Medicine, Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, Oral Health and Dentistry
• N=295 – convenient sampling
• Senior students
• Nursing, Occupational Therapy, Physiotherapy, Pharmacy, Social Work and Sports Sciences
• N=282
Design:
• Quantitative data – survey research - explaining phenomena by collecting numerical data (Aliaga & Gunderson, 2002)
• Method to gain quick data about general information about population of interest
• Readiness for IPL – compare to seniors –determine IPL over study period
Data Collection Tool:
• 15-item Likert scale, Readiness for InterprofessionalLearning Scale (RIPLS), adapted from Parsell and Bligh (1999)
• 1, strongly disagree to 5, strongly agree
• Survey divided into three main areas namely: team-work and collaboration, professional identity and roles and responsibilities
• RIPLS questionnaire was confirmed to be valid and reliable and can be used to assess interprofessionalreadiness (Parsell & Bligh, 1999).
Data Collection:
• Pilot study – 1/13 groups – negatively loaded statements
• Completion of demographic information• Administration of process – facilitators
Analysis:
• Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software.
• It is fairly user-friendly and extremely flexible in terms of the desired results required of an assortment of research studies.
• Muijs (2004) SPSS is in all probability the most common statistical data analysis software package used in educational research
Results:
• Demographic information:
– Mean age of the students in the first year group was 21,22 while the mean age for the senior students was 23,46.
– The gender composition was unequal with female students comprising 73, 2% (n=216) and male students were 25, 1% (n=74) of the first year student sample group.
– The senior student gender composition was also unequal with female students comprising 78, 4% (n=221) and male students were 21, 3% (n=60).
• The significant threshold was set at p=0.5
Results:• A strong link existed here between the positive outcomes of
teamworking and the acceptance of a team-based approach to learning. Positive responses to items in this subscale implied that students understood that health professionals needed to acquire specific team-working and collaborative skills, be effective communicators as well as be contributors of professional knowledge to an interprofessional team. Although both student groups understood the importance of developing a positive professional identity within the context of a team approach to health care, the senior students rated this more important. Roles and responsibilities had no significant difference between the two groups
Conclusions:
• The staggered curriculum implemented by the university is allowing students to systematically over time develop an understanding for IPE.
Presentation by: Gaolatlhe Mothoagae
Wits University, CHSE
Presented at:UNAM
AfrIPEN Symposium
21 September 2017
Outline Introduction
The journey: planning process >>> implementation
Lessons learnt
Challenges
Conclusion and Way Forward
Introduction
In 2017, Wits FHS showed commitment to incorporating IPE into undergraduate curricula across all professional disciplines
Granted 3 days of ‘protected time’ for IPE
The Programme: WHO? MODEL?Degree +
Year
GEMP
2
BCMP
2
BDS
4
BPHAR
M4
OT
4
PT
4
SPA
3+4
BIOK
4
ORAL Hyg
3
NURS
3
654329 34 25 61 40 54 27 37 8 39
4 different settings, rotational basis model (654/4 = 163) 4 team leaders led 4 teams
The Programme Model
Learning Objectives based on the IPEC Core Competencies
The Programme: WHAT? WHERE? Group Setting Activities
STREAMING
DECISIONS
Hospital (Casualty,
Ortho and Neuro wards)
Patient assessments followed by patient management
discussions. Livestreaming from CMAH to the eZone
JOZI MAPPING 23 Community Facilities:
Schools, OAHs, Shelters
for Women and
Children’s Homes
Strengths-Based Community assessment followed by report
back to a panel at the site. Group and individual feedback
and reflections done via Videos, PadLet and Sakai
MASS
CASUALTY
Medical School Theoretical and practical sessions on disaster management
activities in partnership with ER24. Table-top activities,
evacuation procedures and command centre experiences.
Debriefing was done at the end of the activities
BUILDING
HEALTHY
COMMUNITIES
Medical School
Wits Education Campus
Table Top Activities: Health Promotion scenarios - produce
HP material (video/poster) for a specific target group.
‘IPE Card’ games: use song, dance or role playing to respond
to IPE-related questions
The Programme: WHEN?
27 July 10 August 24 August
Streaming
Decisions
D B A
Mass Casualty C A B
Building Healthy
Communities
A C D
Jozi Mapping B D C
JOZI MAPPING
MASS CASUALTY
ST
RE
AM
ING
DE
CIS
ION
S
We are family!
Dentists, Nurses, BCMP.
We are family!
OT’s, Physio’s, Speechies & me.
We are family!
Doctors, Bio’s & Oral hygiene.
We are family!
Take me to the pharmacy!
That is how we change our degree
Key learning Knowing about other professions
Knowing roles of other professions
Learning from each other
Collaboration and teamwork
Communication and learning to listen
Creativity
Group dynamics
Ownership of learning and co-responsibility
Decision making
Discovery about ‘self ’
Challenges and Lessons Learnt Timing of the programme
Attendance monitoring
Communication/briefing sessions
Student groupings (level of students)
Clarity of learning objectives
Availability of all professions
Group numbers
Relevance of activities for students in all disciplines
Conclusion Objectives of the programme were met
A large scale IPE programme with protected time has benefits
Resources (human and capital) key for success of the programme
Staff commitment and buy-in and support from HoS/HoDs is essential
Way Forward
Planning for 2018 is already in progress with 4 potential days identified
Engage with student to ensure buy-in and participation
Continue and expand on the current offerings: MDT Sessions SCORPIOS Clinical IPE sessions at teaching hospitals and CBE sites Student groups involved in projects such as Trinity Health Services
Continue the conversation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THANK YOU CMJAH Management
ER24
The eZone team
Wits Education Campus
Team leaders and team members
Facilitators
Everyone who contributed to the success of the programme
DEVELOPMENT OF
INTERPROFESSIONAL HEALTHCARE
LEADERSHIP MODULES FOR
UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
Carin Maree, Pippa Bresser, Mable Kekana,
Karien Mostert, Mariatha Yazbek, Lydia
Engelbrecht, Christa Viviers
2017
Background information
The University of Pretoria went through organisational
restructuring, and one of the outcomes was the
merging of department to establish schools.
The School of Healthcare Sciences, Faculty of Health
Sciences consists of the following Departments:
• Human Nutrition
• Nursing Science
• Occupational Therapy
• Physiotherapy
• Radiography
Background information (cont.)
Need was identified for collaboration for alignment
with:
• Vision of University
• National health trends (Re-engineering of Primary
Healthcare and National Department of Health’s
Strategies)
• National education trends (Higher Education
Qualification Sub-Framework)
• International trends (Interprofessional Education
and Sustainable Development Goals)
…and one of the outcomes:
Development of ‘shared modules’ in integrated healthcare leadership in the
community setting and research for undergraduate students in the School of Healthcare Sciences, with addition of the
Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology
Professionals from different healthcare
disciplines are prepared in their own fields
with limited exposure to teamwork, with
each discipline focussing on their own
responsibilities regarding patients and
communities
Practice at that time: Traditional
Health Education
New practice to be introduced:
Interprofessional Health Education
Professionals from different
healthcare disciplines learn with, from
and about each other while sharing
common responsibilities to the benefit
of patients and communities
Problem statement
• The reality of healthcare includes an
overburden of diseases and lack of
healthcare professionals
• Healthcare professionals should be prepared
for the challenges and complexities for their
future careers during enrolment of
undergraduate programmes
Potential solution
• Interprofessional teamwork is expected
to contribute to:
–Optimise use of resources
–Improve quality of healthcare
–Improve outcomes for patients and
communities(WHO 2010; Frenk et al. 2010)
Research DesignAction research design was followed:
• Problem identification
• Action planning
• Implementation
• Evaluation
• Reflection
Based on principles:
• Learning in and through action and reflection
• Iterative process
• Collaboration
• Using multiple methods (McNiff & Whitehead 2002)
Conceptual Framework
Knowledge-to-Action Cycle of Graham & Tetroe (2009; 2010):
• Phase 1: Planning
• Phase 2: Pre- and post implementation
• Phase 3: Evaluation
Knowledge-to-Action Cycle (Graham & Tetroe 2009; 2010)
Knowledge-to-Action Cycle (Graham & Tetroe 2009; 2010)
Phase 1: Planning
Knowledge enquiry: Identify problem
• Consensus during strategic planning of
School of Healthcare Sciences was the lack
of interprofessional teamwork in health
settings at background stipulated
• Representative task team appointed to
explore problem and potential for introduction
of interprofessional modules in new curricula
Phase 1: Planning (cont.)
Synthesis: Review knowledge
• Task team systematically unpacked common exit level
outcomes of the undergraduate degrees stipulated by
Health Professions Council of South Africa and South
African Nursing Council, as well as graduate attributes
• The common exit level outcomes and attributes were
consolidated in table format for comparison
• Through in-depth discussion and debate, potential
learning outcomes were synthesized and captured, and
were presented to the executive management and
academic staff of the School of Healthcare Sciences
• Identified modules: Integrated healthcare leadership
and research
Phase 1: Planning (cont.)
Product tools: Adapt knowledge to local context
• Discussions with executive management and
academic staff focused on content, financial and
logistical implications
• Proposed regulation changes were drafted and
submitted to Academic Planning Department
• Upon approval two representative sub-committees
were established to develop micro-curriculum and
learning material
• Department of Speech-Language Pathology and
Audiology joined the process
• Regular meetings were held to plan and reflect
Semester 1 Semester 2
First year
NQF level 5
Uniprofessional module:
introduction to respective
professions*
Interprofessional health leadership I:
teamwork and communication in the
community health setting
(8 credits)
Second year
NQF level 6
Interprofessional health
leadership II: principles of
community health project
development and health literacy
(8 credits)
Uniprofessional module:
complementary content determined by
each discipline*
Third year
NQF level 7
Interprofessional health
leadership III: community
based project
(8 credits)
Uniprofessional module: complementary
content determined by each discipline*
Interprofessional Healthcare Research III:
Proposal development (30 credits)
Fourth year
NQF level 8
Uniprofessional module:
content determined by each
discipline*
Uniprofessional module:
content determined by each discipline*
Interprofessional Healthcare Research IV:
Research project (10 credits)
Reality of planning process
• Implementation was planned regarding contact
sessions, venues, team-teaching, interprofessional
group work, individual and group assessment
• First module was rolled out in 2015 with a group of 154
students from Departments of Human Nutrition,
Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy (other
Departments to follow in 2017/2018 when new curricula
are launched)
• Lecturers from all the Departments have been involved
in teaching and refining from the beginning, with
challenges …….
• Students were invited to comment any time and make
suggestions for improvement
Some lessons learned thus far…
• The focus of interprofessional education should be on core competencies across professions such as ethics, professionalism, team work, communication, project management and research
• It is necessary for discipline-specific education complementary to interprofessional education to prepare healthcare students for their professional responsibilities and ‘role uptaking’
• A platform is created for future healthcare professionals to learn interactively together with the purpose of improving knowledge, skills and attitudes to work in collaboration with each other towards a common goal
Some lessons learned (cont.)…
• Uniprofessional ‘silos’ are broken down
• Deliberate activities need to be planned to engage students in interprofessional team work
• Students’ input should be acknowledged and attended to
• Lecturers should be role models for interprofessional team work through their involvement of the modules and portray enthusiasm
• The process of development of interprofessionalmodules is intense, time-consuming, faces multiple challenges and requires commitment
Conclusion
We are proud of what we have achieved thus far with the
introduction of interprofessionalmodules and we hope to expand it to
include more professions in the future.
References
• McNiff J & Whitehead J. 2002. Action Research: Principles and Practice, 2nd Ed. New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library.
• Graham ID, Tetroe JM. The knowledge to action framework. In: Rycroft-Malone J, Bucknall T, eds. Models and Frameworks for implementing evidence-based practice. Linking evidence to action. West-sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010: 207-221
• World Health Organization. Framework for Action on Interprofessional Education & Collaborative Practice. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2010.
• The South African Health News Service. 2014. Report: Department of Health Strategic Plan 2014/15 – 2018/19. http://health-e.org.za/2014/09/25/report-department-health-strategic-plan-201415-20189/
• Frenk, J., Lincoln, C., Bhutta, Z.A., Cohen, J., Crisp, N., Evans, T., Fineberg, H. et al., 2010, Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world, The Lancet, 376(9756): 1923-1958, available from http://www.thelancet.com
Lessons learnt from
designing and
implementing
undergraduate
interprofessional
healthcare modules
P. Bresser, C. Maree,
K. Mostert-Wentzel,
RM. Kekana
22 September 2017
Introduction
AfriPEN 22 September 2017 – IPE Lessons learnt
Excerpt from Maree et al (ahead of print), AJPHE, Oct 2017
Pre-implementation - Challenges
Buy in & resistance
Curriculum revision
Naming
Logistics
Learning materials
Upholding unique professional cultures
AfriPEN 22 September 2017 – IPE Lessons learnt
Pre-implementation - Supports
Driving committee
Enhanced teamwork
Role players
Learning materials
Regular meetings
AfriPEN 22 September 2017 – IPE Lessons learnt
Post-implementation - Lessons
AfriPEN 22 September 2017 – IPE Lessons learnt
Edu
cators
Logistics & Time
Group Dynamics
Role modelling
Communication
Funding
Stu
den
ts
Post-implementation - Reflections
AfriPEN 22 September 2017 – IPE Lessons learnt
Edu
cators
Authentic
Teamwork
Community engagement
Ownership & Empowerment
Interprofessional Learning
Stu
den
ts
Interventions introduced
Enhanced communication channels
Streamlining processes
Administrative support
Multiple source feedback
Brainstorming & revision sessions
Facilitation skills development
Flexible but controlled group allocation
Increased hybrid teaching
AfriPEN 22 September 2017 – IPE Lessons learnt
The way forward
3rd phase of monitoring and evaluation
Clear sponsorship guidelines
Maintain enhanced communication pathways
Review of projects through educator meetings
Establish database to avoid community saturation
Facilitation training and mentoring for staff
Focus on evaluation of impact
Source project funding
AfriPEN 22 September 2017 – IPE Lessons learnt
Conclusion
Upholding standards and unique cultures of different
professions while simultaneously promoting
interprofessional health team concepts is a
challenging but achievable goal
Process of change that requires continued reflection
from all involved
AfriPEN 22 September 2017 – IPE Lessons learnt
Thank You
AfriPEN 22 September 2017 – IPE Lessons learnt
Experiences of facilitators of interprofessional education
Hanlie Pitout
Facilitators and students
Facilitators and students from:
Occupational therapy
Physiotherapy
Human nutrition /dietetics
Speech language pathology and audiology
Skills centre: included Standardised Patients
TeamSTEPPS
Literature
IPE is an expectation of WHO, HPCSA andprofessional organisation.
Facilitators need to be role models: interprofessional and collaborative practice.
METHOD
Pilot study
Qualitative
Purpose: preparation for next year’s IPE
Data collection
• Offered choice: open ended questionnaire; individual interview or focus group.
• The least experienced facilitators preferred to complete the questionnaire.
• The five SPs were seen in a focus group.
Results
Participants
• Eleven of the fifteen facilitators from four professions responded.
• SP coordinator / facilitator
• Five SP’s
Themes
• Value and uniqueness of IPE
• Knowledge, attitude and skills
• Planning and logistics
• Course content
• Students reactions
• SP’s
Value and uniqueness of IPEUnique challenges compared to departmental teaching. Takes facilitators out of their comfort zones. Bottom up and top down
“Like to share experiences of teamwork with students”
“Correct way to treat patients”
“Need to improve students confidence to work with other professions before qualification.”
Knowledge, attitude and skillsNot necessary to know everything of all professions – focus should be on team work and not so much on profession’s content.
“Need to feel equipped and prepared – it is impossible to present if you were not part of the preparation, the process and do not understand your own role.” “Need to be open minded”
“Facilitators learn from each other more on ways to facilitate but also about the roles of other professions.”
“Other staff in own department may not view IPE as important as you do.”
“IPE need time for preparation, participation, marking reflections and feedback / debriefing.”
Planning and logistics
Vital for success and strive to ensure a positive experience
“facilitators need to have good time management to maintain students cooperation and interest”
“Constant group of students and facilitators -> students relax more but if there is change -> students learn to adapt to new expectations and learn to work with others / different professionals.”
Course content
“Very challenging to develop scenarios that are complex enoughbut not too challenging.” “Scenarios that are more dimensionalcreates a stronger learning experience.”
“Developing the scenario is an important part of the process ofdeveloping cohesion and comprehension of facilitators”.
“The reflection is one of the most valuable IPE learning opportunities. Initially students reflections were very narrow but then it expanded”
Students reactions
“Students got the opportunity to present themselves as their profession – students confidence grew because they can assert themselves.”
“Need to be open to the process and remind yourself that you do not need to know everything – that you will learn as you go. Remember IPE is about the students and you are there to benefit them and they are relying on your commitment”
An unprepared or unsure facilitator -> students feel unsafe -> react with aggression or become apathetic -> limited participation -> affect the whole small group.
SP’sImportant for the success of IPE role play / simulation. Valued by both facilitators and students.
Preparation of SPs is vital. All the facilitators need to be part of the preparation.
“Facilitators also need to be prepared to work with SPsunderstanding their role in the session, their background /training and what they need to provide to enable the SPs to playthe role.”
“With good training SP’s can steer the students in the rightdirection i.e. if SP give an authentic portrayal of the patient thestudents will pick up on the emotional issues.”
DISCUSSION
‘Expert teacher’ needs to be replaced by ‘facilitator’ or ‘coach’.
Instead of teaching ‘work with learners’. Oandasan and Reeves, 2005.
Facilitators must be ready to encounter interprofessional friction –understand issues of power and hierarchy.
Prepared by facilitating small groups.
Facilitators who know each other are more effective.
Discussion (cont)
• Weekly meetings of all facilitators: feedback and debriefing
- >improved facilitation of future sessions.
• Departmental commitment may need top down approach.
• Staff who have never participated before underestimate the complexity of IPE facilitation.
• Assessment of facilitation skills are available and may contribute to facilitator preparation. Sargeant, Hill, Breau (2006); Davis et al. (2015)
TAKE HOME MESSAGE
• Facilitators can promote, cultivate and direct IPE initiatives.
• Need enough time and appropriate activities to prepare facilitators.
• Be prepared to move out of comfort zone.
• Open minded.
REFERENCES
• Available on request
QUESTIONS
The research process followed to assess theIPEP*-value of activities students participatein at a community-based rehabilitation centre
Kloppers, M., Bester, J., Bardien, F., Koornhof, H.E.K. & Statham, S.
•Community based out-patient physical rehabilitation centre in Western Cape, RSA•Established 1993 in partnership with Department of Health, Stellenbosch University and the Bishop Lavis Community•Inter-professional service-delivery @BLRC based on WHO ICF Model1 to ensure holistic patient centred treatment•Training of four health professions at the centre with students participating in a variety of activities with fellow students- Physiotherapy(3rd&4th years),- Occupational Therapy(3rd&4th years),- Speech,Language and Hearing Therapy(4th years) - Human Nutrition(4th years)
2 Reason for research:
3 Variety of IPEP-activities students participate in:
•A descriptive study with a before-after design
•All undergraduate students trained at BLRC invited to participate in study while completing their clinical placement
•Mixed data gathering methods to triangulate data
•Informed consent obtained
•Cohort of 42 students participated over an one year period
•Valuable and insightfull doing research in an IP-team (about IPEP)
•Important to differentiate between 3rd&4th years due to maturity that takes place i.t.o. their own professional identity
Corresponding author: [email protected]
6 Lessons learned:
Results from student feedback, given upon completion of their clinical placement, indicated that inter-professional learning occurred spontaneously between various professions as a result of how the centre and activities are managed2. This led to the research questions:- What IPEP happens during students clinical placement at BLRC? - From students’ perspective: what activities facilitates this IPEP?
1 Background:Bishop Lavis Rehabilitation Centre (BLRC)
Patient DiscussionWeekly inter-professional team meeting todiscuss patients, mutual goals setting andreferrals needed
4 Focus of poster:
Research process followed to ascertain IPEP at BLRC and well as the students’ perception of the activities that contributed to it
5 Methodology used:
GroupsStudents get the opportunity to present
and shadow a variety of groups
Home VisitsStudents do assessment and treatment in patients’ homes with fellow professions
WorkshopsStudents get the opportunity to present
and shadow a variety of workshops
Team SocialsMonthly team dress-up lunches are held
for staff and students
1. World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002. http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfbeginnersguide.pdf (accessed 27 September 2012)
2. Kloppers, M., Koornhof, H.E.K., Bester, J. & Bardien, F. 2015. Students’ experiences of inter-professional education through International classification of functioning-based activities at a community-based rehabilitation centre. African Journal of Health Professions Education. 2015:7(1):22-25, doi:10.7196/AJHPE.289.
3. RIPLS McFadyen, A. K., Webster, V., Strachan, K., Figgins, E., Brown, H. and McKechnie, J. (2005). The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale: A possible more stable sub-scale model for the original version of RIPLS. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(6), 595-603
4. IEPS McFadyen, A. K., Maclaren, W. M., and Webster, V. S. (2007). The Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS): An alternative remodeled sub‐scale structure and its reliability. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 21(4), 433-‐443
Data gathering method(Completed individualy)
Purpose
Before(Completed within first
week of placement)
After(Completed within last
week of placement)
RIPLS3
Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale
The RIPLS was used to assess the students’ perception of readiness for inter-professional learning
IEPS4
Interdisciplinary Education PerceptionScale
The IEPS was used to determine students’ professionally orientated perceptions and related affective domains
CASE STUDYCase of female with neurological condition. Medical and social history as well as outline of her resultant disability and function provided
Students were required to identify all the relevant professionals who they deemed necessary for the comprehensive management of the patient and to motivate the reason for their inclusion. This assisted in measuring the change in students’ perceptions and understandings of inter-professional collaboration
REFLECTIONReflect on an academic, social and personal level about their Inter-professional teamwork experience
To gain insight into the meaning that students derived as a result of their participation in IPEP-activities. Students reflected on what they learned, in what situation they learned it and how it will change their practice in future
ACTIVITY RATINGStudents rated the activities they participated in as part of their clinical placement
Activities were rated in terms of the contribution it made to students’ understanding of other professions and their ability to work together with other professionals
Data gathering method (Completed in group)
Purpose After
FOCUS GROUPData collected using an interview guide
To gather information regarding IPEP learning experiences of students within one month after completion of their clinical placement
7 References:
*Inter-Professional Education and Practice (IPEP)
Faculty development: A need for successful implementation of Interprofessional Education
1Rhoda, A, Frantz J, G. Fielies, Waggie F.
University of the Western Cape, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, South Africa
INTRODUCTION
The belief that health professions educators, trained in the previous
century, are adequately equipped to lead a process of education
innovation to transform the current model of Health Professions
Education training may be misguided. Preparing academics to drive the
Interprofessional Education (IPE) agenda both nationally and
internationally is therefore key. The Faculty of Community and Health
Sciences (FCHS) at the University of the Western Cape embarked on a
process of Faculty development to ensure that academics are sufficiently
skilled to facilitate the implementation of Interprofessional Education
and Collaborative practice (IPECP) initiatives for students
PURPOSE
The purpose of this presentation is to share the implementation and
outcomes of IPE faculty development initiatives implemented in the
Faculty of Community and Health Sciences at the University of the
Western Cape.
CONCLUSION AND TAKE HOME MESSAGESupporting and implementing IPE faculty development initiatives
facilitates outputs in IPE.
IMPLEMENTATION AND OUTPUTS
IPE
FACULTY GOALS IPE CHAMPIONS ACADEMICS NEEDS
Buy In Research Project Publications
Title:
• Faculty development: A need for successful
implementation of Interprofessional
Education
INTRODUCTION
• The belief that health professions educators, trained in the previous
century, are adequately equipped to lead a process of education
innovation to transform the current model of Health Professions
Education training may be misguided. Preparing academics to drive
the Interprofessional Education (IPE) agenda both nationally and
internationally is therefore key. The Faculty of Community and
Health Sciences (FCHS) at the University of the Western Cape
embarked on a process of Faculty development to ensure that
academics are sufficiently skilled to facilitate the implementation of
Interprofessional Education and Collaborative practice (IPECP)
initiatives for students
PURPOSE
• The purpose of this presentation is to share
the implementation and outcomes of IPE
faculty development initiatives implemented
in the Faculty of Community and Health
Sciences at the University of the Western
Cape.
CONCLUSION AND TAKE HOME MESSAGE
• Supporting and implementing IPE faculty
development initiatives facilitates outputs in
IPE.
INTRODUCTIONIt is the imperative of universities and faculties to develop and offer cohesive curricula that are systematically aligned with program objectives as well as national and international imperatives. Introducing concepts into a curriclum needs to be evalauted and assessed in order to ensure that it is relevant. Curriculum mapping introduces two main objectives: (i) to make the curriculum more transparent to all stakeholders; and (ii) to demonstrate the links and relationships between the various components of the curriculum. Thus curriculum mapping was used to indicate to faculty and students how the core competencies of interprofessional education in the curriculum are implemented and how it is linked to the identified university graduate attributes.
RESULTS
PURPOSEThis study aimed to offer insight into how discipline-specific curricula incorporate the competencies of interprofessional education as part of
promoting their graduate attributes.
Aligning graduate attributes with the interprofessional core competencies in an interdisciplinary health science faculty
1Frantz J, N.Mlenzana, N.Roman. C. Erasmus, H. Julie, G.Fielies, W. Cassiem, A.Rhoda1University of the Western Cape, Department of Physiotherapy,
Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, South Africa
METHODOLOGYA qualitative methodology using a case study approach was used for this study.
The curriculum map process was used and module descriptors for specific programmes were reviewed. Departments who volunteered to participate in
the study included Occupational therapy, Physiotherapy, Natural medicine,
Social Work, Child and Family Studies, Sport Science and Nursing. The unit
of analysis is the interprofessional core competencies as it is reflected within health professional discipline curricula.
CONCLUSIONSAlthough integrating inter-
professional core competencies
was an accepted imperative
amongst these departments,
the interpretation of the core
competencies varied. Implications
for the faculty were to unpack the
core competencies and develop a
common understanding that was
relevant to our context.
REFERENCESKelly et al. (2008).
PLANNING:Decide what
questions should be answered about the curriculum
CREATE THE CODE:
Decide what data will be gathered to answer the questions in Step 1 and carefully define the
metrics for measurement and the ‘‘code’’ for the map. This code must clearly communicate meaning to faculty.
FACULTY INPUT AND DATA
GATHERING:Plan the process
for gathering data from faculty
ANALYSIS OF MAP:Decide how to use the
map to answer pertinent curriculum questions
generated in Step 1.
IMPLEMENT CHANGES:
Create a plan to
address the changes
needed based on
the analysis in
Step 4.
INTERPROFESSIONAL CORE COMPETENCIESInterprofessional communication
Patient/client/family/
community-centred care
Role clarification
Team functioning
Interprofessional conflict resolution
Collaborative leadership
Values/Ethics for Interprofessional
Practice
GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES
Skilled communicators
Inquiry-focused and
knowledgeable
Critically and relevantly
literate
Interpersonal flexibility and confidence to engage across difference
Autonomous and collaborative
Ethically, environmentally and
socially aware and active
Exposing students to IPE experiences – thinking out of the box
Gerda M Reitsma; Belinda Scrooby; Grieta HanekomCHPE, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University
IntroductionInterprofessional Education is still a somewhat new and unexplored concept at
the Faculty of Health Sciences at the NWU. In 2015 an IPE pilot project was
implemented in the Faculty, focussing on third year students and following a
theoretical based group discussion model. The results of the project indicated
many gaps to address for sustainable and successful IPE integration in thecurriculum. After collaboration with different stakeholders in the faculty
(lecturers, teaching-learning advisors and management), a different approach to
IPE implementation was put on the table. This approach aims to expose
students to different experiences of IPE from their first year to their final
year of undergraduate studies, in various contexts and including different
professions at different stages of the model. These include IPE collaboration
in first year anatomy classes, producing primary health care video’s in the
second year, participating in an IPE race in the third year, and presenting
research projects in a final year seminar.
PurposeTo present an alternative approach to IPE integration in the curriculum, and
to research the planning, implementation and evaluation of this model in
the faculty of Health Sciences.
MethodsPhase 1: Presentation and motivation of the alternative IPE model.
Phase 2: Mixed Methods research on the planning, implementation and
evaluation of the IPRace.
Students as well as lecturers will form part of the target population. Programme
leaders responsible for curriculum quality will be included in the final reflection
and debriefing stages.
Qualitative data (focus group interviews, written narratives and student
portfolios) and quantitative data (structured questionnaires) will be gatheredthroughout the implementation of the new IPE model. Observation and field
notes will from an integral part of the process
ResultsPhase 1:
Figure 1: Mono-, Trans- and Interdisciplinary exposure in HealthProfessions Training.
The alternative model is based on the research conducted by Viviers et.al.,
(2016) where the principles of team functioning of students in a
competitive but safe environment were implemented to develop
pervasive skills. The pervasive skills listed by Viviers et al (2016) are
similar to the CANMED competencies (Frank, 2005) listed for Health
professions.
The model will be implemented in 2018 at which time data will be collected
(Phase 2).
DiscussionIPE need to be implemented at a stage when the students’ have
established their own professional identity but are open towards
interprofessional experiences (Coster et al, 2008; Cooper et al, 2001).
Results from a pilot study (Reitsma et al, 2017) indicated that 3rd year
students in most of the health professions were ready to participate in
IP experiences, except the psychology students.
The IPRace is designed according to a model developed by Viviers et al
(2016).
Advantages:
• A large number of students can be accommodated.
• Students can be involved in different aspects of the IPRace (Steps 1-6
Figure 2) in IP teams.
• Students play a role in planning, implementing and evaluating, providing
ample opportunity for IP competency development.
• The IPRace takes place in a safe controlled environment (on-campus, in
Sim labs, using SP’s), without the logistical and resource constraints of
sending students to other training platforms.
• All professions can be accommodated as the students take responsibility
for designing the case studies.
• Debriefing can help students reflect on and understand the dynamics of IP
better.
Disadvantages:
• Planning and designing can be time consuming.
• Additional role players (including campus staff) will have to be included.
The advantages of the educational game on which the IPRace is modelled
have been proven in previous research (Viviers et al, 2016). The IP Race may
be an alternative to exposing students to IP scenarios where logistical barriers
such as timetables, finances and lack of appropriate supervised clinical
platforms exist. Students from all health professions, and the lecturers, can be
involved in different steps of the IPRace, providing adequate opportunities for
IP experiences for large student numbers. The necessity for IPE in health
professions education is undebatable, but the approach should be tailor-made
to the contexts and needs of the training institution to promote
sustainable integration in the curriculum. The results of this study may
form the blue-print for IPE implementation in the Faculty of Health Sciences,
NWU.
ReferencesCooper, H., Carlisle, C., Gibbs, T., & Watkins, C. 2001. Developing an evidence base for interdisciplinary
learning: A systematic review. Journal of advanced nursing, 35(2), 228-237.
Coster,S., Norman, I., Murrells,T., Kitchen, S., Meerabeau,E., Sooboodoo, E. & d’Avray,L. 2008.
Interprofessional attitudes amongst undergraduate students in the health professions: A longitudinal
questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies 45: 1667–1681
Frank, J.R. (Ed). 2005. The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency framework. Better standards. Better
physicians. Better care. Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.
Reitsma, G.M., Scrooby, B., Rabie, T., Du Preez, A., Pretorius, R., Van Oordt, A., Swanepoel, ., Naudé,
A., Viljoen, M., Dolman, R., Smit, K. 2017. Inplementing interprofessional education in health sciences at
a South African university without a medical school: a pilot study. (unpublished).
Viviers, H.A., Fouché, J.P., & Reitsma, G.M. 2016. Developing soft skills (also known as pervasive skills),
Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(3): 368 - 389
Proposed IPE implementation
Conclusions
Figure 2: Proposed model for the IPRace
How to use community primary care clinical placements as a medium for Inter-professional Education in BotswanaMmoloki Molwantwa1 Detlef Prozesky Mpho Mogodi
BackgroundMedical and nursing students at the University of Botswana (UB) have clinical placements in similar primary care clinics. These students also have clinical skills classes in their own skills laboratories and sometimes the topics learnt are similar. Opportunities for students to learn together in skills training and clinical placements are not being utilized in spite of the common learning outcomes and events that exist.
AimsTo maximise the opportunity for medical and nursing students to learn together in their clinical skills and placement programmes through; Merging similar clinical skills sessions of medical and nursing students into a joint IPE skills
curriculum. Planning learning activities in clinical placements that can foster IPE amongst the students.
Current situation
Medical students Nursing students
Examples of students working in parallel
programmes
Plans Engage relevant leadership from Faculty of Health Sciences and Faculty of Medicine to consider IPE in
their curricular Develop IPE curriculum for clinical skills teaching for medical and nursing students Include IPE activities as one of the outcomes in clinical placements
The Collaborative Care Project
Jana Muller
Undergraduates collaborate interprofessionally to improve health
care in a vulnerable, rural community in South Africa
2012-2017
The project takes place in a health resource-constrained and socially vulnerable community. Students from five to seven professions are involved for one afternoon a week.
Aim
Using an interprofessional approach to patient assessment and
management during home visits to: improve health care delivery 1 ;
foster ‘agents of change’ 2 ; develop young professionals who are
Holistic, patient-centered clinicians who take ownership of change
Responsive to contextual factors that impact their patients
Cognisant of the power within their health care team
Aware of the resources available to them to best meet the needs of
their patients and community.
Context:
Medical student: ‘Being able to go to
the patient’s house and see this is
where they live and this what they
have to deal with and what they have
available to them. I think that rounds
you more as a clinician’
Identity:
Allied health
student: ‘You’re not
just someone, you’re
actually a therapist,
you’re a team
member’
Deeper understanding:
Medical student: ‘You need to ask (the
patients) about their life, how they cope at
home. I understand 100% that’s why we do
home visits. You’re shocked to see, oh hectic,
wow, this is bad. This is why my patient didn’t
arrive (for follow up) or this is why they don’t
have money, or why they want a (social)
grant, they really just can’t get by’
Partnerships:
Allied health student:
‘Definite highlights for me
were working with the
community health care
workers. Just getting to
know them.… They know
the patients on a more
intimate level’
Transformation:
Medical student: ‘The
home visit project
shapes better clinicians,
and it teaches us how to
work in interdisciplinary
teams, which is very
important….as a patient
would get better
treatment’
Role clarification:
Medical student: ‘We would see
what the Allied Health Sciences are
actually doing, as opposed to just
sending the patient to them and not
knowing what’s happening’
Outcomes
1. Reciprocal teaching, learning and a sense of social
accountability within the group
2. Change in self perception, team identity and role clarification
3. Development of student projects to meet identified need i.e. student
run rehab, therapy garden, sports project and support groups
4. Expansion of the project to other communities in 2017
Conclusion
The Collaborative Care project is contextually relevant,
allowing students to develop a better understanding of the
precipitating factors to health and wellness not necessarily
addressed in routine health care education or delivery.
The diverse team of students and community is inclusive,
despite differing professions and cultural backgrounds
providing space for reflection and transformative learning.
Jana Muller (MSc. Physio)
Ukwanda Centre for Rural Health
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
Stellenbosch University
1 Durban Street, Worcester, Western Cape, South Africa, 6850
Tel: (023) 346 7812 / Fax: (023) 346 7859 / Cell: 083 504 1046
Email: [email protected] / Website: www.sun.ac.za/ukwanda-rcs
Bibliography
1. World Health Organisation, 2010: Framework for action in interprofessional and collab-
orative practice: Geneva: Wold Health Organisation
2. Frenk, J., et al., 2010: Health professionals for a new century: transforming education
to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world: The Lancet; 376:1923-1958
Acknowledgments: Ukwanda Centre for Rural Health, Prof H. Conradie and
Dr S. Snyman, Sharon Montgomery, FAIMER and Karin Schermbrucker (photographs)
Data from 2012-2015
155 days
200 homes visited
280 people identified
365 referrals made