Upload
ahmed-allam
View
291
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
FOLFIRI PLUS CETUXIMAB VERSUS FOLFIRI
PLUS BEVACIZUMAB AS
FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH
METASTATIC COLORECTAL
CANCER (FIRE-3): A RANDOMIZED, OPEN-
LABEL, PHASE 3 TRIAL
Ahmed Allam A. MohamedAssistant Lecturer of Clinical Oncology
Assiut University Hospitals
→ The FIRE-3 trial of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft InternistischeOnkologie (AIO),is a two-group, open-label, multicentric,randomized, phase III trial, patients were recruited from Germanyand Austria.
→ sponsored by : Klinikum Großhadern, University of Munich.
→ Funded by : Merck KGaA
→ Recruitment in the trail:• January 23rd 2007: No K-RAS mutation status was required.• October 7th 2008: inclusion was restricted to only patients with
K-RAS exon 2 wild-type tumors.
Development of Mabagainst EGFR
80-90’s-----2004----------06-----------07----------Jan 08-------June08----------2009
• Retrospectivedate aboutkras in 30 ptnstreated withcetuximab*
• Amdao presented krasdata with panitumumab
• Conditional marketing authorization and approval of panitumumab in Europe to kras wild **
• Kras aspredictivePACCE***
Subgroupanalysis of kraspresentation ofCRYSTAL & OPUSin ASCO
NCI bulletin: ptnswith mCRC withmKras shouldn’treceive Cetuximab
• FDA changedthe labels forPanitumumab- Cetuximabto involvekras exon 2status.
• FDA approval ofCetuximab inadvanced CRC
• aged 18–75 years
• with stage IV, adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum.
• K-RAS status. !!!!
• an ECOG P.S of 0–2.
• an estimated life expectancy of greater than 3 months.
• adequate organ function (WBC ≥3·0 × 10⁹ /L, neutrophils ≥1·5 × 10⁹ /L, platelets ≥100 × 10⁹ / L and HGB ≥ 9 g/dL, serum bilirubin ≤1·5 × ULN; AST & ALT ≤2·5 × ULN or ≤5 × ULN in the presence of liver metastases, and s.creatinine ≤1·5 × ULN).
• no surgery within the 4 weeks before the start of study treatment.
• The presence of at least one measurable reference lesion according to (RECIST) version 1.09 was also required.
INCLUSION
CRITERIA
• known or suspected brain metastases.• previous treatment with an EGFR-targeting agent or bevacizumab.• previous chemotherapy for colorectal cancer, excluding adjuvant
therapy completed at least 6 months before trial enrolment.• receipt of any experimental drug treatment within 30 days before
enrolment.• clinically relevant coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction within
the past 12 months or a risk of uncontrolled arrhythmia.• acute or subacute intestinal obstruction or a history of chronic infl
ammatory disease or chronic diarrhoea.• symptomatic peritoneal carcinomatosis.• serious, non-healing wounds, ulcers or bone fractures.• uncontrolled hypertension.• pronounced proteinuria (nephrotic syndrome).• arterial thromboembolisms or severe haemorrhages within 6 months
before study enrolment (except a bleeding tumor before tumor resection surgery).
• haemorrhagic diathesis or thrombotic tendency; a pre-existing dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase defi ciency.
• a pre-existing glucuronidation defect (Gilbert-Meulengrachtsyndrome).
• a history of secondary malignancy within the past 5 years, except for basalioma or carcinoma in situ of the cervix if treated with curative intent.
• or been receiving therapeutic anticoagulation therapy.
EXCLUSION
CRITERIA
Patients with previously untreated
KRAS WT mCRC (ITT: n=592)
Bevacizumab+ FOLFIRI (n=295)
R
PD
PD
•Primary endpoint: ORR
•Secondary endpoints: progression-free survival, overall survival.
752 ptns randomly assigned
KRAS mutant :100
KRAS unknown: 43
No treatment 17
BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE INTENTION-TO-TREAT AND RAS-ASSESSABLE
POPULATIONS
Evaluation of ORR
FOLFIRI + Cetuximab FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab
Odds ratio pORR % 95%-CI % 95%-CI
KRAS exon 2 WTITT population*
(N= 592)
62.0 56.2 – 67.5 58.0 52.1 – 63.7 1.180.85–1.64
0.183
RAS WT
(N= 342)
65.5 57.9 – 72.6 59.6 51.9 – 67.1 1.280.83–1.99
0.32
RAS MT
(N= 65)
38.2 22.2 – 56.4 58.1 39.1 – 75.5 0.450.17–1.21
0.14
KRAS exon 2 MT and RAS MT
(N=178)
38.0 28.1–48.8 51.2 40.0–62.1 0.590.32–1.06
0.097
Evaluation of PFS
FOLFIRI + CetuximabFOLFIRI +
BevacizumabHazard
ratio pPFS Months 95%-CI Months 95%-CI
KRAS exon 2 WTITT population
(N=592)
10.0 8.8–10.8 10.3 9.8–11.3 1.06(0.88–1.26)
0.547
RAS WT
(N=342)
10.4 9.5–12.2 10.2 9.3–11.5 0.93(0.74–1.17)
0.54
RAS MT
(N=65)
6.1 5.3–8.5 12.2 9.7–13.9 2.22(1.28–3.86)
0.004
KRAS exon 2 MT and RAS MT
(N=178)
7.5 6.1–9.0 10.1 8.9–12.2 1.31(0.98–1.78)
0.085
0.75
1.0
0.50
0.25
12 24 36 48 60 72
171
171
No. at risk64
57
14
8
8
34
1
2
0.0
PFS
est
imat
ePROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL RAS* WT
Eventsn/N (%)
Median(months) 95% CI
FOLFIRI + Cetuximab 144/171 (84.2%) 10.4 9.5–12.2
FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab 143/171 (83.6%) 10.2 9.3–11.5
HR=0.93 (95% CI 0.74–1.17)
p (log-rank)=0.54
*RAS wild-type: KRAS 61/146; NRAS Exon2, NRAS Exon3
0
Time (months)
FOLFIRI + CetuximabFOLFIRI +
Bevacizumab Hazardratio
p
PFS Months 95%-CI Months 95%-CI
KRAS exon 2 WTITT population
(N=592)
28.7 24.0 – 36.6 25.0 22.7 – 27.60.77
(0.62 – 0.96)0.017
RAS WT
(N=342)33.1 24.5 – 39.4 25.6 22.7 – 28.6
0.70(0.53 – 0.92)
0.011
RAS MT
(N=65)16.4 15.9 – 27.6 20.6 17.0 – 28.4
1.20(0.64 – 2.28)
0.57
KRAS exon 2 MT and RAS MT
(N=178)
20.3 16.4– 23.4 20.6 17.0 – 26.71.09
(0.78 – 1.52)0.60
EVALUATION OF OS
Internal Use Only
Patients at risk297 218 111 60 29 9295 214 111 47 18 2
OS
est
imat
e
1.0
0.75
0.50
0.25
0
Time (months)
0 12 24 36 48 60 72
Cetuximab + FOLFIRI
Beavcizumab + FOLFIRI
Median, months
28.7 25.0
HR (95% CI)p-value
0.77 (0.62–0.96)p=0.017
28.725.0
Median duration of treatment~5 months (all 3 agents)
Median PFS~10.0 months
Δ = 7.5 months
OVERALL SURVIVAL RAS* WT
0.75
1.0
0.50
0.25
12 24 36 48 60 72
171
171
No. at risk128
127
71
68
39
2620
9
6
1
0.0
OS
est
imat
e
Eventsn/N (%)
Median(months) 95% CI
FOLFIRI + Cetuximab 91/171 (53.2%) 33.1 24.5–39.4
FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab 110/171 (64.3%) 25.6 22.7–28.6
HR=0.70 (95% CI 0.53–0.92)
p (log-rank)=0.011
*RAS : KRAS 61/146; NRAS Exon2, NRAS Exon3
0
Time (months)
Exploratory subgroup analysis for OS
(ITT)
Cetuximab + FOLFIRI Bevacizumab + FLOFIRI
Alive after 1st line 87.5% 84.7%
Alive after 2nd line 78.5% n(204) 76.4% n(191)
Second line drugs
Oxaliplatin 63.7% 62.8%
Irinotican 15.7 % 15.7%
Bevacizumab 46.6% 17.3%
Anti-EGFR mAb 15.2% 41.4%
2nd Line treatment and crossover
3rd Line Therapy
Cetuximab + FLOFIRI Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI
Received 3rd line 36% ( n=107) 40% (n= 118)
HAEMATOLOGICAL TOXICITY
Adverse event, %Cetuximab + FOLFIRI
(n=297)Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI
(n=295)p-value
(grade ≥3)
Any grade Grade ≥3 Any grade Grade ≥3
Leucopenia 66.7 12.8 66.8 11.2 0.613
Anaemia 87.9 2.4 90.9 1.4 0.545
Thrombocytopenia 25.6 0.3 23.4 0.3 >0.999
Neutropenia 61.3 24.2 60.3 22.8 0.699
Febrile neutropenia 1.7 1.7 3.0 1.0 0.725
NON-HAEMATOLOGICAL TOXICITY
Adverse event, % Cetuximab + FOLFIRI (n=297)Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI
(n=295)p-value (grade
≥3)
Any-grade Grade ≥3 Any-grade Grade ≥3
Any adverse event 100.0 71.0 100.0 63.7 0.066
Nausea 48.2 3.4 62.4 4.8 0.414
Vomiting 24.6 2.4 32.9 3.4 0.473
Diarrhoea 57.2 11.5 62.7 13.6 0.458
Mucositis/stomatitis 42.1 3.7 44.8 4.1 0.835
Fatigue 50.2 0.7 54.9 1.4 0.449
Pain 50.2 5.4 58.0 7.1 0.401
Hand-foot syndrome 26.6§ 3.4 14.2 0.7 0.037
Fatal adverse events N/A 0.0 N/A 1.7 0.030
Grade ≥3 adverse events of special interest.
Adverse event, % Cetuximab + FOLFIRI (n=297)Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI
(n=295)p-value (grade
≥3)
Any-grade Grade ≥3 Any-grade Grade ≥3
Acneiform exanthema 77.4 16.8 7.8 0.0 <0.0001
Desquamation 35.4 6.7 11.5 0.7 0.0001
Paronychia 37.4 5.7 9.2 0.0 <0.0001
Infusion-related allergic reaction
7.7 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0004
Hypocalcaemia 27.6 4.0 15.3 2.4 0.351
Hypomagnesaemia 63.3 4.4 39.7 0.7 0.007
Adverse event, % Cetuximab + FOLFIRI (n=297)Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI
(n=295)p-value (grade
≥3)
Any-grade Grade ≥3 Any-grade Grade ≥3
Hypertension 21.2 6.4 38.3 6.8 0.870
Proteinuria 2.7 0 2.0 0.3 0.498
Bleeding 21.2ǂ 0.7 28.5 0.3 >0.999
Abscesses/fistulae 1.4 0.3 5.4§ 1.0 0.372
GI perforation 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.7 0.623
Thrombosis (any) 9.4 6.1 11.5 6.1 >0.999
Thromboembolic event 7.4 5.1 7.1 5.8 0.720
Wound healing complications
2.0 0.3 2.7 1.4 0.216
Five deaths, all during treatment with FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab, werereported to be related to adverse events:• arrhythmia (1)• Sepsis (1)• thromboembolic event (1)• infection with neutropenia (2).
Two of these deaths (arrhythmia, and infection with neutropenia) were deemed to be related to study treatment.
Death Report During TTT
“The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet”Aristotle