Upload
drucsamal
View
226
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Diuretic Strategies in AHF:
Dose DOSE Matter?
Michael Felker, MD, MHS, FACC, FAHA
Professor of Medicine
Chief, Heart Failure Section
Duke University School of Medicine
Does DOSE Matter?
• It matters to some people
– Me
– My mom
– Dr. Shah
– My Department Chair/Dean
It Matters to Patients!
Lucas C, et al. Am Heart J. 2000;140:840-847.
Fonarow GC, et al. Circulation.
1994;90(pt. 2):1-488.
Logeart D, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol.
2004;43:635-641
Signs and symptoms PCWP BNP
Persistent Congestion (Clinical or Subclinical)
Associated with Poor Outcomes in AHF
Contemporary Pharmacotherapy for ADHF
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
%
Diuretics Dopamine Dobutamine Milrinone Nesiritide NTG
Fonarow,GC et al. AHJ 2007
Fra
cti
on
al E
xcre
tio
n o
f S
od
ium
Diuretic Concentration
Normal
Heart Failure
Diminished
maximal
responsiveness
Higher doses
required to
achieve same
diuretic effect
Ellison DH. Cardiology, 2001.
Acute Heart Failure (1 symptom AND 1 sign)
<24 hours after admission
2x2 factorial randomization
Low Dose (1 x oral)
Q12 IV bolus
48 hours
1) Change to oral diuretics
2) continue current strategy
3) 50% increase in dose
Co-primary endpoints
High Dose (2.5 x oral)
Q12 IV bolus
Low Dose (1 x oral)
Continuous infusion High Dose (2.5 x oral)
Continuous infusion
72 hours
DOSE: Study Design
Clinical endpoints
60 days
Felker GM et al, NEJM 2011
Patient Global Assessment :
Results from DOSE
Felker GM et al, NEJM 2011
Change in Creatinine at 72 hours
0.05 0.07
0.04
0.08
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
Ch
an
ge i
n C
reati
nin
e (
mg
/dL
)
Felker GM et al, NEJM 2011
Q12 Continuous Low High
P = 0.21 P = 0.45
Secondary Endpoints: Low vs. High
Low High P value
Dyspnea VAS AUC at 72 hours 4478 4668 0.041
% free from congestion at 72 hrs 11% 18% 0.091
Change in weight at 72 hrs -6.1 lbs -8.7 lbs 0.011
Net volume loss at 72 hrs 3575 mL 4899 mL 0.001
Change in NTproBNP at 72 hrs (pg/mL) -1194 -1882 0.06
% Treatment failure 37% 40% 0.56
% with Cr increase > 0.3 mg/dL
within 72 hrs
14% 23% 0.041
Length of stay, days (median) 6 5 0.55
Felker GM et al, NEJM 2011
Change in Cystatin C over Time
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Low High
Days
Ch
an
ge i
n C
ysta
tin
C
What about other alternatives/adjuncts to
furosemide?
• Alternative loop diuretics?
• Sequential nephron blockade with thiazides?
• Natriuretic doses of MRA?
• “renal dose” dopamine?
• “renal dose” nesiritide?
• Vasopressin antagonists revisited?
Are All Oral Diuretics Created Equal?
HR 0.56 (0.36-0.87)
P = 0.038
*Adjustment variables: country of randomization, age, previous
hospitalization for HF, baseline SBP, baseline sodium, baseline BUN, and
having a qualifying episode with JVD Mentz, RM under review
Sequential Nephron Blockade
Jentzer, J. et al JACC,2010
Sequential Nephron Blockade
• Use of loop diuretic in combination with thiazide or
thiazide like diuretic (metolazone)
• Has not been rigorously studied
• Can induce potent diuresis in patients with diuretic
resistance, but
• Associated with multiple electrolyte abnormalities
– Hypokalemia
– Hyponatremia
– Hypomagnesemia
• Use with caution
European J Int Med, 2014
Natriuretic Doses of MRAs?
ATHENA–HF Primary Objective and Endpoint
Objective
To determine if high-dose
spironolactone administered
to patients with AHF will lead
to greater reductions in N-
terminal pro-B-type natriuretic
peptide (NT-proBNP) levels
from randomization to 96 hr.
Primary Endpoint
Change in NT-proBNP from
randomization to 96hr.
Patients admitted with AHFNot on or on low dose MRA on admission
K ≤5.0 mmol/leGFR ≥30 ml/min/1.73m2
BNP >250 pg/ml or NT pro BNP >1000 pg/ml≤24 hours from first dose of IV diuretics
Baseline Assessment, NT-proBNP
Not on MRA On low dose MRA
PlaceboHigh Dose
spironolactone (100mg)
Low Dose spironolactone (25mg)
High Dose spironolactone
(100mg)
In-hospital: K and Cr Assessment q24 hours until 96 hours & pre-discharge
Adjust dose accordingly if needed
96 HoursPrimary Endpoint – Change in NT proBNP
Multiple Secondary Endpoints
30 Day Phone CallMultiple Tertiary Endpoints
From 96 hours to discharge and post-dischargeMRA use per treating physician discretion
6 Month Phone CallVital Status
ROSE Study Design
Standardized Diuretic Dosing For 1st 24 hours
2.5 x Outpt Furosemide Equivalent in Divided (BID) IV Doses
Low Dose Dopamine:
Co-primary End-points
72 Hour Urine
Volume
Change in
Cystatin-C
Chen, HH et al. JAMA 2013
Low Dose Nesiritide
Co-primary End-points
8.3 8.6
0
5
10
15
72-h
ou
r u
rin
e v
olu
me (
L)
Placebo Nesiritide
P=0.25
0.11
0.07
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Ch
an
ge in
Cysta
tin
C (
mg
/L)
Placebo Nesiritide
P=0.35
72 Hour Urine
Volume
Change in
Cystatin-C
Chen, HH et al. JAMA 2013
Safety Endpoints
Study Drug Tolerance Nesiritide
(n=119)
Placebo
(N = 119)
P
Value
Study drug d/c - Hypotension 18.8% 10.4% 0.07
Study drug d/c - Tachycardia 0% 0.9% 0.50
Study drug d/c – Any Cause 25% 25% 0.94
Study Drug Tolerance Dopamine
(n=122)
Placebo
(N = 119)
P
Value
Study drug d/c - Hypotension 0.9% 10.4% <0.001
Study drug d/c - Tachycardia 7.2% 0.9% <0.001
Study drug d/c – Any Cause 23% 25% 0.72
EVEREST: Decongestion at 24 hours
– 1.7
± 1.8 – 1.0
± 1.8 – 1.8
± 2.0 – 0.9
± 1.9
Both trials
P<0.001
Difference 0.7 kg 0.9 kg
Δ in
Dyspnea
Δ in BW (kg)
Tolvaptan Placebo Tolvaptan Placebo
Both trials
P<0.001
37 35 33 31
24 24 25 23
16 11 14
11
–2 –3 –2 –3
–20
0
20
40
60
80
Tolvaptan Placebo Tolvaptan Placebo (n=894) (n=915) (n=941) (n=914)
Improved
worsened
Markedly better
Moderately better
Minimally better
Worse
Gheorghiade, JAMA 2007
Dyspnea Improvement with Tolvaptan
Pang PS, et al. Eur Heart J 2009
Conclusions and Take Home Message
Decongestion is important by whatever means in improving
outcomes
Current approaches generally lacking in robust evidence
Remains major unmet need in HF that requires ongoing study
Freedom From Congestion at 72-96 Hrs
Felker GM, et al N Engl J Med. 2011 Bart, B et al, N Eng J Med 2012 Chen et al, JAMA 2013
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
DOSE ROSE CARRESS
Fre
ed
om
Fro
m C
on
gesti
on
You will be diuresed. Resistance is futile.