48
AICD Directors Briefing Welcome to the Australian Institute of Company Directors (AICD) Victoria Division Directors Briefing OH&S Issues For The Board Presenters: Kirsty Roser, Managing Principal, Workforce Strategies, Marsh Pty Ltd Barry Sherriff, Partner, Employee Relations, Freehills Greg Tweedly MAICD, Chief Executive Officer, Victorian WorkCover Authority

V091013 db1 oh&s issues for the board-09-10-13

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

AICD Directors Briefing

Welcome to the Australian Institute of Company Directors (AICD)

Victoria Division Directors Briefing

OH&S Issues For The Board

Presenters:

Kirsty Roser, Managing Principal, Workforce Strategies, Marsh Pty Ltd

Barry Sherriff, Partner, Employee Relations, Freehills

Greg Tweedly MAICD, Chief Executive Officer, Victorian WorkCover Authority

www.marsh.com.au

OH&S: Issues for Directors and the BoardLimiting exposure through effective risk management

13 October, 2009

Melbourne

3Marsh

Agenda

Background issues

How does an organisation demonstrate due diligence and what are the

benefits?

What makes an effective safety management system?

How do you know when its working?

How do you protect your organisation?

4Marsh

Health & SafetyDrivers

Employeeexpectations

Communityexpectations

Personal liability

Legislation &enforcement

Insurancecosts

Public relations

Accreditation

Health and Safety Pressures Are Increasing

Supply chain Investorexpectations

5Marsh

Duty of Care (in relation to health and safety) can be defined as:

“Taking all reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions likely to harm

any person or cause damage in the workplace.”

An employer has a ‘duty of care’ and fulfills this by showing due

diligence.

Duty of Care

6Marsh

What is Due Diligence?

Taking every reasonable precaution in the circumstances to protect the

health, safety and welfare of all your employees.

Can be used as a defence for prosecutions under the legislation.

Requires everyone in the workplace to understand and comply with the

duties set out in the legislation.

Reasonable pre-caution.

7Marsh

How to Demonstrate Due Diligence

System in place for complying with the law.

Review health and safety issues at Board meetings.

Act promptly when made aware of a problem.

Follow up to ensure instructions have been carried out.

Provide written instructions to subordinates.

Allocate time and resources to support the health and safety program.

Monitor and audit the health and safety program.

8Marsh

Benefits of Due Diligence

Safer workplaces

Reduced costs

Legislative compliance

Increased productivity

Increased business / competitive advantage

Improved morale

9Marsh

Safety Management Systems

Safety needs to be integrated in to your general business practices.

What makes a system effective?

– Senior management involvement

– Reflective of the organisation’s practices

– Implemented – do what you say you are going to do

10Marsh

A Systematic Approach

Safety Management Systems – a model for establishment,implementation and maintenance

(reproduced from ILO-OSH 2001 -Guidelines on occupational safety and

health management systems)

11Marsh

Key Elements of an effective system

Risk management

Consultation

Incident reporting

Monitoring and review

12Marsh

Risk Management

13Marsh

Consultation

Consultation is a two way conversation between employers and

employees that involves:

– Sharing information (information must be made available in a

timely way and in a form that can be understood by employees)

– Giving employees a reasonable opportunity to express their views

(employees should be encouraged to play a part in the problem

solving process), and

– Taking those views into account (employees should help to shape

decisions, not hear about them after they are made).

14Marsh

Incident Reporting

Timely

Detailed

Investigated

Escalated

Followed through

15Marsh

Monitoring and reviewHow do you know if its working?

Audit Results

Management Reporting

– Significant legal non-compliances (including non conformances and

corrective actions)

– Notifiable incidents

– Legislative changes

– Performance Indicators

Costs

16Marsh

Is this what you see?

Monitoring and reviewHow do you know if its working?

17Marsh

This is what you should also see:

– % of planned audits completed

– % of corrective actions closed out within prescribed time frames

– % of incidents reported within prescribed timeframes

– % of incidents investigated within 48 hours

– % of planned health and safety system committee meetings held

– % of managers trained in risk assessment

– % of employees inducted prior to commencing their job

Monitoring and reviewHow do you know if its working?

18Marsh

How do you protect your organisation?

Systems in place and implemented

Clear responsibilities and accountabilities

Robust review of performance and results

Cultural leadership from the top down – high visibility and participation of

senior management is critical

Insurance cover??

www.marsh.com.au

Australian Institute of Company Directors

OH&S: Issues for Directors and the Board

Harmonisation: What will it mean for corporategovernance?13 October 2009

Barry Sherriff

What we will look at today

• current OHS obligations and liabilities relevant tocorporate governance

• positive duty for officers

• other relevant changes

• what to do to comply – and should you be actingdifferently

Key to the model OHS ACT

• Removes employment as the key to duties of care andobligations

• Duties owed to a wider (clearer) class of persons

• A positive duty of care for officers and extension to theCrown

• Broader obligations for consultation and representation inthe workplace

• Much higher penalties, but numerous alternatives to fines

Current officers’ liability provisions

• differ across the jurisdictions

• who is an officer?

– Vic: s9 Corporations Act

• how can an officer be liable?

– Vic: officer guilty if offence by corporation isattributable to failure of officer to exercise reasonablecare

– Reverse onus of proof in NSW, Qld, SA and Tas

– ACT: Specific measures required

• what will be the consequences?

– Vic: Max fine now >$200k

Officers liability - now

• no current positive duty of care

• guilty only if company is guilty

• ‘attributed’ liability

• often reverse onus on the officer

• officer liability provisions nowhere near the duties owedby others (e.g. Vic s144; Qld, s167; ACT s219) – easilymissed

• inconsistent application by courts

• do current provisions

– encourage action by officers?

– let officers know how to comply or avoid liability?

Recommended officers’ duty of care

WRMC decisions on recommendations of National Review intoModel OHS Laws

• Modified s9 definition of an officer• include Crown but not Ministers

• volunteers and councillors have duties of officers but not to be prosecuted

• Officers will have a positive duty of care to exercise due diligence to ensurecompliance by the corporation

– can be guilty of an offence without an incident

– onus of proof on the prosecution

• ‘due diligence’ will not be defined, decisions by the courts will provide themeaning of the term

• The recommended definition - based on case law – may be used as a guide

Due diligence: What should officers do?

(Proposed definition)

Up-to-date knowledge of OHS

laws and compliance requirementsAn understanding of the nature

of the operations of the entityand generally the hazards and risks

associated with those operations

Ensuring appropriate resources andprocesses to enable the identification

and elimination or controlof specific OHS hazards and risks

Verification that risks and hazardsare being appropriately controlled

A process for receiving, considering andensuring a timely response to

information regarding incidents,identified hazards and risks.

Officers protection – the current position

Officers can protect themselves by:

• exercising and showing due/reasonable diligence in fulfilling theirroles (demonstrate obligations identified and responsibilitiesallocated)

• having a proper basis for believing that OHS is being properlyattended to by appropriate people

– governance, accountability, reporting, auditing, follow up etc

• having the understanding of OHS and information to be able to do this

• not ignoring obvious hazards

Same standard under model Act – but a positive duty

How does this fit with what officersordinarily do?

Isn’t this just proper and effectivegovernance?

Will OHS now be any different to otherlegal obligations of officers?

Executive and Senior Management

• Provides the direction and policy

• Authorises resources – human and financial

• Ensures framework and support systemsare in place

• Monitors performance and review throughreports (lead indicators, not just lag)

• Demonstrates leadership

• Lead by example

Management

• Identify and monitor legal obligations and compliance

• Arrange acquisition/allocation of resources

• Analysis and recommendations

• Policy and procedure development and implementation

• Involvement in strategy and action planning

• Engage in consultation

• Deal with authorities

• Ensure information, training and supervision

• Audit/incident follow up

• Demonstrate leadership

Practical impact in current economic climate

OHS compromised

• reduction in resources

– unable to do it properly

– stress and psychological injuries

• distraction from OHS to other issues

• suspension of expenditure on OHS and other initiatives(e.g. training)

• cultural ‘deterioration’ and friction between workers andmanagement

• corner cutting by suppliers of labour and inputs

Corporate governance

Leadership and governanceLeadership and governance

Policies and procedure and actionPolicies and procedure and action

• Culture

• Accountability

• Resource allocation

• Due diligence

Governance and leadership

• To govern is to drive accountability and compliance

• To lead is to make people want to join you to do it

• Either way you need personal involvement at the topsupported by useful information

• Leadership can have the greatest impact, whilegovernance provides the support (and demonstratescompliance)

Particular issues to consider

Preparing for any future changes may also allow you to assess your current levelof compliance

– Understand impact of the new primary duty of care

– Consider requirements of officers’ positive duty and review currentcorporate governance arrangements

– Understand how consultation, issue resolution, HSR provisions may impactyour business to ensure ongoing corporate compliance, for which you mustexercise due diligence

– Require a review or develop or development of policies and contractprovisions for effective and efficient compliance

– Review or develop procedures for incident response, including ensuringprivileges are available and exercised

Starting now is prudent

• Model OHS laws are no longer just a possibility

• While the detail is to be refined the key principles and keychanges have been clearly stated and agreed

• Development and effective implementation (‘take up’) takes18 months to 2 years for significant change

• Detailed requirements in regulations will also happen at thesame time – get the strategic, structural and consultationissues resolved ahead of this

35

Leading from the top

• The executive being first aware can lead and support thechanges – train them first in what is needed to be done

• The executive will be directly involved in strategic andstructural issues – critical to due diligence and their dutyof care as officers

• Then the middle management and subject matter expertscan be trained in the detailed requirements and what theywill mean

• Development, consultation and implementation, trainingand review can then take place

For further information

Contact:

[email protected] 0418.577.736

www.freehills.com

OHS Management inBoards

13 October 2009

Context

• OHS is now an issue of community concern

• Direct and indirect costs of injuries are difficult toquantify

• There is an increasing link between marketperformance and safety records

• Good OHS can provide competitive advantage

Boards have a legal obligation totake a leadership role in health

and safety

Duties of Officers in Victoria

• Officers can be responsible when a contravention by acorporation is attributable to the officer failing to takereasonable care

• In determining whether an officer has committed anoffence, regard must be had to —

(a) what the officer knew about the matter

(b) the extent of the officer's ability to make, or participate in themaking of, decisions that affectthe body corporate in relation to the matter

(c) whether it is also attributable to any other person; and

(d) any other relevant matter.

Good occupational health andsafety is good business

Roles and responsibilities

• Leadership

• Knowledge

• Responsibility

• Decision-making

• Consultation

• Oversee efficacy of OHS systems and programs

Organisational culture is driven from the

top.

Visible levels of involvement in leading

OHS strategy by the board makes a

difference to the level of importance it is

given throughout the organisation.

Thank you

AICD Directors Briefing

Question & Answer Session

AICD Directors Briefing

Thank you for your attendance.

Please complete the evaluation sheets found on yourseat to help us evaluate this event.

We look forward to seeing you at the next AICD event.

Upcoming Events:

15 October: Directors Briefing – Contribution of the Not For Profit Sector

22 October: Leaders Edge Luncheon, Professor Ian Plimer, Human Induced Climate Change

This event was Sponsored by: