29
The Story of your ORS Abstract

The Story of an Abstract

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Story of an Abstract

The Story of your ORS Abstract

Page 2: The Story of an Abstract

Please check that you have:

Correct title, Authors, Institution(s), Keywords

Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Significance, Acknowledgements, References.Disclosures

Checked all necessary boxes

Page 3: The Story of an Abstract

“You have successfully submitted an abstract”

Make sure you get confirmation of acceptance

Page 4: The Story of an Abstract

Your abstract is sent to

four (4) ORS reviewers

to be scored

Page 5: The Story of an Abstract

How many ORS reviewers are there??

Page 6: The Story of an Abstract

Which reviewers will review MY abstract??

Reviewers are assigned to review abstracts based on

the first, second and third keywords selected during submission

Page 7: The Story of an Abstract

TIP #1:

Be sure to select the “right” keywords and

the order matters, so put the most relevant first

Page 8: The Story of an Abstract

All abstracts are reviewed “blinded”

meaning = they do not include authors names

or institution(s)

**Please note, although you make think they are, no reviewers are actually blindfolded during the review process

Page 9: The Story of an Abstract

What if there is a conflict?E.g. if the reviewer is assigned an

abstract from their lab, or they know whose work it is?

Answer – the abstract will get reassigned

Page 10: The Story of an Abstract

How are abstracts scored?

1 = Innovative and Technically Excellent (should be a podium

presentation)

Tip #2 : This is what to strive for!!!!

Page 11: The Story of an Abstract

2 = Solid Work

3= Acceptable

4 = Exclude (bottom 25%)

Page 12: The Story of an Abstract

After all 4 reviews have been received, the mean score is

calculated

Page 13: The Story of an Abstract

Now the Topic Chairs do their work -

Selecting the highest scored andmost innovative abstracts and organizing them into podium sessions

Page 14: The Story of an Abstract

Podium sessions are created from abstracts scoring

“1.0” to “2.0”

Page 15: The Story of an Abstract

What happens if my abstract is

accepted, but not as a podium

presentation?

Page 16: The Story of an Abstract

It is presented as a POSTER

Page 17: The Story of an Abstract

Program Meeting Day

The Program Committee meets for 2 days to review all suggested

podium presentations and lays them out hour-by-hour, day-by-day

Page 18: The Story of an Abstract
Page 19: The Story of an Abstract

The committee tries to avoid conflicts in the program between authors and institutions to ensure

they are not scheduled in the same session, or in the same time slot

Page 20: The Story of an Abstract

The committee also checks for multiple abstracts from the same group that are very similar, but happen to have different titles.

These are either rejected or the group is asked to combine them

Tip #3 Best to avoid this altogether.

The committee is pretty smart.

Page 21: The Story of an Abstract

Finished!!

Page 22: The Story of an Abstract

After the Program is finalized it is entered into our system

Your contact person is sent your acceptance or rejection notice

Page 23: The Story of an Abstract
Page 24: The Story of an Abstract

Tip #4 – if your abstract is rejectedtry again next year.

Page 25: The Story of an Abstract

Tip #5

Be sure that the CONTACT person for your abstract actually contacts YOU when they

get the notification

Page 26: The Story of an Abstract

Tip #6

If your CONTACT moves to another institution, or gets a new email address – be sure to inform us

Bess -

Page 27: The Story of an Abstract

Tip #7

Register for the meeting

Bess -

Page 28: The Story of an Abstract

Tip #8

If you are not a member of the ORS -JOIN!

http://www.ors.org/membership/

Bess -

Page 29: The Story of an Abstract

See you in San Antonio!

Bess -