62
1

The spot sign

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Haemorrhagic stroke is an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Of the complications of this type of stroke, haematoma expansion is one of the most important, common and dangerous. The spot sign helps to predict haematoma expansion in patients of haemorrhagic stroke.

Citation preview

Page 1: The  spot  sign

1

Page 2: The  spot  sign

2

THE SPOT SIGN

DR. QUAMRUDDIN AHMADDEPARTMENT OF NEUROLOGYRAJSHAHI MEDICAL COLLEGE

Page 3: The  spot  sign

3

Spontaneous or Primary Intracerebral Haemorrhage

• Accounting for 10 – 30% of first - ever strokes.

• The 30 day mortality for ICH has been reported to be 30 – 55%, with

• Half the deaths occurring in the acute phase, especially in the first 48 h.

Page 4: The  spot  sign

4

COMPLICATIONS OF INTRA CEREBRAL HAEMORRHAGE

1. Haematoma Expansion (HE),2. Perihaematomal Oedema (PHE), 3. Intraventricular Extension of

Haemorrhage (IVH) with Hydrocephalus,4. Seizures and Epilepsy,5. Venous Thromboembolic Events (VTE), 6. Fever and Infections,7. Hyperglycaemia, and8. Increased Blood Pressure (BP).

Page 5: The  spot  sign

5

Haematoma Expansion (HE)

• Defined as an increase in volume of 33 – 50% or an absolute change in haematoma volume of 12.5 – 20 mL (on repeat CT),

• Early HE occurs in 18–38% of patients scanned within 3 h of ICH onset, and more than 70% develop at least some extent of HE within 24 h of symptom onset, even in the absence of known coagulopathy, suggesting an active bleeding process in the hyperacute phase of ICH.

COMPLICATIONS OF ICH1. Haematoma Expansion (HE),2. Perihaematomal Oedema (PHE),3. Intraventricular Extension of Hge (IVH) with Hydrocephalus,4. Seizures and Epilepsy, 5. Venous Thromboembolic Events (VTE), 6. Fever and Infections,7. Hyperglycaemia,8. Increased Blood Pressure (BP),

Page 6: The  spot  sign

6

Haematoma Expansion (HE)(contd.)

• In warfarin-associated ICH, 27–54% of patients develop early HE and a delayed expansion because of protracted bleeding,

• It is associated with up to 70% increase in mortality.

• HE is an independent predictor of poor outcome and increased mortality.

Page 7: The  spot  sign

7

Haematoma Expansion (HE)

• Findings from a meta-analysis of 218 patients with ICH who had CT scans within 3 h of onset and follow-up scans within 24 h showed that for every 10% increase in ICH growth there was a 5% increased risk of death, a 16% increased risk of worsening outcome as measured with the modified Rankin score (mRS), and an 18% increased likelihood of being dependent or of a poor outcome on the Barthel index.

Page 8: The  spot  sign

8

• Hyperacute expansion of haematoma in a patient with intracerebral hge on serial CT scans. Small haematoma detected in the basal ganglia and thalamus (A). Expansion of haematoma after 151 min (B). Continued progression of haematoma after another 82 min (C). Stabilisation of haematoma after another 76 min (D).

A B

C D

Page 9: The  spot  sign

9

• Progression of haema-toma and perihaema-tomal oedema in a patient with ICH on serial CT scans. First scan (E) was acquired before the ICH. Perihaematoma oedema is high-lighted in green to facilitate recognition of progression of oedema. At 4 h after symptom onset there is a small haematoma in the basal ganglia (F). Expansion of haema-toma with extension into the lateral ventricle and new mass effect and midline shift at 14 h (G). Worsening hydrocephalus and early perihaematomal oedema at 28 h (H). Continued mass-effect with prominent perihaematomal oedema at 73 h (I). Resolving haematoma with more prominent perihaematomal oedema at 7 days (J).

E F G

H I J

Page 10: The  spot  sign

10

Haematoma Expansion (HE)

ManagementInterventions to restrict HE include:

* haemostatic therapy,

* cautious lowering of high BP,

* quick reversal of prior

anticoagulation, and

* surgical evacuation.

Page 11: The  spot  sign

11

HOW TO

PREDICT

HAEMATOMA

EXPANSION ?

Page 12: The  spot  sign

12

THE THE

SPOT SPOT

SIGNSIGN

Page 13: The  spot  sign

13

The Spot Sign• Defined as the presence of active

contrast extravasation into the hematoma at the time of multi-detector CT angiography (MDCTA).

• The ‘spot sign’ is a bright spot of 1 to 2 mm focus of enhancement within a hematoma on the CT angiographic axial source and multiplanar reformatted (MPR) images as assessed by simple visual inspection.

Page 14: The  spot  sign

14

The Spot Sign

It is an indicator of active hemorrhage and has been associated with an increased risk of significant hematoma expansion and mortality in patients with ICH.

Page 15: The  spot  sign

• Baseline noncontrast CT shows heterogeneous right deep parenchymal hemorrhage (A). • Subsequent CT angiography demonstrates hematoma progression with significant enlargement and new intraventricular extension. A small focus of enhancement is seen within the lesion consistent with spot sign (B) (arrow). • Control noncontrast CT shows increased size of the hemorrhage with substantial mass effect, subfalcine herniation, and midline shift (C).

Page 16: The  spot  sign

16

CT scan of an 83-year-old woman with acute onset of left sided weakness. (A–D) Nonenhanced CT (contiguous 5 mm slices shown) with a right fronto-parietal hemorrhage. (E–L) CT angiogram (contiguous 0.625 mm slices shown) with normal cerebral vascular enhancement and a punctuate focus of intrahematomal contrast (arrow) – spot sign. (M–P) Nonenhanced CT (contiguous 5 mm slices shown) performed 1 hour later with evidence of hematoma expansion.

Page 17: The  spot  sign

17

MDCTA – Multidetector CT Angiography

• MDCTA is rapidly becoming the favored diagnostic examination in the initial evaluation of patients presenting to the emergency department with ICH, due to its: – widespread availability, – rapidity of acquisition, – lower cost, and – favorable risk profile compared with

conventional catheter angiography,

Page 18: The  spot  sign

18

MDCTA – Multidetector CT Angiography

• MDCTA is highly accurate for the detection of underlying vascular lesions in patients with ICH, with reported sensitivities ranging from 89% to 96% and specificities of 92% to 100%.

Page 19: The  spot  sign

19

MULTI - DETECTORCT ANGIOGRAPHY (MDCTA)

• MDCTA is performed by scanning from the base of the C1 vertebral body to the vertex using an axial technique, 0.5 pitch, 1.25-mm collimation, 350 maximal mA, 120 kVp, 22-cm field of view, and 65 to 85 mL of iodinated contrast material administered by power injector at 4 to 5 mL per second into an antecubital vein with either a fixed 25-second delay between the onset of contrast injection and the start of scanning, or Smart-Prep, a semiautomatic contrast bolus triggering technique.

Page 20: The  spot  sign

20

MULTI - DETECTORCT ANGIOGRAPHY (MDCTA)

• Subsequently, the 1.25-mm axial CTA source images is reviewed in “spot windows” (width 200, level 110) to determine the presence of active contrast extravasation, the spot sign, according to the following strict radiological criteria:

Page 21: The  spot  sign

21

The Spot Sign Score in Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage Identifies Patients at Highest Risk of In-Hospital Mortality and Poor Outcome Among Survivors. Stroke 2010;41:54-60.

• Spot Sign Criteria–1 focus of contrast pooling within

the ICH,

–Attenuation 120 Hounsfield units,

–Discontinuous from normal or abnormal vasculature adjacent to the ICH,

–Any size and morphology.

Page 22: The  spot  sign

22

A 64-year-old woman presented with the ‘worst headache of her life’ followed by obtundation. (A) Non-contrast CT (NCCT) scan showing a left inferior frontal ICH (24.8 ml) with associated intraventricular hge (55 ml) and SAH in the basal cisterns. (B) CT angiogram source image in spot windows showing an aneurysm of the A2 segment of the right anterior cerebral artery (arrowhead) with a separate focus of contrast pooling within the intracerebral hge (arrow), consistent with a spot sign. (C) Follow-up NCCT scan 3.5 h after the baseline CT angiogram showing marked interval increase in the size of the intracerebral hemorrhage (72.6 ml) and the intraventricular hemorrhage (215.2 ml). The patient died shortly after the follow-up NCCT scan.

Page 23: The  spot  sign

23

A 67-year-old man on warfarin therapy for atrial fibrillation and daily aspirin intake presents with syncope and increasingunresponsiveness (admission INR, 2.7). A, NCCT demonstrates a right thalamic ICH (24 mL) with associated IVH (6 mL). B, Axial CTA source image in spot windows demonstrates 3 foci of contrast pooling within the ICH (arrowheads), consistent with spot signs. The largest spot sign measures 10 mm in maximum axial dimension. C, Delayed CTA acquisition 48 seconds after the first-pass CTA shows that the spot signs increased in volume and changed in morphology (arrowheads). D, NCCT 8 hours after the baseline CTA demonstrates marked interval expansion of both the ICH (94 mL) and IVH (82 mL). The patient died shortly after the follow-up NCCT.

Page 24: The  spot  sign

24

● A 69-year-old man underwent imaging 2 hours following onset of right-sided paralysis. ● A, Admission NCCT demonstrates left thalamic hematoma with extension of hge into the third ventricle.● Admission CTA (B) and CECT (C), respectively, show 2 foci of active extravasation (arrows). ● D, Follow-up NCCT 12 hours later shows marked hematoma growth with hemorrhage in both lateral ventricles and severe hydrocephalus. ● The patient had a fatal outcome.

Page 25: The  spot  sign

25

A B

C D

CT angiogram showing contrast extravasation

Arrowheads indicate contrast extravasation.

Spot-sign score:

1 (A), 2 (B), 3(C), and

4 (D).

The spot-sign score, which is used to grade the number of spot signs and their maximum dimensions and attenuation, is the strongest predictor of HE and is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality and poor outcome in people with ICH.

Page 26: The  spot  sign

26

Calculation of the Spot Sign Score

• Spot Sign Characteristic* Points No. of spot signs 1– 2 1 3 2

• Maximum axial dimension 1– 4 mm 0 5 mm 1

• Maximum attenuation 120–179 HU 0 180 HU 1

* The spot sign characterization is performed in the first CTA acquisition in which a spot sign is identified. For CTAs with more than 1 spot sign, the maximum dimension in a single axial CTA source image and maximum attenuation of the largest spot sign is determined. The spot sign score is obtained by adding the total No. of points for the CTA.

HU indicates Hounsfield unit; CTA, CT angiogram.

Page 27: The  spot  sign

27

• Patient with spot sign, demonstrating extravasation and hematoma expansion. CT slice selection has been optimized for hematoma configuration, not for head position.

• A, Unenhanced CT demonstrates left posterior putaminal and internal capsule hematoma with mild surrounding edema. An old parieto-occipital infarct is seen posterior to this.

• B, A small focus of enhancement is seen peripherally on CTA source images, consistent with the spot sign (black arrow).

• C, Postcontrast CT demonstrates enlargement of the spot sign, consistent with extravasation (white arrow).

• D, Unenhanced CT image 1 day after presentation reveals hematoma enlargement and intraventricular hemorrhage.

Page 28: The  spot  sign

28

● An 85-year-old woman underwent imaging 1 hour following onset of left-sided weakness.● A, Admission NCCT demonstrates hemorrhage in the right superior frontal gyrus.● B, Admission CTA conspicuously reveals a focal area of high attenuation (arrow) within the hematoma consistent with active extravasation (spot sign).● C, Admission CECT shows a slightly heterogeneous right frontal hematoma with several areas of higher attenuation, frequently seen with acute hemorrhage, which were not interpreted by the reviewer as discrete foci of contrast extravasation (as a reminder, the reviewer evaluated CTA and CECT images separately from each other). This patient survived.

Page 29: The  spot  sign

29

An 82-year-old man underwent imaging 0.5 hours following onset of right-sided weakness. Admission NCCT (A) and CTA (B) demonstrate hge in the left midbrain without active extravasation on CTA. C, Admission CECT, however, reveals focal high attenuation (arrow) in the left tectal plate, consistent with active extravasation. D, Follow-up NCCT 17 hours later shows hematoma expansion into the left thalamus and lateral ventricle with marked hydrocephalus. The patient had a fatal outcome.

Page 30: The  spot  sign

30

41-year-old female with a micro AVM. A, NCCT demonstrates centrum semiovale hematoma (white asterisk).B, A punctate focus of enhancement (white arrow) representing a pseudo-aneurysm (white arrow) on CTA axial source images mimics a CTA spot sign. C, A vessel is clearly seenextending from the lateral ventricular surface to the hematoma periphery and communicates with the focal spot of enhancement on coronal MPR image (black arrow). D, AP Oblique conventionalangiographic image demons-trates a micro AVM with pseu-doaneurysm (black arrow) fed by branches of the anterior cerebral artery and draining to the lateral ventricular vein.

* Discontinuous from normal or abnormal vasculature adjacent to the ICH

Page 31: The  spot  sign

31

55-year-old male with moya moya. An enhancing focus is seen in the inferior Basal Ganglia/Nucleus accumbens consistent with a pseudoaneurysm (white arrow) arising from a lenticulostriate artery (white arrowhead) on (A) CTA source, (B) coronal MPR, and (C) saggital MPR images. The lenticulostriate vessel lies peripheral to the hematoma only contacting it at the site of pseudoaneurysm. Intraventricular hemorrhage and hydrocephalus incidentally noted.(Discontinuous from normal or abnormal vasculature adjacent to the ICH)

Page 32: The  spot  sign

32

A 53-year-old female patient presenting at 140 minutes. Baseline noncontrast CT (NCCT; A) demonstrates a right basal ganglia hge with mass effect on the right lateral ventricle and subfalcine herniation. Intraventricular hge (IVH) is seen within the bilateral occipital horns, right frontal horn, and third and fourth (not shown) ventricles (Graeb score 6). B, Coronal CTA reformats demonstrate a peripheral region of contrast extravasation inferiorly within the hematoma consistent with the CTA spot sign (arrow).`

Page 33: The  spot  sign

33

Graeb ScoreIntraventricular Hematoma

Components• Each lateral ventricle

– 1 = trace of blood – 2 = less than 50% filled – 3 = more than 50% filled – 4 = completely filled and expanded

• 3th and 4th ventricles– 0 = no blood – 1 = blood present, size normal – 2 = filled with blood and expanded

Calculation• Graeb score = right ventricular score + left ventricular

score + 3rd ventricular score + 4th ventricular score.

Hwang BY, Bruce SS, Appelboom G, Piazza MA, Carpenter AM, Gigante PR, et al. Evaluation of intraventricular hemorrhage assessment methods for predicting outcome following intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 2012; 116:185-192.

Page 34: The  spot  sign

34

A 67-year-old male patient with a history of hypertension presented with blood pressure of 200/100 mm Hg and a right thalamic intracerebral hge on noncontrast head CT (A). (B) CTA revealed no CTA spot sign.

Page 35: The  spot  sign

35

A 66-year-old male patient presents with acute right-sided weakness and urinary incontinence. A, Baseline noncontrast CT (NCCT) demonstrates 20-cm3 left parieto-occipital lobar hematoma with adjacent intraventricular hge within the left lateral ventricle and along the falcotentorial reflection (arrowhead). B, Coronal CTA reformat shows a solitary contrast density within the superior hematoma consistent with the CTA spot sign (white arrow). Linear density below represents partial voluming of cortical vessel.(C–D) Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and multiplanar gradient recalled echo 4 days later demonstrates an increase in hematoma size measured at 29 cm3 consistent with hematoma enlargement. Intraventricular hge is also increased (asterisk) in size. Subarachnoid and falcotentorial blood (arrowheads) is demonstrated but no microbleeds were present.

C

Page 36: The  spot  sign

36

A 44-year-old woman presented with headache and right sided weakness.(A) Non-contrast CT scan showing a left parietal intracerebral hge (18.4 ml) with a small associated left frontal subdural hge. (B) Coronal maximum intensity projection image of CT angiogram in spot windows showing a left parietal arteriovenous fistula (arrowheads) with a separate small focus of contrast pooling within the intracerebral hge (arrow), consistent with a spot sign. The patient underwent endovascular embolization of the arteriovenous fistula and was discharged home 9 days after admission.

Page 37: The  spot  sign

37

38-year-old male with a right frontal oligodendroglioma. A, NCCT demonstrates punctuate peripheral calcification, (white arrow) within the hematoma (white asterisk). B, Hyperdensity apparent on CTA axial source images – the spot sign.

Page 38: The  spot  sign

38

A 53-year-old man was admitted with SAH and a right temporal ICH adjacent to the sylvian fissure (A and C; the first CT). Initially, his clinical condition was stable, with a GCS score of E3M6V3 and a left-sided paralysis. A few hours later, the patient had to be intubated because of sudden neurologic deterioration accompanied by progressive respiratory failure. Subsequent CTA (E and F) showed active extravasation; the arrow indicates contrast leakage into the hematoma from a middle cerebral artery aneurysm into the expanding ICH (B and D, second CT). His neurologic condition worsened to a GCS score of E1M1Vtube with bilateral, fixed, dilated pupils and brainstem dysfunction, and he died soon after admission.

Page 39: The  spot  sign

39

Axial non-contrast CT on admission (a) showed a large parenchymal haema-toma in the right frontotemporal lobe.(b–d) Coronal reformats of dynamic CT angiography (dCTA) in arterial and late venous phase (44 s) showed develop-ment of an area of ‘‘spot sign’’ (arrow in c).

a b C Dynamic CT angiography (dCTA) demonstrates temporal wash-in and wash-out of intravenous contrast material over a chosen temporal resolution. This allows temporal visualisation of contrast flowing through vessels. dCTA is a non-invasive technique to acquire a time series of bone subtracted or unsubtracted CT angiogram images of the whole brain, thus removing timing uncertainties found in typical static CT angiogram images. This approach also provides temporal flow information.

Page 40: The  spot  sign

40

Axial dCTA images in arterial (d) and late venous phase (e)(49 s) shows development of another two areas of contrast extravasation (arrows). An axial CT image on day 2 (f) shows expansion of the haematoma with intraventricular hge.

d e f

Page 41: The  spot  sign

41Oblique sagittal sections of the dynamic CT angiography (dCTA) sequence show the evolution of ‘‘spot signs’’ at (a) 34 s, (b) 39 s, (c) 44 s, (d) 49 s and (e) 60 s. (f) Post-contrast brain immediately following dCTA at the level of superior ‘‘spot sign’’ shows fading of the superior ‘‘spots’’.

a b c

d e f

Page 42: The  spot  sign

42

The Spot Sign Score in Primary Intracerebral Hge Identifies Patients at Highest Risk of In-Hospital Mortality and Poor Outcome Among Survivors. Stroke 2010;41:54-60.

• Spot signs were identified in 133 of 573 CTAs (23.2%), 11 of which were delayed spot signs (8.3%).

• The presence of any spot sign increased the risk of in-hospital mortality (55.6%, OR 4.0, 95% CI 2.6 to 5.9, P<0.0001) and poor outcome among survivors at 3-month follow-up (50.8%, OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4 to 4.3, P<0.0014). The spot sign score successfully predicted an escalating risk of both outcome measures.

• In multivariate analysis, the spot sign score was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.9, P<0.0002) and poor outcome among survivors at 3-month follow-up (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.1, P<0.0065).

Page 43: The  spot  sign

43

Systematic Characterization of the Computed Tomography Angiography Spot Sign in Primary ICH Identifies Patients at Highest Risk for Hematoma Expansion: The Spot Sign Score. Stroke 2009;40:2994-3000.

• Spot signs were identified in 71 of 367 CT angiograms (19%), 6 of which were delayed spot signs (8%). The presence of any spot sign increased the risk of significant hematoma expansion (69%, OR=92, P<0.0001).

• Among the spot sign characteristics examined, the presence of ≥3 spot signs, a maximum axial dimension ≥5 mm, and maximum attenuation ≥180 Hounsfield units were independent predictors of significant hematoma expansion, and these were subsequently used to construct the spot sign score.

• In multivariate analysis, the spot sign score was the strongest predictor of significant hematoma expansion, independent of time from ictus to CT angiogram evaluation.

• Conclusion— The spot sign score predicts significant hematoma expansion in primary intracerebral hemorrhage. If validated in other data sets, it could be used to select patients for early hemostatic

therapy.

Page 44: The  spot  sign

44

The Spot Sign in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: The Importance of Looking for Contrast Extravasation. Cerebrovasc Dis 2010;29:217-220.

• 28 patients of spontaneous ICH who presented within 4 hours were studied with CTA.

• 11/27 (40.7%) had a positive spot sign and 13/22 (59.1%) had CE. • Contrast extravasation (CE) is seen on routine head CT following

CTA as pooling of contrast within the hematoma. • Both the spot sign and CE were associated with ICH growth (p <

0.001) and poor outcome (p < 0.001). • Conclusions: In ICH patients, the presence of the spot sign or CE is

highly correlated with early ICH growth. CE is a more sensitive predictor of ICH growth with a better negative predictive value than the spot sign; CE is more consistently identified even by experienced clinicians. Post contrast CT should be done routinely after CTA in patients presenting with ICH within 4 h.

• Patients who are CE-positive may be candidates for hemostatic therapies or early surgical intervention.

Page 45: The  spot  sign

45

CT angiography spot sign predicts in-hospital mortality in patients with secondary intracerebral hemorrhage. J NeuroIntervent Surg doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010061.

• Spot signs were identified in 31 of 215 patients with SICH (14.4%), four of which were delayed spot signs (12.9%). Spot signs were most common in patients with arteriovenous fistulas (42%), Moyamoya (40%), elevated admission blood glucose (23%) and large intraventricular hemorrhage volumes (29%).

• Spot signs were most predictive of in-hospital mortality in patients with aneurysms of the anterior cerebral artery (100%) and anterior communicating artery (75%).

• In univariate analysis, the presence of a spot sign significantly increased the risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with SICH (38.7%, OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0 to 4.9, p=0.0497). However, in multivariate logistic regression analysis the admission Glasgow Coma Scale was the only independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with SICH (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.6 to 5.1, p=0.0004).

Page 46: The  spot  sign

46

Contrast Extravasation on CT Predicts Mortality in Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:520–25.

56 patients of Primary ICH were studied.• Of these, spot sign was seen in 17.9% (10/56) of patients

on initial CTA and contrast extravasation in 23.2% (13/56) of patients on initial CECT following CTA. Univariate analysis showed that increased mortality was associated with– the presence of extravasation on CT, – large initial hematoma size (30 mL), – the presence of “swirl sign” on NCCT, – the Glasgow Coma Scale and ICH scores, and – international normalized ratio.

• On multivariate analysis, only contrast extravasation on CT (P =.017) independently predicted mortality.

• Contrast extravasation on CT (P =.001) was also an independent predictor of hematoma growth on multivariate analysis.

Page 47: The  spot  sign

47

Contrast Extravasation on Computed Tomography Angiography Predicts Clinical Outcome in Primary ICH A Prospective Study of 139 Cases. Stroke 2011;42:3441-3446.

A total of 139 patients with primary intracerebral hge were analyzed. Contrast extravasation occurred in 30 (21.6%) patients. The presence of contrast extravasation was associated with

– increased hematoma expansion (P<0.0001), – in-hospital mortality (P=0.008), – prolonged hospital stay (P=0.006), – poor outcome on discharge (P=0.025), – increased 3-month mortality (P=0.009), and – poor clinical outcome (P<0.0001).

In multivariate analysis, contrast extravasation was a promising independent predictor for 90-day poor clinical outcome followed by the presence of intraventricular hge and initial hematoma volume.

Conclusions—The presence of contrast extravasation on multidetector CT angiography in patients with hyperacute-stage intracerebral hemorrhage is an independent and strong factor associated with poor outcome. Any patient with intracerebral hemorrhage with such sign on multidetector CT angiography should be monitored intensely and treated accordingly.

Page 48: The  spot  sign

48

Postcontrast CT Extravasation Is Associated With Hematoma Expansion in CTA Spot Negative Patients. Stroke. 2009; 40: 1672-1676.

• A retrospective study of 61 patients presenting within 6 hours of primary ICH onset imaged with CT angiography (CTA) and (Post Contrast CT) PCCT. Presence of CTA spot sign and PCL (Post contrast leakage) were documented. PCL was defined as the presence of contrast extravasation on the PCCT study at a location remote from the CTA spot sign if present.

• PCL was present in 11/61 patients (18%), occurring in 5 without a spot sign (45%). Spot negative PCL patients demonstrated larger absolute (P=0.02) and percentage hematoma growth (P=0.02) compared to those without PCL. The mean volume and percent increase was 6.7 mL and 26%, respectively. Inclusion of PCL together with CTA spot sign as risk factor for hematoma expansion increased sensitivity from 0.78 (95% CI; 0.52 to 0.94) to 0.94 (95% CI; 0.72 to 1.00) and NPV from 0.90 (95% CI; 0.76 to 0.97) to 0.97 (95% CI; 0.85 to 1.00).

• Conclusion— Inclusion of PCCT in the investigation of ICH patients allows detection of PCL which, together with the CTA spot sign, increases sensitivity and negative predictive value for predicting hematoma expansion. This finding should be validated in larger studies.

Page 49: The  spot  sign

49

Early Rate of Contrast Extravasation in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage.AJNR 2011;32:1879-1884.

• CT was performed at admission and at 24 hours for 16 patients with ICH with/without contrast extravasation seen on CTA and post–contrast-enhanced CT (PCCT).

• Hematoma volume increased from 34.1 ± 41.0 mL to 40.2 ± 46.1 mL in extravasation-positive patients and decreased from 19.8 ± 31.8 mL to 17.4 ± 27.3 mL in extravasation-negative patients.

Page 50: The  spot  sign

50

CT Angiography “Spot Sign” Predicts Hematoma Expansion in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke 2007;38:1257-1262.

The Diagnostic Performance Measures Of Spot Sign For Hematoma Expansion.

Sensitivity, % (95% CI)

Specificity, % (95% CI)

PPV, % (95% CI)

NPV, % (95% CI)

+LR

(95% CI)

−LR (95% CI)

Spot sign 91 %

(62–100)

89 %

(72–96)

77 %

(50–92)

96 %

(81–99)

8.5

(2.9–25)

0.1

(.02–0.7)

Extrava-sation (CE)

45 %

(21–72)

96 %

(82–100)

83 %

(43–99)

81 %

(66–91)

12.7

(1.7–97)

0.6

(0.3–0.9)

Anticoa-gulation

45 (21–72) 79 (63–94) 79 (61–90) 45 (21–72) 2 (0.8–5.5)

0.7 (0.4–1.2)

MAP >120 mm Hg

36 (15–65) 61 (42–76) 27 (11–52 71 (51–85) 0.9 (0.4–2.3)

1.0 (0.6–1.8)

History of hypertension

54 (28–79) 57 (39–73) 33 (16–56) 76 (54–89) 1.3 (0.6–2.5)

0.8 (0.4–1.6)

Glucose >8.3 18 (5–48) 71 (53–85) 20 (5–51) 69 (51–83) 0.6 (0.2–2.5)

1.1 (0.8–1.6)

PPV indicates positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; and LR, likelihood ratio, the preferred way to represent a single summary result of a diagnostic test. It estimates the posttest odds of an outcome (significant increase in ICH volume) changed relative to the pretest odds.

Page 51: The  spot  sign

51

Prediction of haematoma growth and outcome in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage using the CT-angiography spot sign (PREDICT): a prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:307–14.

Sensi-tivity

Speci-ficity

PPV NPV Mortality

CTA spot sign

positive

60 % 90% 73 % 84 % 43.4%

(23 of 53)

Contrast Extravasation

50 % 85 % 58 % 80 %

CTA Spot sign negative

19.6%

(31 of 158)

268 patients were enrolled in 12 centres in six countries from June 24, 2006, to Sept 6, 2010. No adverse events were reported directly attributable to the CT angiogram.

Diagnostic Performance Measures for an haematoma expansion >6 mL or >33%

Page 52: The  spot  sign

52

Accuracy of the Spot Sign for the Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality and Poor Outcome Among Survivors in Primary ICH

Accuracy In-Hospital Poor Outcome*

Parameter______Mortality (95% CI) (95% CI) ______

Sensitivity 41% (34–49) 23 % (17–32)

Specificity 85 % (81–88) 89 % (85–92)

PPV 56 % (47–64) 51 % (38–64)

NPV 76 % (72–80) 70 % (65–75)

Positive LR 2.7 (2.0–3.7) 2.2 (1.4–3.4)

Negative LR 0.69 (0.61–0.78) 0.86 (0.78–0.95)

Accuracy 71 % 67 %

Prevalence 31 % 33 %

For sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and prevalence, the numbers in the table represent percentages. The numbers in parenthesis represent the 95% CI. *Defined as a modified Rankin Scale of 4 at 3-month follow-up among the 393 survivors. ICH indicates intracerebral hemorrhage; CI, confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; LR, likelihood ratio.

Page 53: The  spot  sign

53

CONCLUSION

• The Spot Sign is a potentially promising sign for predicting hematoma expansion.

• This sign may play a role in patient selection for clinical trials of acute hemostatic therapy or surgical interventions aimed at minimizing hematoma growth.

• Correct recognition of the sign and exclusion of secondary ICH causes will be crucial to the success of such studies.

Page 54: The  spot  sign

CONCLUSION• Clinicians should be aware of the Spot

Sign mimics, classified as either vascular or nonvascular. Nonvascular causes are easily distinguished with NCCT but may be misinterpreted as contrast density in its absence.

• The presence of a vessel extending from brain or ventricular surface into a hematoma strongly suggests the presence of underlying vascular malformation.

54

Page 55: The  spot  sign

55

TAKE HOME MESSAGE• CT Angiogram can be done immediately

after an intracerebral hemorrahage.• Spot sign should be specifically looked

for in a CT angiogram.• After a CTA, a post contrast CT of the

Brain should be done to detect the presence of Contrast Extravasation.

• Presence of Spot Sign or Contrast Extravasation predicts poor outcome and such patients should be vigorously treated.

Page 56: The  spot  sign

THANK YOU

56

Page 57: The  spot  sign

57

REFERENCES1. The Spot Sign in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: The Importance of Looking

for Contrast Extravasation. Cerebrovasc Dis 2010;29:217-220.

2. The Spot Sign Score in Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage Identifies Patients at Highest Risk of In-Hospital Mortality and Poor Outcome Among Survivors. Stroke 2010;41:54-60.

3. Contrast Extravasation on CT Predicts Mortality in Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:520–25.

4. CT Angiography “Spot Sign” Predicts Hematoma Expansion in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke 2007;38:1257-1262.

5. Systematic Characterization of the Computed Tomography Angiography Spot Sign in Primary ICH Identifies Patients at Highest Risk for Hematoma Expansion: The Spot Sign Score. Stroke 2009;40:2994-3000.

6. CT angiography spot sign predicts in-hospital mortality in patients with secondary intracerebral hemorrhage. J NeuroIntervent Surg doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010061.

7. Contrast Extravasation on Computed Tomography Angiography Predicts Clinical Outcome in Primary ICH: A Prospective Study of 139 Cases. Stroke 2011;42:3441-3446.

Page 58: The  spot  sign

58

REFERENCES8. Early Rate of Contrast Extravasation in Patients with Intracerebral

Hemorrhage. AJNR 2011;32:1879-1884.9. Intracerebral haemorrhage. Lancet 2009;373:1632-644.10. Diagnostic Accuracy and Yield of Multidetector CT Angiography in the

Evaluation of Spontaneous Intraparenchymal Cerebral Hemorrhage. Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1213–221.

11. Early Rate of Contrast Extravasation in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage. AJNR 2011 32: 1879-1884.

12. Options to Restrict Hematoma Expansion After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke 2010;41:402-409.

13. Spot sign and live-imaged dramatic intracerebral hematoma expansion. Neurology 2010;75;834.

14. Postcontrast CT Extravasation Is Associated With Hematoma Expansion in CTA Spot Negative Patients. Stroke 2009; 40: 1672-1676.

15. Vascular and Nonvascular Mimics of the CT Angiography ''Spot Sign'' in Patients With Secondary Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke 2008, 39:1177-1183.

16. Dynamic nature of the CT angiographic ‘‘spot sign’’. The British Journal of Radiology 2010;83:e216–e219.

Page 59: The  spot  sign

59

REFERENCES17. Diagnostic cerebral angiography in spontaneous intracranial

haemorrhage: a guide for developing countries. Asian J Surg 2005;28(1):1-6.

18. Radiological Investigation of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Systematic Review and Trinational Survey. Stroke 2010; 41: 685-690.

19. The risk of recurrent stroke after intracerebral haemorrhage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78:836–840.

20. Natural History of Perihematomal Edema After Intracerebral Hemorrhage Measured by Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Stroke 2011;42:73-80.

21. Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage : A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2010, 41:2108-2129.

22. Prediction of haematoma growth and outcome in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage using the CT-angiography spot sign (PREDICT): a prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:307–14.

Page 60: The  spot  sign

60

Definitions of Classes and Levels of Evidence Used in AHA Stroke Council Recommendations

Class I Conditions for which there is evidence for and/or general agreement that the procedure or treatment is useful and effective

Class II Conditions for which there is conflicting evidence and/or a divergence of opinion about the usefulness/efficacy of a procedure or Treatment

Class IIa: the weight of evidence or opinion is in favor of the procedure or treatment

Class IIb: usefulness/efficacy is less well established by evidence or opinion

Class III Conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that the procedure or treatment is not useful/effective and in some cases may be harmful

Therapeutic recommendations: Level of EvidenceLevel of Evidence A

Data derived from multiple randomized clinical trials

Evidence B Data derived from a single randomized trial or nonrandomized studies

Evidence C Consensus opinion of experts

Diagnostic / prognostic recommendations: Level of EvidenceLevel of Evidence A

Data derived from multiple prospective cohort studies using a reference standard applied by a masked evaluator

Level of Evidence B

Data derived from a single grade A study or 1 case-control studies or studies using a

reference standard applied by an unmasked Evaluator

Evidence C Consensus opinion of experts

Page 61: The  spot  sign

61

Diagnostic Accuracy and Yield of Multidetector CT Angiography in the Evaluation of Spontaneous Intraparenchymal Cerebral Hemorrhage. Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1213–221.`

• A study of 623 patients with ICH examined with MDCTA identified clinical and NCCT characteristics that independently predicted an increased incidence of a vascular lesion as the ICH etiology: – age younger than 46 years (47%), – neither known hypertension nor impaired coagulation

at presentation (33%), – lobar (20%) or infratentorial (16%) ICH location, and– female sex (18%).

Page 62: The  spot  sign

62

Prediction of haematoma growth and outcome in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage using the CT-angiography spot sign (PREDICT): a prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:307–14.

• 268 patients were enrolled in 12 centres in six countries from June 24, 2006, to Sept 6, 2010. No adverse events were reported directly attributable to the CT angiogram.

• For an haematoma expansion >6 mL or >33%, the PPV for the CTA spot sign was 73%, and the NPV was 84%, with 63% sensitivity and 90% specificity. For haematoma expansion, contrast extravasation assessed by site investigator had a PPV of 58%, NPV of 80%, 50% sensitivity, and 85% specificity.

• Mortality at 3 months was 43.4% (23 of 53) in the CTA spot-sign positive group versus 19.6% (31 of 158) in the CTA spot-sign negative group (age-adjusted hazard ratio, HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4–4.0; p=0.002). The association between CTA spot-sign positive group and mortality remained significant in a sensitivity analysis whether patients lost to follow-up were assigned a mRS of 0 or 6. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed an early difference in mortality between CTA spot-sign positive and CTA spot-sign negative groups, which was sustained during the follow-up period (p=0.0006).