32
San Antonio Breast Cancer San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy Radiotherapy Kathleen C. Horst, M.D. Kathleen C. Horst, M.D. Assistant Professor Assistant Professor Department of Radiation Department of Radiation Oncology Oncology Stanford University Stanford University

San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

Kathleen C. Horst, M.D.Kathleen C. Horst, M.D.

Assistant ProfessorAssistant ProfessorDepartment of Radiation OncologyDepartment of Radiation Oncology

Stanford UniversityStanford University

Page 2: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

Post-lumpectomy XRTTechniqueFractionationPartial Breast Irradiation

Post-mastectomy XRT

Nodal XRT

Page 3: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

The Cambridge Breast Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) Trial: Dosimetry Results

Abstract # 4086 Coles, et al.

1089 patients with breast cancer treated with BCT

Standard treatment plan

< 2 cm3 of breast tissue > 107% > 2 cm3 of breast tissue > 107%

Non-randomized Randomized

Standard RT IMRT

Page 4: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

317/1089 (29%) had acceptable homogeneity with standard 2D radiotherapy.

IMRT significantly reduced both “hot spots” and “cold spots”.

The Cambridge Breast Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) Trial: Dosimetry Results

Abstract # 4086 Coles, et al.

Page 5: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy
Page 6: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy
Page 7: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy
Page 8: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

Prospective trial of individual optimal positioning (prone vs supine) for whole breast radiotherapy: results of 224 patients

Abstract # 4082 Formenti, et al.

Page 9: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

Prospective trial of individual optimal positioning (prone vs supine) for whole breast radiotherapy: results of 224 patients

Abstract # 4082 Formenti, et al.

CONCLUSIONS:Prone enables best sparing of heart and lung in most patients (204/224)Most patients best treated supine (17/20) had left-sided lesions

When prone, heart is displaced anteriorly 5-19 mm (Duke)May limit utility of prone technique

Page 10: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

Node-NegativePost BCS

1234 patients

Accelerated Hypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation (AHWBI)

42.5 Gy/16 fractions622 patients

Standard Whole Breast Irradiation (SWBI)

50 Gy/25 fractions612 patients

Stratification: Age Size Systemic tx Center

Recruitment April ’93- Sept ’96

R

Radiotherapy Fractionation SchedulesRadiotherapy Fractionation SchedulesAbstract #21 Whelan, et al.

Long-term results of a randomized trial of accelerated hypofractionated whole breast irradiation following breast conserving surgery in women with node negative breast cancer

Page 11: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

SWBI AHWBI n=612 n=622 n (%) n (%)

Age < 50 yrs 148 (24) 157 (25)Tumor size ≥ 2 cm 203 (33) 190 (31)ER negative 157 (26) 165 (26)Tumor grade high 116 (21) 117 (20)Tamoxifen 266 (41) 265 (41)Chemotherapy 72 (11) 75 (11)

BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS

Page 12: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

LOCAL RECURRENCE

SWBI AHWBI

5 years 3.2% 2.8%10 years 6.7% 6.2%

 

No difference in Overall Survival

Whelan T, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 94(15):1143-50, 2002. Whelan T, et al. Abstract #21. SABCS 2007.

Radiotherapy Fractionation SchedulesRadiotherapy Fractionation SchedulesAbstract #21 Whelan, et al.

Page 13: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

SWBI AHWBI

Age (y) < 50 10.7 7.5 ≥ 50 5.4 5.8

Tumor < 2 cm 6.1 5.4Size (cm) ≥ 2 cm 7.8 8.0

Systemic yes 5.9 6.5Therapy no 7.4 5.8

Local Recurrence Rates at 10 years

Page 14: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

Baseline 3 yr 5 yr 10 yr

SWBI 83% (604) 77% (496) 79% (423) 71% (216)

AHWBI 84% (616) 77% (518) 78% (448) 70% (235)

Cosmetic Outcome by Time and Treatment

% excellent or good (# evaluable)

Page 15: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

3 yr 5 yr 10 yr

SkinSWBI 2% 3% 8% AHWBI 2% 3% 9%

Subcutaneous tissueSWBI 5% 6% 11% AHWBI 4% 5% 12%

% Grades 2-3

RTOG/EORTC Late Radiation Morbidity by Time and Treatment

Page 16: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

SWBI AHWBI (n=612) (n=622)

Cancer related 13.2% (81) 13.7% (85)

Non-cancer related 7.4% (45) 5.9% (37)

Total 20.6% (126) 19.6% (122)

Cause of Death

Page 17: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

Accelerated Hypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation:

• Demonstrated excellent local control

• Was not associated with long-term morbidity

• Skin and soft tissue toxicity• Breast Cosmesis• Non-cancer deaths

CONCLUSIONS

Page 18: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

JCO. 25:18S (June 20 Supplement), 2007: LBA518

T1-3, N0-1Post BCS

Recruitment 1999-2002

Radiotherapy Fractionation SchedulesRadiotherapy Fractionation SchedulesASCO 2007 Dewar, et al.

Hypofractionation for early breast cancer: First results of the UK standardisation of breast radiotherapy (START) trials

START A2236 patients

50 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks

41.6 Gy/13 fractions/5 weeks

39 Gy/13 fractions/5 weeks

START B2215 patients 40 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks

50 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks

Page 19: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

Radiotherapy Fractionation SchedulesRadiotherapy Fractionation Schedules

RATIONALE

Tumor response (i.e., local control) thought to be as sensitive to fraction size as late adverse effects

Radiation fraction sizes > 2.0 Gy may have advantages in breast cancer treatment1

Goals: test the benefit of fraction sizes > 2.0 Gy in terms of locoregional controllate normal tissue responses

1Owen R et al. Lancet Oncol 7:467-71, 2006.

Page 20: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

Radiotherapy Fractionation SchedulesRadiotherapy Fractionation SchedulesASCO 2007 Dewar, et al.

Hypofractionation for early breast cancer: First results of the UK standardisation of breast radiotherapy (START) trials

Median follow up = 5.1 yrs Median follow up = 6.0 yrs

Page 21: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

Radiotherapy Fractionation SchedulesRadiotherapy Fractionation SchedulesASCO 2007 Dewar, et al.

Hypofractionation for early breast cancer: First results of the UK standardisation of breast radiotherapy (START) trials

Page 22: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

Are patients with T1-2 breast cancer with 1-3 +LN suitable candidates for partial breast radiotherapy trial enrollment?

Abstract # 4089 Truong, et al.

Page 23: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

Are patients with T1-2 breast cancer with 1-3 +LN suitable candidates for partial breast radiotherapy trial enrollment?

Abstract # 4089 Truong, et al.

5688 women

pT1-2, 0-3 N+ breast ca

Treated with BCT (1989-1999)

N0 (n=4433) vs 1-3 N+ (n=1255)

Median follow up = 8.6 yrs

Page 24: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

Are patients with T1-2 breast cancer with 1-3 +LN suitable candidates for partial breast radiotherapy trial enrollment?

Abstract # 4089 Truong, et al.

Page 25: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

Are patients with T1-2 breast cancer with 1-3 +LN suitable candidates for partial breast radiotherapy trial enrollment?

Abstract # 4089 Truong, et al.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients with 1-3 N+ have high risks of regional nodal relapse ~10-15% despite standard whole breast XRT and systemic therapy, particularly

young agegrade III histologyER- disease>20% positive nodes

Such patients should receive standard whole breast XRT and are not ideal candidates for PBI trial enrollment

Page 26: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

Update of the Phase II MammoSite Brachytherapy Trial for DCISAbstract # 4079 Streeter, et al.

Page 27: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

NSABP B39/RTOG 0413 Interstitial/intracavitary brachytherapy, 3DCRT

European Institute of Oncology Intraoperative electrons

TARGIT Intrabeam – photoelectron 50 kV photons

RAPID Canadian External Beam

Ongoing Trials in Partial Breast Irradiation

Other Intraoperative techniques Stanford University of North Carolina MSKCC (Intraoperative HAM applicator)

Protons MGH

Permanent radioactive seed University of Toronto, Canada

Other Intracavitary applicators Cianna Medical SenoRx North American Scientific Xoft

Page 28: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

Identification of Patients for Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy using the Cambridge Index

Abstract # 4093 Wilson, et al.

Index designed to help identify intermediate and low risk patients who might be at higher risk of local recurrence after mastectomy.

Applied since 1999. Retrospective review of patients from 2000-2003

Page 29: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

Low level of LR in both the Low and Intermediate risk groups confirms that appropriate patients in the Intermediate risk group are receiving PMRT

Identification of Patients for Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy using the Cambridge Index

Abstract # 4093 Wilson, et al.

Intermediate risk Score < 3 (n=21)

Low riskScore < 3 (n=131)

Chest Wall XRT n=198 (55%)

No XRT n=159 (45%)

High risk (n=125)

Intermediate risk Score > 3 (n=63)

Low riskScore > 3 (n=17)

Page 30: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

Increased use of regional radiotherapy is associated with improved outcome in a population based cohort of women with

breast cancer and 1-3 positive nodesAbstract # 4076 Wai, et al.

Page 31: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

EORTC 10925LN+ or any medial/central lesionBreast Only vs Breast + Upper IM/Medial SCV

NCIC MA.20LN+ and high risk LN-Breast Only vs Breast + Upper IM, high axilla, SCV

Ongoing Trials in Regional Nodal RT in Breast Conservation Therapy

Page 32: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Highlights – Radiotherapy

Post-operative radiotherapy does not adversely affect the outcome of autologous free abdominal flap breast

reconstructionAbstract # 4084 Chatterjee, et al.

• No significant difference by objective mammometry in the volume of reconstructed breast compared with contralateral breast

• No significant difference in fibrosis and thickening in the reconstructed breast

• Postoperative XRT does not adversely affect the outcome of immediate DIEP reconstruction following mastectomy