48

Click here to load reader

RoseK2 part2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: RoseK2 part2

Mini-Scleral Design - MSD

• Large RGP• Vaults the cornea, rests on the

sclera.• Creates a fluid filled environment.• Can be used to treat any corneal

condition.• Can be used to treat other anterior

segment conditions.

Page 2: RoseK2 part2

MSD - Advantages

• Very Stable lens.

• Fluid filled environment.

• Improved comfort.

• Good visual acuity.

Page 3: RoseK2 part2

Mini-Scleral Design

Page 4: RoseK2 part2

MSD – Fitting Pearls

Central Feather-

touch.

Intra-limbal

adjustment.

With or without

fenestration or

fenestrations.

Watch edge for

tightening.

Page 5: RoseK2 part2

Practice Management Issues

• Setting Fees.• Bill for services performed.• Insurances and fee collection.• Appropriate diagnostic and

treatment equipment.– Topography/corneal mapping.– Pachymetry.– Fitting sets.

Page 6: RoseK2 part2

Refractive Surgery Specific

Moderate – Large Diameter(10.5 mm Standard Diameter, 9.5 mm

to 12.0 mm). Reverse Geometry Transition.

Post Surgical Central BC. Curves

• Paracentral Fitting Curves.

• Asymmetric Corneal Technology (ACT).

Page 7: RoseK2 part2

A New Option for Keratoconus

Keratoconus Intacs -1 Day PKP -1 Week

Page 8: RoseK2 part2

Contact Lens Intolerant Keratoconus Steep K ‘s, 45 to 60 Changing refractions, eyes irritated, frequent visits/re-

fits Lenses not providing functional vision

Outright failure Shortened wearing time Inability to achieve 20/40

“keratoconus personality” exacerbated Apprehensive about transplant

Active, younger or risk averse

Objective - Bridge the gap between frustration and (PKP) “the point of no

return”

Page 9: RoseK2 part2

Reshape the Cornea for CL Success

Page 10: RoseK2 part2

History

Adjustable Ring

1984

Page 11: RoseK2 part2

INTACS Design Features• Precision manufactured

to ± 0.01mm: •150° arcs PMMA

•Unique hexagonal cross-section design with 7mm wide optical zone

•Positioning holes for manipulation

• Inserts placement:• In peripheral cornea

•Between stromal layers

Stromal LamellaeStromal Lamellae

6.9 mm

8.1 mm

Page 12: RoseK2 part2

Stromal LamellaeStromal Lamellae

How INTACS Work…

Inserts placed at 75% corneal depth

Inserts separate corneal lamellae

Separation shortens corneal arc length

Central cornea flattens

Increased flattening achieved with thicker segments

Page 13: RoseK2 part2

Watch the Pre-op and Post-op mire INTACS Normalize Corneal Shape

The INTACS Procedure

Courtesy David Schanzlin, MD Shiley Eye Inst. UCSD

Page 14: RoseK2 part2

INTACS – PKP ComparisonINTACS – PKP Comparison

+8.00 (.)-2.00 X 180°-0.75

TransplantIntacs

Page 15: RoseK2 part2

INTACS - PKP ComparisonPKP

Irreversible Procedure Time: 1 Hour Rehab Time: 12-18

Months

Intraocular Procedure Lifetime Follow-up

required Complications

• Cataract• Glaucoma• Endophthalmitis• Rejection• Expulsive hemorrhage• Corneal ulcer• Neovascularization• Induced astigmatism• Disease recurrence• Risk of viral transference

INTACS

Reversible Out-Patient Procedure

Time: 20-30 Minutes Rehab Time: 1-2 Weeks

(Visual Function Immediate) Corneal Lamellar Procedure Periodic Follow-up Complications

• Unsatisfactory ring placement• Segment extrusion(All easily managed with segment removal)

Page 16: RoseK2 part2

INTACS - PKP Comparison

PKP

Significant loss of endothelial cells

Permanently weakened cornea with risk of additional trauma

Outcomes: unpredictable, often unstable

INTACS

Endothelial cell loss, not clinically significant1

Provides structural integrity, PKP still an option without complication

Outcomes: predictable, case dependent

1Two-Year Endothelial Cell Assessment following INTACS implantation, Azar et al, J Refract Surg. 2001 Sept-Oct

Page 17: RoseK2 part2

3 lenses for most of the situations

The most common cones : nipple and ovale

Page 18: RoseK2 part2

Lenses have to follow as close as possible this very prolate cornea in order to :

– respect the cornea– Stabilize properly– Be comfortable

Need to have « very » steep lenses in the center that get flatter « quickly ».

Page 19: RoseK2 part2

Good center and periphery

Page 20: RoseK2 part2

Rose K PrincipleLens changes with the cone

evolution • When a keratoconus is getting more and

more advanced, the apex of the cone is getting steeper but the periphery remains the same.

• For a known apex of the cone, the periphery is often the « same » fom one patient to another : Paul Rose’s Statistic and mathematic models : correlation between BC and slope

Page 21: RoseK2 part2

Rose K lenses principle

• For each BC that respects the apex of the cone, an unique AEL will be associated to it– Unique Optic Zone– Unique Peripheral curves

World sales indicate that the original AELrepresent 65% of sold lenses

Page 22: RoseK2 part2

For a 8.70mm diam.

Page 23: RoseK2 part2

Axial Ege Lift (AEL) Edge Lift (EL)

• Rather than talking about AEL in mm which is difficult to evaluate for the fitter, Paul Rose simplified and reduced this notion to a simple number without unit : Edge Lift (EL)• EL = 0 = standard corresponds to the AEL

associated to the curve• EL > 0 correspond to lenses that are flatter in

periphery than standard• EL < 0 correspond to lenses that are steeper in

periphery than standard

Page 24: RoseK2 part2

available EL+3.00 à -1.3 / 0.1

•EL Standard “0” 65%

•EL “quick” +1.0 20%

•EL “slow” -0.5 10%

•Others 5 to 10%

The majority of Rose K are done with 3 EL

Page 25: RoseK2 part2

Trial Box

• Std EL for all lenses (but AEL unique for each BC)

• Powers increase in steep curves : the more advanced is the cone, the more myopia there is important for assessing precisely centration and mobility .

• Diameter decreases when the cone is getting advanced (difficult for large lenses to follow the very flat periphery)

Page 26: RoseK2 part2
Page 27: RoseK2 part2

Fitting steps

1. Keratometry from a keratometer or a topograph

7,00 mm 12⁰

6,60 mm 102⁰

Km. 6.80

Cyl. 3,00

Page 28: RoseK2 part2

2. In the trial box, choose the lens according to the rule :BC = av.K -0.10

3. Assess the contact at the apex of the cone• If too much contact (Flat) decrease BC• If not enough contact (Steep) increase BC

STEEP FLATOPTIMALE

Page 29: RoseK2 part2

Remarques

• Wait 1 minute before evaluation

• Analyze fluo pattern, lens centered

Page 30: RoseK2 part2

4. After finding the best BC– If too thin periphery (< 0.6 mm) EL

« quick » +1.0– If too wide periphery (> 0.8mm) EL

« slow » -0.5Too thin Optimal Too wide

Page 31: RoseK2 part2

5. Centration and mobility

Up riding.steep the lens.and/or reduce diameter .and/or reduce EL

Low riding.Flatten the lens.and/or increase diameter .and/or increase ELOptimal

Page 32: RoseK2 part2

6. Find the best sphere giving the best

Page 33: RoseK2 part2

Spherical Aberrations

• Peripheral rays are more refracted than central rays.

Ex : -7.00 in the center, -7.75 in periphery

Page 34: RoseK2 part2

• Those aberrations induced by the lens are higher when : – Pupil is large– Power of the lens is high

More benefits for high myopic patients

Page 35: RoseK2 part2

Rose K2 Advantages

• Easy to fit– Only 1 trial box : one lens name– Lens changes with the cone (AEL changes with BC)– Std EL works in main cases– 2 other EL slow and quick cover most of the

modifications– 6 steps fitting

• Maximum physiological respect– Material Z– Special Geometry for the best compromise

physiology/vision

• Vision– Control of the spherical aberrations

Page 36: RoseK2 part2
Page 37: RoseK2 part2

Indications

• Pellucid Marginal Degeneration - PMD• Keratoglobus• Post lasik ectasy, Post Graft

PMDDMP Globus Lasik

Page 38: RoseK2 part2

• reversed design for BC > 7.20• flatter the BC is, more reversed the design is• Larger optical zone • OZ decreases with BC• EL steeper than Rose K•Total diameter larger than graft diameter• Also used on post lasik ectasy

Page 39: RoseK2 part2
Page 40: RoseK2 part2

5 Edge Lift

+0.6 /+1.2 / -0.5 / -1.0

Page 41: RoseK2 part2

1st lens: BC = K’ +0.30 mm

Fitting: 1. Keratometry 2. BC

3. central Fitting 4. peripheral fitting 5. Centration/Mobility (=>Diameter)

6.Power

Ex. 6.80/5.50 5.50 +0.30 = 5.80

Page 42: RoseK2 part2

BC

plat

OK / serré

serré

Page 43: RoseK2 part2

EL

périphérie très serrée EL Lent (-)

périphérie serrée EL standard

Périphérie ok EL rapide (+)

Page 44: RoseK2 part2

Mobility

Look for enough mobility to insure enough tear flow

Mobility ++ Mobility --

increase diameter Decrease diameter decrease BC Flatten BC0

decrease l’Edge Lift increase l’Edge Lift

Page 45: RoseK2 part2

1st lens = Km - 0.30 mm

Fitting : 1. Keratometry 2. BC 3. central fitting 4. peropheral fitting 5. Centration / mobility

6. Power

Ex. 6.80/5.50 6.15 - 0.30 = 5.85

Page 46: RoseK2 part2

ROSE K2 Post Graft: Rose K2 PG

• the hardest fitting• irregular cornea shape• High astigmatism, often irregular sensitives eyes

Page 47: RoseK2 part2

• Optimal