View
141
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
11
Structures and Processes for Creating & Managing Quality
Outcomes & Reducing Waste in Alberta Health Services
GMF SymposiumApril 19, 2013
Montreal, QuebecDr Tom Noseworthy
22
Compared to other Provinces
Alberta is• Not less expensive (highest per capita, higher
service intensity & higher unit costs)• Not more accessible (maybe less)• Not the country’s best quality for most
outcomes (with clear exceptions)• Not the longest, or health-adjusted, length of life
33
825
557
875
627
1048
306
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
South Zone Calgary Zone Central Zone Edmonton Zone North Zone Best Large RHA/Zone (Central LHIN, ONT)
Age
-Sta
ndar
dize
d Ra
te (p
er 1
00,0
00)
Source = CIHI Health Indicators
Injury Hospitalization - 2010/11
44
11.21
8.73
7.68
5.92
4.29
5.53
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
South Zone Calgary Zone Central Zone Edmonton Zone North Zone Best Large RHA/Zone (Central West LHIN,
ONT)
Risk
-Adj
uste
d Ra
te (
per 1
,000
)
Source = CIHI CHRP
5-Day In-Hospital Mortality Following Major Surgery - 2010/11
55
Alberta Health Services
• One health care delivery system for entire Province• ‘Third way’- Canada (no regions, all regions, one) • Largest health system in Canada- 3.7 million • Budget $12B, 100,000 employees, 7500 doctors• Formed 2008, 5 Zones in 2010, Networks in 2012• Nine clinical networks launched to date• Up to six more planned
66
How will the Provincial Clinical Mandate of AHS be Accomplished? Structures
• Strategic Clinical Networks• Clinically-led change• Performance measurement, research & best
evidence drive practice• Clinical care pathways• Clinical variance management & peer review
77
Goals of Clinical Networks?
• Achieve the best outcomes• Practice the highest quality of clinical care• Seek the greatest value from resources used• Engage clinicians in all aspects of this work
88
Why Clinical Networks?
• Networks are positive ways for all partners along a broad continuum to be involved in planning & improving care & service delivery
• Networks have been shown to be an effective mechanism to ensure collaboration, joint decision-making and shared learning
• Networks are a sound model to promote the use/uptake of clinical experience, knowledge and evidence-based clinical pathways to reduce clinical variation & improve care
99
17.87
11.71
20.93
13.41
18.23
11.71
0
5
10
15
20
25
South Zone Calgary Zone Central Zone Edmonton Zone North Zone Best Large RHA/Zone (Calgary Zone, AB)
Risk
-Adj
uste
d Ra
te (p
er 1
00)
Source = CIHI CHRP
30-Day In-Hospital Mortality Following Stroke - 2010/11
1010
What are Strategic Clinical Networks (SCNs)?
• Collaborative clinical teams with a provincial strategic mandate to improve quality & outcomes
• Led by clinicians, driven by clinical needs, focused on outcomes & based on best evidence
• Comprised of an all-inclusive membership, with 25 core members (community & specialty clinicians, patients, policy-makers, researchers) & leadership (0.5 Senior Medical Director, 0.5 Strategy Vice-President & 0.3 Scientific Director)
1111
How do SCNs Work?
• Broad mandate:– Specific populations: seniors, women's health, children– High impact: cardiovascular disease & stroke– High burden: diabetes, obesity & nutrition, amh
• Scope encompasses entire continuum of care– From population health & prevention to primary care to
acute care to chronic disease management to palliation
• Projects & resources – Driven by evidence and focused on improving outcomes
and eliminating waste
1212
Planned Support & Resources for Each SCN
• Dedicated Business Intelligence Unit– Project management, clinical analytics, case costing, quality
improvement, pathway development, patient safety, knowledge management, health technology assessment
• Embedded research capability and expertise• Education & skills development for leaders• Funding including:
– Seed money for innovation, initiatives, and research– Remuneration of core members– Opportunities to retain savings that are realized
1313
First Six SCNs (June 12/12)
• Addiction and Mental Health• Bone and Joint Health• Cancer Care• Cardiovascular Health and Stroke• Obesity, Diabetes and Nutrition• Seniors’ Health
1414
Three Operational Clinical Networks
Similar to SCNs
i. Provincial, clinically led teams
ii. Similar infrastructure & resources
Differ from SCNs
iii. Responsible across populations
iv. Operationally focused
v. Social determinants/ EOL agenda not required in projects
1515
Three Operational Clinical Networks (Jan13)
• Critical Care• Emergency Services• Surgical Services
1616
Proposed SCNs (Fiscal 2013)
• Population Health and Health Promotion• Primary Care & Chronic Disease Management• Maternal Health• Newborn, Child, and Youth Health• Neurological Disease, ENT, and Vision• Complex Medicine (GI, Kidney & Respiratory)
1717
Proposed SCN & OCN Projects 2013Obesity, Diabetes
& NutritionSCN
Bone & JointSCN
Surgery OCN
Emergency OCN
Addiction & Mental Health
SCN
Cardiovascular Health and Stroke
SCN
Insulin Pump criteria
Rural Stroke Program
Vascular Risk Reduction
C-CHANGE
Enhancing recovery
after surgery
ARTE-referral
Fragility & Stability -
Hip Fracture Rx and
Prevention
Inappropriate use of
antipsychotics
Cancer SCN
Critical Care OCN
Seniors’ HealthSCN
Depression Pathway
Safe Surgery Checklist
aCATS TBDTBD
Hip & Knee 5 year Plan
Lung Cancer
Elder Friendly Care*
1818
Project Scope:• Create standards and clear definition of rural stroke
unit care• Implement early supported discharge (ESD) &
enhanced stroke unit care in 5 small stroke centres• Implement enhancements to stroke unit care for 10
rural primary stroke centres
System Impact:• Acute care• Transition management
• Long term care
Project Financials:•Q4 (12/13): $ 141,964•13/14: $1,745,950• TOTAL Project: $2,873,594
Benefits to be Realized:Short term – Jan 31/ 13 – Mar 31 /14• ESD implemented in 5 small centres serving100
patients • 26% reduction in length of stay; 3 persons avoid
nursing home care; 1 life savedLong term– 1- 3 year window • 214 new patients per year receive ESD and over 1000
new patients per year receiving full stroke unit services; 23 lives saved/year; 17 patients avoid nursing homes after stroke/year
• Reduction in length of stay of over 20%
CV&S: Rural Stroke Action Plan
1919
How Alberta Health Services Will Achieve its Clinical Mandate (Processes)
• Strategic & Operational Clinical Networks• Clinically-led change• Performance measurement, research & best
evidence drive practice• Clinical care pathways & models of care• Clinical variance measurement & management
2020
Variance Management
• Variance is everywhere you look for it• Variation makes the world go around – but…• How much variation is ‘good’• Lessons from financial variances & management• Variance points to a need to ask why & manage it
2121
NL/LB PEI NS NB Que Ont Man Sask AB BC Canada0
10
20
30
40
50
60
24.223.0
35.0
50.6
37.5
47.8
40.8
28.9
53.6
26.0
41.4
MRI Exams per 1000 Population - 2009
Source: CIHI - National Survey of Selected Medical Imaging Equipment, 2009
Supply and Utilization
2222
280
221
298
258
318
176
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
South Zone Calgary Zone Central Zone Edmonton Zone North Zone Best Large RHA/Zone (Central LHIN, ONT)
Age
-Sta
ndar
dize
d Ra
te (p
er 1
00,0
00)
Source = CIHI Health Indicators
Premature Mortality - 2006-2008
2323
431
237
408
240
551
180
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
South Zone Calgary Zone Central Zone Edmonton Zone North Zone Best Large RHA/Zone (Central LHIN, ONT)
Age
-Sta
ndar
dize
d Ra
te (p
er 1
00,0
00)
Source = CIHI Health Indicators
Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions Hospitalizations - 2010/11
2424
Clinical Variance Measurement
• Variance points to a need to ask why & manage it• Variance measurement & management does this• Small-areas clinical variation apparent for 30 years• Multiple explanations for small-areas clinical variation• Clinical variance management requires measurement• Measurement necessitates sound health informatics
& clinical analytics
2525
Clinical Variance Management
• Management requires measurement• Compare to evidence, others & target best practice• Some clinical variance is justified, some is not• Unjustifiable variance is costly• Unjustifiable variance adversely affects patients• Managing clinical variance is sensitive & complex• At some point, examines individual practices
2626
Managing Individual Clinical Variance (1)
• The essence of professional self-regulation• Comparative assessment of individual physician
performance may be required• How is this best done & by whom• What is the legal/moral mandate to protect identity • Globe & Mail vs professional ‘privilege’
2727
Managing Individual Clinical Variance (2)
• Understand the determinants of decision-making• Lessons from behaviour modification• Modification menu ( education, feedback,
participation, incentives, penalties & rules)• Individual modalities do not work• Habitual behaviours are hard to change
2828
DEFINITION
Health Technology Reassessment (HTR) is a structured, evidence-based assessment of the clinical, social, ethical & economic effects of a technology, currently used in the health care system, to inform optimal use of that technology in comparison to its alternatives.
Clement & Noseworthy IJTAHC 2011
Figure 1: Joshi, Stahnisch & Noseworthy (2009)
3030
Scope of Reassessment• HTA focuses on introduction of new technologies• HTR focuses on existing technologies:
– Obsolescence- when new supersedes old– Waste (overuse, misuse)- scope of use
• Reassessment common in other fields• Reassessment of health technologies is not
widely considered, practiced or standardized • Reassessment may lead to no change; reduced
scope of use; decommissioning & disinvestment
3131
Health Technology Reassessment is HTA +
• Clinical Synthesis• Comparative effectiveness
• Economic evaluation of costs & benefits
+• Impact analysis
• Intended consequences• Unintended • Social context
• Feasibility assessment
3232
Proposed Reassessment Projects
• Knee MRI following injury• Optimal cardiac imaging for cardiac conditions• Antipsychotic use in elderly patients in LTC• Nitrous Oxide use in Critical Care