Upload
ashley-gardner
View
348
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Policy & Funding Issues in Rural Health Saginaw Valley State University NUR 642, Fall 2014 Ashley Gardner
Citation preview
Ashley Gardner
Saginaw Valley State University
Tremendously Diverse Lifestyle & Culture
Distinct Challenges & Needs
Community Collaboration
Ambiguous definition
“The populations served are different in every rural community. So is the way they rural patients define health and the way they receive care”
-Deana Molinari
Cons “Blurring of relationships” Fewer Resources Lower Pay Lateral rather than
Administrative Growth Geography Fewer insurance options Higher costs of care
Pros Variety
Autonomy
“Extended Family”
Job Satisfaction
Higher Poverty Rates
7.5 million rural residents live below poverty line
Almost 76% of U.S. counties are rural
$644/pp more spent on urban citizens
Political activity is low
Funding appears to play significant role
Creative, Innovative, Resourceful
Return on Investment
Healthcare Access
Access Dimensions
Need a Voice
Retention & Recruitment play significant role in access issues
Research is unclear
Important Factors for Retention:
Personal & Professional Support
Education
Regulation & Safety
Financial Compensation
No “one-size-fits-all” solution
Increase Access, Reduce Costs, Improve Quality
WHO Suggestions
828 Federal programs initiated directed at assisting rural areas (2002)
Affordable Care Act
Housing & Community Development Programs
Rural Housing Service (RHS)
Rural Business-Cooperative Service (RBS)
Distance learning & Telemedicine Grants & Loans
Community Access Program (CAP)
Rural Health Outreach Program
Office of Rural health Policy (ORHP)
Bureau of Health Resources Development
The Foundation Center Cooperating Collection Network
General Fund Raising Resources
Improvement in public health is closely related with political participation
Healthcare providers are called to be the voice for these communities
Increase involvement in policy-making, seek available funding, utilize retention strategies to change the story of rural healthcare
References
Beal, E. (2012). Pros and cons of rural nursing. Retrieved from http://career-news.healthcallings.com/2012/09/19/pros-and-cons-of-rural-nursing/.
Buchan, J., Couper, I. D., Tangcharoensathien, V., Thepannya, K., Jaskiewicz, W., Perfilieva, G., & Colea, C. (2013). Early implementation of WHO recommendations for the retention of health workers in remote and rural areas. Policy & Practice, 91, 834-840. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.13.119008.
Buykx, P., Humphreys, J., Wakerman, J., & Pashen, D. (2010). Systematic review of effective retention incentives for health workers in rural and remote areas: Towards evidence-based policy. The Australian Journal of Rural Health, 18, 102-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2010.01139.x.
Fluharty, C. W. (2002). Refrain or reality: A United States rural policy? Implications for rural health care. The Journal of Legal Medicine, 23, 57-72.
Harris, J. K., & Mueller, N. L. (2013). Policy activity and policy adoption in rural, suburban, and urban local health departments. Journal of Public Health Management Practice, 19(2), E1-E8. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318252ee8c.
Health and Human Services. (2013). The affordable care act-What it means for rural America. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/healthcare/facts/factsheets/2013/09/rural09202013.html.
Morgan, A. (2012). The rural health care tundra. In D. J. Mason, J. K. Leavitt, & M. W. Chaffee (Eds.), Policy & politics in nursing and health care (pp.200-205). St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders.
National Agricultural Library. (2013). Capital assistance funding: A rural health resource guide. Retrieved from http://pubs.nal.usda.gov/sites/pubs.nal.usda.gov/files/capital_assistance.html.
Russell, D. J., Humphreys, J. S., Ward, B., Chisholm, M., Buykx, P., McGrail, M., & Wakerman, J. (2013). Helping policy-makers address rural health access problems. The Australian Journal of Rural Health, 21, 61-71.
**All pictures found via google image search