Upload
slliim
View
959
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
NATIONAL OCCUPATIONALSAFETY AND HEALTH WEEK 2013
Overview of Occupational disease
Case Studies
Dr Wayne Ramgoolam
Head Occupational Health Unit South West Regional Health
Authority
ILO Facts and figures
Worldwide, occupational diseases continue to be the leading cause of work-related deaths.
2.02 million people die each year from work-related diseases.
321,000 people die each year from occupational accidents. 160 million non-fatal work-related diseases per year. 317 million non –fatal occupational accidents per year.
This means that:
Every 15 seconds, a worker dies from a work-related accident or disease.
Every 15 seconds, 151 workers have a work-related accident
SUMMARY
Overview of Occupational Disease Definition Historical perspective Classification Management Prevention
Case Studies
Definitions of occupational diseases
Any disease contracted as a result of an exposure to risk factors arising from work activity.Protocol of 2002 to the Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 1981 (No. 155)
Diseases known to arise out of the exposure to substances and dangerous conditions in processes, trades or occupationsILO Employment Injury Benefits Recommendation, 1964 (No. 121), Paragraph 6(1)
Two main elements are present in the definition of an occupational disease:1. the causal relationship between exposure in a specific working
environment or work activity and a specific disease2. the fact that the disease occurs among a group of exposed
persons with a frequency above the average morbidity of the rest of the population.
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE
BIRTH OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE
Bernardino Ramazzini (1633 – 1714)
Considered to be the father of occupational and industrial medicine
Diseases of Workers(De Morbis Artificum Diatriba) First edition - 1700 Second edition - 1713
Bernardino Ramazzini (1633 – 1714)
published the first systematic study connecting the environmental hazards of specific professions to disease Example: lead exposure in potters and painters
His book on occupational diseases outlined the health hazards and other disease-causative agents encountered by workers in 52 occupations.
This was one of the founding and seminal works of occupational medicine and played a substantial role in its development.
It was he who proposed that physicians should extend the list of questions that Hippocrates recommended they ask their patients by adding, "What is your trade?"
Sir Percivall Pott (1714 – 1788)
Chimney Sweepers’ Cancer of the scrotum
first to associate cancer with occupational exposure (1775)
Sir Percivall Pott (1714 – 1788) In what represents one of the earliest
epidemiologic studies (or studies of the occurrence and causes of disease), Pott observed that chimney sweeps in England had higher rates of scrotal cancer than the rest of the population.
In doing their jobs, the chimney sweeps often had to climb into chimneys and suffered prolonged exposure to soot containing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
Alice Hamilton (1869 – 1970)
founder of occupational medicine in the U.S. and the first woman on the faculty of Harvard Medical School
took a leading role in two major environmental controversies of the 1920s involving leaded gasoline and radium dial painters (known as the “radium girls”).
Radium Girls
Radium Girls
The Radium Girls were female factory workers who contracted radiation poisoning from painting watch dials with glow-in-the-dark paint at the United States Radium factory in Orange, New Jersey around 1917.
The women, who had been told the paint was harmless, ingested deadly amounts of radium by licking their paintbrushes to sharpen them; some also painted their fingernails and teeth with the glowing substance.
Five of the women challenged their employer in a case that established the right of individual workers who contract occupational diseases to sue their employers
The litigation and media sensation surrounding the case established legal precedents and triggered the enactment of regulations governing labour safety standards
HISTORY
19th Century Statutory medical service for factory workers▪ Factory Inspectors▪ Medical certification for children▪ Certifying Surgeons▪ Workers with exposure to lead, white phosphorus, explosives, rubber –
periodic exams▪ Notification of industrial disease – lead, phosphorus, arsenic, anthrax
Common law – employer liable if negligent WC legislation in Europe
20th Century WC legislation in North America Development of government agencies and professional
associations International Congress on workers’ diseases in Milan - 1906 - ICOH
CLASSIC OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES
Skin cancer – sunlight, tar, oils, soot, arsenic
Silicosis – quarries, mines, stone cutting
Coal workers’ pneumoconiosis Lead poisoning Mercury poisoning Bladder cancer – organic dyes Lung cancer – chrome, nickel, radon,
asbestos
CLASSIFICATION OF OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES
List of occupational diseases (ILO)
Occupational diseases caused by exposure to agents arising from work activities (Hazards) Diseases caused by chemical agents
Diseases caused by physical agents Diseases caused by biological agents
Occupational diseases by target organ systems Occupational respiratory diseases Occupational skin diseases Occupational musculo-skeletal disorders
Mental and behavioural disorders Occupational cancer
Cancer caused by the following agents Other diseases
OCCUPATIONAL HAZARDS Physical Chemical Biological Mechanical &
Ergonomic Psychosocial
HAZARD EXAMPLES
Physical Noise, Vibration, Radiation, Heat
Chemical Dusts, Metals, Solvents, Gases
Biological Human tissue & bodily fluids (blood)Microbial pathogens Animal and animal products
Ergonomic/Mechanical Lifting & handlingPoor postureRepetitionPoor equipment & workplace design
Psychosocial Organizational Psychosocial FactorsHigh demandLow control
Violence and aggressionLone workingShift workNight workLong working hours
OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES
Target organ systems Occupational infections Respiratory & Cardiovascular disorders Skin disorders Musculoskeletal disorders GI & Urinary Tract disorders Eye disorders Neurological disorders Psychiatric disorders Reproductive disorders Haematological disorders Medically unexplained occupational disorders
OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES
Occupational Infections Respiratory & Cardiovascular
Blood borne virusesHep B,CHIV
Meningococcal TuberculosisLegionnaires TetanusInfluenzaZoonoses
Anthrax (cows,sheep)Glanders (horses, cats, dogs)Brucellosis (cows, sheep, goats, pigs)Lyme disease (deer)Q fever (sheep, cows goats)Orf (sheef)
Occupational AsthmaCOPDHypersensitivity pneumonitis
Farmer’s lung (mouldy hay, grain, straw)Bird fanciers lung (bird excreta)Mushroom workers lung (mushroom compost)Bagassosis (bagasse from sugar caneMalt workers lung (mouldy barley)Ventilation pneumonitis (water in AC systems)
Metal fume feverPneumoconioses
Coal workersAsbestosis Silicosis
Lung cancerPleural disorders (mesothelioma)Coronary heart disease
OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES
Skin Musculoskeletal
GI & Urinary
Eye Neurological
DermatitisContact urticariaSkin cancerPigmentation disordersPhotodermatitisscleroderma
Lower back painWRULD’SCarpal tunnelTenosynovitiscapsulitis
Hepatic AngiosarcomaCirrhosisHepatotoxicityGI cancersRenal failureBladder cancer
ConjunctivitisCataractRetinal burns
Brain cancerParkinsonismOrganophosphate HAVSNIHL
Psychiatric
Reproductive Haematological Unexplained
PsychosesStressPTSD
Impaired fertilityAdverse pregnancy
Bone Marrow aplasiaMethaemoglobinaemiaHaemolysisHaematological malignancies
Sick building syndrome
MANAGEMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE
MANAGEMENT
Diagnosis Clinical investigation▪ Occupational history (plus routine history)▪ Identify occupational risk factors for disease / patterns of exposure▪ Understand job demands
▪ Physical examination▪ Investigations (functional test of target organ)▪ Audiometry, spirometry, blood & radiological investigations
Workplace investigation▪ Review job description▪ Review job task analysis▪ Visit workplace understand processes ▪ Review hygiene data where available (may require further
workplace monitoring)
MANAGEMENT
Epidemiological investigationSir Bradford Hill established the following nine criteria for causation (does factor A cause disorder B).
▪ Strength of the association. How large is the effect? ▪ The consistency of the association. Has the same association been
observed by others, in different populations, using a different method? ▪ Specificity. Does altering only the cause alter the effect? ▪ Temporal relationship. Does the cause precede the effect? ▪ Biological gradient. Is there a dose response? ▪ Biological plausibility. Does it make sense? ▪ Coherence. Does the evidence fit with what is known regarding the
natural history and biology of the outcome? ▪ Experimental evidence. Are there any clinical studies supporting the
association? ▪ Reasoning by analogy. Is the observed association supported by
similar associations?
MANAGEMENT
Treatment Treat emergent medical issues Decide on return to work strategies▪ Fit to work▪ Job modification (workplace, procedures)▪ Modified working hours▪ Modified duties (fit to work with restrictions)
▪ Redeployment▪ Ill health retirement
PREVENTION OF OCCUPTIONAL DISEASE
PREVENTION
Five (5) steps1. Hazard
Identification2. Risk assessment3. Control measures
(Hierarchy of control)
4. Monitoring5. Audit
DEFINITIONS
HazardPotential adverse effect of an agent or circumstanceE.g. Mesothelioma is a hazard of asbestos
RiskProbability that a hazard will be realized, given the nature and extent of a person’s exposure to an agent or circumstanceE.g. Risk of mesothelioma from asbestos depends on the type of fibre and the amount that is inhaled
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
How do the Occupational Physicians identify hazards? Clinical Assessment Toxicological Assessment Epidemiological Assessment
RISK ASSESSMENT
Exposure Assessment Determine what are the nature and
extent of the exposures that will occur if a course of action is followed.
Estimation of risk Determine what is the likely probability
of each hazard if the course of action is followed
Hierarchy of control
•ELIMINATION
•SUBSTITUTION•Procedure, agent
•ENGINEERING CONTROLS•Ventilation, enclosures
•ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS•Information, instruction, training; task rotation ; health surveillance
•PPE•Hard hat, ear plugs, glasses, gloves, coveralls, boots
PREVENTION
Monitoring compliance with controls Company enforcement Regulatory bodies (OSH Agency)
Audit controls Set standard Measure performance Review Implement change Repeat cycle
CASE STUDIES
CASE 1Lead Poisoning In A Construction Worker
CASE STUDY Lead Poisoning In A Construction Worker
Clinical Investigation History
Medical25 year old male4 week history – lethargy, abd pain, headaches, NauseaRecent onset – weakness and tingling sensation - HandsSmoker
OccupationalGeneral labourer with contracting firm for 2 yearsRepair and refurbish old buildingUse of sander to remove paint from walls
CASE STUDY Lead Poisoning In A Construction Worker
Physical Examination Generalized abdominal tenderness Other wise unremarkable
Investigations Blood
Elevated blood lead levelsBlood film – basophilic stippling of
erythrocytesConsistent with lead poisoning
CASE STUDY Lead Poisoning In A Construction Worker
Workplace Investigation Several employees performing similar
duties Not provided with adequate or sufficient
PPE Coveralls, boots, dust masks No provision for respirators Share safety glasses
No dedicated site for breaks Took breaks and ate meals in the building they
were repairing
CASE STUDY Lead Poisoning In A Construction Worker
Diagnosis & Treatment Acute lead poisoning Suspended from work based on
recorded blood lead level (Used exposure limits set by Control of Lead at Work Regulations UK)
Referred to Internal Medicine for Chelation therapy.
CASE STUDY Lead Poisoning In A Construction Worker
Occupational Health Case Management Employee
Surveillance ▪ Biological monitoring (blood lead levels) monthly
until acceptable level▪ Condition significantly improved one month later
however still unfit to work▪ Job modification not an option▪ Redeployment not an option▪ Ill health retirement not considered (temporary issue)
(No attempts by employer to improve work practices)
CASE STUDY Lead Poisoning In A Construction Worker
Employer Duty to assess the risks to his workers as
stipulated in the Occupational Safety and Health Act of Trinidad & Tobago
Complete the required risk assessment Institute measures considered to be
reasonably practicable to prevent or control exposures without resorting to the use of PPE as the initial control
CASE STUDY Lead Poisoning In A Construction Worker Employer
Elimination and substitution not viable options Engineering controls▪ Introduction of local exhaust ventilation (vacuum sys)▪ Dust suppression techniques (use of water)
Administrative controls▪ Provision of clean eating and rest facilities as well as suitable washing
facilities▪ Enforcement of separate clean and dirty zones, banning smoking,
drinking and eating in the latter▪ Information, instruction and training with respect to lead▪ Implementation of pre employment screening as well as a health
surveillance program for all at risk employees inclusive of biological monitoring
▪ Respiratory fit testing for employees using Respiratory PPE PPE▪ Provision of adequate and sufficient PPE
CASE STUDY Lead Poisoning In A Construction WorkerSummary Employee no longer works for the general
contracting firm having opted instead to seek employment elsewhere
Issues Employer did not consider all elements of the hierarchy
of control Jumped straight to PPE and even that may have been
inappropriate (Respiratory PPE) No national policy or guideline addressing lead exposure
at work as well as exposure limits to be enforced Which international best practice regarding exposures
and limits should we follow (UK VS USA)
CASE STUDIES
CASE 2Organophosphate Poisoning In A Pesticide Sprayer
QUESTIONS
THANK YOU
Dr. Wayne RamgoolamMB.BS, MSc Occupational Medicine
(UK), MFOMOccupational Medicine SpecialistPhone: (868)-385-6000Email: [email protected] www.occumedltd.com