4
Amygdala pharmacology and crime behavior, dysfunctions to be considered as a disease? M. Luisetto 1 , Farhan Ahmad Khan 2 , Luca Cabianca 3 , Mobin Ibne Mokbul 4 , Ahmed Yesvi Rafa 4 , Behzad NiliAhmadabadi 1 Applied Pharmacologist and European Specialist in Laboratory Medicine, Italy, 2 Department of Pharmacology, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, TMU, India, 3 Biomedical Laboratory, Italy, 4 Founder & President, International Light of Neuroscience Foundation House: 32/A, Road-03, Prianka Housing, Turag City, Mirpur-1, Dhaka-1216, 5 Co-Founder & General Secretary, ILNF Independent Neuroscience Researcher, Independent Applied Physics Researcher, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 6 Nano Drug Delivery, Chapel Hill NC 27514, USA www.iabcr.org International Archives of BioMedical and Clinical Research | April-June 2016 | Vol 2 | Issue 2 Page 1 Original Article ABSTRACT We don’t have today drugs specifically registered for amygdala dysfunctions as preventable agents towards some kind of crime behavior. This Neuro psychiatric condition or organ state are to be considered and treated in preventive way as common disease. There is an amygdala physio-pathological Level of activation. Still we are not sure to call this dysfunctions status as Disease and drugs are needed or efficacy to control it. A neuro-pharmacology research of amygdala can give the response also using imaging Techniques. Studies demonstrated that Amygdala activation is involved in aggressive behavior. The aim of this work is to investigate in this relationship and to find if there is a level of activation. . Keywords: Amygdala activation level, Pharmacology Neuro Imaging, Antisocial personality disorder. INTRODUCTION Amygdala is activated in some condition such as anger Anxiety, fear, predatory behavior, aggressive behavior, defense or subjugate behavior. Emotion: behavior and physiological response (vegetative and hormonal) involved in behavior and communication adjustment. “The hippocampus, amygdala, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, septal area, cingulate gyrus, and prefrontal cortex project to these structures directly or indirectly and thus can modulate the intensity of attack and rage” [1] Amygdala- SNC connections and other systems involved Receive connections from frontal temporal limbic (olfactory way) and send connections to frontal, hippocampus hypo thalamus encephalic trunk (behavior and vegetative response). Amygdala stimulation increase emotional response and drugs as Benzodiazepines, morphine reduces amygdala activation. Hypothalamus and aggressivity: defensive and predation behavior. Orbitofrontal cortex: involved in emotion interpreting Morality, caution behavior in social situation. Connected with temporal area, limbic. And amygdala cingulum. The temporal lobe is involved in theory of mind and its dysfunction is often implicated in violent psychopathy. [2] Face emotional recognize. Innate, transcultural controlled by right hemisphere (neuroimaging studies). Face emotional expression: happiness, sadness, anger, fear and other stereotyped behaviors. Aggressive behavior is involved in physiological adjustment. Serotonin neuron activation Access this article online Website: www.iabcr.org Quick Response code DOI: 10.21276/iabcr.2016.2.2.1 Received:21.04.16| Revised:20.05.16| Accepted:10.06.16 Corresponding Author M. Luisetto, Applied pharmacologist, European Specialist in Laboratory Medicine, Italy, Copyright: © the author(s) and publisher. IABCR is an official publication of Ibn Sina Academy of Medieval Medicine & Sciences, registered in 2001 under Indian Trusts Act, 1882. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Original article Amygdala pharmacology and crime behavior,disfunctions to be considered as a disease ? intern. archives of biomedical and clinical research m.luisetto, f.a.khan et

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Original article Amygdala pharmacology and crime behavior,disfunctions to be considered as a disease ? intern. archives of biomedical and clinical research m.luisetto, f.a.khan et

 

 

Amygdala  pharmacology  and  crime  behavior,  dysfunctions  to  be  considered  as  a  disease?    M.  Luisetto1,  Farhan  Ahmad  Khan2,  Luca  Cabianca3,  Mobin  Ibne  Mokbul4,  Ahmed  Yesvi  Rafa4,  Behzad  Nili-­Ahmadabadi    

1Applied Pharmacologist and European Specialist in Laboratory Medicine, Italy, 2Department of Pharmacology, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, TMU, India, 3Biomedical Laboratory, Italy, 4Founder & President, International Light of Neuroscience Foundation House: 32/A, Road-03, Prianka Housing, Turag City, Mirpur-1, Dhaka-1216, 5Co-Founder & General Secretary, ILNF Independent Neuroscience Researcher, Independent Applied Physics Researcher, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 6Nano Drug Delivery, Chapel Hill NC 27514, USA

www.iabcr.org International Archives of BioMedical and Clinical Research | April-June 2016 | Vol 2 | Issue 2 P a g e

1

Original Article

     ABSTRACT  We don’t have today drugs specifically registered for amygdala dysfunctions as preventable agents towards some kind of crime behavior. This Neuro psychiatric condition or organ state are to be considered and treated in preventive way as common disease. There is an amygdala physio-pathological Level of activation. Still we are not sure to call this dysfunctions status as Disease and drugs are needed or efficacy to control it. A neuro-pharmacology research of amygdala can give the response also using imaging Techniques. Studies demonstrated that Amygdala activation is involved in aggressive behavior. The aim of this work is to investigate in this relationship and to find if there is a level of activation. . Keywords: Amygdala activation level, Pharmacology Neuro Imaging, Antisocial personality disorder.

   INTRODUCTIONAmygdala is activated in some condition such as anger Anxiety, fear, predatory behavior, aggressive behavior, defense or subjugate behavior. Emotion: behavior and physiological response (vegetative and hormonal) involved in behavior and communication adjustment. “The hippocampus, amygdala, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, septal area, cingulate gyrus, and prefrontal cortex project to these structures directly or indirectly and thus can

modulate the intensity of attack and rage”[1]

Amygdala- SNC connections and other systems involved Receive connections from frontal temporal limbic (olfactory way) and send connections to frontal, hippocampus hypo thalamus encephalic trunk (behavior and vegetative response). Amygdala stimulation increase emotional response and drugs as Benzodiazepines, morphine reduces amygdala activation. Hypothalamus and aggressivity: defensive and predation behavior. Orbitofrontal cortex: involved in emotion interpreting Morality, caution behavior in social situation. Connected with temporal area, limbic. And amygdala cingulum. The temporal lobe is involved in theory of mind and its dysfunction is often implicated in violent psychopathy.[2] Face emotional recognize. Innate, transcultural controlled by right hemisphere (neuroimaging studies). Face emotional expression: happiness, sadness, anger, fear and other stereotyped behaviors. Aggressive behavior is involved in physiological adjustment. Serotonin neuron activation

Access this article online Website: www.iabcr.org

Quick Response code

DOI: 10.21276/iabcr.2016.2.2.1

Received:21.04.16| Revised:20.05.16| Accepted:10.06.16

Corresponding Author M. Luisetto, Applied pharmacologist, European Specialist in Laboratory Medicine, Italy,

Copyright: © the author(s) and publisher. IABCR is an official publication of Ibn Sina Academy of Medieval Medicine & Sciences, registered in 2001 under Indian Trusts Act, 1882. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Page 2: Original article Amygdala pharmacology and crime behavior,disfunctions to be considered as a disease ? intern. archives of biomedical and clinical research m.luisetto, f.a.khan et

Int  Arch  BioMed  Clin  Res. Luisetto M, et al.: Association of Amygdala dysfunctions and crime Behavior

www.iabcr.org International Archives of BioMedical and Clinical Research | April-June 2016 | Vol 2 | Issue 2 P a g e 2

reduce aggressively and anti-social behavior. Various aggressive behaviors are related with reproductive functions and sexual hormones. Androgen increase aggressivity and associate to increase aggressivity. Preoptical medial area: male sexual aggressivity involved. Neuroimaging results say that Amygdala has a level of activation for GABAergic Gene and it excretes serotonin. “Among the anatomical structures implicated in morality are the frontal, temporal and cingulate cortices”.[2]

“Brain areas participating in moral processing can be influenced also by genetic, endocrine and environmental factors“.[2]

“Hormones can modulate moral behavior through their effects on the brain. Finally, genetic polymorphisms can predispose to aggressivity and violence, arguing for a genetic-based predisposition to morality”.[2]

“The violence-specific modulation of prefrontal-amygdala networks appears to control aggressive behavior and provides a neurobiological model for the anti-aggressive effects of quetiapine” klasen et al.[3]

“Biochemical data suggests that heightened anxiety-like behavior and aggression is associated with increased plasma levels of corticosterone and elevated oxidative stress. Significant alterations in dopamine (DA), norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine (EPI) were observed within the hippocampus, amygdala, and the prefrontal cortex, suggesting potential involvement of dopaminergic and noradrenergic systems in regulation of aggressive behaviors”.[4]

“We found novel evidence that childhood aggressive behavior is related to decreased amygdala volume, decreased sensorimotor cortical thickness, and decreased global right hemisphere gyrification”.[5]

J P Hayes, ET AL “In recent years, neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) have played a significant role in elucidating the neural underpinnings of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).[6]

Results demonstrated that the region’s most consistently hyper activated in PTSD patients included mid- and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, and when ROI studies were included, bilateral amygdala. These results provide evidence for a neuro circuitry model of PTSD that emphasizes alteration in neural networks important for salience detection and emotion regulation”.[6] Sergerie K, et al.[7] “Functional neuroimaging studies have provided strong support for a critical role of the amygdala in emotional processing. However, several controversies remain in terms of whether different factors-such as sex, valence and stimulus type-have an effect on the magnitude and lateralization of amygdala responses. We conducted a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of visual emotional perception that reported amygdala activation. Critically, unlike previous neuroimaging meta-analyses, we took into account the magnitude (effect size) and reliability (variance) associated with each of the activations. Our results confirm that the amygdala responds to both positive and negative stimuli,

with a preference for faces depicting emotional expressions. We did not find evidence for amygdala lateralization as a function of sex or valence. Taken together, results from this meta-analysis shed new light on several of the models proposed in the literature regarding the neural basis of emotional processing” “The amygdala is involved in the response to fearful and sad facial expressions.[8]

It is suggested that amygdala dysfunction is one of the core neural systems implicated in the pathology of psychopathy.[8,9]

Neuroimaging studies confirmed that amygdala dysfunction is associated with psychopathy. Tiihonen et al. used volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to explore the relationship between amygdaloid volume and degree of psychopathy in violent offenders as measured by the PCL-R. High levels of psychopathy were associated with reduced amygdaloid volume. Kiehl et al. used functional MRI to examine neural responses in individuals with high and low scores on the PCL-R during an emotional memory task where the participant processed words of neutral and negative valence. They found a reduced amygdala response in the high-scoring group, relative to the low-scoring group, during the processing of words of negative valence. On the basis of neuropsychological and neuroimaging findings for violent offenders, it has been argued that the frontal cortex could be dysfunctional. There are crucial differences between the general population of violent offenders and these individuals. Neuropsychological work with individuals with psychopathy, unlike work with individuals who are violent, has repeatedly found frontal functioning to be intact. The basic causes of the pathology remain unclear; however, there are interesting possibilities. One is that pathology in the noradrenergic system can lead to the observed amygdala dysfunction. Certainly, administration of the β-adrenergic blocker propranolol, as well as amygdala damage, blocks the improvement in episodic memory for emotionally arousing events, as well as disrupting the processing of sad facial expressions.[9]

Neuro Imaging Functional Studies (that used the paradigm of induced anger), showed that the activation of orbitofrontal cortex is inhibitory towards emotions regulation. Injury in prefrontal cortex are associated with reduction in inhibitory capacity to control emotions and violent behavior even if other cognitive function remains the same.

“Theory, research, and clinical reports suggest that moral cognitions play a role in initiating and sustaining criminal behavior. The 25 item Criminogenic Cognitions Scale (CCS) was designed to tap 5 dimensions: Notions of entitlement; Failure to Accept Responsibility; Short-Term Orientation; Insensitivity to Impact of Crime; and Negative Attitudes Toward Authority. Results from 552 jail inmates support the reliability, validity, and predictive utility of the measure. The CCS was linked to criminal justice system involvement,

Page 3: Original article Amygdala pharmacology and crime behavior,disfunctions to be considered as a disease ? intern. archives of biomedical and clinical research m.luisetto, f.a.khan et

Int  Arch  BioMed  Clin  Res. Luisetto M, et al.: Association of Amygdala dysfunctions and crime Behavior

www.iabcr.org International Archives of BioMedical and Clinical Research | April-June 2016 | Vol 2 | Issue 2 P a g e 3

self-report measures of aggression, impulsivity, and lack of empathy. Additionally, the CCS was associated with violent criminal history, antisocial personality, and clinicians’ ratings of risk for future violence and psychopathy (PCL:SV). “With PubMed research using keyword amygdala associated to the word: crime, pharmacology, neuroimaging, we have find various scientific articles that demonstrated a link between amygdala and aggressive behavior in collaboration with other systems. The article on PubMed demonstrates a strictly influence of amygdala and related systems in behavior and aggressivity. J.Downer at University College London first identified amygdala in the reason of aggressive behavior and he tested it on rhesus monkey. Neuro- Psychological and neuroimaging studies results say that amygdala plays a crucial role in aggression and violence. Neurobiology and anatomy, heterogeneity, phenotypes, pathophysiological findings, neurochemistry, molecular genetics, regional volumes, functional studies, neuropharmacology, interregional connectivity says that amygdala-frontal circuitry is very related to crime. Pharmacological researches say that this region excretes serotonin 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (5,7-DHT). American Psychological Association (APA) published a paper on a criminal mind. They told that that amygdala is the main reason behind crime and aggressive behavior. D. Pardini found in the University of Pittsburgh found that lower amygdala volumes were more than three times aggressive. This trait remains in a man before many years than the people crimes. Raine et al, 1997 in Department of Criminology (the University of Pennsylvania) studied on amygdala function on 1,795 children of 3 years old. After 20 years, they discovered that the children which had deficit of fear conditioning in amygdala predisposes to crime at 23 years.[10]

The anterior cingulate cortex which plays a major role in behavior regulation and impulsivity, has also been linked to crime, this volume is reduced in the criminals or prisoners Goodman et. al. demonstrated that dialectical behavior therapy(DBT) can be used as a therapy for amygdala functions. So the neurobiology of crime says that amygdala is associated with crime and aggression and therapies can be given on amygdala. Functional imaging studies suggest abnormalities in limbic brain activity during emotional information processing in impulsively aggressive subjects with Intermittent Explosive Disorder (IED).[12]

These data reveal that IED Intermittent Explosive Disorder (IED). is associated with a significant loss of neurons in both the amygdala and hippocampus.[12]

Goodman et. al. demonstrated that dialectical behavior therapy(DBT) can be used as a therapy for amygdala dysfunctions.[13]

Neurobiology of crime indicates that amygdala is associated with crime and aggression. Therapies can be given on a pathological amygdala which could be consider a solution of criminal behavior in future. Neuropharmacological interventions is the key to prevent these kind of amygdala related aggressive behavior. In future can be interesting to investigate in this filed.

DISCUSSION  Because abnormal moral behavior can arise from both functional and structural brain abnormalities that should be diagnosed and treated, the neurology of moral behavior has potential implications for clinical practice and raises ethical concerns.[2]

“The complex interaction among these neurotransmitters occurs at the level of brain areas and neural circuits such as the orbito prefrontal cortex, anterior cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, periaqueductal gray, and septal nuclei, where the receptors of these neurotransmitters are expressed. The neurobiological mechanism of aggression is important to understand the rationale for using atypical antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, and lithium in treating aggressive.[14]

“A better understanding of the neurobiological bases of psychopathy could improve therapeutic interventions, reducing the related social costs”.[15] Emotional processing and learning, and several social and affective decision-making functions are impaired in psychopathy, which correlates with specific changes in neural functions.[15] “A better understanding of the neural mechanisms and substrates regulating aggression and rage and thus establish a rational basis for treatment of disorders associated with these forms of aggression”.[1] Various physiological systems are involved in aggressive behavior. But as every organs and apparatus we can think a physiological level of function that classify as physiological from pathological State we can find also for amygdala systems a Basal level to think a pathological status or malfunctions. For various organ and apparatus, we have diagnostic tests in order to monitoring Physiology or pathological status (ex imaging or other lab. Test) but in order to verify amygdala functionality we do not have a diagnostic system to delimited pathological status of iper activation in objective way. CONCLUSION  we conclude that is needed to find an objective diagnostic system to verify the basic level of activation status of amygdala in stress conditions and also to find if a drugs therapy systems can be considered if we have an organic pathology conditions. As others physiological apparatus: a pathological activation and status can be controlled by specific pharmacological therapy. Other implication (moral, ethical, legal) are not considered in this paper. This article has not diagnostics or therapy intent.

 What  this  study  adds:  1.What is known about this subject? Amygdala is found to be activated in conditions such as anger Anxiety, fear, predatory behavior, aggressive behavior, defense or subjugate behavior. 2. What new information is offered in this study?

We need to diagnose the level of activation of Amygdala during stressful conditions and further Drugs system can be used to modify that level of activation of amygdala.

Page 4: Original article Amygdala pharmacology and crime behavior,disfunctions to be considered as a disease ? intern. archives of biomedical and clinical research m.luisetto, f.a.khan et

Int  Arch  BioMed  Clin  Res. Luisetto M, et al.: Association of Amygdala dysfunctions and crime Behavior

www.iabcr.org International Archives of BioMedical and Clinical Research | April-June 2016 | Vol 2 | Issue 2 P a g e 4

REFERENCES  1.   Gregg TR1, Siegel A. et al. Brain structures and neurotransmitters

regulating aggression in cats: implications for human aggression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2001 Jan;25(1):91-140.

2.   Fumagalli M, Priori A. Brain. Functional and clinical neuroanatomy of morality. 2012 Jul;135(Pt 7):2006-21. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr334. Epub 2012 Feb 13.

3.   Klasen M, Zvyagintsev M, Schwenzer M, Mathiak KA, Sarkheil P, Weber R, et al. Quetiapine modulates functional connectivity in brain aggression networks. 2013 Jul 15;75:20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.053. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

4.   Patki G, Atrooz F, Alkadhi I, Solanki N, Salim S. High aggression in rats is associated with elevated stress, anxiety-like behavior, and altered catecholamine content in the brain. Neurosci Lett. 2015 Jan 1;584:308-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.10.051. Epub 2014 Nov 1.

5.   Thijssen S1, Ringoot AP, Wildeboer A, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, El Marroun H, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW, et al. Brain morphology of childhood aggressive behavior: A multi-informant study in school-age children. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Sep;15(3):564-77

6.   Hayes JP, Hayes SM, Mikedis AM. Quantitative meta-analysis of neural activity in posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Mood Anxiety Disord. 2012; 2: 9.

7.   Sergerie K, Chochol C, Armony JL. The role of the amygdala in emotional processing: a quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32(4):811-30. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.12.002. Epub 2008 Jan 17.

8.   Blair RJ1, Morris JS, Frith CD, Perrett DI, Dolan RJ. Dissociable neural responses to facial expressions of sadness and anger. Brain. 1999 May;122 ( Pt 5):883-93.

9.   R. JAMES R. Blair. Neurobiological basis of psychopathy. The British Journal of Psychiatry Jan 2003, 182 (1) 5-7; DOI: 10.1192/bjp.182.1.5

10.   Raine A, Buchsbaum M, LaCasse L. Brain abnormalities in murderers indicated by positron emission tomography. Biol Psychiatry. 1997 Sep 15;42(6):495-508.

11.   Hornak J, Rolls ET, Wade D. Face and voice expression identification in patients with emotional and behavioral changes following ventral frontal lobe damage. Neuropsychologia. 1996;34:247–61

12.   Coccaro EF1, Lee R2, McCloskey M3, Csernansky JG4, Wang L5. J Morphometric analysis of amygdla and hippocampus shape in impulsively aggressive and healthy control subjects. Psychiatr Res. 2015 Oct;69:80-6.

13.   Goodman et. al. Dialectical behavior therapy alters emotion regulation and amygdala activity in patients with borderline personality disorderPsychiatr Res. 2014 October; 57: 108–116.

14.   Comai S1, Tau M, Gobbi G.J. The psychopharmacology of aggressive behavior: a translational approach: part 1: neurobiology. Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Feb;32(1):83-94

15.   del casale et al. Functional Neuroimaging inPsychopathy. Neuropsychobiology 2015;72:97–117

How to cite this article: Mauro L, Khan FA, Cabianca L, Mokbul MI, Rafa AY, Nili-Ahmadabadi B. Amygdala pharmacology and crime behavior, dysfunctions to be considered as a disease. Int Arch BioMed Clin Res. 2016 June;2(2):x-x. DOI: 10.21276/iabcr.2016.2.2.4 Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None