28
Modern European Guidelines on HIV Treatment Anna Maria Geretti Institute of Infection & Global Health University of Liverpool, United Kingdom

Modern European Guidelines on HIV Treatment 2016. Key Updates

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Modern European Guidelines on HIV Treatment

Anna Maria Geretti

Institute of Infection & Global Health

University of Liverpool, United Kingdom

Themes

Updates on Factors to Consider:

• When deciding to start ART

• When selecting the first-line ART regimen

HIV Treatment Guidelines: When to Start?

EACS 2015

Symptomatic Asymptomatic

Any CD4 Count CD4 <350 CD4 ≥350

Strongly recommend

Strongly recommend

Recommend

EACS 2016*

All patients

*EACS 2016 Guidelines in preparation

DHSS 2016

All patients*

HIV Treatment Guidelines: When to Start?

EACS 2016*

All patients

*EACS 2016 Guidelines in preparation

ART prevents HIV-related disease and mortality (AI-level evidence)

ART prevents HIV transmission (AI-level evidence)

Incidence of New HIV Diagnoses Across Europe (per 100,000 residents)

WHO; eCDC

START: Immediate vs. Deferred Therapy for Asymptomatic, ART-Naive Patients

• International, randomized trial

• Composite primary endpoint: any serious AIDS or non-AIDS* event or death

• Follow-up mean 3 years

• Median baseline CD4 count 651 cells, plasma HIV-1 RNA 12,759 cps

• Median CD4 count at ART initiation for deferred group: 408 cells

Immediate ART ART initiated immediately

following randomization (n= 2326)

INSIGHT START Study Group. N Engl J Med 2015

Deferred ART Deferred until CD4 count ≤350 cells,

AIDS, or event requiring ART (n= 2359)

ART-naïve adults CD4 count >500 cells

(N= 4685)

Study closed by DSMB following interim analysis

*Non-AIDS event: Cardiovascular disease, end-stage renal disease, decompensated liver disease, non-AIDS cancer

START: 57% Reduced Risk of Serious Events or Death With Immediate ART

Serious AIDS or non-AIDS event or death: 4.1% vs. 1.8% in deferred vs. immediate ART (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.30-0.62; P<0.001)

10

8

6

4

2

0

Cu

mu

lati

ve %

wit

h E

ven

t

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60

Months

Deferred ART

Immediate ART

INSIGHT START Study Group. N Engl J Med 2015

START: Primary Endpoint Events by Latest CD4 Cell Count

Immediate ART Deferred ART

Pe

rce

nt

of

Follo

w-u

p T

ime

Latest CD4 Count (cells/mm3)

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

2 (4.7)

No. of Pts With Events (Rates/100 PY)

No. of Pts With Events (Rates/100 PY)

3 (0.8)

6 (0.4)

11 (0.6)

20 (0.6)

5 (1.8)

34 (2.0)

34 (1.5)

9 (0.6)

14 (1.1)

INSIGHT START Study Group. N Engl J Med 2015

START: Primary Endpoint Components With Immediate vs. Deferred ART

Endpoint

Immediate ART

(n= 2326)

Deferred ART

(n= 2359) HR (95% CI)

P

Value N Rate/100 PY N Rate/100 PY

Serious AIDS event 14

0.20 50

0.72 0.28 (0.15-0.50) <0.001

Serious non-AIDS event 29

0.42 47

0.67 0.61 (0.38-0.97) 0.04

All-cause death 12

0.17 21

0.30 0.58 (0.28-1.17) 0.13

Tuberculosis 6 0.09 20

0.28 0.29 (0.12-0.73) 0.008

Kaposi’s sarcoma 1 0.01 11

0.16 0.09 (0.01-0.71) 0.02

Malignant lymphoma 3 0.04 10

0.14 0.30 (0.08-1.10) 0.07

Non-AIDS defining cancer

9 0.13 18

0.26 0.50 (0.22-1.11) 0.09

Cardiovascular disease 12

0.17 14

0.20 0.84 (0.39-1.81) 0.65

INSIGHT START Study Group. N Engl J Med 2015

START: Cancer Events With Immediate vs. Deferred ART

Cancer

Event, n

Immediate ART

(n= 2326)

Deferred ART

(n= 2359)

Total 14 39

Kaposi’s sarcoma 1 11

Lymphoma NHL + HL 3 10

Prostate 2 3

Lung 2 2

Anal 1 2

Cervical or testis 1 2

Other types* 4 9 *Immediate ART: squamous cell carcinoma, plasma cell myeloma, bladder cancer, fibrosarcoma

*Deferred ART: gastric adenocarcinoma, breast cancer, ureteric cancer, malignant melanoma, myeloid leukemia, thyroid cancer, leiomyosarcoma, liver cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck

Time to Cancer Event

10

8

6

4

2

0 Cu

mu

lati

ve

% w

ith

Eve

nt

0 12 24 36 48 60

Months

Deferred ART

Immediate ART

Rate/100 PY: Immediate 0.20; deferred 0.56 (HR: 0.36; 95% CI 0.19-0.66; P = .001)

INSIGHT START Study Group. N Engl J Med 2015

Factors to Consider When Selecting ART

Patient-related

• CD4 count, Viral Load, Resistance, HLA-B*5701 status

• Preferences & Life-style; Anticipated adherence; Psyco-social dimension

• Cardiovascular, renal, or neurological disease; Metabolic disorders; Osteoporosis; Hepatitis B or C; TB

• Psychiatric illness; Drug abuse or dependency; Narcotic replacement therapy

• Pregnancy and pregnancy potential

Factors to Consider When Selecting ART

Treatment-related

• Evidence of virological efficacy and safety

• Tolerability profile

• Barrier to resistance

• Drug interactions

• Convenience

• Cost

Registrational Treatment-Naive Clinical Trials

HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 48 *This slide depicts data from multiple studies ( 2004-2013). Not all regimens have been compared head-to-head in a clinical trial

78

77

76

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

STARTMRK RAL (n=281)

CASTLE ATV + RTV (n=440)

ABT 730 LPV/r qd (n=333)

CASTLE LPV/r (n=443)

68

67 HEAT LPV/r (n=345)

HEAT LPV/r (n=343)

71 ASSERT EFV (n=193)

84

82 ECHO/THRIVE EFV (n=546)

76 ABT 730 LPV/r bid (n=331)

86

GS-102 STRIBILD (n=348)

90 GS-103 STRIBILD (n=353)

59 ASSERT EFV (n=192)

87 GS-103 ATV + RTV (n=355)

86

GS-102 ATRIPLA (n=352)

84 ARTEMIS DRV + RTV (n=343)

83 ECHO/THRIVE RPV (n=550)

76 GS-903 EFV (n=299)

82 STARTMRK EFV (n=282)

80 GS 934 EFV (n=244)

78 ARTEMIS LPV/r (n=346)

SPRING-2 DTG (n=242) 89

SINGLE DTG (n=414) 88

SPRING-2 DTG (n=169)

88

NRTI Backbone

FTC/TDF

3TC/ABC

TDF/3TC

82 STaR EFV (n=392)

86 STaR RPV (n=394)

HIV Treatment Guidelines

• When to start? Now • What to start? A preferred regimen EACS 2015 DHSS 2016

ABC 3TC DTG

TDF FTC DTG

TDF FTC RAL Preferred with anti-TB therapy

TDF FTC EVG/c* Pre-treatment estimated CrCl ≥70 mL/min

In 2016 TAF FTC EVG/c* Pre-treatment estimated CrCl ≥30 mL/min

TDF FTC DRV/r*

TDF FTC RPV* CD4 count >200 cells and VL <100,000 cps (BI-level)

ABC only if HLA-B*5701 negative; 3TC may substitute FTC *With food

ABC= Abacavir; 3TC= Lamivudine; DTG= Dolutegravir; TDF= Tenofovir DF; FTC= Emtricitabine; RAL= Raltegravir; EVG/c= Elvitegravir/cobicistat

TAF= Tenofovir AF; DRV/r= Darunavir + ritonavir; RPV= Rilpivirine

TAF in Clinical Trials Study Design Follow-up Outcomes in TAF arm 1089 Randomised

(1:1) DB (n=663)

Continue suppressive TDF/FTC + 3rd agent Or Switch TDF to TAF

Wk 48 (primary) Through wk 96

Wk 48: virologically non-inferior; better

renal & bone measures

104/ 111

Randomised (1:1) DB (n=1733)

Naïve adults TDF/FTC/EVG/c vs. TAF/FTC/ EVG/c (1:1)

Wk 48 (primary) Through wk 144

Wk 96: virologically non-inferior; better

renal measures

109 Randomised (1:2) Open label (n=1426)

Continue suppressive TDF/FTC + 3rd agent or Switch to TDF/FTC/EVG/c

Wk 48 (primary) Through wk 96

Wk 48: virologically statistically superior; better renal & bone

measures 112 Single arm

Open label (n=242)

Suppressed adults with renal Impairment (eGFR 30-69 mL/min) Switch to TAF/FTC/EVG/c

Wk 24 (primary) Through wk 144

Wk 96: 2% virological failure; improved

renal & bone measures

106 Single arm Open label (n=50)

Naïve adolescents TAF/FTC/EVG/c

Wk 48 (primary)

Wk 48: 6% virological failure; improved bone measures

GS-1089: Renal Outcomes with Switch from TDF- to TAF-Containing ART

No proximal renal tubulopathy or Fanconi syndrome in either arm

Me

dia

n e

GFR

Ch

ange

(m

L/m

in)

Wk

8.4

2.8

P < .001

TAF

TAF

40

20

0

-20

-40

Me

dia

n %

Ch

ange

at

Wk

48

Protein Albumin RBP β2-M

Urine Protein-to-Creatinine Ratio

7.7

-14.6 -7.7

-16.3

-39.6

12.3 18.2 22.0

TDF

TDF

P < .001

P < .001

P < .001

P < .001

Gallant et al. CROI 2016

20

10

0

-10 0 12 24 36 48

GS-1089: Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Changes with Switch from TDF- to TAF-Containing ART

Spine 4

2

0

Me

an %

ch

ange

in

BM

D (

95

% C

I)

1.5

-0.2

P < .001

BL 24 48

Wks

FTC/TAF, n FTC/TDF, n

321 320

310 310

300 306

Hip 4

2

0

1.1

-0.2

BL 24 48

Wks

321 317

309 305

300 303

P < .001

≥ 3% BMD Increase at Wk 48 FTC/TAF FTC/TDF P Value

Spine 30% 14% <0.001

Hip 17% 9% 0.003

Gallant et al. CROI 2016

Alternative & Other First-Line Regimens

EACS 2015 DHSS 2016 TDF FTC RPV* CD4 count >200 cells and VL <100,000 cps

TDF FTC EFV Preferred with anti-TB therapy

TDF FTC ATV/r* TDF FTC ATV/c* Pre-treatment estimated CrCl ≥70 mL/min

ABC 3TC DRV/r or DRV/c* Pre-treatment estimated CrCl ≥70 mL/min

TDF FTC DRV/c* Pre-treatment estimated CrCl ≥70 mL/min

ABC only if HLA-B*5701 negative; 3TC may substitute FTC *With food

TDF= Tenofovir DF; FTC= Emtricitabine; RPV= Rilpivirine; EFV= efavirenz ATV/r= Atazanavir + ritonavir; ATV/c= Atazanavir/cobicistat

ABC= Abacavir; 3TC= Lamivudine; DRV/r= Darunavir + ritonavir DRV/c= Darunavir/cobicistat

Alternative & Other First-Line Regimens

EACS 2015 DHSS 2016 ABC 3TC RAL ABC 3TC EFV VL <100,000 cps

ABC 3TC ATV/r or ATV/c* VL <100,000 cps

ABC 3TC LPV/r* TDF FTC LPV/r* Caution if high cardiovascular risk

DRV/r RALa* CD4 count >200 cells and VL <100,000 cps

3TC LPV/ra*

aIf ABC and TDF/TAF cannot be used

ABC only if HLA-B*5701 negative; 3TC may substitute FTC *With food ABC= Abacavir; 3TC= Lamivudine; RAL= Raltegravir

EFV= Efavirenz; ATV/r Atazanavir + ritonavir ATV/c= Atazanavir/cobicistat; LPV/r= Lopinavir/ritonavir

DRV/r= Darunavir + ritonavir

Common Reasons for Starting a PI

• Concerns about adherence – protective effect of high barrier to emergence of resistance

• Need to start ART immediately and resistance test result not yet available – e.g., PHI

• Perceptions about potency in late presenters with low CD4 cells counts and high viral load

• Hospitalised patients undergoing diagnostic investigations

PI= Protease Inhibitor PHI = Primary HIV Infection

Proportion with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml through 48 weeks

FLAMINGO: DTG vs. DRV/r in First-Line ART

Clotet et al. Lancet 2014

Virological success

DTG DRV

90% 83%

DTG DRV

FLAMINGO: Responses by Baseline Viral Load & NRTI Backbone

DTG DRV Difference (95% CI)

P-value

Baseline VL

≤100,000 160/181 (88%) 157/181 (87%) 1.7 (-5.1 to 8.5)

>100,000 57/61 (93%) 43/61 (70%) 23 (9.9 to 36) 0.005

Backbone

ABC 3TC 71/79 (90%) 68/80 (85%) 4.9 (-5.4 to 15.1)

TDF FTC 146/163 (90%) 132/162 (81%) 8.1 (0.5 to 15.7) 0.624

Proportions with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies

Clotet et al. Lancet 2014

START: TDR Rates by ARV Class

10,1

13

8,8

10,6

13

4,4

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Total(n=1781)

USA(n=392)

Europe(n=1219)

Germany(n=263)

Spain(n=184)

UK(n=295)

% w

ith

RA

Ms

Any

NRTI

NNRTI

PI

TDR = Transmitted drug resistance RAMs= Resistance-associated mutations

Baxter et al. HIV Med 2015

Virological or Tolerability Failure with RAL, ATV/r, or DRV/r + TDF/FTC in First-Line

Cu

mu

lati

ve In

cid

en

ce

1.00

0.75

0.50

0.25

0.00

ATV/r

RAL DRV/r

Lennox et al. Ann Intern Med 2014

Difference in 96 wk cumulative incidence (97.5% CI)

605 536 494 427 317 603 574 545 511

307 601 559 520 470 358

ATV/r RAL DRV/r

Food requirements

Determinants of ART Success

Potency of the ART regimen

Pill burden and dosing schedules

Drug interactions

Convenience of the ART regimen

Drug resistance Drug PK

Psyco-social factors

Pre-ART CD4 Count and Viral Load

Tolerability of the ART regimen Retention

Adherence

Summary: Starting ART

• All patients will benefit from starting ART soon after diagnosis

– Use the correct language in patients who are reluctant

– Consider transmission risk

• Mental illness, substance abuse, psychosocial challenges are not reasons to withhold ART

– Select the ART regimen accordingly and use additional interventions to support adherence and retention

When: Annually in September

Where: Aix en Provence, France

For: Healthcare practitioners and clinical researchers

Structure:

Morning: Research and clinical plenaries for all Afternoon: Research (A) and clinical (B) tracks

HIV Summer School Residential Course

Clinical Management of HIV Online Course Main topics

• Epidemiology and surveillance of HIV

• Opportunistic infections and co-morbidities

• Antiretroviral therapy and complications of ART

• Continuum of HIV Care

• Key affected populations

• Treatment as prevention of HIV Russian translation available

Thank you