Upload
hivlifeinfo
View
364
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Modern European Guidelines on HIV Treatment
Anna Maria Geretti
Institute of Infection & Global Health
University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
Themes
Updates on Factors to Consider:
• When deciding to start ART
• When selecting the first-line ART regimen
HIV Treatment Guidelines: When to Start?
EACS 2015
Symptomatic Asymptomatic
Any CD4 Count CD4 <350 CD4 ≥350
Strongly recommend
Strongly recommend
Recommend
EACS 2016*
All patients
*EACS 2016 Guidelines in preparation
DHSS 2016
All patients*
HIV Treatment Guidelines: When to Start?
EACS 2016*
All patients
*EACS 2016 Guidelines in preparation
ART prevents HIV-related disease and mortality (AI-level evidence)
ART prevents HIV transmission (AI-level evidence)
START: Immediate vs. Deferred Therapy for Asymptomatic, ART-Naive Patients
• International, randomized trial
• Composite primary endpoint: any serious AIDS or non-AIDS* event or death
• Follow-up mean 3 years
• Median baseline CD4 count 651 cells, plasma HIV-1 RNA 12,759 cps
• Median CD4 count at ART initiation for deferred group: 408 cells
Immediate ART ART initiated immediately
following randomization (n= 2326)
INSIGHT START Study Group. N Engl J Med 2015
Deferred ART Deferred until CD4 count ≤350 cells,
AIDS, or event requiring ART (n= 2359)
ART-naïve adults CD4 count >500 cells
(N= 4685)
Study closed by DSMB following interim analysis
*Non-AIDS event: Cardiovascular disease, end-stage renal disease, decompensated liver disease, non-AIDS cancer
START: 57% Reduced Risk of Serious Events or Death With Immediate ART
Serious AIDS or non-AIDS event or death: 4.1% vs. 1.8% in deferred vs. immediate ART (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.30-0.62; P<0.001)
10
8
6
4
2
0
Cu
mu
lati
ve %
wit
h E
ven
t
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60
Months
Deferred ART
Immediate ART
INSIGHT START Study Group. N Engl J Med 2015
START: Primary Endpoint Events by Latest CD4 Cell Count
Immediate ART Deferred ART
Pe
rce
nt
of
Follo
w-u
p T
ime
Latest CD4 Count (cells/mm3)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2 (4.7)
No. of Pts With Events (Rates/100 PY)
No. of Pts With Events (Rates/100 PY)
3 (0.8)
6 (0.4)
11 (0.6)
20 (0.6)
5 (1.8)
34 (2.0)
34 (1.5)
9 (0.6)
14 (1.1)
INSIGHT START Study Group. N Engl J Med 2015
START: Primary Endpoint Components With Immediate vs. Deferred ART
Endpoint
Immediate ART
(n= 2326)
Deferred ART
(n= 2359) HR (95% CI)
P
Value N Rate/100 PY N Rate/100 PY
Serious AIDS event 14
0.20 50
0.72 0.28 (0.15-0.50) <0.001
Serious non-AIDS event 29
0.42 47
0.67 0.61 (0.38-0.97) 0.04
All-cause death 12
0.17 21
0.30 0.58 (0.28-1.17) 0.13
Tuberculosis 6 0.09 20
0.28 0.29 (0.12-0.73) 0.008
Kaposi’s sarcoma 1 0.01 11
0.16 0.09 (0.01-0.71) 0.02
Malignant lymphoma 3 0.04 10
0.14 0.30 (0.08-1.10) 0.07
Non-AIDS defining cancer
9 0.13 18
0.26 0.50 (0.22-1.11) 0.09
Cardiovascular disease 12
0.17 14
0.20 0.84 (0.39-1.81) 0.65
INSIGHT START Study Group. N Engl J Med 2015
START: Cancer Events With Immediate vs. Deferred ART
Cancer
Event, n
Immediate ART
(n= 2326)
Deferred ART
(n= 2359)
Total 14 39
Kaposi’s sarcoma 1 11
Lymphoma NHL + HL 3 10
Prostate 2 3
Lung 2 2
Anal 1 2
Cervical or testis 1 2
Other types* 4 9 *Immediate ART: squamous cell carcinoma, plasma cell myeloma, bladder cancer, fibrosarcoma
*Deferred ART: gastric adenocarcinoma, breast cancer, ureteric cancer, malignant melanoma, myeloid leukemia, thyroid cancer, leiomyosarcoma, liver cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck
Time to Cancer Event
10
8
6
4
2
0 Cu
mu
lati
ve
% w
ith
Eve
nt
0 12 24 36 48 60
Months
Deferred ART
Immediate ART
Rate/100 PY: Immediate 0.20; deferred 0.56 (HR: 0.36; 95% CI 0.19-0.66; P = .001)
INSIGHT START Study Group. N Engl J Med 2015
Factors to Consider When Selecting ART
Patient-related
• CD4 count, Viral Load, Resistance, HLA-B*5701 status
• Preferences & Life-style; Anticipated adherence; Psyco-social dimension
• Cardiovascular, renal, or neurological disease; Metabolic disorders; Osteoporosis; Hepatitis B or C; TB
• Psychiatric illness; Drug abuse or dependency; Narcotic replacement therapy
• Pregnancy and pregnancy potential
Factors to Consider When Selecting ART
Treatment-related
• Evidence of virological efficacy and safety
• Tolerability profile
• Barrier to resistance
• Drug interactions
• Convenience
• Cost
Registrational Treatment-Naive Clinical Trials
HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 48 *This slide depicts data from multiple studies ( 2004-2013). Not all regimens have been compared head-to-head in a clinical trial
78
77
76
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
STARTMRK RAL (n=281)
CASTLE ATV + RTV (n=440)
ABT 730 LPV/r qd (n=333)
CASTLE LPV/r (n=443)
68
67 HEAT LPV/r (n=345)
HEAT LPV/r (n=343)
71 ASSERT EFV (n=193)
84
82 ECHO/THRIVE EFV (n=546)
76 ABT 730 LPV/r bid (n=331)
86
GS-102 STRIBILD (n=348)
90 GS-103 STRIBILD (n=353)
59 ASSERT EFV (n=192)
87 GS-103 ATV + RTV (n=355)
86
GS-102 ATRIPLA (n=352)
84 ARTEMIS DRV + RTV (n=343)
83 ECHO/THRIVE RPV (n=550)
76 GS-903 EFV (n=299)
82 STARTMRK EFV (n=282)
80 GS 934 EFV (n=244)
78 ARTEMIS LPV/r (n=346)
SPRING-2 DTG (n=242) 89
SINGLE DTG (n=414) 88
SPRING-2 DTG (n=169)
88
NRTI Backbone
FTC/TDF
3TC/ABC
TDF/3TC
82 STaR EFV (n=392)
86 STaR RPV (n=394)
HIV Treatment Guidelines
• When to start? Now • What to start? A preferred regimen EACS 2015 DHSS 2016
ABC 3TC DTG
TDF FTC DTG
TDF FTC RAL Preferred with anti-TB therapy
TDF FTC EVG/c* Pre-treatment estimated CrCl ≥70 mL/min
In 2016 TAF FTC EVG/c* Pre-treatment estimated CrCl ≥30 mL/min
TDF FTC DRV/r*
TDF FTC RPV* CD4 count >200 cells and VL <100,000 cps (BI-level)
ABC only if HLA-B*5701 negative; 3TC may substitute FTC *With food
ABC= Abacavir; 3TC= Lamivudine; DTG= Dolutegravir; TDF= Tenofovir DF; FTC= Emtricitabine; RAL= Raltegravir; EVG/c= Elvitegravir/cobicistat
TAF= Tenofovir AF; DRV/r= Darunavir + ritonavir; RPV= Rilpivirine
TAF in Clinical Trials Study Design Follow-up Outcomes in TAF arm 1089 Randomised
(1:1) DB (n=663)
Continue suppressive TDF/FTC + 3rd agent Or Switch TDF to TAF
Wk 48 (primary) Through wk 96
Wk 48: virologically non-inferior; better
renal & bone measures
104/ 111
Randomised (1:1) DB (n=1733)
Naïve adults TDF/FTC/EVG/c vs. TAF/FTC/ EVG/c (1:1)
Wk 48 (primary) Through wk 144
Wk 96: virologically non-inferior; better
renal measures
109 Randomised (1:2) Open label (n=1426)
Continue suppressive TDF/FTC + 3rd agent or Switch to TDF/FTC/EVG/c
Wk 48 (primary) Through wk 96
Wk 48: virologically statistically superior; better renal & bone
measures 112 Single arm
Open label (n=242)
Suppressed adults with renal Impairment (eGFR 30-69 mL/min) Switch to TAF/FTC/EVG/c
Wk 24 (primary) Through wk 144
Wk 96: 2% virological failure; improved
renal & bone measures
106 Single arm Open label (n=50)
Naïve adolescents TAF/FTC/EVG/c
Wk 48 (primary)
Wk 48: 6% virological failure; improved bone measures
GS-1089: Renal Outcomes with Switch from TDF- to TAF-Containing ART
No proximal renal tubulopathy or Fanconi syndrome in either arm
Me
dia
n e
GFR
Ch
ange
(m
L/m
in)
Wk
8.4
2.8
P < .001
TAF
TAF
40
20
0
-20
-40
Me
dia
n %
Ch
ange
at
Wk
48
Protein Albumin RBP β2-M
Urine Protein-to-Creatinine Ratio
7.7
-14.6 -7.7
-16.3
-39.6
12.3 18.2 22.0
TDF
TDF
P < .001
P < .001
P < .001
P < .001
Gallant et al. CROI 2016
20
10
0
-10 0 12 24 36 48
GS-1089: Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Changes with Switch from TDF- to TAF-Containing ART
Spine 4
2
0
Me
an %
ch
ange
in
BM
D (
95
% C
I)
1.5
-0.2
P < .001
BL 24 48
Wks
FTC/TAF, n FTC/TDF, n
321 320
310 310
300 306
Hip 4
2
0
1.1
-0.2
BL 24 48
Wks
321 317
309 305
300 303
P < .001
≥ 3% BMD Increase at Wk 48 FTC/TAF FTC/TDF P Value
Spine 30% 14% <0.001
Hip 17% 9% 0.003
Gallant et al. CROI 2016
Alternative & Other First-Line Regimens
EACS 2015 DHSS 2016 TDF FTC RPV* CD4 count >200 cells and VL <100,000 cps
TDF FTC EFV Preferred with anti-TB therapy
TDF FTC ATV/r* TDF FTC ATV/c* Pre-treatment estimated CrCl ≥70 mL/min
ABC 3TC DRV/r or DRV/c* Pre-treatment estimated CrCl ≥70 mL/min
TDF FTC DRV/c* Pre-treatment estimated CrCl ≥70 mL/min
ABC only if HLA-B*5701 negative; 3TC may substitute FTC *With food
TDF= Tenofovir DF; FTC= Emtricitabine; RPV= Rilpivirine; EFV= efavirenz ATV/r= Atazanavir + ritonavir; ATV/c= Atazanavir/cobicistat
ABC= Abacavir; 3TC= Lamivudine; DRV/r= Darunavir + ritonavir DRV/c= Darunavir/cobicistat
Alternative & Other First-Line Regimens
EACS 2015 DHSS 2016 ABC 3TC RAL ABC 3TC EFV VL <100,000 cps
ABC 3TC ATV/r or ATV/c* VL <100,000 cps
ABC 3TC LPV/r* TDF FTC LPV/r* Caution if high cardiovascular risk
DRV/r RALa* CD4 count >200 cells and VL <100,000 cps
3TC LPV/ra*
aIf ABC and TDF/TAF cannot be used
ABC only if HLA-B*5701 negative; 3TC may substitute FTC *With food ABC= Abacavir; 3TC= Lamivudine; RAL= Raltegravir
EFV= Efavirenz; ATV/r Atazanavir + ritonavir ATV/c= Atazanavir/cobicistat; LPV/r= Lopinavir/ritonavir
DRV/r= Darunavir + ritonavir
Common Reasons for Starting a PI
• Concerns about adherence – protective effect of high barrier to emergence of resistance
• Need to start ART immediately and resistance test result not yet available – e.g., PHI
• Perceptions about potency in late presenters with low CD4 cells counts and high viral load
• Hospitalised patients undergoing diagnostic investigations
PI= Protease Inhibitor PHI = Primary HIV Infection
Proportion with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml through 48 weeks
FLAMINGO: DTG vs. DRV/r in First-Line ART
Clotet et al. Lancet 2014
Virological success
DTG DRV
90% 83%
DTG DRV
FLAMINGO: Responses by Baseline Viral Load & NRTI Backbone
DTG DRV Difference (95% CI)
P-value
Baseline VL
≤100,000 160/181 (88%) 157/181 (87%) 1.7 (-5.1 to 8.5)
>100,000 57/61 (93%) 43/61 (70%) 23 (9.9 to 36) 0.005
Backbone
ABC 3TC 71/79 (90%) 68/80 (85%) 4.9 (-5.4 to 15.1)
TDF FTC 146/163 (90%) 132/162 (81%) 8.1 (0.5 to 15.7) 0.624
Proportions with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies
Clotet et al. Lancet 2014
START: TDR Rates by ARV Class
10,1
13
8,8
10,6
13
4,4
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Total(n=1781)
USA(n=392)
Europe(n=1219)
Germany(n=263)
Spain(n=184)
UK(n=295)
% w
ith
RA
Ms
Any
NRTI
NNRTI
PI
TDR = Transmitted drug resistance RAMs= Resistance-associated mutations
Baxter et al. HIV Med 2015
Virological or Tolerability Failure with RAL, ATV/r, or DRV/r + TDF/FTC in First-Line
Cu
mu
lati
ve In
cid
en
ce
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
ATV/r
RAL DRV/r
Lennox et al. Ann Intern Med 2014
Difference in 96 wk cumulative incidence (97.5% CI)
605 536 494 427 317 603 574 545 511
307 601 559 520 470 358
ATV/r RAL DRV/r
Food requirements
Determinants of ART Success
Potency of the ART regimen
Pill burden and dosing schedules
Drug interactions
Convenience of the ART regimen
Drug resistance Drug PK
Psyco-social factors
Pre-ART CD4 Count and Viral Load
Tolerability of the ART regimen Retention
Adherence
Summary: Starting ART
• All patients will benefit from starting ART soon after diagnosis
– Use the correct language in patients who are reluctant
– Consider transmission risk
• Mental illness, substance abuse, psychosocial challenges are not reasons to withhold ART
– Select the ART regimen accordingly and use additional interventions to support adherence and retention
When: Annually in September
Where: Aix en Provence, France
For: Healthcare practitioners and clinical researchers
Structure:
Morning: Research and clinical plenaries for all Afternoon: Research (A) and clinical (B) tracks
HIV Summer School Residential Course
Clinical Management of HIV Online Course Main topics
• Epidemiology and surveillance of HIV
• Opportunistic infections and co-morbidities
• Antiretroviral therapy and complications of ART
• Continuum of HIV Care
• Key affected populations
• Treatment as prevention of HIV Russian translation available