Upload
john-blue
View
194
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Effects of lysine and energy intake during late gestation on reproductive performance of gilts and sows under
commercial conditions
M. A. D. Gonçalves*, K. M. Gourley, S. S. Dritz, M. D. Tokach,N. M. Bello, J. M. DeRouchey, J. C. Woodworth, and
R. D. Goodband
Kansas State University, Manhattan
BackgroundBump feeding during late gestation is a widely used practice generally defined as increasing feed intake by about 0.9 kg (2 lb) during the last third of gestation.
Cromwell et al. (1989)– Observed a 40 g (0.09 lb) increase in piglet birth
weight for bump fed gilts and sows. Shelton et al. (2009) and Soto et al. (2011)
– Increase in piglet birth weight from bump fed gilts, but no differences in piglet birth weight of bump fed sows.
Background
However, are these results reproducible under
commercial conditions in high prolific herds
(14.5 total born)?
If so, is the improvement in piglet birth weight
due to amino acids, energy, or both?
ObjectiveTo determine the effects of lysine and energy
intake during late gestation on reproductive
performance of gilts and sows.
Materials and Methods
2 (parity) × 2 (lysine) × 2 (energy) factorialParity (after farrowing): P1 (Gilts) or P2+ (Sows)Lysine: 10.7 or 20 g SID Lysine intake per dayEnergy: 4.50 or 6.75 Mcal of NE intake per day
d 40 d 90 d 111
Group housed (ESF) Dietarytreatments
1,102 females(741 gilts and 361 sows; PIC 1050)
Treatment structure:
Individually housed
Materials and MethodsDesign structure
1. Females were housed in pens by parity level (Gilt vs. Sows)2. Blocked by BW3. Individually and randomly assigned to the dietary treatments
Statistical analysis Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLIMMIX, SAS Inc.)
– Pen = experimental unit for parity– Female = experimental unit for the dietary treatments– Bonferroni adjustment was used to adjust multiple
comparisons
Feeding stations Calibrated twice a week
Dietary treatments
All other nutrients met or exceeded the NRC (2012) recommendations.
SID Lysine, %Ingredient 0.40 1.06Corn 87.98 62.48Soybean meal (46% CP) 8.05 33.58Monocalcium phosphate 1.60 1.25Limestone 1.50 1.45 Sodium chloride 0.50 0.50 L-Lys-HCl 0.05 0.05 DL-Met --- 0.20 L-Thr 0.04 0.21 Choline chloride 60% 0.10 0.10 Sow VTM 0.15 0.15 Phytase 0.04 0.04TOTAL 100.00 100.00
Dietary treatments
Low SID Lysine (0.40%) High SID Lysine (1.06%)
0.40% 0.59% 1.06%
2.52 2.48 2.45 2.39
SID Lys, %
Diet NE Mcal/kg
SID Lys and NE Intake/d:
10.7 g, 4.50 Mcal
20.0 g, 4.50 Mcal
10.7 g, 6.75 Mcal
20.0 g, 6.75 Mcal
1.9 kg/d
1.8 kg/d
2.7 kg/d
2.8 kg/d
0.73%
Blended fromLow and High Lys
Feed line 1 Feed line 2
Chemical analysis of the diets AA intake: Low High
Energy intake: Low High Low HighDry matter, % 89.3 (87.4) 90.1 (88.0) 89.3 (87.2) 89.8 (87.6)Crude protein, % 13.6 (14.2) 10.4 (11.2) 20.9 (21.5) 15.9 (16.3)Total Lysine, % 0.66 (0.69) 0.48 (0.48) 1.14 (1.21) 0.81 (0.84)
Crude fiber, % 1.6 (2.2) 1.6 (2.1) 2.1 (2.5) 1.9 (2.3)Calcium, % 0.84 (0.85) 0.74 (0.85) 0.79 (0.85) 0.78 (0.85)P, % 0.59 (0.63) 0.59 (0.62) 0.64 (0.66) 0.64 (0.64)Fat, % 2.6 (3.0) 2.5 (3.2) 2.8 (2.7) 2.5 (2.9)Ash, % 4.5 (5.1) 4.0 (4.9) 5.1 (5.8) 4.5 (5.3)
Values in parentheses indicate those calculated from diet formulation and are based on values from NRC, 2012
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
13.416.4
18.4
24.5
10.513.4
18.5
23.0
GiltsSows
BW g
ain
d 90
to d
111
, kg
BW gain (d 90 to d 111)
SID Lysine, g/d 10.7 20.0 10.7 20.0Net energy, Mcal/d 4.50 6.75
SEM = 0.68Lysine x Energy x Parity, P=0.128
Lysine x Energy, P<0.001Parity x Energy, P<0.001
In High Energy intake, BW gain increased 5.3 kg (11.7 lb) with increasing Lys intake, but in Low Energy increased 3.0 kg (6.6 lb)
Compared to High Energy, Low Energy decreased BW gain by 6.5 kg (14.3 lb) in gilts, but 8.8 kg (19.4 lb) in sows.
Total piglets bornSEM = 0.32
Lysine x Energy x Parity, P=0.249Parity, P<0.001
SID Lysine, g/d 10.7 20.0 10.7 20.0Net energy, Mcal/d 4.50 6.75
5
7
9
11
13
15
17
19
14.2 14.1 14.1 14.215.3 14.8 15.1 15.5
GiltsSows
Tota
l pig
lets
bor
n, n
Piglets born aliveLysine x Energy x Parity, P=0.569
Parity x Energy, P=0.092
5
7
9
11
13
15
17
19
13.4 13.4 13.2 13.314.3 13.7 13.5 14.1
GiltsSows
Pigl
ets b
orn
aliv
e, n
Reduced by 0.2 (P<0.001) in sows with High energy intake but no evidence for differences in gilts
95% 95% 94% 94%93% 90%93% 91% 1.0%
SEM
SID Lysine, g/d 10.7 20.0 10.7 20.0Net energy, Mcal/d 4.50 6.75
Stillborn piglets SEM = 0.83Lysine x Energy x Parity, P=0.456
Parity x Energy, P=0.014Lysine, P=0.049
012345678
3.5 3.2 3.6 3.2
5.1
3.7
6.96.1
GiltsSows
Still
born
rate
, %
SID Lysine, g/d 10.7 20.0 10.7 20.0Net energy, Mcal/d 4.50 6.75
SB increased 2.1 percentage points in Sows with High Energy
intake but no evidences for differences in Gilts
Stillborn piglets SEM = 0.83Lysine x Energy x Parity, P=0.456
Parity x Energy, P=0.014Lysine, P=0.049
012345678
3.5 3.2 3.6 3.2
5.1
3.7
6.96.1
GiltsSows
Still
born
rate
, %
SID Lysine, g/d 10.7 20.0 10.7 20.0Net energy, Mcal/d 4.50 6.75
SB reduced 0.7 percentage points in High Lys intake
females
Litter birth weight(Total born) SEM = 0.35
Lysine x Energy x Parity, P=0.453Parity, P<0.001
3
8
13
18
23
28
18.0 17.9 17.8 17.920.7 20.2 20.6 21.0
GiltsSows
Litt
er b
irth
wei
ght,
kg
SID Lysine, g/d 10.7 20.0 10.7 20.0Net energy, Mcal/d 4.50 6.75
Litter birth weight(Born alive) SEM = 0.35
Lysine x Energy x Parity, P=0.405Parity, P<0.001
3
8
13
18
23
28
17.2 17.2 17.1 17.319.6 19.5 19.1 20.0
GiltsSows
Litt
er b
irth
wei
ght,
kg
SID Lysine, g/d 10.7 20.0 10.7 20.0Net energy, Mcal/d 4.50 6.75
Individual piglet birth weight(Total born) SEM = 0.02
Lysine x Energy x Parity, P=0.885Parity, P<0.001
SID Lysine, g/d 10.7 20.0 10.7 20.0Net energy, Mcal/d 4.50 6.75
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.25 1.27 1.28 1.281.36 1.36 1.38 1.36
GiltsSows
Pigl
et b
irth
wei
ght,
kg
SEM = 0.02Lysine x Energy x Parity, P=0.489
Energy, P=0.011Parity, P<0.001
Individual piglet birth weight(Born alive)
SID Lysine, g/d 10.7 20.0 10.7 20.0Net energy, Mcal/d 4.50 6.75
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.28 1.28 1.30 1.311.36 1.39 1.40 1.41
GiltsSows
Pigl
et b
irth
wei
ght,
kg
Increased 30 grams (0.07 lb) in High Energy intake compared to Low energy intake females.
Piglets from sows were 97 g (0.21 lb) heavier than from gilts.
CV of birth weight within the litter(Born alive) SEM = 0.76
Lysine x Energy x Parity, P=0.955Parity, P<0.001
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
18.0 18.1 18.4 18.3
23.4 23.0 22.8 21.9
GiltsSows
CV o
f birt
h w
eigh
t with
in th
e lit
-te
r, %
SID Lysine, g/d 10.7 20.0 10.7 20.0Net energy, Mcal/d 4.50 6.75
Litter size after cross-fosteringSEM = 0.44
Lysine x Energy x Parity, P=0.462
Litters standardized (blinded) regardless of dietary treatment
SID Lysine, g/d 10.7 20.0 10.7 20.0Net energy, Mcal/d 4.50 6.75
5.0
7.0
9.0
11.0
13.0
15.0
17.0
19.0
14.5 14.4 14.6 14.314.2 13.7 13.9 14.0
GiltsSows
Litt
er si
ze a
fter c
ross
-fost
erin
g, n
Pre-weaning mortalitySEM = 1.21
Lysine x Energy x Parity, P=0.254Lysine, P=0.034Parity, P<0.001
SID Lysine, g/d 10.7 20.0 10.7 20.0Net energy, Mcal/d 4.50 6.75
5
7
9
11
13
15
17
10.3
8.08.9 8.4
13.7 13.1 13.312.1
GiltsSows
Pre-
wea
ning
mor
talit
y, %
PWM reduced 1.2 percentage points in piglets suckling from High Lys intake females
Wean-to-estrus intervalSEM = 0.49
Lysine x Energy x Parity, P=0.741Parity, P<0.001
SID Lysine, g/d 10.7 20.0 10.7 20.0Net energy, Mcal/d 4.50 6.75
0123456789
6.2 5.8 6.2 5.8
4.4 4.14.7 4.8
GiltsSows
Wea
n-to
-est
rus i
nter
val,
d
Subsequent performance: Farrowing rateSEM = 4.7
Lysine x Energy x Parity, P=0.436Parity, P<0.001
SID Lysine, g/d 10.7 20.0 10.7 20.0Net energy, Mcal/d 4.50 6.75
40
60
80
10088.3 88.4
84.288.6
93.7 93.9 91.387.1
GiltsSows
Farr
owin
g ra
te, %
(P1)
Subsequent performance: Total bornSEM = 0.62
Lysine x Energy x Parity, P=0.208Parity, P<0.001
SID Lysine, g/d 10.7 20.0 10.7 20.0Net energy, Mcal/d 4.50 6.75
8
10
12
14
16
18
13.2 13.2 13.0 13.414.7
15.5 15.5 15.0
GiltsSows
Tota
l pig
lets
bor
n, n
Subsequent performance: Born aliveLysine x Energy x Parity, P=0.459
Parity, P=0.004
SID Lysine, g/d 10.7 20.0 10.7 20.0Net energy, Mcal/d 4.50 6.75
89
101112131415161718
12.4 12.3 12.2 12.613.4
14.2 14.3 13.8
GiltsSows
Born
aliv
e, n
94% 93% 94% 94%91% 92%92% 92% 1.1%
SEM
Summary Body weight gain
– Greater magnitude of gain when Lys and Energy intake were increased simultaneously.
Stillborns– High energy intake increased stillborn rate in sows by 2.1
percentage points, but no effects in gilts. Piglet birth weight
– Total born: No evidence for differences in total litter birth weight and piglet birth weight between dietary treatments.
– Born alive: Increasing Energy increased piglet birth weight in 30 grams (0.07 lb) compared to low energy. No evidence for differences in total litter birth weight and CV.
Summary Pre-weaning mortality
– Piglets suckling from females fed High Lys intake were associated with a reduction of 1.2 percentage points in pre-weaning mortality
WEI and Subsequent performance
– There was no evidence for differences between dietary treatments.
Take home message1. Stillborn rate was increased in bump-fed sows,
but not in gilts.2. Energy influenced individual piglet birth
weight (born alive) but Lys failed to impact birth weight in this highly prolific herd.
3. Individual piglet birth weight (born alive) increased 30 g (0.07 lb) in females fed high energy. In contrast, the impact of parity was over 3 times more than energy (97 g; 0.21 lb).
Thank you!
Acknowledgment: