55
The Science The Question The Experiment The Meals The Results Lunch Science: A Personal Dietary Investigation Prepared for Mountain View 4H Trent Smith Assistant Professor Washington State University School of Economic Sciences April 13, 2011 Smith Asymmetric Information 1 / 27

Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

Lunch Science: A Personal Dietary Investigation

Prepared for Mountain View 4H

Trent SmithAssistant Professor

Washington State UniversitySchool of Economic Sciences

April 13, 2011

Smith Asymmetric Information 1 / 27

Page 2: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

Glycemic Effects

Though conventional wisdom has long held that dietary fatexacerbates chronic diseases such as obesity and heart disease,attention is increasingly being focused on refined carbohydrates.

Refined carbohydrates are sugars and starches that have beenprocessed in a way that speeds digestion.

Chronic high blood sugar has deleterious effects on health.Side effects of uncontrolled diabetes (i.e., unchecked highblood sugar) can include polyuria, polydipsia, blurred vision,fatigue, weight gain, and (maybe) heart disease and cancer.

One common measure of carbohydrate quality is the glycemicindex (GI), a standardized measure of blood sugar (glucose)response to individual foods.

Reference: Good Calories, Bad Calories: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom

on Diet, Weight Control, and Disease by Gary Taubes, 2007

Smith Asymmetric Information 2 / 27

Page 3: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

Glycemic Effects

Though conventional wisdom has long held that dietary fatexacerbates chronic diseases such as obesity and heart disease,attention is increasingly being focused on refined carbohydrates.

Refined carbohydrates are sugars and starches that have beenprocessed in a way that speeds digestion.

Chronic high blood sugar has deleterious effects on health.Side effects of uncontrolled diabetes (i.e., unchecked highblood sugar) can include polyuria, polydipsia, blurred vision,fatigue, weight gain, and (maybe) heart disease and cancer.

One common measure of carbohydrate quality is the glycemicindex (GI), a standardized measure of blood sugar (glucose)response to individual foods.

Reference: Good Calories, Bad Calories: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom

on Diet, Weight Control, and Disease by Gary Taubes, 2007

Smith Asymmetric Information 2 / 27

Page 4: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

Glycemic Effects

Though conventional wisdom has long held that dietary fatexacerbates chronic diseases such as obesity and heart disease,attention is increasingly being focused on refined carbohydrates.

Refined carbohydrates are sugars and starches that have beenprocessed in a way that speeds digestion.

Chronic high blood sugar has deleterious effects on health.Side effects of uncontrolled diabetes (i.e., unchecked highblood sugar) can include polyuria, polydipsia, blurred vision,fatigue, weight gain, and (maybe) heart disease and cancer.

One common measure of carbohydrate quality is the glycemicindex (GI), a standardized measure of blood sugar (glucose)response to individual foods.

Reference: Good Calories, Bad Calories: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom

on Diet, Weight Control, and Disease by Gary Taubes, 2007

Smith Asymmetric Information 2 / 27

Page 5: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

Glycemic Effects

Though conventional wisdom has long held that dietary fatexacerbates chronic diseases such as obesity and heart disease,attention is increasingly being focused on refined carbohydrates.

Refined carbohydrates are sugars and starches that have beenprocessed in a way that speeds digestion.

Chronic high blood sugar has deleterious effects on health.Side effects of uncontrolled diabetes (i.e., unchecked highblood sugar) can include polyuria, polydipsia, blurred vision,fatigue, weight gain, and (maybe) heart disease and cancer.

One common measure of carbohydrate quality is the glycemicindex (GI), a standardized measure of blood sugar (glucose)response to individual foods.

Reference: Good Calories, Bad Calories: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom

on Diet, Weight Control, and Disease by Gary Taubes, 2007

Smith Asymmetric Information 2 / 27

Page 6: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

Blood Sugar and Insulin

High-GI foods (e.g., white bread) caninduce sudden spikes in blood sugar.

Your pancreas responds by secretinginsulin into the bloodstream.

Insulin tells your body to absorb glucose(by burning it, storing it in liver andmuscles, and converting it to body fat).

GI is hard to measure: differs from personto person, is affected by cooking time,other foods included in meal, and evenchewing speed. Nevertheless, publishedvalues for some foods are available.

Smith Asymmetric Information 3 / 27

Page 7: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

Blood Sugar and Insulin

High-GI foods (e.g., white bread) caninduce sudden spikes in blood sugar.

Your pancreas responds by secretinginsulin into the bloodstream.

Insulin tells your body to absorb glucose(by burning it, storing it in liver andmuscles, and converting it to body fat).

GI is hard to measure: differs from personto person, is affected by cooking time,other foods included in meal, and evenchewing speed. Nevertheless, publishedvalues for some foods are available.

Smith Asymmetric Information 3 / 27

Page 8: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

Blood Sugar and Insulin

High-GI foods (e.g., white bread) caninduce sudden spikes in blood sugar.

Your pancreas responds by secretinginsulin into the bloodstream.

Insulin tells your body to absorb glucose(by burning it, storing it in liver andmuscles, and converting it to body fat).

GI is hard to measure: differs from personto person, is affected by cooking time,other foods included in meal, and evenchewing speed. Nevertheless, publishedvalues for some foods are available.

Smith Asymmetric Information 3 / 27

Page 9: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

Blood Sugar and Insulin

High-GI foods (e.g., white bread) caninduce sudden spikes in blood sugar.

Your pancreas responds by secretinginsulin into the bloodstream.

Insulin tells your body to absorb glucose(by burning it, storing it in liver andmuscles, and converting it to body fat).

GI is hard to measure: differs from personto person, is affected by cooking time,other foods included in meal, and evenchewing speed. Nevertheless, publishedvalues for some foods are available.

Smith Asymmetric Information 3 / 27

Page 10: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

Blood Sugar and Insulin

High-GI foods (e.g., white bread) caninduce sudden spikes in blood sugar.

Your pancreas responds by secretinginsulin into the bloodstream.

Insulin tells your body to absorb glucose(by burning it, storing it in liver andmuscles, and converting it to body fat).

GI is hard to measure: differs from personto person, is affected by cooking time,other foods included in meal, and evenchewing speed. Nevertheless, publishedvalues for some foods are available. Reference: Ludwig, D. S. JAMA

2002;287:2414-2423.

Smith Asymmetric Information 3 / 27

Page 11: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Economics of (Dietary) Information

Because high-GI foods are less costly to produce, and becauseinformation about glycemic effects. . .

. . . is (prohibitively?) costly to the consumer

. . . is asymmetric, in that it is more available to producers(who have full information about processing)

. . . is unobservable even after consumption

. . . is something consumers are likely to care about, giveneffects on health. . .

. . . glycemic effects constitute what economists call a credencequality, or credence good.blank line

References: Darby & Karni (1973); Smith, Chouinard & Wandschneider (2011)

Smith Asymmetric Information 4 / 27

Page 12: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Economics of (Dietary) Information

Because high-GI foods are less costly to produce, and becauseinformation about glycemic effects. . .

. . . is (prohibitively?) costly to the consumer

. . . is asymmetric, in that it is more available to producers(who have full information about processing)

. . . is unobservable even after consumption

. . . is something consumers are likely to care about, giveneffects on health. . .

. . . glycemic effects constitute what economists call a credencequality, or credence good.blank line

References: Darby & Karni (1973); Smith, Chouinard & Wandschneider (2011)

Smith Asymmetric Information 4 / 27

Page 13: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Economics of (Dietary) Information

Because high-GI foods are less costly to produce, and becauseinformation about glycemic effects. . .

. . . is (prohibitively?) costly to the consumer

. . . is asymmetric, in that it is more available to producers(who have full information about processing)

. . . is unobservable even after consumption

. . . is something consumers are likely to care about, giveneffects on health. . .

. . . glycemic effects constitute what economists call a credencequality, or credence good.blank line

References: Darby & Karni (1973); Smith, Chouinard & Wandschneider (2011)

Smith Asymmetric Information 4 / 27

Page 14: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Economics of (Dietary) Information

Because high-GI foods are less costly to produce, and becauseinformation about glycemic effects. . .

. . . is (prohibitively?) costly to the consumer

. . . is asymmetric, in that it is more available to producers(who have full information about processing)

. . . is unobservable even after consumption

. . . is something consumers are likely to care about, giveneffects on health. . .

. . . glycemic effects constitute what economists call a credencequality, or credence good.blank line

References: Darby & Karni (1973); Smith, Chouinard & Wandschneider (2011)

Smith Asymmetric Information 4 / 27

Page 15: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Economics of (Dietary) Information

Because high-GI foods are less costly to produce, and becauseinformation about glycemic effects. . .

. . . is (prohibitively?) costly to the consumer

. . . is asymmetric, in that it is more available to producers(who have full information about processing)

. . . is unobservable even after consumption

. . . is something consumers are likely to care about, giveneffects on health. . .

. . . glycemic effects constitute what economists call a credencequality, or credence good.blank line

References: Darby & Karni (1973); Smith, Chouinard & Wandschneider (2011)

Smith Asymmetric Information 4 / 27

Page 16: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Economics of (Dietary) Information

Because high-GI foods are less costly to produce, and becauseinformation about glycemic effects. . .

. . . is (prohibitively?) costly to the consumer

. . . is asymmetric, in that it is more available to producers(who have full information about processing)

. . . is unobservable even after consumption

. . . is something consumers are likely to care about, giveneffects on health. . .

. . . glycemic effects constitute what economists call a credencequality, or credence good.

blank line

References: Darby & Karni (1973); Smith, Chouinard & Wandschneider (2011)

Smith Asymmetric Information 4 / 27

Page 17: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Economics of (Dietary) Information, cont’d

Market Problem: In the absence of a market interventionthat makes it possible for producers to send credible signalsabout product quality (standards, certifications, etc.),credence qualities lead to a market breakdown (a.k.a.“Lemons Equilibrium”), in which low-quality goods (in thiscase, high-GI foods) dominate the market.

Personal Problem: So which foods should I eat? Avoidingall processed food is costly. . . so it would be nice to knowwhich products are better or worse. . . for me.

The Good News: The cost of measuring one’s blood sugar isfalling, making it possible to personally assess individual foods(economic note: thus transforming a credence quality into anexperience quality. . . for me).

Smith Asymmetric Information 5 / 27

Page 18: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Economics of (Dietary) Information, cont’d

Market Problem: In the absence of a market interventionthat makes it possible for producers to send credible signalsabout product quality (standards, certifications, etc.),credence qualities lead to a market breakdown (a.k.a.“Lemons Equilibrium”), in which low-quality goods (in thiscase, high-GI foods) dominate the market.

Personal Problem: So which foods should I eat? Avoidingall processed food is costly. . . so it would be nice to knowwhich products are better or worse. . . for me.

The Good News: The cost of measuring one’s blood sugar isfalling, making it possible to personally assess individual foods(economic note: thus transforming a credence quality into anexperience quality. . . for me).

Smith Asymmetric Information 5 / 27

Page 19: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Economics of (Dietary) Information, cont’d

Market Problem: In the absence of a market interventionthat makes it possible for producers to send credible signalsabout product quality (standards, certifications, etc.),credence qualities lead to a market breakdown (a.k.a.“Lemons Equilibrium”), in which low-quality goods (in thiscase, high-GI foods) dominate the market.

Personal Problem: So which foods should I eat? Avoidingall processed food is costly. . . so it would be nice to knowwhich products are better or worse. . . for me.

The Good News: The cost of measuring one’s blood sugar isfalling, making it possible to personally assess individual foods(economic note: thus transforming a credence quality into anexperience quality. . . for me).

Smith Asymmetric Information 5 / 27

Page 20: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

Measuring Blood Sugar

Home test kits are cheap and reliable (this one: $9 at Walmart)

Each measurement requires tiny drop of blood and asingle-use test strip ($0.43 each)

Need to be careful about things that influence blood sugar:exercise, time of day, time since last meal, etc.

Smith Asymmetric Information 6 / 27

Page 21: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Question

What should I eat?

GI available for some foods, but not for meals,

not for ME.

Question, more precisely: what are the foods I eat (or onceate, as a teenager) doing to my blood sugar?

Note: Subject is non-diabetic, as confirmed by recent A1c test($9 single-use kit, Walmart) result of 5.3%.

Smith Asymmetric Information 7 / 27

Page 22: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Experiment

Experimental protocol, in brief:

Measure blood sugar before lunch (t = 0).

Eat lunch (0 < t < 30 min.).

Re-sample blood every 30 minutes, for five hours.

Limit exercise during afternoon to short walks down the hall.

Take notes.

Smith Asymmetric Information 8 / 27

Page 23: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Meals

1 Fruit & Veggies: Stir-fried Bok Choy, Peanuts,

Pear, Carrots (≈ 750 cal)

2 Beans: 1 can, rinsed, w/Canola Oil (≈ 950 cal)

3 Buttered Bread: Thick-crust Ciabatta (4x)

w/plenty of Butter (≈ 1100 cal)

4 Mac & Cheese: 1 package, w/Olive Oil

(≈ 1450 cal)

5 Beer & Brats: 24oz. Moose Drool, 3 Brats

(≈ 1350 cal)

6 Vending Machine: Vanilla Creme Cookies,

Potato Chips (3x), Twix, Cherry Coke (1725 cal)

Smith Asymmetric Information 9 / 27

Page 24: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Meals

1 Fruit & Veggies: Stir-fried Bok Choy, Peanuts,

Pear, Carrots (≈ 750 cal)

2 Beans: 1 can, rinsed, w/Canola Oil (≈ 950 cal)

3 Buttered Bread: Thick-crust Ciabatta (4x)

w/plenty of Butter (≈ 1100 cal)

4 Mac & Cheese: 1 package, w/Olive Oil

(≈ 1450 cal)

5 Beer & Brats: 24oz. Moose Drool, 3 Brats

(≈ 1350 cal)

6 Vending Machine: Vanilla Creme Cookies,

Potato Chips (3x), Twix, Cherry Coke (1725 cal)

Smith Asymmetric Information 9 / 27

Page 25: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Meals

1 Fruit & Veggies: Stir-fried Bok Choy, Peanuts,

Pear, Carrots (≈ 750 cal)

2 Beans: 1 can, rinsed, w/Canola Oil (≈ 950 cal)

3 Buttered Bread: Thick-crust Ciabatta (4x)

w/plenty of Butter (≈ 1100 cal)

4 Mac & Cheese: 1 package, w/Olive Oil

(≈ 1450 cal)

5 Beer & Brats: 24oz. Moose Drool, 3 Brats

(≈ 1350 cal)

6 Vending Machine: Vanilla Creme Cookies,

Potato Chips (3x), Twix, Cherry Coke (1725 cal)

Smith Asymmetric Information 9 / 27

Page 26: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Meals

1 Fruit & Veggies: Stir-fried Bok Choy, Peanuts,

Pear, Carrots (≈ 750 cal)

2 Beans: 1 can, rinsed, w/Canola Oil (≈ 950 cal)

3 Buttered Bread: Thick-crust Ciabatta (4x)

w/plenty of Butter (≈ 1100 cal)

4 Mac & Cheese: 1 package, w/Olive Oil

(≈ 1450 cal)

5 Beer & Brats: 24oz. Moose Drool, 3 Brats

(≈ 1350 cal)

6 Vending Machine: Vanilla Creme Cookies,

Potato Chips (3x), Twix, Cherry Coke (1725 cal)

Smith Asymmetric Information 9 / 27

Page 27: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Meals

1 Fruit & Veggies: Stir-fried Bok Choy, Peanuts,

Pear, Carrots (≈ 750 cal)

2 Beans: 1 can, rinsed, w/Canola Oil (≈ 950 cal)

3 Buttered Bread: Thick-crust Ciabatta (4x)

w/plenty of Butter (≈ 1100 cal)

4 Mac & Cheese: 1 package, w/Olive Oil

(≈ 1450 cal)

5 Beer & Brats: 24oz. Moose Drool, 3 Brats

(≈ 1350 cal)

6 Vending Machine: Vanilla Creme Cookies,

Potato Chips (3x), Twix, Cherry Coke (1725 cal)

Smith Asymmetric Information 9 / 27

Page 28: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Meals

1 Fruit & Veggies: Stir-fried Bok Choy, Peanuts,

Pear, Carrots (≈ 750 cal)

2 Beans: 1 can, rinsed, w/Canola Oil (≈ 950 cal)

3 Buttered Bread: Thick-crust Ciabatta (4x)

w/plenty of Butter (≈ 1100 cal)

4 Mac & Cheese: 1 package, w/Olive Oil

(≈ 1450 cal)

5 Beer & Brats: 24oz. Moose Drool, 3 Brats

(≈ 1350 cal)

6 Vending Machine: Vanilla Creme Cookies,

Potato Chips (3x), Twix, Cherry Coke (1725 cal)

Smith Asymmetric Information 9 / 27

Page 29: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Meals

1 Fruit & Veggies: Stir-fried Bok Choy, Peanuts,

Pear, Carrots (≈ 750 cal)

2 Beans: 1 can, rinsed, w/Canola Oil (≈ 950 cal)

3 Buttered Bread: Thick-crust Ciabatta (4x)

w/plenty of Butter (≈ 1100 cal)

4 Mac & Cheese: 1 package, w/Olive Oil

(≈ 1450 cal)

5 Beer & Brats: 24oz. Moose Drool, 3 Brats

(≈ 1350 cal)

6 Vending Machine: Vanilla Creme Cookies,

Potato Chips (3x), Twix, Cherry Coke (1725 cal)

Smith Asymmetric Information 9 / 27

Page 30: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Meals

7 McDonald’s: Quarter Pounder w/Cheese,

Large Fries, Med. (21 oz.) Shake (1855 cal)

8 Jack in the Box: Big Cheeseburger, Medium

Fries, 16 oz. Shake (1940 cal)

9 Burger (No Bun): Ground Beef (1/2 lb.),

Fried Eggs (3x), Cheese (≈ 1150 cal)

10 Bun (No Burger): 6 Hamburger Buns,

Ketchup/Mustard/Pickles (≈ 1100 cal)

11 Ice Cream: 1 pint, 24 oz. Shake (≈ 1900 cal)

12 Pizza Hut: Medium Pepperoni (Pan Pizza, 6

slices), 22 oz. Root Beer (1780 cal)

13 Subway (low-fat menu): Footlong Chicken

Teriyaki, Yogurt, Baked Lays, Juicebox (872 cal)blank line

Which will cause biggest “spike” in blood sugar?

Smith Asymmetric Information 10 / 27

Page 31: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Meals

7 McDonald’s: Quarter Pounder w/Cheese,

Large Fries, Med. (21 oz.) Shake (1855 cal)

8 Jack in the Box: Big Cheeseburger, Medium

Fries, 16 oz. Shake (1940 cal)

9 Burger (No Bun): Ground Beef (1/2 lb.),

Fried Eggs (3x), Cheese (≈ 1150 cal)

10 Bun (No Burger): 6 Hamburger Buns,

Ketchup/Mustard/Pickles (≈ 1100 cal)

11 Ice Cream: 1 pint, 24 oz. Shake (≈ 1900 cal)

12 Pizza Hut: Medium Pepperoni (Pan Pizza, 6

slices), 22 oz. Root Beer (1780 cal)

13 Subway (low-fat menu): Footlong Chicken

Teriyaki, Yogurt, Baked Lays, Juicebox (872 cal)blank line

Which will cause biggest “spike” in blood sugar?

Smith Asymmetric Information 10 / 27

Page 32: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Meals

7 McDonald’s: Quarter Pounder w/Cheese,

Large Fries, Med. (21 oz.) Shake (1855 cal)

8 Jack in the Box: Big Cheeseburger, Medium

Fries, 16 oz. Shake (1940 cal)

9 Burger (No Bun): Ground Beef (1/2 lb.),

Fried Eggs (3x), Cheese (≈ 1150 cal)

10 Bun (No Burger): 6 Hamburger Buns,

Ketchup/Mustard/Pickles (≈ 1100 cal)

11 Ice Cream: 1 pint, 24 oz. Shake (≈ 1900 cal)

12 Pizza Hut: Medium Pepperoni (Pan Pizza, 6

slices), 22 oz. Root Beer (1780 cal)

13 Subway (low-fat menu): Footlong Chicken

Teriyaki, Yogurt, Baked Lays, Juicebox (872 cal)blank line

Which will cause biggest “spike” in blood sugar?

Smith Asymmetric Information 10 / 27

Page 33: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Meals

7 McDonald’s: Quarter Pounder w/Cheese,

Large Fries, Med. (21 oz.) Shake (1855 cal)

8 Jack in the Box: Big Cheeseburger, Medium

Fries, 16 oz. Shake (1940 cal)

9 Burger (No Bun): Ground Beef (1/2 lb.),

Fried Eggs (3x), Cheese (≈ 1150 cal)

10 Bun (No Burger): 6 Hamburger Buns,

Ketchup/Mustard/Pickles (≈ 1100 cal)

11 Ice Cream: 1 pint, 24 oz. Shake (≈ 1900 cal)

12 Pizza Hut: Medium Pepperoni (Pan Pizza, 6

slices), 22 oz. Root Beer (1780 cal)

13 Subway (low-fat menu): Footlong Chicken

Teriyaki, Yogurt, Baked Lays, Juicebox (872 cal)blank line

Which will cause biggest “spike” in blood sugar?

Smith Asymmetric Information 10 / 27

Page 34: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Meals

7 McDonald’s: Quarter Pounder w/Cheese,

Large Fries, Med. (21 oz.) Shake (1855 cal)

8 Jack in the Box: Big Cheeseburger, Medium

Fries, 16 oz. Shake (1940 cal)

9 Burger (No Bun): Ground Beef (1/2 lb.),

Fried Eggs (3x), Cheese (≈ 1150 cal)

10 Bun (No Burger): 6 Hamburger Buns,

Ketchup/Mustard/Pickles (≈ 1100 cal)

11 Ice Cream: 1 pint, 24 oz. Shake (≈ 1900 cal)

12 Pizza Hut: Medium Pepperoni (Pan Pizza, 6

slices), 22 oz. Root Beer (1780 cal)

13 Subway (low-fat menu): Footlong Chicken

Teriyaki, Yogurt, Baked Lays, Juicebox (872 cal)blank line

Which will cause biggest “spike” in blood sugar?

Smith Asymmetric Information 10 / 27

Page 35: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Meals

7 McDonald’s: Quarter Pounder w/Cheese,

Large Fries, Med. (21 oz.) Shake (1855 cal)

8 Jack in the Box: Big Cheeseburger, Medium

Fries, 16 oz. Shake (1940 cal)

9 Burger (No Bun): Ground Beef (1/2 lb.),

Fried Eggs (3x), Cheese (≈ 1150 cal)

10 Bun (No Burger): 6 Hamburger Buns,

Ketchup/Mustard/Pickles (≈ 1100 cal)

11 Ice Cream: 1 pint, 24 oz. Shake (≈ 1900 cal)

12 Pizza Hut: Medium Pepperoni (Pan Pizza, 6

slices), 22 oz. Root Beer (1780 cal)

13 Subway (low-fat menu): Footlong Chicken

Teriyaki, Yogurt, Baked Lays, Juicebox (872 cal)blank line

Which will cause biggest “spike” in blood sugar?

Smith Asymmetric Information 10 / 27

Page 36: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Meals

7 McDonald’s: Quarter Pounder w/Cheese,

Large Fries, Med. (21 oz.) Shake (1855 cal)

8 Jack in the Box: Big Cheeseburger, Medium

Fries, 16 oz. Shake (1940 cal)

9 Burger (No Bun): Ground Beef (1/2 lb.),

Fried Eggs (3x), Cheese (≈ 1150 cal)

10 Bun (No Burger): 6 Hamburger Buns,

Ketchup/Mustard/Pickles (≈ 1100 cal)

11 Ice Cream: 1 pint, 24 oz. Shake (≈ 1900 cal)

12 Pizza Hut: Medium Pepperoni (Pan Pizza, 6

slices), 22 oz. Root Beer (1780 cal)

13 Subway (low-fat menu): Footlong Chicken

Teriyaki, Yogurt, Baked Lays, Juicebox (872 cal)

blank line

Which will cause biggest “spike” in blood sugar?

Smith Asymmetric Information 10 / 27

Page 37: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Meals

7 McDonald’s: Quarter Pounder w/Cheese,

Large Fries, Med. (21 oz.) Shake (1855 cal)

8 Jack in the Box: Big Cheeseburger, Medium

Fries, 16 oz. Shake (1940 cal)

9 Burger (No Bun): Ground Beef (1/2 lb.),

Fried Eggs (3x), Cheese (≈ 1150 cal)

10 Bun (No Burger): 6 Hamburger Buns,

Ketchup/Mustard/Pickles (≈ 1100 cal)

11 Ice Cream: 1 pint, 24 oz. Shake (≈ 1900 cal)

12 Pizza Hut: Medium Pepperoni (Pan Pizza, 6

slices), 22 oz. Root Beer (1780 cal)

13 Subway (low-fat menu): Footlong Chicken

Teriyaki, Yogurt, Baked Lays, Juicebox (872 cal)

blank line

Which will cause biggest “spike” in blood sugar?Smith Asymmetric Information 10 / 27

Page 38: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Results

0 1 2 3 4 5Hours

100

150

200

250

Blood Glucose, mg�dL

Smith Asymmetric Information 11 / 27

Page 39: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Results

0 1 2 3 4 5Hours

100

150

200

250

Blood Glucose, mg�dL

Fruit & Veggies

Smith Asymmetric Information 12 / 27

Page 40: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Results

0 1 2 3 4 5Hours

100

150

200

250

Blood Glucose, mg�dL

BeansFruit & Veggies

Smith Asymmetric Information 13 / 27

Page 41: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Results

0 1 2 3 4 5Hours

100

150

200

250

Blood Glucose, mg�dL

Buttered BreadBeansFruit & Veggies

Smith Asymmetric Information 14 / 27

Page 42: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Results

0 1 2 3 4 5Hours

100

150

200

250

Blood Glucose, mg�dL

Mac & CheeseButtered BreadBeansFruit & Veggies

Smith Asymmetric Information 15 / 27

Page 43: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Results

0 1 2 3 4 5Hours

100

150

200

250

Blood Glucose, mg�dL

Beer & BratsMac & CheeseButtered BreadBeansFruit & Veggies

Smith Asymmetric Information 16 / 27

Page 44: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Results

0 1 2 3 4 5Hours

100

150

200

250

Blood Glucose, mg�dL

Vending MachineBeer & BratsMac & CheeseButtered BreadBeansFruit & Veggies

Smith Asymmetric Information 17 / 27

Page 45: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Results

0 1 2 3 4 5Hours

100

150

200

250

Blood Glucose, mg�dL

McDonald's

Fruit & Veggies

Smith Asymmetric Information 18 / 27

Page 46: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Results

0 1 2 3 4 5Hours

100

150

200

250

Blood Glucose, mg�dL

Jack in the BoxMcDonald's

Fruit & Veggies

Smith Asymmetric Information 19 / 27

Page 47: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Results

0 1 2 3 4 5Hours

100

150

200

250

Blood Glucose, mg�dL

Burger HNo BunLJack in the BoxMcDonald's

Fruit & Veggies

Smith Asymmetric Information 20 / 27

Page 48: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Results

0 1 2 3 4 5Hours

100

150

200

250

Blood Glucose, mg�dL

Bun HNo BurgerLBurger HNo BunLJack in the BoxMcDonald's

Fruit & Veggies

Smith Asymmetric Information 21 / 27

Page 49: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Results

0 1 2 3 4 5Hours

100

150

200

250

Blood Glucose, mg�dL

Ice CreamBun HNo BurgerLBurger HNo BunLJack in the BoxMcDonald's

Fruit & Veggies

Smith Asymmetric Information 22 / 27

Page 50: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Results

0 1 2 3 4 5Hours

100

150

200

250

Blood Glucose, mg�dL

Pizza Hut

Jack in the BoxMcDonald's

Fruit & Veggies

Smith Asymmetric Information 23 / 27

Page 51: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Results

0 1 2 3 4 5Hours

100

150

200

250

Blood Glucose, mg�dL

Subway HLow FatLPizza Hut

Jack in the BoxMcDonald's

Fruit & Veggies

Smith Asymmetric Information 24 / 27

Page 52: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Results

0 1 2 3 4 5Hours

100

150

200

250

Blood Glucose, mg�dL

Subway HLow FatLPizza HutIce CreamBun HNo BurgerLBurger HNo BunLJack in the BoxMcDonald'sVending MachineBeer & BratsMac & CheeseButtered BreadBeansFruit & Veggies

Smith Asymmetric Information 25 / 27

Page 53: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

The Results

0 1 2 3 4 5Hours

100

150

200

250

Blood Glucose, mg�dL

'Slow' Food

Fast Food

Smith Asymmetric Information 26 / 27

Page 54: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

. . . A Grain of Salt

Caveats:

Small subject pool! (n=1)

Small number of meal replications! (n=1 in most cases)

Best course of action: collect your own data.(and if you do, consider sharing it: [email protected])

Nevertheless, some tentative observations:

At best, standard 2-hour GI misses a lot.

Fast food is hard to beat if you’re looking for a(blood) sugar high.

Be skeptical of health claims.

Would the market outcome be different if information aboutglycemic effects were more widely available?

Smith Asymmetric Information 27 / 27

Page 55: Lunch Science: Glycemic Effects as a Credence Quality

The ScienceThe Question

The ExperimentThe Meals

The Results

. . . A Grain of Salt

Caveats:

Small subject pool! (n=1)

Small number of meal replications! (n=1 in most cases)

Best course of action: collect your own data.(and if you do, consider sharing it: [email protected])

Nevertheless, some tentative observations:

At best, standard 2-hour GI misses a lot.

Fast food is hard to beat if you’re looking for a(blood) sugar high.

Be skeptical of health claims.

Would the market outcome be different if information aboutglycemic effects were more widely available?

Smith Asymmetric Information 27 / 27