Author
salutaria
View
318
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Presentacin de PowerPoint
Interventionist Treatment of Acute DVT does not Represent any Advantge over the Best Medical Treatment alone
Pascual Lozano VilardellVascular Surgery DepartmentMajorca. Spain
1
IntroductionDVT 3rd cause of CV morbidity/mortalityIncidence of DVT: 1/1 000Posthrombotic syndrome (PTS) 50% in 2 years
2
Introduction: natural history DVT Spontaneous thrombus recanalization
Iliofemoral20% 5 yearsFemoropopliteal80% 6 monthsVan Ramshorts B et al. Thrombus regresion in DVT. Circulation 1992;86:414-9
Akesson H et al. Venous function assesed during 5 year period after acite IF DVT treated with anticoagulation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1990;4:43-8
3
Treatment for acute iliofemoral DVT Systemic anticoagulationSurgical thrombectomy (ST)Systemic thrombolysisCatheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT)CDT + stenting
4
Treatment for acute iliofemoral DVT
5
Treatment for acute iliofemoral DVT
6
CDT + stentBroholm R et al. J Vasc Surg 2011;54:18-S-25S
7
CDT + stentBroholm R et al. J Vasc Surg 2011;54:18-S-25S
8
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis
Enden et al. Long-term outcome after CDT vs standard treatment for acute IF DVT (the CaVenT study): a RCT. Lancet2012;379:31-8
9
Catheter Directed ThrombolysisEnden et al. Long-term outcome after CDT vs standard treatment for acute IF DVT (the CaVenT study): a RCT. Lancet2012;379:31-8AnticoagulationCDTPTS 6 months32%30%NSPTS 24 months55%41%P= .04QALY 24 months31,6%32,3%NS
10
Treatment for acute iliofemoral DVT
Casey et al. Treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg 2012;55:1463-73
11
Catheter Directed ThrombolysisBleeding requiring trasfusion7,5%CDTPTSRR 0.19 95% CI, 0.07-0.48Vein obstructionRR 0.38 95% CI, 0.18-0.37Venous refluxRR 0.39 95% CI, 0.16-1.01QOL-
Casey et al. Treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg 2012;55:1463-73
12
Treatment for acute iliofemoral DVT Low-evidence studies:Methodological limitationsLack of bias protectionLack of comparability of studiesAnalysis of surrogate outcomesLack of QOL analysisPublication and reporting biases
13
Bashir R et al. Comparative outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis plus anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone to treat lower-extremity DVT. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:1494-501
90 000DVT 3 649CDT
14
Bashir R et al. Comparative outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis plus anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone to treat lower-extremity DVT. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:1494-501
CDTACMortality1.2%0.9%
15
Bashir R et al. Comparative outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis plus anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone to treat lower-extremity DVT. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:1494-501CDTACBlood trasfusion11.1%6.5%p