Upload
peter-j-stavroulakis
View
99
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Course assignment
Citation preview
HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE
Executive Summary & Critical Review: Thomas Bodenheim, (2005) “High and Rising Health Care Costs. Part 1:
Seeking an Explanation”, Annals of Internal Medicine, American College of Physicians (ACP), pp. 847-854
Medical School of AthensPostgraduate Programme in Occupational & Environmental Health
Peter J. Stavroulakis
Postgraduate Programme in Occupational & Environmental Health
Paper Specifics
US health care costs are rising rapidly (growth of almost 10% per annum)
Seeks to portray explanations with respect to the mechanism of underlying causes
The paper is easily readable by non-economists
Concise and pleasant read though backed up by scientific principle (and 67 references)
Postgraduate Programme in Occupational & Environmental Health
Snapshot of the US Health Care System
Postgraduate Programme in Occupational & Environmental Health
Underlying Causes/Perspectives
Not a problem External factors Absence of a free market Technological innovation Excessive costs in administering the system Absence of cost-containment Market power of the providers
This paper covers the first 3 perspectives
Postgraduate Programme in Occupational & Environmental Health
1. Not a problem
If the economy is expanding (broad economic cycle, growth) then growth in costs can be sustained
Comments: Exclusivity and purchasing power Strategic perspective (economies of
scale/scope)
Postgraduate Programme in Occupational & Environmental Health
2. External Factors
State of the overall economy Proportion of elderly people (5 times higher costs, άρα
φταίνε οι γιαγιάδες) Obesity
Comments: Under a systemic view, the economy is not an external
factor More data is required; longitudinal data linking specific
demographic cohorts with expenditures trends
Postgraduate Programme in Occupational & Environmental Health
3. Absence of a Free Market
In reality there is no free market (prices are not extracted solely via supply & demand); “a patient with a headache does not know whether the cost of care will be a $50 physician visit plus a bottle of aspirin or
$60,000 neurosurgery for a brain neoplasm”
Comments: We may model a free market divergent from the
original definition
Postgraduate Programme in Occupational & Environmental Health
Cost Sharing
Several studies with varying results Quasi Pareto principle (70% of expenditures by 10% of
the population) The 70% of expenditures may be unaffected by shifting
costs
Comments: System segregation (of the cost sharing services that is
dependent on severity) What patients really need within an inclusive perspective
that will lead to overall patient satisfaction
Postgraduate Programme in Occupational & Environmental Health
Competition Several strategies implemented from 1980 to today Practitioners’ consolidation made costs rise through gained
market power Managed competition?
Comments: The system is competitive Maybe quality has been overlooked Maybe the insurers insert a system caveat and hamper free
market competition (centralized market) Market power acts inversely...are we losing customers? Consolidation & price growth points to inefficiency Regulation of services from a body that takes into account all
stakes?
Postgraduate Programme in Occupational & Environmental Health
Addendum It is a matter of policy Solutions can be sought after by discretization of the scarcity
principle Maybe a paradigm shift is required Mitigation of the paradox of the insurance companies
(“reduce reimbursements to providers but incur more funds from purchasers”)
Health should not be considered a Veblen good Demand and WTP does not (or should not) increase whence
the price increases “Health care costs represent a battleground among competing
interests” while the product is (and always will be) uncontested
Postgraduate Programme in Occupational & Environmental Health
Thank you for your attention!