Upload
hivscotland
View
36
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Health and Social Care integration: where should HIV services fit?
Gordon Scott
Chalmers Centre
Edinburgh
Why is Health and Social Care Integration (HSCI) happening?
The simple answer is the changing demographic– Increasingly ageing population
The unsaid answer is the lower and lower threshold for seeking services
The awkward answer is the fractured nature of public services, their centralist/silo tendencies and their struggle to be locally responsive
In addition to working in an integrated Sexual Health Centre…
GUM – STI management
Contraception HIV treatment and care Medical Termination of
Pregnancy – Half of Lothian’s TOPs
All young people’s sexual health services
Psychosexual services Medical Gynaecology Menopause clinics
Colposcopy Sexual assault Vasectomy Clinical Psychology Gender Reassignment Genital dermatology Premenstrual syndrome
clinic Training clinics
– Both specialist and general
I have this wonderful title
Vice Chair of the Professional Advisory Committee (PAC) to the Integrated Joint Board (IJB) of the Edinburgh Health and Social Care Partnership (HSCP)
The HSCP is mainly a mixture of Edinburgh City Councillors and Senior NHS Lothian reps
– Plus a range of Practitioners/Managers who represent the views of the shop floor
Whilst almost everyone else is obsessed with structures, and responsibility for various bits of financial governance etc, our role is to look at individual patients and how to improve care pathways
Try not to get overwhelmed by the new “structures”
This is about individual patients My concept of what we are trying to achieve
through HSCI is– The right professional sitting down with the right
patient/client/service user in the right place at the right time to sort out the issue(s) that most affect their health and/or the public health
What are the steps?
Identify where there is most to gain from avoiding an adverse outcome
Identify individuals/groups more likely to have an adverse outcome
Identify the actions that frontline staff can do to reduce the likelihood of an adverse outcome
Support them to implement those actions
An example might be the Care Home Liaison Service
The right professional sitting down with the right patient in the right place at the right time to sort out the issue(s) that most affect their health and/or the public health
Medicine of the Elderly Consultant (facilitated by the liaison nurse)
Frail elderly person at high risk of hospital admission
Home visit Improved care package
to prevent admission
The steps in this example
Identify where there is most to gain from avoiding an adverse outcome
Identify individuals/groups more likely to have an adverse outcome
Identify the actions that frontline staff can do to reduce the likelihood of an adverse outcome
Support them to implement those actions
Reduce hospital admission
Elderly patients in care homes
Care Home staff alert the liaison nurse about particularly frail patients
Send out a consultant who will optimise the package of care in the community
Remember the buzzwords
Localities– This is an intervention firmly embedded in the
local community
Anticipatory care– You know from previous experience what type of
patient is most likely to end up in hospital, so don’t sit and wait for it to happen
What about HIV and H&SC Integration?
Certainly in Edinburgh in the 1980’s, HIV services led the way
An epidemic driven by intravenous drug use requires multiple, responsive, integrated, community-based services
At strategic level we had the Lothian Regional AIDS team with any number of sub-groups beneath that
Today we still have integrated strategic planning, with a specialist BBV social care team and good links to third sector
At strategic level
Your H&SC Partnership(s) should be writing a strategic plan based on some kind of needs assessment (JSNA)
This may be driven very much by the Frail Elderly agenda
You need to find out if HIV/BBV/Sexual Health is included in your JSNA
And if it’s not, get it in there
HIV ticks a lot of boxes
Anticipatory care (prevention)
– Prevention of new infections
– Fewer late diagnoses– Reduction in ill-health
(and use of services)
Localities– Are where people with
HIV live, often in clusters – Are where transmissions
happen, so prevention initiatives should be established there
Don’t forget co-morbidities
Mental health Including addictions
– Don’t forget New Psychoactive Substances (NPS) Obvious health issues But can also include multiple Social Care strands eg
drug recovery, C&F, Criminal Justice HCV can be added here
Everyone bangs on about HIV and ageing
In the grand scheme of things, I’m not convinced it will cut much ice
Multiple co-morbidities and issues with polypharmacy/interactions are par for the course across the whole “ageing” sector
The biggest problem I see is demented patients not taking their ART, becoming detectable, thus creating issues with personal care
– Of concern, but still a relatively small risk of resultant harm
Key considerations when arguing your case
Bad outcome x costs a lot money It is more common in y subset of my patient group Investing z in a service development (considerably
less than x) is therefore a good plan
And in time, may well require a comparison with the relative value of investment in, for example, Frail Elderly
Conclusions
Health and Social Care Integration is about individuals
It begins close to home “anticipatory care” means intervening as far back in
the pathway as possible “localities” means services within communities Get to know the key Locality Managers/Practitioners
in the parts of your patch where HIV is most prevalent
Patients, carers and Third Sector all have a voice/role too, so don’t forget to include them