45
Fractures with Soft Tissue Injuries Gary E. Benedetti, MD

G13 mangled extremity

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: G13 mangled extremity

Fractures with Soft Tissue Injuries

Gary E. Benedetti, MD

Page 2: G13 mangled extremity

Introduction• All fractures have some degree of soft tissue

injury– Prognosis determined by:

• Amount of energy transferred to the soft tissue and bone

• Degree of contamination and type of bacteria

• Patient factors

Page 3: G13 mangled extremity

Introduction

• Energy Transfer– Fall from curb

• 100 ft-lbs

– Skiing• 300-500 ft-lbs

– High-Velocity GSW• 2000 ft-lbs

– Automobile Bumper @ 20 MPH

• 100,000 ft-lbs

Page 4: G13 mangled extremity

Classification of Soft Tissue Injuries-Closed Fractures

• Tscherne Type 0: – Minimal soft tissue injury– Indirect injury mechanisms– Simple fracture patterns.

Page 5: G13 mangled extremity

Classification of Soft Tissue Injuries-Closed Fractures

• Tscherne Type I: – Superficial abrasion

or contusion (pressure from within)

– Mild to moderate severe bony injury

Page 6: G13 mangled extremity

Classification of Soft Tissue Injuries-Closed Fractures

• Tscherne Type II:– Deep,

contaminated abrasions or muscle contusion

– Impending compartment syndrome

– Severe fracture pattern

Page 7: G13 mangled extremity

Classification of Soft Tissue Injuries-Closed Fractures

• Tscherne Type III: – Extensive skin contusion or

crush– Severe underlying muscle

damage– Subcutaneous avulsion

(degloving)– Associated major vascular injury– Severe, comminuted fracture

pattern

Page 8: G13 mangled extremity

Skin Lesions• Blisters

– Clear– Sanguineous

• Abrasions• Degloving

– Morel-Lavalle

Page 9: G13 mangled extremity

Treatment of Closed Fractures with Soft Tissue Injury

• Control swelling– Provisional reduction– Stabilize: splint/traction/brace– Elevate– Consider foot pump in lower extremity

• Serial evaluation for compartment syndrome

Page 10: G13 mangled extremity

Treatment of Closed Fractures with Soft Tissue Injury

• Treat fracture operatively or non operatively as appropriate

• Timing– In tenuous areas (such as the ankle) await for skin lines

to reappear prior to surgical intervention-- “wrinkle sign”

– With skin lesions await for adequate resolution• Healing of abrasions, blisters or use alternate approach

Page 11: G13 mangled extremity

Open Fracture

• Definition– A break in the skin and

soft tissues communicating with a fracture or its hematoma.

Page 12: G13 mangled extremity

Classification of Open Fractures

Gustilo & Anderson

Page 13: G13 mangled extremity

Gustilo-AndersonGrade I

Page 14: G13 mangled extremity

Gustilo-AndersonGrade II

Page 15: G13 mangled extremity

Gustilo-AndersonGrade IIIA

Page 16: G13 mangled extremity

Gustilo-AndersonGrade IIIA

IIIA Includes severe comminution despite size of skin wound.

Page 17: G13 mangled extremity

Gustilo-AndersonGrade IIIB

Page 18: G13 mangled extremity

Gustilo-AndersonGrade IIIC

Page 19: G13 mangled extremity

Limitations of Gustilo-Anderson Classification

• Tibia model• Emphasis on size of

skin lesion• Reproducibility • Does not differentiate

degree of vascular insult

Page 20: G13 mangled extremity

Prognosis & Gustilo-AndersonClassification

INFECTION & AMPUTATION: Correlates with degree of soft tissue injury

GRADE I II IIIA IIIB IIIC

INFECTION 0-2% 2-7% 10-25% 10-50% 25-50%AMPUTATION 50%

*Tibia Fractures

Page 21: G13 mangled extremity

Prognosis & Gustilo-AndersonClassification

IM NAIL TIBIA GRADE I GRADE II GRADE IIIA

GRADE IIIB

HEALING 21-28 WKS

26-28 WKS 30-35 WKS 30-35 WKS

FRACTURE HEALING: Correlates with degree of soft tissue injury

Page 22: G13 mangled extremity

Assessment

• History– Mechanism

• High or low energy?

– Time since injury– Pre-morbid

conditions– Other injuries

Page 23: G13 mangled extremity

Assessment

• Physical Exam– One look soft tissue

exam– Neurological status– Vascular status– Compartments

Page 24: G13 mangled extremity

Assessment

• X-rays– Standard two 90°

views– Joint above and

below fracture

Page 25: G13 mangled extremity

Emergent Treatment

• Stabilize the Patient– ATLS

SPLEEN

Page 26: G13 mangled extremity

Emergent Treatment

• One Look Exam• Sterile Dressing• No ER Cultures

– Poor indicator of probability of infection and organism

– expensive• Realign and Splint

Page 27: G13 mangled extremity

Tetanus Toxoid

IMMUNIZATION HISTORY NON-TETANUS PRONE

TETANUS PRONE*

UNKNOWN YES YES

>3 IMMUNIZATIONS(<5 YEARS)

NO NO

Tetanus Toxoid 2.5 cc to all poly-trauma patients, otherwise:

*Tetanus Prone: >6 hours old, complex soft tissue injury, wound >1 cm deep, missile, crush, burn, frostbite, devitalized tissues, soil contaminants, denervated, ischemic, early infection.

Page 28: G13 mangled extremity

Tetanus Immune Globulin

IMMUNIZATION HISTORY

NON-TETANUS PRONE

TETANUS PRONE*

UNKNOWN NO YES

>3 IMMUNIZATIONS(<5 YEARS)

NO NO

250-500 units IM:

Page 29: G13 mangled extremity

Bacteriology of Open Fractures

Blunt Trauma, Low Energy GSW Staph, Strept

Farm Wounds Clostridia

Fresh Water Pseudomonas, Aeromonas

Sea Water Aeromonas, Vibrios

War Wounds, High Energy GSW Gram Negative

Page 30: G13 mangled extremity

Recommended Antibiotic Treatment

1 Gen Ceph Gent PCN

Grade I

Grade II +/-

Grade III +/-

Farm/War Wounds

(Gustilo, et al; JBJS 72A 1990)

Page 31: G13 mangled extremity

Duration of Antibiotic Treatment

• Initial 72 hours

• 48 hours after each subsequent procedure

Page 32: G13 mangled extremity

Treatment

• Principles– Decrease

contamination and remove devitalized tissues

Page 33: G13 mangled extremity

Treatment

• Principles– Limb Salvage?– Vascular Injury?

Page 34: G13 mangled extremity

Principles of I&D

• Longitudinal incisions-extensile exposures

• Excise non viable tissue– Systematic and detailed

approach• Irrigation• Stabilize fracture

Page 35: G13 mangled extremity

I&D

• Systematic– Skin– Fascia and fat– Muscle: 4 C’s of

muscle viability• Contractility• Capacity to bleed• Consistency• Color

Page 36: G13 mangled extremity

I&D

– Bone• Deliver, inspect

and cleanse bone ends

• Remove fragments without soft tissue attachment

• Cleanse and retain all major articular fragments

Page 37: G13 mangled extremity

I&D• Pulsatile Irrigation

– Copious volume– Pulsatile action

reduces bacteria counts

– Antibiotics in solution controversial

– May impair bone healing

Page 38: G13 mangled extremity

Stable Fixation

• Reduces infection– Options:

• External fixation– +/- delayed

internal fixation

• IM Nail• ORIF

Page 39: G13 mangled extremity

IM Nailing of Open Fractures

• Immediate IM Nail• After External Fixation

– Generally safe if < 2-3 wks of placement– Avoid if evidence of pin tract infection

• Reamed vs. Unreamed?– No difference in infection rate

Page 40: G13 mangled extremity

Treatment

• No routine intraoperative cultures– Unless clinically

suspect infection

Page 41: G13 mangled extremity

Treatment

• Antibiotic Beads– Decrease infection

rates– High local

antibiotic levels– Useful for dead

space management– Bead pouch

Page 42: G13 mangled extremity

Antibiotic Beads

• Pros– Very high levels of

antibiotics locally– Dead space

management

• Cons– Requires removal– Limited to heat

stable antibiotics– Increased drainage

from wound

Page 43: G13 mangled extremity

Wound Closure

– Primary Closure?– Delayed

closure/coverage• DPC• STSG• Flaps• VAC

Temporary vessel loops, awaiting DPC

Page 44: G13 mangled extremity

Early Soft Tissue Coverage

• Early <7 days decrease secondary infection rate.

• Requires Clean Defect

Gastrocnemius Flap

Page 45: G13 mangled extremity

Questions?

Return to General Index