CERVICAL FRACTURES By Dr. Tarek A. ElHewala Lecturer of Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University ZAGAZIG UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF MEDICINE ORTHOPAEDI C DEPARTMENT
It is a simplified presentation to group the cervical spine fractures and I wish you find it helpful
Text of Cervical fractures
ORTHOPAEDIC DEPARTMENT ZAGAZIG UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF MEDICINE
By Dr. Tarek A. ElHewala Lecturer of Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty of
Medicine, Zagazig University
Spinal Injuries Less common than traumatic injuries of the
extremities but: Have the lowest functional outcomes and the lowest
rates of return to work after injury in all major organ
systems.
Major Trauma High energy trauma. Polytrauma patients.
Neurological involvement.
Spinal Injuries Incidence of spinal fracture in (NA): 64/100000
Trend: Decrease in high income countries. Strong increase in medium
and low income countries.
Cervical Spine Injuries Account for one-third of all spinal
injuries. The most commonly injured vertebrae(1) are: C2: where
one-third of which are odontoid fracture. C6,C7: are the most
frequently affected levels in the subaxial spine (vertebral body
fracture) A neurological injury occurs in about 15% of spine trauma
patients. A low GCS indicates a high risk for a concomitant
cervical injury. 1- Goldberg W, Mueller C, Panacek E, Tigges S,
Hoffman JR, Mower WR (2001) Distribution and patterns of blunt
traumatic cervical spine injury. Ann Emerg Med 38:1721
Normal Anatomy Functionally, the cervical spine is divided
into: The upper cervical spine [occiput (C0)C1C2] The lower
(sub-axial) cervical spine (C3C7).
Normal Anatomy Upper Cervical Spine: The atlas-occiput junction
primarily allows flexion/extension and limited rotation. Axial
rotation at the craniocervical junction is restricted by osseous as
well as ligamentous structures.
Normal Anatomy Upper Cervical Spine: The atlantoaxial joint is
composed of lateral mass articulations with loosely associated
joint capsules and an atlantodental articulation
Normal Anatomy Lower (Subaxial) Cervical Spine: The vertebrae
of the lower cervical spine have a superior cortical surface which
is concave in the coronal plane and convex in the sagittal plane.
This configuration allows flexion, extension, and lateral tilt by
gliding motion of the facets.
Normal Anatomy Lower (Subaxial) Cervical Spine: The C5/6 level
exhibits the largest range of motion, which in part explains its
susceptibility to trauma and degeneration. The facet joint capsules
are stretched in flexion and therefore limit rotation in this
position.
Biomechanics of Cervical Spine Trauma The conditions under
which neck injury occurs include several key variables such as:
impact magnitude. impact direction. point of application. rate of
application.
Biomechanics of Cervical Spine Trauma For example in lower
cervical spine: Vertical loading of the lower cervical spine in the
forward flexed position reproduce pure ligamentous injuries. This
mechanism produced bilateral dislocation of the facets without
fracture. A unilateral dislocation was produced if lateral tilt or
axial rotation occurred as well.
Biomechanics of Cervical Spine Trauma Axial loading less than 1
cm anterior to the neural position produced anterior compression
fractures of the vertebral body. Burst fractures can be produced by
direct axial compression of a slightly flexed cervical spine.
Tear-drop fracture results from a flexion/compression injury with
disruption of the posterior ligaments.
Spinal Cord Injury It is now well accepted that acute spinal
cord injury (SCI) involves both: Primary injury mechanisms.
Secondary injury mechanisms.
Spinal Cord Injury The primary injury of the spinal cord
results in local deformation and energy transformation at the time
of injury and is irreversible. It can therefore not be repaired by
surgical decompression. The injury is caused by: In the vast
majority of cases bony fragments that acutely compress the spinal
cord. acute spinal cord distraction. acceleration-deceleration with
shearing. laceration from penetrating injuries. The injury directly
damages cell bodies and/or processes of neurons.
Spinal Cord Injury Immediately after the primary injury,
secondary injury mechanisms may initiate, leading to delayed or
secondary cell death that evolves over a period of days to weeks.
These secondary events are potentially preventable and
reversible.
Spinal Cord Injury A variety of complex chemical pathways are
likely involved including: hypoxia and ischemia intracellular and
extracellular ionic shifts lipid peroxidation free radical
production excitotoxicity eicosanoid production neutral protease
activation prostaglandin production programmed cell death or
apoptosis
Spinal Cord Injury In the case of a lesion of the cord cranial
to T1, a complete loss of sympathetic activity will develop that
results in loss of compensatory vasoconstriction (leading to
hypotension) and loss of cardiac sympathetic activation (leading to
bradycardia). Secondary deteriorations of spinal cord function that
result from hypotension and inadequate tissue oxygenation have to
be avoided.
Spinal Cord Injury Injuries to the spinal cord often result in
spinal shock. The phenomenon of spinal shock is usually described
as: loss of sensation flaccid paralysis absence of all reflexes
below the spinal cord injury. It is thought to be due to a loss of
background excitatory input from supra-spinal axons
Spinal Cord Injury Spinal shock is considered the first phase
of the response to a spinal cord injury, hyperreflexia and
spasticity representing the following phases. When spinal shock
resolves, reflexes will return and residual motor functions can be
found.
History The cardinal symptoms of an acute cervical injury are:
pain loss of function (inability to move the head) numbness and
weakness bowel and bladder dysfunction.
History In patients with evidence for neurological deficits,
the history should include: time of onset (immediate, secondary)
course (unchanged, progressive, or improving) The history should
include a detailed assessment of the injury: type of trauma (high
vs. low-energy) mechanism of injury (compression,
flexion/distraction, hyperextension, rotation, shear injury)
History In polytraumatized or unconscious patients, patients
must be considered to have sustained a cervical injury until proven
otherwise. The history should also comprehensively assess details
of collision and injury such as: type of collision (rear-end,
frontal or side impact) use of headrest/seat belt position in the
car injury pattern for all passengers head contusion severity of
impact to the vehicle
Initial Management Primary survey A full general and
neurological assessment must be undertaken in accordance with the
principles of advanced trauma life support (ATLS). Spinal trauma is
frequently associated with multiple injuries. As always, the
patients airway, breathing and circulation (ABCin that order) are
the first priorities in resuscitation from trauma.
Initial Management Secondary survey Once the immediately
life-threatening injuries have been addressed, the secondary (head
to toe) survey that follows allows other serious injuries to be
identified. If neurological symptoms or signs are present, a senior
doctor should be present and a partial roll to about 45 may be
sufficient.
Initial Management Secondary survey specific signs of injury
including: local bruising deformity of the spine (e.g. a gibbus or
an increased interspinous gap) vertebral tenderness. The whole
length of the spine must be palpated, another spinal injury at a
different level. Priapism and diaphragmatic breathing invariably
indicate a high spinal cord lesion. The presence of warm and
well-perfused peripheries in a hypotensive patient should always
raise the possibility of neurogenic shock attributable to spinal
cord injury in the differential diagnosis.
Initial Management Secondary survey At the end of the secondary
survey, examination of the peripheral nervous system must not be
neglected. Diagnosis of intra-abdominal trauma often difficult
because of: impaired or absent abdominal sensation absent abdominal
guarding or rigidity, because of flaccid paralysis paralytic
ileus
Neurological assessment In spinal cord injury the neurological
examination must include assessment of the following: Sensation to
pin prick (spinothalamic tracts) Sensation to fine touch and joint
position sense (posterior columns) Power of muscle groups according
to the Medical Research Council scale (corticospinal tracts)
Reflexes (including abdominal, anal, and bulbocavernosus) Cranial
nerve function (may be affected by high cervical injury).
Neurological assessment By examining the dermatomes and
myotomes, the level and completeness of the spinal cord injury and
the presence of other neurological damage such as brachial plexus
injury are assessed. The last segment of normal spinal cord
function, as judged by clinical examination, is referred to as the
neurological level of the lesion. This does not necessarily
correspond with the level of bony injury, so the neurological and
bony diagnoses should both be recorded. Sensory or motor sparing
may be present below the injury.
Neurological assessment The differentiation of a complete and
incomplete paraplegia is important for the prognosis. It is
mandatory to exclude a spinal shock which can mask remaining neural
function and has an impact on the treatment decision and timing.
The first reflex to return is the bulbocavernosus reflex in over
90%of cases.
Neurological assessment No voluntary sensory (sacral sparing)
or motor sparing bulbocavernosus reflex is present spinal shock is
resolved, and a complete cord lesion is confirmed.
Neurological assessment The American Spinal Injury Association
(ASIA) has now produced the ASIA impairment scale modified from the
Frankel grades.
Neurological assessment
Neurological assessment
Conclusions Primary Assessment ATLS is the guiding principle:
First life, then limb. Spinal fractures can be missed easily during
initial assessment: Every HET patient has spinal injury until it is
disproved. There is no reliable way of determining the neurologic
status with certainty at the admission. There is no place for
fatalism as far as the neurology is concerned Give your patients
the benefit of doubt.
Diagnostic Work-up In 2001, a highly sensitive decision rule
(Canadian C-Spine Rule) was derived, for use in cervical spine
radiography in alert and stable trauma patients.
Standard Radiographs At least three views are recommended for
alert and stable trauma patients: anteroposterior view cross-table
lateral view open-mouth dens view
Standard Radiographs Oakley introduced a simple system
(radiological ABC) for analyzing plain films: A1: appropriateness:
correct indication and right patient A2: adequacy: extent (occiput
to T1, penetration, rotation/projection) A3: alignment: anterior
aspect of vertebral bodies, posterior aspect of vertebral bodies,
spinolaminar line (bases of spinous process), tips of spinous
process, craniocervical and other lines and relationships B: bones
C: connective tissues: pre-vertebral soft tissue, pre-dental space,
intervertebral disc spaces, interspinous gaps
Standard Radiographs The most common causes of missed cervical
spine injury are: not obtaining radiographs making judgments on
technically suboptimal films The latter cause most commonly occurs
at the cervico-occipital and cervico-thoracic junction levels.
Standard Radiographs Helpful signs to diagnose cervical spine
instability:
Standard Radiographs For the upper cervical spine, White and
Panjabi suggested criteria indicative of instability based on
conventional radiography.
Standard Radiographs
Computed Tomography CT is the first choice for unconscious or
polytraumatized patients. the ease of performance, speed of study,
the greater ability of CT to detect fractures other than
radiography. The craniocervical scans should be of a maximum 2 mm
thickness, because dens fractures can even be invisible on 1-mm
slices with reconstructions
Computed Tomography Computed tomography scans are sensitive for
detecting characteristic fracture patterns not seen on plain films:
the mid-sagittal fracture through the posterior vertebral wall and
lamina. rotatory instability at the atlantoaxial joints. shows if
the dens separates from the anterior arch of C1 with increased
rotation. Importantly, all the injuries that were missed by plain
films required treatment.
Computed Tomography
MRI Magnetic resonance imaging is the imaging study of choice
to exclude discoligamentous injuries, if lateral cervical
radiographs and CT are negative. MRI is the modality of choice for
evaluation of patients with neurological signs or symptoms to
assess soft tissue injury of the cord, disc and ligaments.
Particularly, STIR sequences are very helpful in visualizing
posterior soft tissue injuries and thereby helping to diagnose
unstable fractures (especially if conservative treatment is
decided)
MRI
Neck Pain Task Force
Neck Pain Task Force
General objectives of treatment restoration of spinal alignment
preservation or improvement of neurological function restoration of
spinal stability restoration of spinal function resolution of
pain
Non-operative Treatment Modalities Cervical orthoses limit
movement of the cervical spine by buttressing structures at both
ends of the neck, such as the chin and the thorax. However, applied
pressure over time can lead to complications such as: pressure
sores and skin ulcers weakening and atrophy of neck muscles
contractures of soft tissues decrease in pulmonary function chronic
pain syndrome
Non-operative Treatment Modalities Collars Soft collars have a
limited effect on controlling neck motion. The Philadelphia collar
has been shown to control neck motion, especially in the
flexion/extension plane, much better than the soft collar.
Disadvantages of the Philadelphia collar are the lack of control
for flexion/extension control in the upper cervical region and
lateral bending and axial rotation.
Non-operative Treatment Modalities Minerva Brace/Cast A Minerva
cervical brace is a cervicothoracal orthosis with mandibular,
occipital and forehead contact points. This brace provides adequate
immobilization between C1 and C7, with less rigid immobilization of
the occipital-C1 junction. The addition of the forehead strap and
occipital flare assists in immobilizing C1C2.
Non-operative Treatment Modalities Traction: The Gardner-Wells
tongs can be applied using local anesthesia. The pin application
sites should be a finger breadth above the pinna of the auricle of
the ear in line with, or slightly posterior to, the external
auditory canal. Rule out atlanto-occipital dislocation or
discoligamentous disruption before applying traction.
Non-operative Treatment Modalities Halo The halo vest is the
first conservative choice for unstable lesions. Its clinical
failure is due to: pin track problems accurate fitting of the vest
a lack of patient compliance
Occipital Condyle Fracture This type of fracture is a rare
injury. They often are discovered on a head CT scan in an
unconscious patient; cervical radiographs rarely show these
fractures. Conscious patients complaining of an occipital headache
should be suspected of having an occipital condyle fracture until
proven otherwise. Though cranial nerves IX-XII are sometimes
affected, neurological examination is often normal.
Occipital Condyle Fracture
Occipital Condyle Fracture
Atlanto-occipital Dislocation Rare survivors usually have a
neurological deficit, particularly with cranial nerves VII to X.
Frequent diagnosis is at autopsies following death related to a
spinal injury. High-resolution CT efficiently illustrates the
injury. Treatment includes closed reduction and surgical
stabilizationoften occiput to C2.
Atlanto-occipital Dislocation Traynelis et al. classification:
Type I: anterior dislocation. Type II: vertical dislocation. Type
III: posterior dislocation.
Atlanto-occipital Dislocation
Occiput to C2 Fixation
Fractures of the Atlas Fractures of the atlas account for
approximately 12% of all fractures. These fractures are frequently
associated with other cervical fractures or ligamentous traumatic
injuries. Burst fractures of the atlas are caused by massive axial
loads.
Fractures of the Atlas
Fractures of the Atlas The literature does not allow treatment
recommendations to be given on solid scientific evidence. It is
recommended to treat isolated fractures of the atlas with intact
transverse alar ligaments (implying C1C2 stability) with cervical
immobilization alone. It is recommended to treat isolated fractures
of the atlas with disruption of the transverse ligament with
atlantoaxial screw fixation and fusion (a Magerl C2 and C1
transfacet screw fixation technique).
Atlantoaxial Instabilities Atlantoaxial instability results
from either: a purely ligamentous injury or avulsion fractures.
While atlantoaxial dislocation and subluxation is relatively common
in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, a traumatic origin due to a
rupture of the transverse ligament is rare.
Atlantoaxial Instabilities These injuries are significant,
because complete bilateral dislocation of the articular processes
can occur at approximately 65 of atlantoaxial rotation. When the
transverse ligament is intact, a significant narrowing of the
spinal canal and subsequent potential spinal cord damage is
possible
Atlantoaxial Instabilities With a deficient transverse
ligament, complete unilateral dislocation can occur at
approximately 45 with similar consequences. In addition, the
vertebral arteries can be compromised by excessive rotation which
may result in brain stem or cerebellar infarction and death.
Atlantoaxial Instabilities Atlantoaxial instabilities can be
classified according to the direction of the dislocation as:
anterior (transverse ligament disruption, dens or Jefferson
fracture) posterior (dens fracture, see Fielding Type IV) lateral
(lateral mass fracture of C1, C2, or unilateral alar ligament
ruptures) rotatory (see Fielding Types IIII) vertical (rupture of
the alar ligaments and tectorial membrane)
Atlantoaxial Instabilities Rotatory Atlantoaxial Instability A
special form of atlantoaxial instability which may occur with or
without an initiating trauma. This subluxation is more common in
children than in adults. Non-traumatic etiologies include: juvenile
rheumatoid arthritis surgical interventions such as tonsillectomy
or mastoidectomy infections of the upper respiratory tract (Grisel
syndrome).
Atlantoaxial Instabilities According to Fielding et al. four
types can be differentiated:
Atlantoaxial Instabilities Common complaints are neck pain with
evidence of torticollis, suboccipital pain, and limited cervical
rotation. Radiographic diagnosis includes: open-mouth odontoid
view, lateral cervical spine with or without flexion extension
views, dynamic (rotation to the right then the left) CT scan, MRI.
Surgical treatment involves a C1-C2 fusion.
Dens Fractures The most common axis injury is a fracture
through the odontoid process. Translational motion of C1 on C2 is
restricted by the transverse atlantal ligaments that center the
odontoid process to the anterior arch of C1. With a fracture of the
odontoid process, restriction of translational atlantoaxial
movement is lost.
Dens Fractures According to the classification of Anderson and
DAlonzo: Type I: oblique fractures through the upper portion of the
odontoid process. Type II: across the base of the odontoid process
at the junction with the axis body. Type III: through the odontoid
that extends into the C2 body.
Dens Fractures A variety of non-operative and operative
treatment alternatives have been proposed for odontoid fractures
based on: fracture type degree of (initial) dens displacement
extent of angulation patients age Type II and Type III odontoid
fractures should be considered for surgical fixation in cases of:
dens displacement of 5 mm or more dens fracture (Type IIA)
inability to achieve fracture reduction inability to achieve main
fracture reduction with external immobilization
Dens Fractures
Dens Fractures
Dens Fractures
Dens Fractures Anterior transarticular screw fixation: As an
augmentation of the anterior dens screw or in cases of a salvage
procedure. Screws can be inserted over Kirschner wires from a
medialanterior-caudal to a lateral-posterior-cranial direction
crossing the atlantoaxial joint.
Dens Fractures
Traumatic Spondylolisthesis of the Axis Traumatic fractures of
the posterior elements of the axis may occur after hyperextension
injuries as seen in: motor vehicle accidents, diving, Falls,
judicial hangings. Therefore, the term hangmans fracture was coined
by Schneider in 1965.
Traumatic Spondylolisthesis of the Axis Effendi et al.
described three types of fractures which are mechanism based: Type
I: isolated hairline fractures of the ring of the axis with minimal
displacement of the body of C2. These injuries are caused by axial
loading and hyperextension.
Traumatic Spondylolisthesis of the Axis Type II: displacement
of the anterior fragment with disruption of the disc space below
the axis. These injuries are a result of hyperextension and rebound
flexion. Type IIA: displacement of the anterior fragment with the
body of the axis in a flexed position without C2C3 facet
dislocation.
Traumatic Spondylolisthesis of the Axis Type III: displacement
of the anterior fragment with the body of the axis in a flexed
position in conjunction with C2C3 facet dislocation. These injuries
are caused by primary flexion and rebound extension.
Traumatic Spondylolisthesis of the Axis Most patients with
traumatic spondylolisthesis reported in the literature were treated
with cervical immobilization with good results. Most traumatic
spondylolisthesis heals with 12 weeks of cervical immobilization
with either a rigid cervical collar or a halo immobilization
device. Surgical stabilization is a preferred treatment option in
cases with: severe angulation (Effendi Type II) disruption of the
C2C3 disc space (Effendi Type II and III) inability to establish or
maintain fracture alignment with external immobilization.
Traumatic Spondylolisthesis of the Axis
Subaxial Cervical Trauma Common. Usually Cx-Th junction
fracture is missed in diagnosis if no appropriate X-rays are
ordered. There are many controversy on the best line of
treatment.
Subaxial Cervical Trauma Allen and Ferguson classification of
compressionflexion injuries.
Subaxial Cervical Trauma Allen and Ferguson classification of
vertical compression injuries.
Subaxial Cervical Trauma Allen and Ferguson classification of
distractionflexion injuries.
Subaxial Cervical Trauma Allen and Ferguson classification of
compressionextension injuries.
Subaxial Cervical Trauma Allen and Ferguson classification of
distractionextension injuries.
Subaxial Cervical Trauma Allen and Ferguson classification of
lateral flexion injuries.
Subaxial Cervical Trauma Cervical Spine Injury Severity Score:
The Cervical Spine Injury Severity Score (CSISS) is based on
independent analysis of four columns (anterior, posterior, right
column, and left lateral column).
Subaxial Cervical Trauma Anderson and colleagues assessed
reliability of this classification. They found construct validity
was also good as all patients with scores equal to 7 had surgery.
They found a significant correlation with high CSISS scores
(>11) to a posterior or combined anteroposterior approach.
Subaxial Cervical Trauma Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury
Classification The Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification
system (SLIC) evaluates: fracture morphology, the discoligamentous
complex, neurologic function. Creating a comprehensive treatment
decision making system to aid
Subaxial Cervical Trauma
Subaxial Cervical Trauma Anterior Column Injuries Anterior
column injuries include: Compression fractures, Burst fractures,
Flexion axial loading injury. Disc distraction injuries. Transverse
process fractures are included in this group, although they have no
effect on spinal stability but may be associated with vertebral
artery injury.
Anterior Column Injuries
Anterior Column Injuries
Subaxial Cervical Trauma Posterior Column Injuries Isolated
injuries to the posterior column are less common than those that
are combined with other fractures. Isolated injuries include:
spinous process and lamina fractures. Disruption of the posterior
ligamentous complex without facet subluxation.
Posterior Column Injuries
Posterior Column Injuries
Subaxial Cervical Trauma Lateral Column Injuries Injuries to
the lateral column are being recognized more frequently, likely due
to better restraint systems that are preventing the more serious
injuries and by increasing recognition from the use of diagnostic
CT. Anatomically the lateral column consists of the lateral masses
with their superior and inferior articular process projections.
Lateral column injuries include: isolated facet fractures without
subluxation, lateral mass fractures, unilateral and bilateral
dislocation with and without fractures.