16
1 Adaptive Clinical Trial Designs: Health Canada’s Regulatory Perspective Celia Lourenco, PhD Bureau of Gastroenterology, Infection And Viral Diseases

Cadth 2015 e4 lourenco adaptive design april 2015 final

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Cadth 2015 e4 lourenco   adaptive design april 2015 final

1

Adaptive Clinical Trial Designs: Health Canada’s Regulatory

Perspective

Celia Lourenco, PhDBureau of Gastroenterology, Infection

And Viral Diseases

Page 2: Cadth 2015 e4 lourenco   adaptive design april 2015 final

Health Canada - HPFB• Reviews and authorises clinical trial applications for

pharmaceuticals, biologics, radiopharmaceuticals, medical devices, and natural health products

• Reviews and authorises for sale pharmaceuticals, biologics, radiopharmaceuticals, medical devices, and natural health products

• Carries out pharmacovigilance in clinical trials and post-market

2

Page 3: Cadth 2015 e4 lourenco   adaptive design april 2015 final

3

Main regulatory concerns

• Design should be appropriate to answer the scientific question of interest

• Sponsor must demonstrate control of Power and Type I error rate over the entire clinical trial

• Operational bias – appropriate pre-planning and measures are implemented to avoid operational bias (e.g., randomization, blinding, secure electronic systems, independent DSMBs, blinded steering committees, etc.)

Page 4: Cadth 2015 e4 lourenco   adaptive design april 2015 final

4

Adaptive Designs

• On Health Canada’s radar for several years (HC working group formed in 2008)

• Many seen in clinical trial applications (CTAs)

• Some in new drug submissions (NDSs)

Page 5: Cadth 2015 e4 lourenco   adaptive design april 2015 final

5

HC WG definition of adaptive design

• An adaptive clinical trial design is a study design planned prospectively that uses accumulating data to decide how to modify aspects of an ongoing study and that uses pre-specified, validated, methodological approaches to preserve the validity and integrity of the trial

Page 6: Cadth 2015 e4 lourenco   adaptive design april 2015 final

Some examples in CTAs

• Adaptive randomization, drop or add arms– Mainly in phase 2 trials– Use of modeling and simulation

• Sample size re-estimation: phase 2 or 3

• Seamless design: phase 2/3, two-stage dose selection

6

Page 7: Cadth 2015 e4 lourenco   adaptive design april 2015 final

7

Page 8: Cadth 2015 e4 lourenco   adaptive design april 2015 final

8

Page 9: Cadth 2015 e4 lourenco   adaptive design april 2015 final

Some examples in NDSs

• Indacaterol: for treatment of COPD - Trial B2335S, a 26-week seamless adaptive design trial that included an initial 2 week dose-ranging phase

• Gardasil 9: a vaccine indicated for the prevention of infection caused by the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52 and 58– A Randomized, International, Double-Blinded (With In-

House Blinding), Controlled With GARDASIL™, Dose-Ranging, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy Study of a Multivalent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) L1 Virus-Like Particle (VLP) Vaccine Administered to 16- to 26-Year-Old Women

9

Page 10: Cadth 2015 e4 lourenco   adaptive design april 2015 final

10

B2335s Trial Design

Page 11: Cadth 2015 e4 lourenco   adaptive design april 2015 final

Gardasil 9 design

• From FDA’s review on FDA’s website:

– Phase 2b/3, with two parts

– Part A: ~1240 subjects were enrolled, equally randomized to 3 dose formulations of 9vHPV or qHPV

– Part B: one dose formulation of 9vHPV was selected for Part B based on interim immunogenicity results, with ~13,380 subjects enrolled in Part B and equally randomized to the selected dose formulation of 9vHPV or qHPV

11

Page 12: Cadth 2015 e4 lourenco   adaptive design april 2015 final

Conclusion from case-studies

• Adaptive designs present increased complexity• May be difficult to interpret, and make use of new

statistical tests/procedures • Increase in use of Bayesian statistics, which involves a

different approach in statistical inference• Increase use of simulation – time consuming to

validate and can be difficult to interpret what the results mean

12

Page 13: Cadth 2015 e4 lourenco   adaptive design april 2015 final

13

• Simulation provides the operating characteristics of the trial design

• That is the description (a picture) of the likelihood (probabilities) of how the trial will progress down the different paths (planned possible adaptations) to eventual completion or termination of the trial

Why and What of Simulation

Page 14: Cadth 2015 e4 lourenco   adaptive design april 2015 final

14

• The sponsors should provide that picture

• Usually in well designed and planned trials, yes

• The question is should regulators look behind the picture and actually check that it was done right?– That means try to duplicate the simulation results– Ask to submit codes, and check/replicate

Seeing that Picture

Page 15: Cadth 2015 e4 lourenco   adaptive design april 2015 final

Conclusions & recommendations• Continue to monitor adaptive designs, expect that the

topic will continue to evolve• Pre-submission meetings are encouraged• Optimize biostatistics and IT resources to deal with

emerging trends such as use of Bayesian statistics• Provide support and encourage attendance of courses

and seminars on adaptive design• Biostatistics consult sought (early) for pivotal Adaptive

Design trials in submissions

15

Page 16: Cadth 2015 e4 lourenco   adaptive design april 2015 final

THANK YOU!