21
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Workshop on options for medium-term planning The Serbian case Tibor Draskovics, Hungary, SIGMA expert Podgorica, 30.09.2015

Presentation, Draskovics, Serbian case, Workshop, Podgorica, 30 Sept 2015_English

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

© OECD

A j

oin

t i

nit

iati

ve o

f th

e O

EC

D a

nd

th

e E

uro

pe

an

Un

ion

,

pri

nc

ipall

y f

ina

nced

by t

he

EU

Workshop on options for medium-term planning

The Serbian case

Tibor Draskovics, Hungary, SIGMA expert

Podgorica, 30.09.2015

A j

oin

t i

nit

iati

ve o

f th

e O

EC

D a

nd

th

e E

uro

pe

an

Un

ion

,

pri

nc

ipall

y f

ina

nced

by t

he

EU

Why Serbia?

• History?

• Language?

• Culture?

• Legal system?

1

Serbia is on the threshold of a comprehensive policy

reform

A j

oin

t i

nit

iati

ve o

f th

e O

EC

D a

nd

th

e E

uro

pe

an

Un

ion

,

pri

nc

ipall

y f

ina

nced

by t

he

EU

State of play in Serbia 2014-2015

• Medium-term institutional planning does exist – on paper, no enforcement, very formalistic

• No coordination

• Completely bottom up

• Not connected to the budget

• No responsible organisation

• No standard policy making processs

2

A j

oin

t i

nit

iati

ve o

f th

e O

EC

D a

nd

th

e E

uro

pe

an

Un

ion

,

pri

nc

ipall

y f

ina

nced

by t

he

EU

The brighter side…

• Secretariat for Public Policies (Republicki Sekretarijat za Javne Politike) established

• Action Plan for Implementing the Government Program developed

• Program budgeting introduced

• Regulatory (legal) elements of a comprehensive policy reform developed and ready for adoption

3

A j

oin

t i

nit

iati

ve o

f th

e O

EC

D a

nd

th

e E

uro

pe

an

Un

ion

,

pri

nc

ipall

y f

ina

nced

by t

he

EU

Medium-term planning or policy reform

(in Serbia)?

• Medium-term planning is a crucial element of the planning system

• The best planning system by itself cannot make the necessary impact

• The entire policy cycle is to be looked at and consistently improved

policy reform is needed

4

A j

oin

t i

nit

iati

ve o

f th

e O

EC

D a

nd

th

e E

uro

pe

an

Un

ion

,

pri

nc

ipall

y f

ina

nced

by t

he

EU

The approach of the reform

5

Policy Planning Political priorities

Problem identification

Policy development

Consultations

Coordination

Government decision making

process

Implementation

Monitoring

Evaluation

Center

of Gov.

Med.Term

Planning

Legal

reg. Guideline

s/manuals

Struct

ures

Policy planning-development-coordination-

implementation-monitoring – budgeting system

Effective

Government

Capacity

building

Civil

Soci

ety

Busi

ness

com

muni

ty

Line

ministri

es

MoF,

SEIO,

PMO

LS

GS/PPS

Proce

sses

6

Reform plan

Local govern

ments

EU

A j

oin

t i

nit

iati

ve o

f th

e O

EC

D a

nd

th

e E

uro

pe

an

Un

ion

,

pri

nc

ipall

y f

ina

nced

by t

he

EU

The legal package developed

• Zakon o planskom sistemu u Republici Srbijie;

• Uredba o metodologiji za izradu srednjorocnih planova;

• Uredba o metodologiji za upravljanje javnim politikama, analizi efekata javnih politika i propisa i sadržaju pojedinačnih dokumenata javnih politika

• Relevant for the entire public administration, including local governments

7

A j

oin

t i

nit

iati

ve o

f th

e O

EC

D a

nd

th

e E

uro

pe

an

Un

ion

,

pri

nc

ipall

y f

ina

nced

by t

he

EU

The key areas covered 1.

• Planning principles

Reality, relevance, reliability

Continuity

Coordination and cooperation

Fiscal feasibility

Transparency and partnership

• Planning/policy documents

Definitions

Hierarchy

Mandatory elements

8

A j

oin

t i

nit

iati

ve o

f th

e O

EC

D a

nd

th

e E

uro

pe

an

Un

ion

,

pri

nc

ipall

y f

ina

nced

by t

he

EU

The key areas covered 2.

• Development of documents

The process

The tools (impact assessment, RIA)

The key players/decision makers

• Implementation

• Monitoring

• Reporting

• Evaluation

9

A j

oin

t i

nit

iati

ve o

f th

e O

EC

D a

nd

th

e E

uro

pe

an

Un

ion

,

pri

nc

ipall

y f

ina

nced

by t

he

EU

The Medium-Term (Institutional) Plan (MTIP)

• The MTIP is the three years „strategic” plan of the budget beneficiary (institution)

• Summary of objectives, measures and resources

• Relevant for the area of responsibility (sector, subsector, geographic area etc.) of the institution and the institution itself

• Based on analysis/evaluation and other documents

10

A j

oin

t i

nit

iati

ve o

f th

e O

EC

D a

nd

th

e E

uro

pe

an

Un

ion

,

pri

nc

ipall

y f

ina

nced

by t

he

EU

Key principles to be followed by MTIPs

• Full alignment with higher level planning documents

• All planned activities should be based on already approved policy documents

• Timeline to be added

• Only approved funding can be planned

• Strickt control within the Government

• Full transparency for the public

11

A j

oin

t i

nit

iati

ve o

f th

e O

EC

D a

nd

th

e E

uro

pe

an

Un

ion

,

pri

nc

ipall

y f

ina

nced

by t

he

EU

The medium-term plans within the system

12

Development Plan

National Dev./Investment

Plan

Staregies/policies

Government

Programme (GP)

Action Plan for GP

Fiscal

Strategy

/MTEF Medium-Term

(Institutional)

Plan Gov.

Work

Plan

Budget

A j

oin

t i

nit

iati

ve o

f th

e O

EC

D a

nd

th

e E

uro

pe

an

Un

ion

,

pri

nc

ipall

y f

ina

nced

by t

he

EU

Key elements of the MTIP 1.

• General part

Competencies, responsibilities

Orgchart

Description of the „as is” and „to be” situation

Priorities (max 3)

• Strategic part

Objectives

Measures

Performance indicators

13

A j

oin

t i

nit

iati

ve o

f th

e O

EC

D a

nd

th

e E

uro

pe

an

Un

ion

,

pri

nc

ipall

y f

ina

nced

by t

he

EU

Key elements of the MTIP 2.

• Plan of normative activities

laws, bylaws and other regulations to be drafted

With indication of priority and timing

To be included into the Government Work Plan

• Program Budget structure

All planned activities structured according the budget requirements

With source and amount of approved funding

• Overview of results of the situational analysis

14

A j

oin

t i

nit

iati

ve o

f th

e O

EC

D a

nd

th

e E

uro

pe

an

Un

ion

,

pri

nc

ipall

y f

ina

nced

by t

he

EU

The MTIP planning cycle

• Once adopted to be reviewed and adjusted annually (in spring)

What is achieved what is not

Changes in higher level policy documents

Changes in the environment

• Additional review in the budgeting phase (in autumn)

• Final approval in December (after the budget is adopted)

15

A j

oin

t i

nit

iati

ve o

f th

e O

EC

D a

nd

th

e E

uro

pe

an

Un

ion

,

pri

nc

ipall

y f

ina

nced

by t

he

EU

Links with the fiscal-budget planning

• Single (integrated) system/process concept

• Supported by integrated IT platform

• Continuous iteration of plans and resources

• Funding to be secured by

Saving

Reallocation

External sources

Requesting approval of new funding

• Dual sponsorship of the system:

MoF

PPS

16

A j

oin

t i

nit

iati

ve o

f th

e O

EC

D a

nd

th

e E

uro

pe

an

Un

ion

,

pri

nc

ipall

y f

ina

nced

by t

he

EU

The MTIP process • To be drafted by working group within the

institution to ensure full overview

• To be approved internally by the top manager of the institution, externally by MoF and PPS

• Continuous monitoring of implementation by the institution

• Annual reporting to the Government

• Implementation and reporting controlled by MoF and PPS

• The MTIP and the annual report is to be published on the web site.

17

A j

oin

t i

nit

iati

ve o

f th

e O

EC

D a

nd

th

e E

uro

pe

an

Un

ion

,

pri

nc

ipall

y f

ina

nced

by t

he

EU

Some lessons 1.

• Is it perfect? No

• Are all the preconditions in place? No

• Will the implementation be smooth? No

• Is it a model to be copied? No

• Can everything be planned? No

• Is it worth to look at and consider? Yes

18

A j

oin

t i

nit

iati

ve o

f th

e O

EC

D a

nd

th

e E

uro

pe

an

Un

ion

,

pri

nc

ipall

y f

ina

nced

by t

he

EU

Some lessons 2.

• High(est) level political commitment

• Committed and capable leading organization (CoG)

• Capacity building across the Government

• Gradual implementation – consistent enforcement

• It is a different way of thinking, a different way of Government – a real cultural change

19

A j

oin

t i

nit

iati

ve o

f th

e O

EC

D a

nd

th

e E

uro

pe

an

Un

ion

,

pri

nc

ipall

y f

ina

nced

by t

he

EU

Thanks for your kind attention.

Let’s discuss!

20