Upload
the-institute-for-government
View
106
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Performance TrackerAutumn 2017
Dr Emily AndrewsSenior ResearcherInstitute for Government
A reactive spending cycle
• Missing warning signs
• Allowing problems to mount
• Diverting emergency cash to the front line
• No clear strategy for what comes next
Health and social care Law and order
Schools
Neighbourhood services
UKVI
2010 2015
2010 2015 2017
The 2010 Spending Review was initially
successful
But pressures started to emerge in the run-up to
2015
A reactive cycle of emergency cash
injections emerges
• control spending
• maintain scope andquality
• control spending
• “world-class public services”
Cash now
prisons hospitals
Plan now
adult social care
schools
Inform now
police
neighbourhood services
Track now
GPs Criminal courts
Cash now: Prisons
Cash now: Prisons
Cash now: Prisons
Cash now: Hospitals
Cash now: Hospitals
3.9 millionrecorded waiting list for treatment for non-urgent conditions (as of July 2017)
Cash now: Hospitals
Plan now: Adult social care
Plan now: Adult social care
Plan now: Schools
Cash now
prisons hospitals
Plan now
adult social care
schools
Inform now
police
neighbourhood services
Inform now: Neighbourhood services
Inform now: Police
Inform now: Police
Inform now: UKVI
Inform now: UKVI
Inform now: UKVI
Inform now: UKVI
Track now
GPs Criminal courts
Track now: GPs
Cash now
prisons hospitals
Plan now
adult social care
schools
Inform now
police
neighbourhood services
Track now
GPs Criminal courts
Government should:
• Track
• Publish
• Scrutinise
Performance TrackerAutumn 2017
Dr Emily AndrewsSenior ResearcherInstitute for Government