View
441
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Soil Quality Assessment in Urban
Gardens: Trace Metals and Phosphorus
Tolessa Deksissa, Yacov Assa & Sebhat Tefera
University of the District of Columbia
70th SWCS International Annual Conference. Greensboro, NC
July 26-29, 2015
World Population: Urban Share
www.newgeography.com
It is time to consider urban agriculture to address urban food security
Intro: Reason for Urban Gardening and Trend
All these four points are the reason for urban gardening in the
21st century.
Ornamental
Food Security
Food Safety
Climate Change
Intro: Urban Gardening
• Urban gardening can contribute to social,
health, economic and ecological benefit.
• Lack of knowledge about the quality of soil
used for gardening could pose a health
threat for consumers, gardeners and
environment.
• Excess addition of fertilizer or nutrients:
Nitrogen and Phosphorous can lead to
eutrophication of surface waters.
Intro: Effect of Excess Nutrient in Chesapeake
Bay Watershed
Sustainable DC Plan:
100% fishable and
swimmable by 2032
Does urban gardening help DC meet water quality standards?
Objective
• To assess the occurrence and extent of soil
contamination with trace metals in home and
community gardens in DC.
• To increase awareness of soil contamination in DC
urban gardens through free soil quality testing service.
• Educate DC residents in Sustainable Urban Gardening
Materials and Methods:
Sample Collection Sites
• 398 composite
samples:
• 142 community
• 257 home
Provided Free
Soil Quality
Testing Service
for DC Residents:
Nutrient and All
metals
Sample Analysis and Visualization
2. Data Visualization
or Geo-coding
1. Sample Analysis:
Inductive Couple
Plasma Mass
Spectrophotometer
Results: Copper
• Copper (Cu) - Higher
variability in home than
community gardens.
Both mean and median
concentrations of Cu is
higher home gardens.
Results: Arsenic
Arsenic (As) –
Higher variation in
home gardens,
similar mean
concentration, but
higher median
concentration in the
community gardens.
Results: Cadmium
Cadmium (Cd) –
Higher mean,
median and
variation in home
gardens than in
community
gardens.
Result: Lead
Lead (Pb) –
Higher mean,
median and
variation in
home gardens
than the
community
gardens.
Comparison of Community and Home
Gardens: Statistical Analysis
Metal T-test p value
Copper 0.0566
Chromium 0.1245
Arsenic 0.8808
Cadmium 0.00001
Lead 0.0000002
Home gardens are significantly higher than community
gardens in Cd and Pb
Results: Nutrient-Excessive Phosphate
• 83% gardens are
excessive in
phosphate
Result: Arsenic Level
EPA guidelines
As < 0.4 ppm
Conclusion Mean concentration of Arsenic is higher than the EPA
guidelines (0.4 ppm), which has potential risk to human
health.
Lead, Copper, Chromium and Cadmium levels are
below the EPA guidelines.
Home gardens have more contamination than
community gardens in Lead, Copper, Cadmium and
Chromium, but only Cadmium and Lead are statistically
significant.
Free soil testing service increased community awareness
about soil quality, soil amendment with compost,
excessive nutrient and nutrient management.
Farther Researches
Potential plant uptake of Arsenic and Lead is being
studied.
The application of urban gardening as a green
stormwater management strategy needs further
investigation.
Appropriate community education of soil amendment
and composting is needed.
Acknowledgement• NIFA/USDA funded the project
• Sample collection and analysis done by
graduate students:
• Harold Yapuwa, PSM
• Siaka Nuah, PSM
• Rahil Fofana, PSM
• Ulrich Bazemo, PSM
• Mulenga Chileshe, BS