13
REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsideration Peter A Minang World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) & ASB Partnership For the Tropical Forest Margins Land and forest governance at multiple levels in supporting climate change mitigation: lessons learned from the tropics Indonesia Pavillion at UNFCCC COP 21 December 3, 2015, Paris, France

REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsideration

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsideration

REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for

reconsideration

Peter A MinangWorld Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) &

ASB Partnership For the Tropical Forest Margins

Land and forest governance at multiple levels in supporting climate change mitigation: lessons learned from the tropics

Indonesia Pavillion at UNFCCC COP 21December 3, 2015, Paris, France

Page 2: REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsideration

Minang et al., 2014

Page 3: REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsideration

The problem• More than 75

countries engaged in some kind of REDD Readiness

• Attracting upto USD 7.2 Billion of investments committed to supporting REDD+ including Readiness in large part (Creed and Nakhooda 2011)

• YET LITTLE EXISTS IN TERMS OF COMPARING READINESS ACROSS COUNTIRES IN AN OBJECTIVE WAY

• HENCE LEARNING SO

FAR LARGELY ANECDOTAL

Page 4: REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsideration

REDD+ READINESS PHASED APPROACH

ELEMENTS FROM CANCUN AGREEMENTS- PARA 70 -73 DECISION 1/CP16

Page 5: REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsideration

REDD Readiness comparison framework

Minang et al., 2014

Page 6: REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsideration

How about multilevel governance and land in REDD+ Readiness?

Page 7: REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsideration

Are Agricultural drivers of deforestation being considered?

Page 8: REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsideration

Selected countries fit along forest transition

Page 9: REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsideration

Results

Minang et al., 2014

Page 10: REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsideration

The Indonesia Paper

Page 11: REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsideration

Some notes on results• Most countries scored really well on process indicators

like R-PIN, R-PP and REDD Strategy- Thanks to FCPF & UN-REDD Support

• Indonesia is the only country that had a full-fledged REDD Policy and also linked REDD+ to a wider economic strategy. Policy, legal & institutional frameworks were patchy for the Peru, Cameroon and Vietnam

• Vietnam stands out in the development of a benefit sharing framework

• Most countries score poorly on benefit sharing, MRV and audit and financing (most financing still external)

Page 12: REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsideration

Way forward for Indonesia?• Showing leadership in nested approaches to REDD+-

RAD-RNK and RAD-RNK. Provincial Strategy and Planning on REDD+ Implementation (Strategi dan Rencana Aksi Propinsi –SRAP).

• Bringing in more peatland areas through HKM (Village forest) mechanisms would help more high value forest areas come under protected areas and generate local emission reduction and multiple benefits.

• Improving cross-sectoral actions to Readiness speed and effectiveness (would help break path dependency)

Page 13: REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsideration

• AKNOWLEDGEMENT OF CONTRIBUTORS– Agung, Putra– Meine van

Noordwijk– Lalisa Duguma– Atiek Widayati– Sonya Dewi

Merci! Terima Kasih!