23
Managing a mountain park in a dynamic context

Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

Managing a mountain park in a dynamic context

Page 2: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

2

Natural / Human History of Aoraki / Mt Cook National Park

– an overview

Welcome to Aoraki/Mt Cook• Managing a mountain park in a

dynamic context– A sustainability story around this

context• Themes • Places • Our critical issues

Page 3: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

3

The story• Gangkhar Puensum

– 7570 m (24,836 ft)– Highest unclimbed mountain in the world– Himalayas in Bhutan near the border with China– Climbing of mountains higher than 6000 m prohibited

since 1994• Spiritual significance of mountains and the role that plays

in management. Many things to many people.• A mountain holiday. Take visitors away from their normal

lives. Achieving DOC Vision and in particular NZers and our visitors are enriched by outdoor experiences

• Defines how we will manage this place into the future. Can DOC be more agile to keep up in an ever changing world – the dynamic context

Page 4: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

4

Themes

Associations with this place through time• Spiritual

– Ngai Tahu– Climbers– Visitors

• Historical– Ngai Tahu– Pastoralism– Tourism

• Management– Conservation– Ngai Tahu Deed of Settlement

• Geological/Glacial

Page 5: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

5

Ngai Tahu

• Aoraki most sacred of ancestors• Provides sense of communal identify, solidarity and

purpose• Significant to their creation story and spiritual association• Topuni - a cloak of protection over Aoraki.

• Defines their deep spiritual association with this place

Page 6: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

6

Geological/glacial theme

• 80,000 million years ago– Gondwanaland– Alpine fault– Glaciers – Erosion

• Defines today’s access/opportunities and values

Page 7: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

7

Historic theme – pastoralism to tourism

• 1840– Treaty of Waitangi

• 1848– Kemp Purchase

• 1858– Glentanner Run

• 1865– Birch Hill Run

• 1884– First ranger and Hermitage

Page 8: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

8

Historic theme - tourism

• 1882– Climbing begins

• 1886– First passenger service

• 1890– Ball Hut

• 1894: – Aoraki /Mt Cook climbed

• 1895– Government buys Hermitage

Page 9: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

9

Historic theme – tourism to management

• 1930– First plane landing

• 1953– Park formed

• 1955– First ski plane landings

• 1987– DOC created

• 1986/1990– Te Wahipounamu World Heritage site

• 1998– Ngai Tahu Deed of Settlement

• 2016– Management Plan review

• Defines today’s critical issues for management

Page 10: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

10

Facts

• 70,000ha - 25 summits over 3000m - Aoraki/Mt Cook-3754m – climbing proving ground

• Estimated over 500,000 visitors/annum• $2.6 million expenditure• $1.55 million revenue plus concession revenue• $15 million capital investment since 2010

Page 11: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

11

Places – defined by access

Page 12: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

12

PlacesPlaces Accessibility Demand Impacts

High alpine Low and decreasing

Static tending to decline

Managed but need for greater efficiency /new approaches

Subalpine Medium and increasing

High and growing

Holding theline. Need new approaches

Village High High and growing

Holding theline. Need new approaches

Page 13: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

13High alpine and Village places

Page 14: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

14

Village place

Places Accessibility Demand ImpactsVillage High High and

growingHolding theline. Need new approaches

• Village = no skills required• Gateway to the Park. Exceed 500,000 visitors/annum . Approx

15% growth• Village short walks• Visitor Centre – 125,000/annum. Cost $372,000 Revenue

$350,000. Managing visitor information and mitigating risk• Visitor accommodation = 1400/night. Over 90% occupancy

during peak. Reduction in shoulder season. Staff = 300• Local body operation. Infrastructure services.

– Cost $860,000 Revenue $860,000 – DOC contribution approx 9% ($70,000) Major contribution AMCAVL 77%

– Solid waste = 36% of the cost. Increase of 10% on last year.

Page 15: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

15

Village place

Places Accessibility Demand ImpactsVillage High High and

growingHolding theline. Need new approaches

• Visitor growth = increasing pressure on infrastructure services

• Increased demand for visitor and staff accommodation• Increased pressure on car parking. Large campervans• More demand for concessions – tourism business

opportunities

Page 16: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

16

High alpine place

Places Accessibility Demand ImpactsHigh alpine Low and

decreasingStatic tending to decline

Managed but need for greater efficiency /new approaches

• High alpine - Alpine skills required • Alpine Huts - Cost $120,800 Revenue $80,000

– 8 DOC range from Kelman (22) 1086 bednights/annum to Empress (12) - 9 – NZAC Murchison (193)– Lost Gardiner Hut - 53 to rock avalanche– Near miss Plateau Hut (30) - 815. Cost $900,000 in 2004

• Search and Rescue programme - $193,000. Changing season and responses• Alpine Huts – static to decreasing demand and high costs – over 80%

helicopter costs for gas/waste management. Need for greater efficiency or new approaches in waste management. Compliance costs.

Page 17: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

17Subalpine place

Page 18: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

18

Sub alpine place

Places Accessibility Demand ImpactsSub alpine Medium and

increasingHigh and growing

Holding theline. Need new approaches

• Sub alpine area - lesser skills required• Destination Huts

– Mueller (30) – 3113 bed nights/annum. Cost $59,000 Revenue $112,000. Cost $700,000 in 2004

– Ball Shelter (4) - 398. Cost $90,000 in 2010• Hunters/Climbers Huts – low use/low return

– Liebig (DOC) – 22. Godley (NZAC)/Onslow (NZDA)• Campground - 26,000 Revenue $245,000• Hooker Track - 72,000. Developed to manage visitor risk. Cost $1.8 million to

develop• Sealing Tasman Valley Road. Cost $2.2 million to develop• Mueller Hut/Campground/Hooker track – increasing demand = increased

revenue and cost. Big pressure on waste management. New approaches to management

Page 19: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

19

Major critical issues for the future

• In the context of the Aoraki/Mount Cook National Park Management Plan review and the differing values that it holds the two major critical issues for management are likely to be: – How to respond to climate change and its

consequences for maintaining opportunities and facilities for recreation, and

– How to manage the projected increase in visitor numbers and the demands this will place on the Park and those facilities

Page 20: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

20

Aoraki/Mount Cook National Park Management Plan review

• Role of plan as: – resolution of conflicts between protection of values and use

of area– guidance for the assessment of concessions applications– providing a monitoring framework for implementation,

reporting and review of policies and outcomes– working document to guide decision making for operations

management

Page 21: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

21

Specific critical issues• How to review management of Aoraki/Mount Cook that recognizes the

values that people have for this place?• How to manage in an era of climate change that is bringing about rapid

change in the alpine environment?• How to make wise investment decisions that reflect demand and in a

context of competing demands/values?• How to enrich visitors outdoor experiences by addressing quality and

safety? • How to be more agile in our operations to respond to changing trends?• How to maximise revenue opportunities based on the visitor growth

being experienced?• What if visitor numbers exceed our ability to provide facilities?• How to manage visitor growth with the increased pressure on existing

infrastructure and services?• How to manage existing and new concession applications in a context

of visitor growth?• How to fund increased operating costs incurred in managing increased

use?• How to communicate critical visitor and safety information to visitors in

a social media dominated environment?

Page 22: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

22

Summary

• The story about this place and it management issues in a context of the different values to different people

• How does Ngai Tahu and DOC write a plan for this place• How can you contribute and help to shape this plan

Page 23: Mike Davies: Aoraki – Mount Cook National Park Plan

23Questions?