Upload
chikslarry
View
2.329
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
Heavy Metal Pollution & Remediation In Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture
Larry ChikukuraCESCRA
NEW DELHI
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
Outline• What is a heavy metal?
– What causes heavy metal pollution?– International examples: Basel , Sandoz, Japan– Regulatory limits for HM
• Remediation Techniques
– Traditional techniques– Modern techniques– Phytoremediation/Hyperaccumulation– Nanoremediation– Options for resource poor farmers
• Conclusion
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
Introduction
Throughout the world, there is a long tradition of farming intensively within and at the edge of cities (Smit et al., 1996).
However, most of these peri-urban lands are contaminated with pollutants including heavy metals i.e. Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd, Ni, and Hg
soil quality in these areas is closely associated with human health and welfare
hence much focus on soil quality degradation from heavy metal contamination and soil remediation (Wilcke et al., 1998; Li et al, 2001; Lu et al., 2003; Imperato et al., 2003; Hu et al., 2004; Zhang and Ke, 2004).
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
What is a Heavy Metal (HM)??
Criteria used to define heavy metals have included density, atomic weight, atomic number, or periodic table position
Density criteria range from above 3.5 g/cm3 to above 7 g/cm3
Atomic weight definitions start at greater than sodium (22.98) to greater than 40
Atomic numbers of heavy metals are generally given as greater than 20; - sometimes this is capped at 92 (uranium).
The term heavy metals has been called “meaningless and misleading” due to the contradictory definitions and its lack of a “coherent scientific basis (Duffus, 2002).
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
Introduction
Heavy metal is a member of an ill-defined subset of elements that exhibit metallic properties, which would mainly include the transition metals, some, metalloids lanthanides and actinides
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
Categorization of heavy metals
There are two categories of heavy metals: i) Essential heavy metals
essential trace elements needed in very low quantities - vital to the proper functioning of the various biological systems.
The essential heavy metals include iron, zinc, manganese, copper, cobalt, selenium etc.
ii) Non-essential heavy metal occur in traces in the human body but have been
designated as non-essential - harmless below their “threshold level”
These metals include chromium, silicon, nickel etc.
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
Metals have unique chemical properties
1. Do not decay like organics
2. Necessary and beneficial to plants 3. Always present at background levels from parent rock weathering
4. Often occur as cations, which are actively exchanged in plant cell processes
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
What causes heavy metal pollution?
Sediment from solid wasteIndustrial waste
Mining waste
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
Some heavy metals and their environmental and physiological effects
Brady and Weil, 1999
* *
**
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
REGULATORY LIMITS FOR HEAVY METALS
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
THE BIGGEST DISASTERS WITH „A SPECIAL APPEARANCE” OF HEAVY METALS
1932-1952 Minamata
Sewage containing mercury was released by Chisso's chemicals works into Minimata Bay in Japan. The mercury accumulated in sea creatures, leading eventually to mercury poisoning in the population.
In 1952, the first incidents of mercury poisoning appear in the population of MinimataBay in Japan, caused by consumption of fish polluted with mercury, bringing nearly 1000 fatalities. Since then, Japan has had the strictest environmental laws in the industrialised world.
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
THE BIGGEST DISASTERS WITH „A SPECIAL APPEARANCE” OF HEAVY METALS
• Itai-itai disease was the documented case of mass cadmium poisoning in Toyama Prefecture, Japan starting around 1912.
• The cadmium was released into rivers by mining companies in the mountains. The cadmium poisoning caused softening of the bones and kidney failure.
• The mining companies were successfully sued for the damage. Itai-itai disease is known as one of the Four Big Pollution Disease of Japan.
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
THE BIGGEST DISASTERS WITH „A SPECIAL APPEARANCE” OF HEAVY METALS
1986-11-01 Sandoz
Water used to extinguish a major fire carried 30 t fungicide containing mercury into the Upper Rhine.
a fire at a chemical factory Sandoz near Basel, Switzerland, sending tons of toxic chemicals into the nearby river Rhine and turning it red
Fish are killed over a stretch of 100 km.
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
THE BIGGEST DISASTERS WITH „A SPECIAL APPEARANCE” OF HEAVY METALS
1998-04 Spanish nature reserve contaminated after environmental disaster
Toxic chemicals in water from a burst dam belonging to a mine contaminate the Coto de Donana nature reserve in southern Spain. 5 million m3_ of mud containing sulphur, lead, copper, zinc and cadmium flow down the Rio Guadimar. Experts estimated that Europe's largest bird sanctuary, as well as Spain's agriculture and fisheries, will suffer permanent damage from the pollution.
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
TRADITIONAL TREATMENTS FOR SOIL CONTAMINATION
Traditional treatments (engineering-based remediation methods for metal contamination in soils
Treatments can be done in situ (on-site), or ex situ (removed and treated off-site).
Some treatments that are available include: High temperature treatments (produce a vitrified,
granular, non-leachable material). Solidifying agents (produce cement-like material).
Washing process (leaches out contaminants) These are expensive and cost prohibitive when large
areas of soil are contaminated.
Glass, 1999
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
TRADITIONAL TREATMENTS FOR SOIL CONTAMINATION
Once metals are introduced and contaminate the environment, they will remain.
The only exceptions are Hg & Se, which can be transformed and volatilized by microorganisms.
However, in general it is very difficult to eliminate metals from the environment.
@2013, ICE, All rights reservedReeves and Baker , 2000; Koyko et al., 2014
uptake and transpiration of contaminants,
primarily organic compounds, by
plant.
Roots stimulates soil microbial
communities in plant root zones to breakdown
contaminants
Plant enzymatic breakdown of
organic contaminants both internally & thru
secreted enzymes
Adsorption of contaminants
& stored above ground shoots
& their harvestable parts & roots
Roots & exudates
immobilize contaminants
thru adsorption, accumulation, precipitation
within the root zone
Phytoremediation => green technology that uses plants systems for remediation and restoration
@2013, ICE, All rights reservedReeves and Baker , 2000
Use of hyperaccumulator plants
Synthetic chelates stimulate the release of metals into soil solution and enhance the potential for uptake into roots.
A variety of synthetic chelates have this potential to induce Pb desorption from the soil matrix eg. EDTA > HEDTA >DTPA >EGTA >EDDHA.
Natural (A) & (B) Assisted phytoextraction.
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Thlaspi caerulescensAlyssum serpyllifolium
The ability to hyperaccumulate toxic metals compared to related species is because of their ‘Detoxification or Tolerance Mechanism’ .
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
Case Studies
Aim => to efficiently utilise Brassica juncea L.to remove lead (Pb).
effect of different concentration of EDTA on lead accumulation
EDTA is the typical chelating agent
Different concentrations of EDTA (3mmol/kg, 4mmol/kg, and 5mmol/kg)
electrodic phytoremediation. The eletrodic phytoremediation system included electrodes, a power supply, EDTA and plants. Copper wires were used for electrodes.
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
Results
The addition of EDTA was shown to significantly increase the accumulation of lead in Brassica juncea
However, the use of electric potential with EDTA caused increased phytoremediation to manyfolds
However, at high EDTA concentration it proved to be necrotic for the plants resulting in burning effect.
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
Nanoremediation use of nanotech in the improvement of a contaminated site to prevent,
minimize or mitigate damage to human health or the environment.
potential not only to reduce the overall costs of cleaning ; reduction in clean-up time, eliminate the need for treatment and disposal of contaminated soil, reduce the contaminant concentrations to near zero— all in situ
Nano alginite
nZVIbentonite
Nano carbon
Nano scale zero valent iron “nZVI”,
used as a potential sorbents to eliminate Cd and Pb from polluted soil
The “nZVI” is reported as an ideal candidate for in-situ remediation because of its large active surface area and high heavy metal adsorption capacity [Yaacob et al., 2012].
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
Adsorption & Desorption isotherms of Cd & Pb
Marzoog et al., 2014
isotherms show that high quantities of Cd (approximately 30-40 g kg-1 ) - Cd was completely removed from solutions
Generally the quantities of Pb adsorbed on nano particles are lower than their corresponding of Cd
quantities of Pb & Cd desorbed from the previously adsorbed ones – tho ratios are low
Fate of the desorbed contaminants???
@2013, ICE, All rights reservedCluin, 2014
Cost Implication of Nanoremediation
Remediation Technology Cost of Remediation ($)
Traditional remediation methods using pump and treat (without nano-enhancement) 5,000, 000Traditional remediation methods e.g. permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) 3,400,000Nano-enhanced remediation methods using nano-zero valent iron (nZVI) 600,000
Traditional remediation methods or technologies are costly and may take as many as 40 years to clean up all sites across the United States
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
Options for resource poor farmers
Soil and crop mgt practices will not remove the HM contaminants, but will help to immobilize them in the soil
& reduce the potential for adverse effects from the metals
The soil becomes the sink, breaking the soil-plant animal or human cycle through which the toxin exerts its toxic effects (Brady and Weil, 1999)
Note that the kind of metal (cation or anion) must be considered:
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
Organic matter binds heavy metals (make sure not contaminated) --the case of Cr
Brady & Weil, 1999
Active organic matter is effective in reducing
the availability of chromium
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
Add lime (make sure source not contain heavy metals)
Brady & Weil, 1999
Increasing the soil pH to 6.5 or higher - Cationic metals are more soluble at lower pH levels,
less available to plants & th4 less likely to be incorporated in their tissues and ingested by humans
Raising pH has the opposite effect on anionic elements.
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
Management of Contaminated Soils Draining wet soils- improves soil aeration and will allow
metals to oxidize, making them less soluble. Therefore when aerated, these metals are less available (opposite for Cr)
Applying phosphate - reduce the availability of cationic metals, but have the opposite effect on anionic compounds like arsenic.
Care - high levels of P in the soil can result in water pollution.
Carefully selecting plants for use on metal-contaminated soils
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
Which crops are safe & suitable in HM soils???
Aim =>to examine the crop species differences in HM accumulation & distribution in various edible and non-edible plant parts
to suggest the cultivation of different vegetable crops in soil contaminated with different HM based on their accumulation in edible plant part.
@2013, ICE, All rights reservedTable 1 & 2 (Combined)
remarkable difference in metal concentration of various plant parts
cauliflower and cabbage recorded highest uptake of Zn, Pb and Ni, while mustard showed higher uptake of Zn and Cd.
radish, carrot, spinach, amaranthus, mustard, cauliflower and cabbage showed higher distribution of metals to the edible parts
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
Leafy vegetables namely, spinach, amaranthus and mustard seemed to be unsafe and not suitable for cultivation on heavy metal contaminated soil
Most of the fruit type vegetables could be suggested for cultivation on Cd contained soil but not for Ni and Pb contained soil.
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
Conclusion
A number of options are there for remediation of soils
Cost and access determine which method will be used
Resource poor farmers can cultivate specific crops depending on the soil and HM
All methods are effective but some have be known to be more efficient , though no study has been made to compare all
Phytoextraction - less expensive than any other clean up process and the possibility of the recovery and re-use of valuable metals
Nanoremediation is is an emerging technology that can perhaps be used in the near future to clean contaminated environments (cost is still prohibitive)
WHERE POSSIBLE - PREVENTION IS CHEAPER & SAFER THAN CLEANING UP
@2013, ICE, All rights reserved
THANK YOU FOR LISTENING