36
#TheSunTheMoonTheTruth #TheShrubTheOpenTheTruth @cjlortie

Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Background/Question/Methods The positive effect of nurse-plants on beneficiary species can act as a selection process affecting competitive ability of these recipient species. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is evidence for changes in competitive ability of species that associate with nurse-plants but maintain a presence in open sites in arid ecosystems. Seeds from species found growing under shrubs and in the open in a South American Desert ecosystem were collected and grown in sets of growth chambers programmed to emulate the microenvironmental conditions of each. Each source was reciprocally planted and simple density series were used to contrast performance in germination and early seedling establishment lifestages to infer changes in competitive ability. Results/Conclusions This design is an excellent extension to the reciprocal common garden design now used to study invasive plant species from different regions and the analog of differentiation within species but at much smaller scales is an important topic to consider for the study of plant faciitation and positive interactions more generally. Importantly, density-dependent interactions between beneficiary species is an important concept in modeling community dynamics and changes in apparent competition could be an important factor that mediates the capacity for shrubs to buffer the loss of smaller plant species within arid systems. Dataset: http://bit.ly/rct-compdata

Citation preview

Page 1: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

#TheSunTheMoonTheTruth

#TheShrubTheOpenTheTruth

@cjlortie

Page 2: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

three things that cannot be hidden

Page 3: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

the shrub or dominants

Page 4: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

the open or non-canopy sites

Page 5: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

the truth

extreme variation is an important opportunity

Page 6: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

not at all deserts at the same of course

but many have significant selection processes & gradients

Page 7: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

the methodology of shrub-open contrasts is a convenient experimental design tool but not necessarily the whole story

Pescador et al. 2014

Page 8: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

Pescador et al. 2014

bivariate nearest-neighbor distance distributions

dart hits

Page 9: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

Pescador et al. 2014

facilitation in the halo

Page 10: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

dominants do have major relative influences in these systems

Filazzola & Lortie 2014

Page 11: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

reasonable to assume that not only can there be different species associated with dominants but that

individuals within species can exhibit ecotypic differentiation

Page 12: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

A test for ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species found under nurse-plants and in open sites in arid

systems

lortie, filazzola, lamarque, sotomayor

@cjlortie

Page 13: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

teamwork & collaboration

http://bit.ly/ecotype

Page 14: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

if you have a two-phase plant system, here is our approach to exploring the following:

(we want you to join the pack)

Page 15: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

local adaptation phenotypic plasticity

ecotypic differentiation

pilot studies

Page 16: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

step 1. seeds

Collect seeds from 5 different species of plants that are found both under shrubs in arid systems and in the open nearby. !A total of 2000 seeds per species is recommended as a minimum.

Page 17: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

step 1I. patterns

Measure microenvironmental conditions & record plant densities for each species. !Use micro-loggers (we used pro v2s) & record at least a season of conditions under your shrub species and nearby in the open (non-canopied sites where your target species also occur).

Page 18: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

step III. reciprocal condition trials (rcts)

petri dish or pot trials in growth chambers (reciprocal design)

Page 19: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

modded the reciprocal common garden protocol

shrubopen

shrubopen

seedchambers

Page 20: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

rcts on seeds to explore seed biology & germination

first set of pilot experiments: both SA & CA

a single density each species

a

b

c

d

e

a

b

c

d

e

under each setof conditions

Page 21: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

SA species

Sotomayor et al. 2014

methodology generated differences

Page 22: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

rcts on seeds

but what about the potential for different competitive abilities

Page 23: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

Hypothesis. The microsite generated by dominants in two-phase communities leads to different competitive trait sets for the associated species because of different indirect interaction networks & reduced variation in microenvironmental conditions.

Page 24: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

Predictions. (i) ndd (negative density dependence):Individuals from understory microsites respond more strongly & negatively to increasing seed densities.

!(ii) ce (competitive effect vs response):Individuals from understory microsites exert significantcompetitive effects on individuals from the open.

(iii) pp phenotypic plasticity: Individuals from open microsites respond more strongly to reciprocal conditions than shrub individuals.

Page 25: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

cage matching: intraspecific seed density series

Lortie et al. 2009

understory open

#TheShrubTheOpenTheTruth

Page 26: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

same initial protocol as first set of pilot experiments

density series each species

a

b

c

d

e

a

b

c

d

e

under each setof conditions

monoculture mixed

Page 27: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

ndd

Page 28: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

ce

Page 29: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

pp

Page 30: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

implications

density-dependent interactions between beneficiary species is an important concept in modeling community dynamics

rct is an effective protocol

Page 31: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

implications

changes in apparent competition & facilitation are important factors that mediate the capacity for shrubs to buffer the loss of smaller plant

species within arid systems

Page 32: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

impacts in arid ecosystems are not always pretty

experimentation at finer scales & collaboration globally needed

Page 33: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

bonus slides: species identity is important

Page 34: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

ndd

Page 35: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

ce

Page 36: Ecotypic differentiation in the competitive ability of beneficiary species

pp