Upload
hugo-ignacio-torres-bahamon
View
39
Download
6
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
167
TESTS & APPROVALS
Test Report Summaries Approvals
4.0
169
TEST REPORT SUMMARIES4.1 TEST REPORTS
Allentown Testing Laboratories, Inc. USA
Allentown Testing Laboratories, Inc, Pennsylvania, USA
Germany
DIN 1048, Amtliche Materialprüfanstalt, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany
Amtliche
Armabeton a.s.Czech Republic
ÈSN 73 1317, Armabeton a.s., Praha, Czech Republic
170
TEST REPORT SUMMARIES4.1 TEST REPORTS
Australia
,Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Australian Centre for Construction Innovation (ACCI), University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
USA
Aviles Engineering Corporation, Houston, Texas, USA
USA
Army Corps of Engineers CRD C48-73, Aviles Engineering Corporation, Houston, Texas, USA
171
TEST REPORT SUMMARIES4.1 TEST REPORTS
Germany
DIN 1048, Bautest Corporation, Augsburg, Germany
Australia
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Metallurgical Technology Department, BHP, NSW, Australia
Australia
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), BRC (NSW) Pty Ltd, Building & Construction Research & Consulting, Brookvale, NSW, Australia
172
TEST REPORT SUMMARIES4.1 TEST REPORTS
Japan
JIS A 6204, Building Materials Test Center, Tokyo, Japan
Russia
GOST 12730.5, Central Construction Laboratory, Public Corporation “Orgenergostroi”, Moscow, Russia
Russia
GOST 12730.5-84, Central Construction Laboratory, Public Corporation “Orgenergostroi”, Moscow, Russia
173
TEST REPORT SUMMARIES4.1 TEST REPORTS
Canada
Clifton Associates Ltd., Fort St. John, BC, Canada
Japan
Construction Bureau of Chubu District, The Ministry of Construction, Aichi Institute of Technology, Japan
Japan
Japan Industrial Standards (JIS) C.R.S. Ltd. (Central Research Laboratory), Tokyo, Japan
174
Australia
CSIRO Division of Building, Construction and Engineering, Highett, VIC, Australia
TEST REPORT SUMMARIES4.1 TEST REPORTS
Chile
DIN 1048, DICTUC S.A., Department of Engineering and Construction Management, Santiago, Chile
Slovenia
JUS Standard U.M1.055, Gradis Teo, Technical, Economic and Organizational Services, d.d., Ljubljana, Slovenia
175
TEST REPORT SUMMARIES4.1 TEST REPORTS
Canada
CAN/CSA A23.2-6B, Hardy BBT Limited, Burnaby, BC, Canada
Canada
HBT Agra Ltd, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Iceland
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CRD C48-73, NT Build 492 and 443, Hönnun Ltd, Consulting Engineers, Reykjavik, Iceland
176
TEST REPORT SUMMARIES4.1 TEST REPORTS
Japan
Hosei University, Department of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
Japan
Civil Engineering Department, Hosei University, Tokyo, Japan
Ireland
Institute for Industrial Research and Standards, Dublin, Ireland
177
TEST REPORT SUMMARIES4.1 TEST REPORTS
Argentina
ITH – Instituto Tecnologico Del Hormigon S.A., Buenos Aires, Argentina
Japan
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Iwate University, Morioka, Japan
Japan
Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (JAERI), Tokai-mura, Japan
178
TEST REPORT SUMMARIES4.1 TEST REPORTS
Lithuania
LST 1330, Laboratory of Building Materials and Constructions, Kaunas Technological University, Kaunas, Lithuania
USA
Kleinfelder, Inc, San Francisco, California, USA
Czech Republic
Klokner Institute, Czech University of Technology, Prague, Czech Republic
179
TEST REPORT SUMMARIES4.1 TEST REPORTS
Czech Republic
Klokner Institute, Czech University of Technology, Prague, Czech Republic
Czech Republic
Klokner Institute, Czech Technical University, Prague, Czech Republic
Canada
II Repair ASTM C109, C78, C496, C1202, C642, Levelton
Engineering Ltd., Richmond, BC, Canada
180
TEST REPORT SUMMARIES4.1 TEST REPORTS
Switzerland
LPM (Laboratories for Preparation and Methodology), Beinwil am See, Switzerland
Australia
Mahaffey Associates Pty Ltd., Rydalmere, NSW, Australia
Canada
I IIMetro Testing Laboratories Ltd., Burnaby, BC, Canada
181
TEST REPORT SUMMARIES4.1 TEST REPORTS
USA
Laboratories, Seattle, Washington, USA
USA
Seattle, Washington, USA
USA
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CRD C48-73,
182
TEST REPORT SUMMARIES4.1 TEST REPORTS
USA
ASTM 39, Professional Services Industries, Inc. (PSI), Corpus Christi, Texas, USA
Singapore
ASTM C856-88, Setsco Services Pte Ltd, Singapore
Singapore
Setsco Services Pte Ltd., Singapore
183
TEST REPORT SUMMARIES4.1 TEST REPORTS
Slovak Republic
Slovak University of Technology, Department of Concrete Construction and Bridges, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
Australia
Taywood Engineering Limited, Perth, WA, Australia
Austria
ÖNORM B 3303, Technologisches Gewerbemuseum (Industrial Museum of Technology), Federal Higher Technical Education and Research Institute, Vienna, Austria
184
TEST REPORT SUMMARIES4.1 TEST REPORTS
Slovak Republic
STN 73 1317, Technical Testing Institute of Civil Engineering, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
Slovak Republic
STN 73 1321, Technical Testing Institute of Civil Engineering, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
Slovak Republic
Institute of Civil Engineering Technology & Testing, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
185
TEST REPORT SUMMARIES4.1 TEST REPORTS
Slovak Republic
CSN 73 1209 and CSN 73 1321, Institute of Civil Engineering Technology & Testing, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
Slovak Republic
STN 73 1311, Institute of Technology & Testing in Civil Engineering, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
Slovak Republic
Institute of Technology & Testing in Civil Engineering, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
186
TEST REPORT SUMMARIES4.1 TEST REPORTS
Slovak Republic
STN 73 1311, Institute of Technology & Testing in Civil Engineering, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
USA
ASTM C672, Twin City Testing and Engineering Laboratory, Inc, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
USA
Twin City Testing and Engineering Laboratory, Inc, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
187
TEST REPORT SUMMARIES4.1 TEST REPORTS
Colombia
Corps of Engineers CRD C48-73, Universidad de Los Andes, Departmento de Engenieria Civil y Ambiental, Laboratorio de Estructuras Geotecnia y Pavimentos, Bogota, Colombia
Australia
Building Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Australia
and NT Build 443, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
188
TEST REPORT SUMMARIES4.1 TEST REPORTS
Australia
Slump(AS1012.3), Setting Time (AS1012.18), Compressive Strength (AS1012.9), Dry Shrinkage (AS1012.13), University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Australia
AS1012.21 and ACCI, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Australia
AS2350.14, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
189
TEST REPORT SUMMARIES4.1 TEST REPORTS
Australia
ASTM C1202, ACCI, NT Build 443, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia
Hungary
Water Resources Management
Canada
Corps of Engineers CRD C48-73, Warnock Hersey Professional Services Ltd, Vancouver, BC, Canada
191
APPROVAL CATEGORIES4.2
Departments of Transportation............................................................................................ 193
General................................................................................................................................ 193
Food & Potable Water ......................................................................................................... 195
Health Safety ...................................................................................................................... 198
Environmental...................................................................................................................... 199
Quality Systems................................................................................................................... 199
193
APPROVAL LISTING4.2
Departments of Transportation Approval
Frankfort, KY, USA
Departments of Transportation Approval
Harrisburg, PA, USA
Departments of Transportation Approval
Denver, CO, USA
Departments of Transportation Approval
Salem, OR, USA
Product Approval
Louisville, KY, USA
Product Approval
Herts, United Kingdom
Product Approval
Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
194
(cont.)
Product Approval
Saint-Rémy-Lès-Chevreuse, France
Product Approval
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Product Approval
Berlin, Germany
Product Approval
Whittier, CA, USA
Product Approval
Warszawa, Poland
Product Approval
Budapest, Hungary
Product Approval
Stockholm, Sweden
Product Approval
Praha, Czech Republic
APPROVAL LISTING4.2
195
(cont.)
Product Approval
Warsaw, Poland
Product Approval
Trondheim, Norway
Product Approval
Bratislava, Slovak Republic
Product Approval
Atlanta, GA, USA
Food Approval
Ottawa, ON, Canada
Potable Water Approval
Berne, Switzerland
Potable Water Approval
Bolivar, South Australia
APPROVAL LISTING4.2
196
(cont.)
Potable Water Approval
Potable Water Approval
Toronto, ON, Canada
Potable Water Approval
Cairo, Egypt
Potable Water Approval
Karlsruhe, Germany
Potable Water Approval
Jerusalem, Israel
Potable Water Approval
Prague, Czech Republic
Potable Water Approval
Paris, France
Potable Water Approval
Budapest, Hungary
APPROVAL LISTING4.2
197
Potable Water Approval
Tokyo, Japan
Potable Water Approval
London, United Kingdom
Potable Water Approval
Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Potable Water Approval
Fresno, CA, USA
Potable Water Approval
Singapore
Potable Water Approval
Gwent, United Kingdom
Potable Water Approval
Richmond, VA, USA
Potable Water Approval
Tallahassee, FL, USA
(cont.)
APPROVAL LISTING4.2
198
(cont.)
Potable Water Approval
Albany, NY, USA
Potable Water Approval
Cincinnati, OH, USA
Potable Water Approval
Oslo, Norway
Potable Water Approval
Columbus, OH, USA
Potable Water Approval
Austin, TX, USA
Health Safety Approval
Zagreb, Croatia
Health Safety Approval
Perth, Australia
APPROVAL LISTING4.2
199
Environmental Approval
New South Wales, Australia
Environmental Approval
Beijing, China
(cont.)
Health Safety Approval
Prague, Czech Republic
Health Safety Approval
Tallinn, Estonia
Health Safety Approval
Bratislava, Slovak Republic
Quality Systems Approval
Norfolk, United Kingdom
Quality Systems Approval
Mississauga, ON, Canada
APPROVAL LISTING4.2