Upload
aziz-sidek-ab
View
191
Download
6
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ELASTIC STUDIES OF Tropical Woods By Using NON-DESTRUCTIVE Ultrasonic Technique. Sidek Hj Ab Aziz1, Abdul Halim Shaari1, Nor Hafzan Sarah Almuin1, 2, Mohd Noorul Ikhsan Ahmad2, Abd Nassir Ibrahim2 & Ilham Mukriz Zainal Abidin2
Citation preview
ELASTIC STUDIES OF TROPICAL WOODS BY USING NON-DESTRUCTIVE ULTRASONIC TECHNIQUE
ELASTIC STUDIES OF TROPICAL WOODS BY USING NON-DESTRUCTIVE ULTRASONIC TECHNIQUE
Sidek Hj Ab Aziz1, Abdul Halim Shaari1, Nor Hafzan Sarah Almuin1, 2, Mohd Noorul Ikhsan Ahmad2,
Abd Nassir Ibrahim2 & Ilham Mukriz Zainal Abidin2
1 Glass and Ultrasonic Studies Centre (GUSC), Department of Physics Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, MALAYSIA
2 NDT Group, Industrial Technology Division, Malaysian Nuclear Agency Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation 43000 Bangi, Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia
Scope of Presentation
• Introduction
• Materials & NDT Techniques
• Experimental Method
• Result and Discussion
• Conclusion
Non-destructive ultrasonic methods
• used for quality control especially during the production stage; detecting cracks in boards, their size densities perpendicular to the board plane and their surface irregularities.
• show some potential in accessing the physical characteristics of woods and hence to determine their qualities.
• not been widely used in Malaysia wood industry although it was largely carried out elsewhere.
• being employed to acquire the quality of woods particularly from their strength (Mazzanti &Uzielli, 2010).
Wood Testing Various methods for non-destructive wood testing (Niemz, 2010)
Properties Basic physical principles Measurable properties
Mechanical Drilling resistance,hardness, intrusion behaviour Detection of fungal decay, density
Electrical
Electrical resistance Correlation between electrical resistance and
moisture content
Correlation between electrical resistance and
fungal decay
Moisture content
Detection of fungal decay
Dielectrical properties Moisture content
Acoustical
Sound velocity; sound reflection; sound
attenuation
Elastic constants (E,G)
Defect detection
Acoustic emission Micro cracks, eating noise of insects
Eigenfrequency Elastic constants (E,G)
Delamination in glued wood joints
Thermal Heat radiation (thermography) Defects on near-surface areas (error adhesion of inlay, opened
fugues)
Particles Neutron radiation Allocation of humidity
Electromagnetic
waves
Visible light (ageing) Colour measuring (CI-Lab), aging,
colour differences
Video Image Correlation (cross
correlation, strain distribution)
IR/NIR radiation humidity, chemical analysis
(impurities), partly mechanical attributes
X-ray
(absorption/diffusion)
density, local density allocation,
annual grow ring profiles, angle in S2
(Sylviscan)
Synchrotron radiation micro structure analysis
Objectives
• To measure the longitudinal wave velocities propagated in selected tropical woods at room temperature
• to obtain detailed information of their elastic properties.
Wood • An anisotropic material
• its physical and mechanical properties depend dramatically on the material direction and on its structural (anatomy, cell wall macromolecular arrangement) features (Simpson & TenWolde, 1999) .
• Describes as an orthotropic material
• has unique and independent mechanical properties in the directions of three mutually perpendicular axes:
– Longitudinal (L)
– Radial (R)
– Tangential (T)
Three principal axes of wood with respect to grain direction and growth rings.
Wood
• Longitudinal axis L is parallel to the fiber (grain)
• Radial axis R is normal to the growth rings (perpendicular to the grain in the radial direction)
• Tangential axis T is perpendicular to the grain but tangent to the growth rings.
Three principal axes of wood with respect to grain direction and growth rings.
Wood Samples • samples cut from local tropical
trees. • Categories: Malaysian tropical
woods are • Heavy hardwood, • Medium Hardwood, • Light Hardwood • Softwood. • samples are obtained from
the Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM), Kepong, Selangor.
• Detailed wood samples preparation are available elsewhere (FRIM) (Anon, 1988; Sidek et al., 1995). Each of wood samples are clean, with straight grain, or as
much as possible, and cut in preferable sizes for ultrasonic wave measurement.
11cm (length) x 7 cm (width) x 1cm (thick
Ultrasonic Testing (UT)
• Through transmission method is more suitable for the acoustic measurement of coarse grained and porous materials like wood compared with pulse-echo method.
• A high-voltage ultrasonic tester (model BPV Steinkamp) with two 45 kHz probes with conical stainless steel contact points was used.
• These probes are suitable for rough surfaces samples and can operate without the need of couplants (Steinkamp, 1995).
• to measure pulse travel times by ultrasonic through-transmission testing.
• Velocity = Distant travel/Time travel
• uses high frequency sound energy to conduct examinations and make measurements.
• can be used for flaw detection/evaluation, dimensional measurements, material characterization, and more.
Orthotropic Behavior of Wood
• To fully understand the elastic mechanical properties of wood (how it bends and deforms elastically),
• Needs 12 elastic properties: – 3 moduli of elasticity
(one for each direction) – 3 moduli of rigidity (one
for each direction) – 6 Poisson’s ratio’s.
• The moduli of elasticity defines how "stiff" or elastic a material is.
• The modulus of rigidity used to characterize how "stiff" a material is when it is twisted or put into a state of torsion.
• Poisson's ratio defines how a material deforms when stressed.
• The longitudinal properties tend to be the most commonly used.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
• The dynamic modulus of elasticity E (=rV2) of wood can be accessed through the measurement of ultrasonic wave velocity (V) and density (r) of a sample.
• Wood samples are assumed to be infinite homogeneous isotropic medium (Steinkamp, 1995).
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
• Following table shows the average density, elastic constants and ultrasonic wave velocities of different types of tropical hardwood, medium hardwood and softwood samples.
• These moduli are presented in term of EL, ER and ET which are usually obtained from compression tests.
• It is observed that the elastic constants themselves vary within and between species and with moisture content and specific gravity.
Why Does Wood Density Matter?
• mass of a substance divided by its volume.
• Denser materials weigh more for the same given volume.
• Also known as specific gravity.
• Wood density measures the strength of a wood and it's
resistance to indentation.
Tropical hardwood samples
Sample
Local
Name
Scientific
Name
Average
Density
(kgm-3)
Elastic Constant (GPa)
Wave Velocity (ms-1)
EL ET ER EL* VL VT VR
A1 Tembusu Fagraea
fragrans 800 14.70 2.00 2.30 14.00 4287 1581 1696
A2 Merbau Intsia
palembanica 800 15.70 1.90 2.00 15.40 4430 1541 1581
A3 Giam Hopea spp. 975 16.70 2.10 2.40 16.50 4139 1468 1569
A4 Balau
Merah Shorea spp. 880 17.40 1.90 2.30 17.00 4447 1469 1617
A5 Resak Vatica spp. 945 18.80 1.80 2.40 18.10 4460 1380 1594
A6 Kekatong Cynometra
spp. 975 18.70 2.20 2.40 18.40 4379 1502 1569
A7 Chengal Neobalanoca
rpus heimii 945 19.60 2.30 2.40 19.60 4554 1560 1594
A8 Keranki Dialium spp. 960 15.60 2.20 2.30 20.10 4031 1514 1548
A9 Balau Shorea spp. 975 17.30 2.10 2.30 20.10 4212 1468 1536
A10 Bitis Madhuca
utilis 1105 21.90 2.40 2.60 23.80 4452 1474 1534
A11 Bakau Rhizophora
spp. 1040 19.90 2.30 2.50 20.70 4374 1487 1550
The average density, elastic constants and ultrasonic wave velocities of different types of tropical hardwood samples.
Tropical medium hardwood samples.
Sample
Local Name
Scientific Name Average
Density
(kgm-3)
Elastic Constant (GPa) Wave Velocity (ms-1)
EL ET ER EL* VL VT VR
B1 Meransi Crallia spp. 800 14.10 1.70 2.20 13.40 4198 1458 1658
B2 Simpoh Dillenia spp. 735 14.90 1.60 1.90 14.30 4502 1475 1608
B3 Rengas Gluta spp. 835 15.20 2.00 2.30 14.90 4267 1548 1660
B4 Kulim Scorodocarpus 835 15.10 1.90 2.20 14.90 4253 1508 1623
B5 Punah Tetramesrista glabra 720 15.40 1.70 1.90 15.40 4625 1537 1624
B6 Merawan Hopea spp 690 16.20 1.90 2.30 15.50 4845 1659 1826
B7 Keledang Artocarpus spp. 800 15.70 1.60 2.10 15.50 4430 1414 1620
B8 Mengkulang Heritiera spp. 755 16.50 1.80 2.00 16.00 4675 1544 1628
B9 Mata Ulat Kokoona littoralis 880 17.60 1.90 2.40 16.30 4472 1469 1651
B10 Kasai Pometia spp 800 18.40 1.50 2.30 17.00 4796 1369 1696
B11 Kelat Eugenia spp. 800 17.70 1.70 2.30 17.60 4704 1458 1696
B12 Tualang Koompassia excelsa 835 18.10 1.70 2.00 17.80 4656 1427 1548
B13 Merpauh Swietonia spp 755 18.70 1.50 1.90 18.10 4977 1410 1586
B14 Kempas Koompassia 880 19.00 1.90 2.40 18.60 4647 1469 1651
B15 Kapur Dryobalanops spp 755 19.80 1.80 2.10 18.00 5121 1544 1668
B16 Keruing Dipterocarpus 880 20.10 1.90 2.30 22.30 4779 1469 1617
The average density, elastic constants and ultrasonic wave velocities of different types of tropical medium hardwood samples.
Tropical softwood samples
Sample
Local Name
Scientific Name Average
Density
(kgm-3)
Elastic Constant (GPa) Wave Velocity (ms-1)
EL ET ER EL* VL VT VR
C1 Terentang Campnosprema
spp. 435 10.9 1.7 1.8 7 5006 1977 2034
C2 Jelutong Dyera costulata 465 11.9 1.3 1.8 8 5059 1672 1967
C3 Pulai Alstonia spp 465 13.9 1.4 2 7.1 5467 1735 2074
C4 Sesendok Endospermum
malaccensis 530 14 1.6 1.9 8.5 5140 1737 1893
C5 Melantai Hopea
macroptera 530 12.1 1.7 2.1 7.9 4778 1791 1991
C6 Geronggang Cratoxylon 545 12.5 2 2.2 8 4789 1916 2009
C7 Meranti
merah muda Shorea spp 545 14 2.1 2.4 19.4 5068 1963 2098
C8 Petai Parkia spp 545 11.3 1.2 2.3 10.7 4553 1484 2054
C9 Perupok Lophopetalum
spp 560 13.8 2 2.2 12.6 4964 1890 1982
C10 Machang Mangifera spp 560 14.5 1.8 2.1 14.3 5089 1793 1936
C11 Kedondong Burseraceae 575 14.5 1.3 2.4 12.9 5022 1504 2043
C12 Terap Paratocarpus spp 575 13.4 1.6 2.2 12 4827 1668 1956
The average density, elastic constants and ultrasonic wave velocities of different types of tropical softwood samples.
Tropical softwood samples…cont
Sample
Local Name
Scientific Name
Average
Density
(kgm-3)
Elastic Constant (GPa) Wave Velocity (ms-1)
EL ET ER EL* VL VT VR
C13 Panarahan Myristicaceae 595 14.5 1.6 1.8 9.4 4937 1640 1739
C14 Medang Lauraceae 610 15.3 1.6 2.2 12.6 5008 1620 1899
C15 Ramin Gonystylus bancanus 625 14.6 1.7 2.3 16.4 4833 1649 1918
C16 Kayu Getah Hevea brasilliensis 640 13.2 1.7 2 9.2 4541 1630 1768
C17 Mersawa Anisoptera spp 655 13.7 1.8 2.1 12.6 4573 1658 1791
C18 Melunak Pentace spp 655 13.6 1.8 2 12 4557 1658 1747
C19 Meranti kuning Shore spp 675 13.8 2 2.2 12.1 4522 1721 1805
C20 Meranti puteh Shorea spp 675 14.6 1.7 2.2 19.4 4651 1587 1805
C21 Kungkur Pithecellobium spp 675 12.6 1.7 2.2 10.7 4320 1587 1805
C22 Meranti bakau Shorea uliginosa 675 15 1.6 1.8 14.7 4714 1540 1633
C23 Sepetir Sindora spp 675 14.9 1.6 2 13.6 4698 1540 1721
C24 Merawan Hopea spp 690 15.9 1.1 1.9 15.5 4800 1263 1659
C25 Gerutu Parashorea lucida 690 20.6 1.7 2 20.6 5464 1570 1703
C26 Bintangor Calophyllum spp 690 18.4 1.9 2.2 14.3 5164 1659 1786
C27 Durian Durio spp 705 16.2 1.8 2.1 15.8 4794 1598 1726
C28 Kembang
semangkok Scaphium spp 705 16.4 2 2.2 17 4823 1684 1767
C29 Meranti Shorea spp 705 15.4 2.1 2.4 13.9 4674 1726 1845
The average density, elastic constants and ultrasonic wave velocities of different types of tropical softwood samples.
Elastic constant vs density of tropical wood sample
• The elastic constant of tropical wood sample versus density at L, R and T directions.
• Modulus of elasticity (MOE) measures a wood’s stiffness, indicates overall strength.
• Technically it’s a measurement of the ratio of stress placed upon the wood compared to the strain (deformation) that the wood exhibits along its length.
• MOE is expressed in GPa.
Elastic constant vs density
• Modulus of Elasticity versus wood density with the same groupings for green and aged wood.
• The data scatter is more severe but a simple trend of denser wood is more stiff and aging increases stiffness is seen.
http://www.waveequation.com/wood_stringer_data.html
• The definition of tropical softwood and hardwood has significant relation to the wood’s materials properties: for example the softwood Terentang is less stiff than the medium hardwood Meransi and hardwood Tembusu .
• This is mainly due to the ultra low density, as the stiffness (and also strength) of wood correlates with density.
• The values of elastic modulus (EL, ET and ER) show that wood is reasonably stiff.
Density and Elastic Constant
• Wood is a composite material, and so to stretch the wood samples the cellulose microfibrils in the wood have to be stretched.
• The Young’s modulus of cellulose fibrils is 100 GPa, and that of lignin and hemicellulose averages to 6 GPa.
• Almost all the tropical wood samples follow the usual trend where the longitudinal modulus is greater than radial modulus and tangential modulus (i.e. EL, > ER > ET).
Static vs Dynamic
Comparison of elastic constant measured using ultrasonic and static methods.
• comparison of elastic constant along the longitudinal wood direction.
• At higher density as well as elastic constant, there is almost good relationship between static and ultrasonic (dynamic) method of wood testing.
• As expected the values given by ultrasonic is relatively higher than the static method by less than 10%.
CONCLUSION • An ultrasonic nondestructive
testing method has been used to determine the elastic properties of various types of tropical wood samples.
• The approach is based on the wave velocity measurements in each wood samples and their bulk density.
• The relation of the wave velocities and elastic constants with the density of tropical woods is found to be relatively nonlinear.
• However the values of wave velocity, elastic constant can be used to classify and predict the quality of tropical wood samples.
• At higher density as well as elastic constant, a good relationship between static and ultrasonic (dynamic) method of wood testing is observed where the elastic constant measured by ultrasonic is relatively higher than the static method by less than 10%.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
• A. T. Dinh, G. Pilate, C. Assor, P. Perré (2010) Measurement of the Elastic Properties of Minute Samples of Wood Along the Three Material Directions, in Wood Science for Conservation of Cultural Heritage –Braga 2008, Joseph Gril. (ed) – Firenze :Firenze University Press, pp. 30-35.
• Anon. (1988) Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Section 4. Volume 4.09 Wood. American Society for Testing and Materials. Philadelphia, U.S.A.
• C., Coutand, Jeronimidis G., Chanson B., Loup C. 2004. Comparison of mechanical properties of tension and opposite wood in Populus. Wood Science and Technology 38, 11-28
• Engku, A.R C (1980) Basic Grade Stresses for Some MalaysianTimbers. Malaysian Forest Service. Trade Leaflet NO. 37. Malaysian Timber Industry Board, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
• I.G. Steinkamp (1995), User Handbook for Ultrasonic Test Instrument Type BP5., Germany.
• L.Brancheriau, H. Bailleres, D.Guitard : Comparison between modulus of elasticity values calculated using 3 and 4 point bending tests on wooden sample. Wood Science and Technology 36 (2002) 367-383.
• P. Mazzanti, L. Uzielli (2010) Strength and MOE of Poplar Woo (Populus Albal.) Across the Grain: Expeimental Data, in Wood Science for Conservation of Cultural Heritage –Braga 2008, Joseph Gril. (ed) – Firenze : Firenze University Press, pp 62-66
• P. Niemz (2010) Methods of Non-Destructive Wood Testing, in Wood Science for Conservation of Cultural Heritage –Braga 2008, Joseph Gril. (ed) – Firenze : Firenze University Press, pp. 163 -168
• Sidek H A Aziz, A Halim Shaari & S.P. Chow (1995) Elastic Constant Determination of Tropical Wood by Using Dynamic Ultrasonic Technique, Pertanika J. Sci. And Technol. 3(2), pp. 389-399
• W. Simpson, TenWolde, A. (1999): “Physical Properties and Moisture Relations of Wood”, Wood Handbook: Wood as an Engineering Material, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison: Ch 3, 3-8.
• http://www.waveequation.com/wood_stringer_data.html