24
SPM-UNIT III RISK MANAGEMENT WORKING IN TEAMS Prof. Kanchana Devi

Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

SPM-UNIT IIIRISK MANAGEMENT

WORKING IN TEAMS

Prof. Kanchana Devi

Page 2: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Prof. Kanchana Devi

2

Working in Teams Usually work/task will be divided among

the groups. Formal Groups will be divided into

subgroups There are two types

Command Group: Formal Mgmt Struct Task Group

Page 3: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Prof. Kanchana Devi

3

Step wise frame work Identify project scope and objectives Identify project infrastructure Analyze project characteristics Estimate effort for each activity Identify activity risks Allocate resources Review/Publicize Plan

Page 4: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Prof. Kanchana Devi

4

Becoming a Team There are 5 basic stages of development

Forming Storming Norming Performing Adjourning

Page 5: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Prof. Kanchana Devi

5

Forming Members of the group get to know each

other Set up some ground rules about

behavior

Page 6: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Prof. Kanchana Devi

6

Storming Conflicts arises, everyone will try to

dominate(Leadership) Group’s methods of operation are

established

Page 7: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Prof. Kanchana Devi

7

Norming Conflicts are settled A feel of group identity emerges

Page 8: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Prof. Kanchana Devi

8

Performing The emphasis will be on the task at hand

Page 9: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Prof. Kanchana Devi

9

Adjourning The group disbands

Page 10: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Prof. Kanchana Devi

10

Balance – Different People The Chair The Plant The Monitor – Evaluator The Sharper The Team Worker The Resource Investigator The Completer – Finisher The Company Worker

Similar to our institution

Page 11: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Prof. Kanchana Devi

11

Group Performance One way of categorizing group tasks

into: Additive Tasks

Effort to get final result Compensatory Tasks

Judgments of individual group members are pooled Disjunctive Tasks

Only one correct answer Conjunctive Tasks

Progress is governed by the rate of slowest performer

Page 12: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Prof. Kanchana Devi

12

Decision Making Decisions are categorized as

Structured: Simple, Routine Decisions (Rules can be applied in straight forward way)

Unstructured: More Complex and often requiring a degree of creativity

Page 13: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Prof. Kanchana Devi

13

Obstacles to make good decision

Faulty Heuristics “Rule of Thumb”

Escalation of Commitment Difficult to alter

Information Overload Too much of information

Page 14: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Prof. Kanchana Devi

14

Obstacles to good GROUP decision

Groups deal less effectively with Poor Structures Problems need Creative Solutions

Risky Shifts – Making decision on their own

Page 15: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

15

Methods to reduce the disadvantages of group DM

Prof. Kanchana Devi

Delphi Technique: Given a problem following procedure have to be carried out The cooperation of a number of experts is enlisted The problem is presented to the experts The experts record their recommendations These recommendations are collated and

reproduced The collected responses are re-circulated The experts comment If there is any deviation the process will be

stopped

Page 16: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Prof. Kanchana Devi

16

Team Heedfulness Eg: Foot Ball team Group members are aware of activities of

others that contribute to overall success “Collective Mind”

Shared Understanding, Familiarity and good communications

In software development environment Egoless Programming Chief Programmer Teams Extreme Programming Scrum – Similar to Agile Model

Page 17: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Prof. Kanchana Devi

17

Organization & Team Structure There are two important issues that are

critical to the effective functioning of every organization are Department Structure

How is a department is organized into teams? Team Structure

How are project teams structured?

Page 18: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Prof. Kanchana Devi

18

Department Structure There are three broad ways in which a

software development department can be structured: Functional Format Project Format Matrix Format

Page 19: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Prof. Kanchana Devi

19

Functional Format VS Project Format

Top Management

Project Team n

Project Team 1

Top Management

a. Project Organization

RequirementsDesignCoding

Networking

TestingDatabase Project

Team n

Project Team 1

b. Functional Organization

Functional Groups

Page 20: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Prof. Kanchana Devi

20

Matrix FormatProject

Functional Group

#1 #2 #3

#1 2 0 3 Functional Manager 1

#2 0 5 3 Functional Manager 2

#3 0 4 2 Functional Manager 3

#4 1 4 0 Functional Manager 4

#5 0 4 6 Functional Manager 5

Page 21: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Prof. Kanchana Devi

21

Team Structure Denotes the reporting, responsibility and

communication structures in individual project teams

There are only three team structures: Democratic Chief Programmer Mixed team organization

Page 22: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

22

Chief Programmer team

Prof. Kanchana Devi

Project Manager

Reporting

Team Members

Page 23: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Prof. Kanchana Devi

23

Democratic Team

Team Member

Communication

Page 24: Spm unit iii-risk-working in teams

Prof. Kanchana Devi

24

Mixed Control Team Structure

Team Members

Senior Members

Project Manager