35
EE 369 Power Systems Engineering Lecture 1 Introduction Slides by: Tom Overbye, University of Illinois With additions by Ross Baldick, University of Texas

Power Transmission

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Power Transmission

EE 369Power Systems Engineering

Lecture 1Introduction

Slides by: Tom Overbye, University of IllinoisWith additions by Ross Baldick, University of Texas

Page 2: Power Transmission

2

Simple Power System• Every power system has three major

components:– generation: source of power, ideally with a specified

voltage and frequency– load or demand: consumes power; ideally with a

constant resistive value– transmission system: transmits power; ideally as a

perfect conductor

• Additional components include:– distribution system: local reticulation of power,– control equipment: coordinate supply with load.

Page 3: Power Transmission

3

Complications

• No ideal voltage sources exist.• Loads are seldom constant and are typically

not entirely resistive.• Transmission system has resistance,

inductance, capacitance and flow limitations.• Simple system has no redundancy so power

system will not work if any component fails.

Page 4: Power Transmission

4

Power• Power:

– Instantaneous rate of consumption of energy,– How hard you work!

• Power = voltage x current for dc • Power Units:

Watts = amps times volts (W)kW – 1 x 103 WattMW – 1 x 106 WattGW – 1 x 109 Watt

• Installed U.S. generation capacity is about 1000 GW ( about 3 kW per person)

• Maximum load of Austin about 2500 MW.• Maximum load of UT campus about 50 MW.

Page 5: Power Transmission

5

Energy• Energy:

– Integration of power over time,– Energy is what people really want from a power

system,– How much work you accomplish over time.

• Energy Units:

Joule = 1 watt-second (J)

kWh – kilowatthour (3.6 x 106 J)

Btu – 1055 J; 1 MBtu=0.292 MWh• U.S. annual electric energy consumption is about 3600

billion kWh (about 13,333 kWh per person, which means on average we each use 1.5 kW of power continuously).

Page 6: Power Transmission

6

Power System Examples• Interconnection: can range from quite small, such

as an island, to one covering half the continent:– there are four major interconnected ac power

systems in North America (five, if you count Alaska), each operating at 60 Hz ac; 50 Hz is used in some other countries.

• Airplanes and Spaceships: reduction in weight is primary consideration; frequency is 400 Hz.

• Ships and submarines. • Automobiles: dc with 12 volts standard and

higher voltages used in electric vehicles.• Battery operated portable systems.

Page 7: Power Transmission

7

North America Interconnections

Page 8: Power Transmission

8

Electric Systems in Energy Context• Class focuses on electric power systems, but we

first need to put the electric system in context of the total energy delivery system.

• Electricity is used primarily as a means for energy transportation:– Use other (“primary”) sources of energy to create

electricity, and electricity is usually converted into another form of energy when used.

– Electricity is used by transforming into another form of energy.

• About 40% of US energy is transported in electric form.

Page 9: Power Transmission

Energy sources in USTotal primary energy in 2014:About 81% Fossil Fuels

Source: EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2014

• About 40% of our total energy is consumed in the form of electricity, a percentage that is gradually increasing.• The vast majority of the non-fossil fuel energy is electric!• In 2013 we got about 3% of our electric energy from wind and < 1% from solar (PV and solar thermal): increasing over time, but still small.

Page 10: Power Transmission

Electricity Generation Sources in US 2012

by energy

Coal

Natural gas

Nuclear

Hydroelectric

Wind

Source: EIA 2013

Page 11: Power Transmission

11

Generation Sources in California 2010

Page 12: Power Transmission

12

Generation Sources in Texas 2010: (wind grown to around 10% by 2014)

Page 13: Power Transmission

13

Generation Sources in Illinois 2010

Page 14: Power Transmission

14

Energy Economics• Electric generating technologies involve a

tradeoff between fixed costs (primarily capital costs to build them) and operating costs:– Nuclear, wind, and solar high fixed costs, but low

operating costs,– Natural gas has low fixed costs but relatively high

operating costs (dependent upon fuel prices)– Coal in between (although recent low natural gas

prices has meant that some coal plants have higher operating costs than some natural gas).

• Total average costs depend on fixed costs, operating costs, and capacity factor (ratio of average power production to capacity).

Page 15: Power Transmission

15

Ball park operating CostsNuclear: $10/MWhCoal: $40/MWh (some coal considerably lower)Wind: couple $/MWh (maintenance and

operating)Hydro: few $/MWh (maintenance and operating)Solar: $0/MWhNatural Gas:

cost in $/MWh is 7 to 20 times fuel cost in $/MBtu; for example, with $8/MBtu gas, cost is $56/MWh to $160/MWh; with $5/Mbtu gas, cost is $35/MWh to $100/MWh.

Note, to get price in cents/kWh take price in $/MWh and divide by 10.

Page 16: Power Transmission

16

Natural Gas Prices – to 2013

Page 17: Power Transmission

Natural Gas Prices

Source: Energy Information Administration, http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=7710

Page 18: Power Transmission

Future mix of sources. • Likely long-term low costs of gas and advent of

greatly increased renewables has already changed the mix in Texas away from coal and towards gas and wind:– Wind already around 10% of electrical energy in

Texas,– Coal traditionally in service throughout year, but

Texas asset owners may only run some coal in Summer.

• Expect the trend to continue, especially if the US (eventually) enacts climate change legislation.

Page 19: Power Transmission

19

Goals of Power System Operation

• Supply load (users) with electricity at– specified voltage (110 ac volts common for

residential),– specified frequency,– at minimum cost consistent with operating

constraints, safety, etc.

Page 20: Power Transmission

20

Major Impediments• Load is constantly changing:

• Electricity is not storable (stored by conversion to other forms of energy),

• Power system is subject to disturbances, such as lightning strikes.

• Engineering tradeoffs between reliability and cost.

Page 21: Power Transmission

21

Example Yearly Electric Load

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

250001

518

1035

1552

2069

2586

3103

3620

4137

4654

5171

5688

6205

6722

7239

7756

8273

Hour of Year

MW

Lo

ad

Page 22: Power Transmission

22

Course Syllabus (chapters 1 to 7 and 11)

• Introduction and review of complex power, phasors & three phase (chapter 2),

• Transformers and per-unit system (chapter 3),• Transmission line parameters (chapter 4),• Power flow analysis (chapter 6),• Symmetrical faults (chapter 7),• Power system controls (chapter 11),• Economic system operation (chapter 11), • Optimal power flow (chapter 11),• Deregulation and restructuring (throughout semester).

Page 23: Power Transmission

23

Brief History of Electric Power

• Early 1880’s – Edison introduced Pearl Street dc system in Manhattan supplying 59 customers.

• 1884 – Sprague produces practical dc motor.• 1885 – invention of transformer.• Mid 1880’s – Westinghouse/Tesla introduce rival

ac system.• Late 1880’s – Tesla invents ac induction motor.• 1893 – First 3 phase transmission line operating

at 2.3 kV.

Page 24: Power Transmission

24

History, cont’d• 1896 – ac lines deliver electricity from hydro

generation at Niagara Falls to Buffalo, 20 miles away.

• Early 1900’s – Private utilities supply all customers in area (city); recognized as a “natural monopoly” (cheapest for one firm to produce everything because of “economies of scale”); states step in to begin regulation.

• By 1920’s – Large interstate holding companies control most electricity systems.

Page 25: Power Transmission

25

History, cont’d

• 1935 – Congress passes Public Utility Holding Company Act to establish national regulation, breaking up large interstate utilities (repealed 2005).

• 1935/6 – Rural Electrification Act brought electricity to rural areas.

• 1930’s – Electric utilities established as vertical monopolies.

Page 26: Power Transmission

26

Vertical Monopolies

• Within a particular geographic market, the electric utility had an exclusive franchise

Generation

Transmission

Distribution

Customer Service

In return for this exclusivefranchise, the utility had theobligation to serve all existing and future customersat rates determined jointlyby utility and regulators

It was a “cost plus” business:Charge to retail customers set byregulatory authority to be cost of investment and operations plusregulated return on investment.

Page 27: Power Transmission

27

Vertical Monopolies• Within its service territory each utility was the only game in

town.• Neighboring utilities functioned more as colleagues than

competitors.• Utilities gradually interconnected their systems so by 1970

transmission lines crisscrossed North America, with voltages up to 765 kV.

• Economies of scale (bigger is cheaper per unit capacity) coupled with growth in demand resulted in decreasing average costs.

• Decreasing average costs together with strongly increasing demand implied decreasing real prices to end-use customers over time.

Page 28: Power Transmission

28

History, cont’d -- 1970’s

• 1970’s brought inflation, stagnation of demand growth, increased fossil-fuel prices, calls for conservation and growing environmental concerns.

• Increasing prices replaced decreasing ones.• In that context, U.S. Congress passed Public

Utilities Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) in 1978, which mandated utilities must purchase power from independent generators located in their service territory (modified 2005).

• PURPA introduced some competition.

Page 29: Power Transmission

29

History, cont’d – 1990’s & 2000’s• Major opening of industry to competition occurred as a

result of National Energy Policy Act of 1992.• This act mandated that utilities provide “nondiscriminatory”

access to the high voltage transmission.• Goal was to set up true competition in generation.• Texas followed suit in 1996 and 1999.• Result over the last few years has been a dramatic

restructuring of electric utility industry (for better or worse!)

• Energy Bill 2005 repealed PUHCA; modified PURPA.

Page 30: Power Transmission

30

Utility Restructuring• Driven by significant regional variations in

electric rates, reflecting variations in generation stock and endowments of natural resources.

• Goal of competition is to reduce prices and increase efficiency:– (in short term) through the introduction of

competition, and – (in long term) competition’s incentives for

technological innovation.

• Allow consumers to choose their electricity supplier.

Page 31: Power Transmission

31

State Variation in Retail Electricity Prices

Page 32: Power Transmission

32

Customer Choice

Page 33: Power Transmission

33

The Result for California in 2000/1

OFF

OFF

Page 34: Power Transmission

34

The California-Enron Effect

Source : http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/chg_str/regmap.html

RI

AK

electricityrestructuring

delayedrestructuring

no activitysuspended

restructuring

WA

OR

NV

CA

ID

MT

WY

UT

AZ

CO

NM

TX

OK

KS

NE

SD

NDMN

IA

WI

MO

IL IN OH

KY

TN

MS

LA

AL GA

FL

SC

NC

WVA VA

PA

NY

VT ME

MI

NH

MA

CTNJ

DEMD

AR

HI

DC

Page 35: Power Transmission

35

August 14th, 2003 Blackout