Upload
dominik-fecher
View
30
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF ALLEVIATING WATER STRESS IN THE THAMES BASIN UTILISING SUSPENDED SHADE MATERIAL
DOMINIK FECHER
• Water Stress in the UK
• Open Water Evaporation Reduction
• Financial Viability
THE UK
Source – EA 2009
THE SOUTH EAST
22%
19%
Rainfall
18% - 25%
2015 Supply Surplus
>900ML/D
2021 Demand = Supply
2039Shortage
= 370ML/D
RESERVOIR LOSSES
4202
4 Days
10,505263.2m³
Year
Second largest consumer
• Water Security in the UK
• Open Water Evaporation Reduction
• Financial Viability
EVAPORATION
EVAPORATION REDUCTION
Suspended Shade Materials
Floating Covers Chemical Covers
SIMULATION OF UK EVAPORATION
EVAPORATION REDUCTION
123456789
101112
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
The Effect of SSM on Energy Transfer
Covered Container Uncovered Container
Change in Temperature (°C)
Test
Num
ber
• Water Security in the UK
• Open Water Evaporation Reduction
• Financial Viability
THE SAVINGS
0 2 4 6 8 10 120
1
2
3
4
5
6
Simplified Penman Equation Estimate of Evaporation Within the Thames Basin
Month (January = 1)
Evap
ora
tion
(m
m)
Chigwell No2 Reservoir
Water Value128p/m3 (Current)237p/m3 (Desalinated)
THE COSTS
Existing Founda
tion•£5.88/m2
Foundation
Required
•£5.88/m2 +•(£63 x m)
ECONOMIC VIABILITY
-£40,000.00 -£35,000.00 -£30,000.00 -£25,000.00 -£20,000.00 -£15,000.00 -£10,000.00 -£5,000.00 £0.00 £5,000.00 £10,000.00
Net Present Value of SSM Investment Based on a 30 Year Return Period
NPV - Unit Price 237.00 Wall required NPV - Unit Price 237.00 No Wall requiredNPV - 128.43 Wall required NPV - Unit Price 128.43 No Wall required
• Water Security in the UK
• Open Water Evaporation Reduction
• Financial Viability
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME
QUESTIONS
INCLUDE NET PRESENT VALUE FORMULA
𝑁𝑃𝑉= σ 𝐶𝑡(1+𝑟)𝑡 −𝐶𝑜 (Equation 4.0)
Where
𝐶𝑡 = Net cash flow during the period 𝑟 = Discount rate
𝑡 = Return period 𝐶𝑜= Initial investment
CONTAINER CHOICE
Material Specific heat capacity (J/kg°C)
Soil Wet 1480
Soil Dry 800
Porcelain 1085
Aluminium 897
Glass 840
Clay 920
Polystyrene 1300
VALIDATION OF EXPERIMENT
No Wind and No Light (Measured After 24 Hrs)
No Wind and 1.5 Hrs Light (Measured After 24 Hrs)
24 Hrs Wind and 2 Hrs Light (Measured After 24 Hrs)
No Wind and No Light (Measured After 48 Hrs)
1.5 Hrs Wind and 1.5 Hrs Light (Measured After 1.5 Hrs)
No Wind and No Light (Measured After 24 Hrs)
6.5 Hrs Wind and 6.5 Hrs Light (Measured After 6.5 Hrs)
24 Hrs Wind and 24 Hrs Light Test 1 (Measured After 24 Hrs)
24 Hrs Wind and 24 Hrs Light Test 2 (Measured After 24 Hrs)
24 Hrs Wind and 24 Hrs Light Test 3 (Measured After 24 Hrs)
6.0 Hrs Wind and 6.0 Hrs Light (Measured After 24 Hrs)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Comparison of the Control Sample, Simplifi ed Penman equation Esti mate and Adjusted Simplifi ed Penman Estimate
Simplified Penman Equation Estimate Adjusted Simplified Penman Equation Estimate Control ContainerEvaporation (mm)
EVAPORATION REDUCTION
1.5 Hours - Solar + Wind
24 Hours - No Solar + Wind
6.5 Hours - Solar + Wind
24 Hours - Solar + Wind
50% Covered Test
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
The Effect of SSM Cover on Evaporation
Polyethylene Covered Container Control Container
Evaporation (mm)
WINTER CONDITIONS
Control Container
Polyethylene Cover
Simplified Penman
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Comparison of Control Sample, Adjusted Simplified Penman Estimate and Covered Container Losses - Outdoor Test
Outdoor Testing Date (27/11/13 - 29/11/13) Outdoor Testing Date (26/11/13 - 27/11/2013)Outdoor Testing Date (25/11/13 - 26/11/13)
Evaporation (mm)