37
Bandwidth Optimization in Satellite Communication

Bandwidth optimization

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Bandwidth optimization

Bandwidth Optimization in Satellite Communication

Page 2: Bandwidth optimization

INTRODUCTION

Satellite communications systems exist because earth is a sphere.

Radio waves travel in straight lines at the microwave frequencies used for wideband communications.

Satellites are important in: voice communications, video & radio transmission, navigation (GPS),remote sensing (maps, weather satellites) etc.

They cover large areas.

Inherent broadcast.

Inherent capability of by-passing the whole terrestrial system.

Page 3: Bandwidth optimization

HOW DO SATELLITES WORK?

Two Stations on Earth want to communicate through radio broadcast but are too far away to use conventional means.

The two stations can use a satellite as a relay station for their communication.

One Earth Station transmits the signals to the satellite. Up link frequency is the frequency at which Ground Station is communicating with Satellite.

The satellite Transponder converts the signal and sends it down to the second earth station. This frequency is called a Downlink.

Page 4: Bandwidth optimization

ADVANTAGES OF SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS

LARGE COVERAGE HIGH QUALITY HIGH RELIABILITY HIGH CAPACITY FLEXIBILITY SPEED OF INSTALLATION EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION

Page 5: Bandwidth optimization

APPLICATIONS OF SATELLITE COMMUNICATION

TELEPHONESATELLITE TELEVISIONFIXED SERVICE SATELLITEDIRECT BROADCAST SATELLITEMOBILE SATELLITE TECHNOLOGIESSATELLITE RADIOSATELLITE INTERNET ACCESSMILITARY USES

Page 6: Bandwidth optimization
Page 7: Bandwidth optimization

Ku Band

The Ku band is a portion of the electromagnetic spectrum that

ranges from 10.95-14.5 GHz

More flexibility

For the End users Ku band is generally cheaper and enables smaller

antennas

The satellite operator's Earth Station antenna do require more

accurate position control when operating at Ku band than compared

to C band.

Page 8: Bandwidth optimization

C Band

Range :  4 – 8 GHz

At frequencies higher than 10 GHz in heavy rain fall areas, a

noticeable degradation occurs

The C-band perform better in comparison with Ku band under

adverse weather conditions

The Ku band satellites typically require considerably more power to

transmit than the C-band satellites.

Page 9: Bandwidth optimization

•Available bandwidth is limited and insufficient to meet

demand

• Existing capacity is usually running at maximum capacity– As a result it is often unusable– Universal flat lining during working hours

•The cost of bandwidth is extremely high•Expanding bandwidth capacity is limited due to finances, supply, technology

THE BANDWIDTH CHALLENGE

Page 10: Bandwidth optimization

optimizing the traffic

advanced modulation techniques to reduce the bandwidth allocated to a given service

HOW TO REDUCE BANDWIDTH

Page 11: Bandwidth optimization

Who Benefits from BANDWIDTH OPTIMIZATION SOLUTIONS

SATELLITE SERVICE PROVIDERS

MARITIME INDUSTRIES

OIL and GAS COMPANIES

CONSTRUCTION and MINING INDUSTRY

MILITARY and GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS

DISASTER RECOVERY , EMERGENCY AID

BROADCASTING COMPANIES

Page 12: Bandwidth optimization

BLOCK DIAGRAM

Page 13: Bandwidth optimization
Page 14: Bandwidth optimization

MODULATION TECHNIQUES

Modulation is the process by which information is conveyed by

means of an electromagnetic wave.

The power and bandwidth necessary for the transmission of a signal with a given level of quality depends on the method of modulation.

1. QPSK

2. 8-PSK

Page 15: Bandwidth optimization

QPSK v/s 8PSK

QPSK occupies 1/2 of the bandwidth of BPSK whereas

8PSK uses 1/3rd of the bandwidth that BPSK for a given bit

rate

With a 8PSK capable satellite receiver you can

demodulate QPSK as well as 8PSK

8PSK makes better use of bandwidth than QPSK

8PSK is not as phase-tolerant as QPSK and has a slightly

longer acquisition time

Page 17: Bandwidth optimization

UP/DOWN CONVERTER

Up converter accepts IF signal in the 70±18 MHz band Convert to an RF signal in 5.925-6.425 GHz band

Down converter accepts RF signal in 3.7-4.2 GHz band

convert to an IF signal in 70±18 MHz band

Same transponder is used for transmitter and receiver channels

Page 18: Bandwidth optimization

HIGH POWER AMPLIFIER

Obtain Necessary EIRP (Equivalent Isotropic Radiated Power) from an earth station

Three types: - klystron power amplifier(KPA)- traveling wave tube amplifier(TWTA)- solid state power amplifier(SSPA)

For large power of the order of few kilowatts, traveling wave tube amplifiers (TWTAs) or Klystron are used

Klystrons amplifiers are used in ONGC

Klystrons have narrow instantaneous bandwidth around 40MHz tunable over 500MHz range

TWTAs have wide bandwidth typically around 500MHz

Page 19: Bandwidth optimization

LOW NOISE AMPLIFIER

Amplify very weak signals

Located very close to the detection device

Placed at the front-end of a radio receiver circuit

The effect of noise from subsequent stages of the receive chain is reduced

Low NF (like 1db)

Large enough gain (like 20db) Large enough intermodulation and compression point (IP3 and P1dB)

The gain of the LNA That is used in satellite earth station, ONGC is 60db

Page 20: Bandwidth optimization

Modems Modems currently in use at ONGC :

- DMD15 Universal Satellite Modem- DMD20 Universal Satellite Modem

Page 21: Bandwidth optimization

DMD15 Universal Satellite Modem

Main Features:

•BPSK and QPSK modulation.

•9.6 Kbps to 8.448 Mbps in 1 bps steps.

•Configuration, monitor and control features are fully user-programmable.

•Excellent spurious performance.

•Fully-compliant with IESS 308/309.•Industry standard I/O interfaces.

•Customize for closed network applications.

•50-90,100-180 MHz IF in 1 Hz steps.

Page 22: Bandwidth optimization

DMD20 Universal Satellite ModemHighlights:•BPSK/QPSK/OQPSK/8-PSK/8-QAM/16-QAM Operation

• 2.4 Kbps to 20 Mbps in 1 bps Steps

• FEC - Viterbi, Reed-Solomon, Sequential, Trellis, Turbo Product Code, Low Density Parity Check Code

• Configuration, Monitor and Control Features Fully User-Programmable

• Excellent Spurious Performance

• Fully Compliant with IESS 308/309/310/314/315

•Industry-standard Universal Interface Module

•50 to 90 MHz and 100 to 180 MHz IF, and 950 to 2050 MHz L-Band in 1 Hz Steps

• Standard Features Include: Reed-Solomon,Asynchronous Overhead, Satellite Control Channel and Automatic Uplink Power Control

Page 23: Bandwidth optimization

The required occupied bandwidth is

B = k ( Rb / m )(1/ r )

Where,

Rb = information bit rate

m = number of bits per symbol

r = code rate

K = bandwidth expansion factor

used

to minimize intersymbol

interference

Page 24: Bandwidth optimization

Link Design, Link Budget and Power

Page 25: Bandwidth optimization

25

Link Power Budget

Transmission:HPA PowerTransmission Losses (cables & connectors)Antenna Gain

EIRPTx

Antenna Pointing LossFree Space LossAtmospheric Loss (gaseous, clouds, rain)Rx Antenna Pointing Loss

Rx

Reception:Antenna gainReception Losses (cables & connectors)Noise Temperature Contribution

Pr

Page 26: Bandwidth optimization

26

Link BudgetsThe transmission formula can be written in dB as:

The calculation of received signal based on transmitted power and all losses and gains involved until the receiver is called “Link Power Budget”, or “Link Budget”.

The received power Pr is commonly referred to as “Carrier Power”, C.

rrotherrapolaptar LGLLLLLLEIRPP

Page 27: Bandwidth optimization

27

Why calculate Link Budgets?System performance tied to operation

thresholds.Operation thresholds Cmin tell the

minimum power that should be received at the demodulator in order for communications to work properly.

Operation thresholds depend on:Modulation scheme being used.Desired communication quality.Coding gain.Additional overheads.Channel Bandwidth.Thermal Noise power.

Page 28: Bandwidth optimization

28

Simple Link Power BudgetParameter Value Totals Units Parameter Value Totals Units Frequency 11.75 GHz Transmitter Receive Antenna Transmitter Power 40.00 dBm Radome Loss 0.50 dB Modulation Loss 3.00 dB Diameter 1.5 m Transmission Line Loss 0.75 dB Aperture Efficiency 0.6 none Transmitted Power 36.25 dBm Gain 43.10 dBi Polarization Loss 0.20 dB Transmit Antenna Effective RX Ant. Gain 42.40 dB Diameter 0.5 m Aperture Efficiency 0.55 none Received Power -98.54 dBm Transmit Antenna Gain 33.18 dBi Slant Path Summary Satellite Altitude 35,786 km Transmitted Power 36.25 dBm Elevation Angle 14.5 degrees Transmit Anntenna Gain 33.18 dBi Slant Range 41,602 km EIRP 69.43 dBmi Free-space Path Loss 206.22 dB Path Loss 210.37 dB Gaseous Loss 0.65 dB Effective RX Antenna Gain 42.4 dBi Rain Loss (allocated) 3.50 dB Received Power -98.54 dBm Path Loss 210.37 dB

Page 29: Bandwidth optimization

BANDWIDTH OPTIMIZATION

Transponder bandwidth is usually the most expensive resource in a satellite communication link. For maximum efficiency, a satellite link should be engineered to balance bandwidth and power.

Available bandwidth can be optimized by using one of the following techniques:

• Using higher modulation• lower order FEC technique• Increased Antenna size

Our project is based on using higher order modulation techniques for efficient utilization of available bandwidth.

Page 30: Bandwidth optimization

FORWARD ERROR CORRECTION In communication forward error

correction(FEC) a system of error control for data transmission, whereby the sender adds systematically generated redundant data to its messages, also known as an error-correcting code (ECC).

The carefully designed redundancy allows the receiver to detect and correct a limited number of errors occurring anywhere in the message without the need to ask the sender for additional data. FEC gives the receiver an ability to correct errors without needing a reverse channel to request retransmission of data.

Page 31: Bandwidth optimization

Benefits of Forward Error Correction (FEC)

Reduce bandwidth by 50%.Increase data throughput by a factor of 2.Reduce antenna size by 30%.Reduce transmitter power by a factor of 2.Provide 3dB more link margin.

Page 32: Bandwidth optimization

if we have bandwidth to spare, then use a lower order modulation or a

higher rate FEC (like 1/2 or 2/3) to spread the signal out. 

If we have power to spare then use a higher order modulation and/or

lower rate FEC (like 3/4 or 7/8).

Ideally use all of both the available bandwidth and power simultaneously

to obtain the highest user information rate. 

Bandwidth-Power Trade-Off

Page 33: Bandwidth optimization

RESULTS

The following results were derived from these calculations:

Bandwidth requirement has been reduced by a considerable amount when 8PSK is used as compared to QPSK.

Different FEC rates used also has an effect on the bandwidth requirement of the transmission and receiving link.

By using a proper combination of modulation technique and FEC rate we can achieve efficient utilization of bandwidth.

Page 34: Bandwidth optimization

Allocated Bandwidth Bandwidth, Allocated Bandwidth or Occupied Bandwidth is the frequency space required by a carrier on a transponder.

E.g. : a duplex E1 (2.048 Mbps) circuit with 8-PSK modulation, FEC rate 3/4 and 1.4 spacing requires:

Bandwidth = data rate/(no. of bits per symbol * FEC)* frequency spacing * 2 [for duplex circuit]

B = 2.048 / (3 * 0.75) * 1.4 * 2 = 2.548 MHz

For a 36 MHz transponder, 2.548 MHz corresponds to 7.078% bandwidth utilization.

Page 35: Bandwidth optimization

Power Equivalent Bandwidth Power Equivalent Bandwidth (PEB) is the transponder power used by a carrier, represented as bandwidth equivalent. PEB calculation example:

• Transponder EIRP = 37 dBW • Output Backoff (OBO) = 4 dB • Available EIRP = 37 – 4 = 33 dBW = 10^3.3= 1995.26 Watts • Transponder Bandwidth = 36 MHz • Power Available / MHz = 1955.26 / 36 = 55.424 W • If a carrier uses 24 dBW, then

PEB = Power used by your carrier/transponder saturated power PEB = 10^2.4/ 55.424 = 4.532 MHz

This corresponds to 12.59% of available transponder power.

Page 36: Bandwidth optimization

CONCLUSION

In the design of a communication system, the choice of

modulation is of fundamental importance and always involves

tradeoffs between power and bandwidth.

In the past, frequency spectrum was relatively plentiful but

the power available on a satellite was limited. Today, the

equation has been reversed. Spectrum is now scarce.

More spectrum efficient forms of digital modulation such as

8PSK and 16QAM are becoming more attractive, even though

the power requirements are higher.

Coupled with powerful coding methods such as concatenated

Reed Solomon/Viterbi coding, these methods offer the

prospect of enhanced spectral efficiency with virtually error-

free digital signal transmission.

Page 37: Bandwidth optimization

Thank You