Upload
lorne-ricketts
View
59
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1 of 85
Attics: Problems and SolutionsBOABC FALL EDUCATION CONFERENCE
November 16, 2016Presented by: Lorne Ricketts | MASc, P.Eng.
2 of 85
Ventilated Attic Performance Case Study Attic Roof Hut Research In Search of Solutions Summary
Presentation Overview
3 of 85
An Obvious Problem
4 of 85
A Not So Obvious Problem
5 of 85
Factors Affecting Moisture Problems in Attics
What influences attic moisture issues &what can we control by design?
Roof orientation (solar radiation) Roof slope (solar radiation) Roofing material/color Adjacent buildings – shading Trees – shading & debris Outdoor climate Indoor climate Roof Leaks Insulation R-value Air leakage from house Duct leakage in attic Duct discharge location Vent area and distribution Sheathing durability Roof maintenance Other things…
6 of 85
Where are we Seeing the Biggest Issues?
1. Air leakage (ceiling details)2. Exhaust duct leaks & discharge location (roof, soffit, or wall)3. Inadequate venting provisions (amount, vent location, or
materials)4. Outdoor moisture: night sky condensation on underside of
sheathing5. Wetting through shingles/roofing (tipping the moisture balance)
7 of 85
The Localized Nature of Air Leakage Condensation
8 of 85
Standard Faith-Based Air-Sealing Approach
Air-sealing details, duct exhaust details often not provided & left
up to the contractor
9 of 85
The Localized Nature of Leaking Penetrations
10 of 85
Typical Issues – Impact of Orientation
South Facing
North Facing
11 of 85
Typical Issues – Impact of Orientation
North = Soaked
South (Partially Shaded) = Damp
12 of 85
Influence of Solar Radiation & Night Sky Radiation
13 of 85
The Nature of Outdoor Moisture Wetting & Night Sky Condensation
14 of 85
Other Not So Great Ideas…
15 of 85
It Happens in Ventilated Low Slope & Cathedral Ceilings Too
16 of 85
So When Does it Become a Problem?
17 of 85
So When Does it Become a Problem?
18 of 85
So When Does it Become a Problem?
19 of 85
Case Study: Two Steps Forward, One Step Backwards
2007 investigation of 5 year old large townhouse complex Was experiencing many of the typical attic problems
20 of 85
An Assortment of Issues – Exhaust Duct Details
21 of 85
An Assortment of Issues – Exhaust Duct Details
22 of 85
An Assortment of Issues – Inadequate Ridge ‘Vent’ Material
Almost no effective net free area, 5 layers of filter fabric
23 of 85
An Assortment of Issues – Ceiling Air Leakage
24 of 85
Attic Remediation (2 Years Later)
25 of 85
Full Review of Initial Contributing Factors - Air-Sealing
26 of 85
Retrofit Ceiling Air Sealing - Sprayfoam
27 of 85
Ceiling Air Sealing – Poly Bags of Fun...
28 of 85
New Exhaust Vent Hoods & Attic Ridge Vents
29 of 85
Mold Remediation - Dry Ice Blasting
30 of 85
2 years after remediation...
31 of 85
Water Leaks Around Plugged Dryer Exhaust Ducts
32 of 85
Lack of Dryer Exhaust Duct Maintenance
33 of 85
Soffit Exhaust Vent Hood Configuration Issues
34 of 85
Air-Sealing Issues
35 of 85
Air-Sealing Issues
36 of 85
But we know how to solve these problems...
Guide to Best Practices for Air Sealing and Insulation Retrofits - Produced by RDH and published by BC Housing
37 of 85
Effectiveness of Dry Ice Blasting against Mold?
38 of 85
Water Seepage through Aged & Saturated Asphalt Shingles?
39 of 85
General Mold Growth Not Attributable to Typical Sources
40 of 85
Measuring the Wetting
41 of 85
Key Findings from Field Investigations
Seeing widespread issues with mold growth in wood-frame attics in Coastal Pacific Northwest in past decade
Wetting exceeding drying capacity provided by ventilation
Problem is most often NOT due to a lack of ventilation
Usual culprits of air-leakage condensation (leaky ceiling, leaky ducts & discharge point)
Also seeing supplemental exterior moisture sources (night sky condensation, rainwater seepage)
42 of 85
Field Monitoring Study
43 of 85
Industry Trends – Less Heat Flow into Attic Spaces
<1970’s attic construction with excessive air leakage and heat loss into the attic
1980’s to 1990’s attic construction with moderate air leakage and heat loss into the attic
2000’s attic construction with minimal air leakage and heat loss into the attic
44 of 85
Research Study
Controlled field monitoring study to isolate exterior wetting mechanisms from interior sources (air, vapour)
To specifically evaluate impact of orientation, slope (3:12, 4:12 and 6:12) & shingle underlay
Remove influence of air leakage or heat gain from house
Monitor the performance of surface treatments
Theoretical attic with no air leakage or heat loss into the attic and unrestricted ventilation(Arrangement for Study)
Typical ventilated attic construction with air leakage and heat loss into the attic
45 of 85
Roof Test Hut Field Monitoring Setup
a) 3:12 Slope roof with roofing felt underlay b) 4:12 Slope roof with roofing felt underlay
c) 6:12 Slope roof with roofing felt underlay d) 3:12 Control roof with SAM underlay
46 of 85
Roof Test Hut Field Monitoring Setup
47 of 85
Monitoring Equipment & Sensors
Moisture Content, Temperature, Relative Humidity and surface Condensation sensors – north and south slopes x 4 huts
48 of 85
Results – Long Term Roof Sheathing Moisture Contents
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
09-2
012
10-2
012
11-2
012
12-2
012
01-2
013
02-2
013
03-2
013
04-2
013
05-2
013
06-2
013
07-2
013
08-2
013
09-2
013
10-2
013
11-2
013
12-2
013
01-2
014
02-2
014
03-2
014
Moi
stur
e Co
nten
t [%
]
MC-FULL-S-CONT MC-FULL-S-312 MC-FULL-S-412
MC-FULL-S-612 EMC (1 wk)
49 of 85
Results - Seasonal Averages
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Fall 2012 Winter2012/2013
Spring 2013 Summer2013
Fall 2013 Winter2013/2014
Spring 2014
Moi
stur
e Co
nten
t (%
)
MC-FULL-N-CONT MC-FULL-S-CONT MC-FULL-N-312 MC-FULL-S-312
MC-FULL-N-412 MC-FULL-S-412 MC-FULL-N-612 MC-FULL-S-612
50 of 85
Long-Term Impacts of Elevated Moisture Contents
North 3:12 after 1 year North 4:12 after 1 year
51 of 85
Tracking Mold Growth
TABLE 2: VITTANEN’S MOLD GROWTH INDEX DESCRIPTIONS
INDEX GROWTH RATE DESCRIPTION
0 No growth Spores not activated
1 Small amounts of mold on surface (microscope)
Initial stages of growth
2 <10% coverage of mold on surface (microscope)
___
3 10% – 30% coverage of mold on surface (visual)
New spores produced
4 30% – 70% coverage of mold on surface (visual)
Moderate growth
5 >70% coverage of mold on surface (visual) Plenty of growth
6 Very heavy and tight growth Coverage around 100%
52 of 85
Tracking Mold Growth – Year 1
53 of 85
Why is the Sheathing Wet? What is the Mechanism?
Night sky condensation!(Important: It happen when all moisture sources eliminated.)
Sub-cooling effect
Radiative heat loss from roof surface to colder night sky
54 of 85
When Does it Occur?
55 of 85
When Does it Occur?0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06
Sola
r Rad
iatio
n [W
/m2 ]
Solar Radiation CONDENSE-Plywood-312
Incr
easin
gSu
rfac
eCo
nden
satio
n
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06
Moi
stur
e Co
nten
t [%
] and
Tem
pera
ture
[°C]
Condensation
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06
Moi
stur
e Co
nten
t [%
] and
Tem
pera
ture
[°C]
MC-FULL-N-312 MC-IN-SURF-N-312 T-IN-N-312-Plywood
T-N-312-Embedded Outdoor - Temperature Outdoor - Dewpoint
COND-N-312 Sheathing Solar Radiation
Condensation
56 of 85
Monitoring Night Sky Cooling Impacts
57 of 85
When Does it Occur?
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06
Sola
r Rad
iatio
n [W
/m2 ]
Solar Radiation CONDENSE-Plywood-312
Incr
easin
gSu
rfac
eCo
nden
satio
n
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06
Moi
stur
e Co
nten
t [%
] and
Tem
pera
ture
[°C]
Condensation
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06
Sola
r Rad
iatio
n [W
/m2 ]
Solar Radiation CONDENSE-Plywood-312
Incr
easin
gSu
rfac
eCo
nden
satio
n
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06
Moi
stur
e Co
nten
t [%
] and
Tem
pera
ture
[°C]
Condensation
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06
Sola
r Rad
iatio
n [W
/m2 ]
Solar Radiation CONDENSE-Plywood-312
Incr
easin
gSu
rfac
eCo
nden
satio
n
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06
Moi
stur
e Co
nten
t [%
] and
Tem
pera
ture
[°C]
Condensation
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06
Moi
stur
e Co
nten
t [%
] and
Tem
pera
ture
[°C]
MC-FULL-N-312 MC-IN-SURF-N-312 T-IN-N-312-Plywood
T-N-312-Embedded Outdoor - Temperature Outdoor - Dewpoint
COND-N-312 Sheathing Solar Radiation
Condensation
Heavy Condensation
Daily Solar Radiation Cycles
Dry
Light Condensation
58 of 85
Shingle & Sheathing Temperature Depressions
2.6 2.5 2.52.6
2.4 2.5
0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
312-N 312-S 412-N* 412-S 612-N 612-STem
pera
ture
Dep
ress
ion
from
Am
bien
t (°C
)
Avg Shingle T Avg Interior Sheathing Surface T
*412-N sheathing temperature unavailable due to sensor malfunction
Average Shingle and Sheathing Temperature Depression compared to Ambient Temperature for Winter (December 1, 2013 to January 31, 2014).
59 of 85
Hours of Potential Condensation - Sheathing
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
North South
Hour
s of P
oten
tial C
onde
nsati
on
Tem
pera
tue
Depr
essio
n fr
om A
mbi
ent (
°C)
3:12 Temp 4:12 Temp 6:12 Temp 3:12 Hours 4:12 Hours 6:12 Hours
150 to 300 hours per year
60 of 85
Nuances of Mold on Plywood - Heartwood vs Sapwood
61 of 85
On the Flip Side: Solar Heat Gain & Drying During the Day
62 of 85
On the Flip Side: Solar Heat Gain & Drying Potential
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
Aug 21 00:00 Aug 21 06:00 Aug 21 12:00 Aug 21 18:00 Aug 22 00:00
Tem
pera
ture
[°C]
Temperatures - 3:12 and 6:12 Slope Roofs - Early Spring Conditions
T-OUT-N-612-Shingle
T-OUT-S-612-Shingle
T-IN-N-612-Plywood
T-IN-S-612-Plywood
T-OUT-N-312-Shingle
T-OUT-S-312-Shingle
T-IN-N-312-Plywood
T-IN-S-312-Plywood
Outdoor - Dewpoint
Outdoor - Temperature
South Shingles 55°C
North Shingles 35-40°C
South Sheathing = 35°C North Sheathing = 31°C
Ambient Air up to 21°C
Lots of cloud cover changes the wetting and drying balance.
63 of 85
A Localized Problem...
SeattlePortland
Vancouver
San Francisco
CalgaryHigh Risk Climate for Night Sky Radiation Attic Moisture Issues
64 of 85
Key Findings – The Cause of the Pacific Northwest Problems Roof sheathing in well ventilated attics (also soffits, canopies) experiences
elevated moisture levels in winter Occurs despite elimination of typical wetting mechanisms within attics
(air leakage, duct leakage, rain water leaks etc.) Moisture level is above equilibrium level indicating additional wetting
sources Night sky cooling causes wetting when sheathing drops below ambient
dewpoint (few hundred hours per year) in attic Difficult to stop it from occurring Fungal growth occurs due to elevated moisture content and
condensation on underside of sheathing More fungal growth on north than south – drying matters, the heat from
a ceiling above a house will help too
65 of 85
Monitoring of Potential Mitigation Strategies
Vented underlayment tode-couple night sky radiation cooling effects
Surface treatments to kill & prevent fungal growth
66 of 85
Vented Underlay - Night Sky Radiation De-Coupler?
Vented shingle underlay installed in one roof in 2nd year of study Purpose: try to de-couple
night sky cooling effects from sheathing
67 of 85
Vented Underlay – The Double Edged Sword
South Orientation – Vented Underlay vs Direct Applied Shingles
050100150200250300350400450
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
Jan 16 Jan 17 Jan 18
Sola
r Rad
iatio
n (W
/m2 )
Tem
pera
ture
(°C)
T-OUT-S-VENT (Shingles) T-IN-S-VENT (Sheathing)
T-OUT-S-312 (Shingles) T-IN-S-312 (Sheathing)
Outdoor T T-Drainmat-S-VENT
Solar Radiation
Shingles – direct appliedShingles – vent mat
6°C drop in shingle 1°C drop in sheathing
68 of 85
Vented Underlay – The Double Edged Sword
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
Day Night Avg
Tem
pera
ture
(°C)
Moi
stur
e Co
nten
t (%
)
Spring
VENT-N-MC VENT-S-MC 312-N-MC 312-S-MC
VENT-N-T VENT-S-T 312-N-T 312-S-T
Nor
th
Sout
hN
orth
Sout
h
Vent Normal
Spring (March 1, 2013 to April 30, 2013) Diurnal Moisture Content (SURF) and Temperature Averages for North and South Oriented Vented and Control (Direct Applied Shingles) Roof Assemblies
69 of 85
Surface Treatment Application – Round 1
4 huts x 2 orientations = 8 applications of each Fungicides, Cleaners,
Sealers› Boracol® 20-2› Boracol® 20-2 BD› Bleach› Thompson’s WaterSeal®› Kilz® Paint
Wood Preservatives› Copper Naphthenate› Zinc Naphthenate
70 of 85
Wood Preservative & Fungicide Surface Treatments
When Applied 1 Year Later
Fungal Growth observed is Cladosporium
71 of 85
North vs South Orientation
South North
72 of 85
Visual Assessment of Surface Treatment Efficacy
VISUAL ASSESSMENT OF SURFACE TREATMENT EFFICACY
Test Roof
Surface Treatments (north left, south right) Sa
nsin
Bo
raco
l®
20-2
Copp
er
Naph
then
ate
Blea
ch
Thom
pson
s W
ater
Seal
®
Kilz
® Pa
int
Zinc
Na
phth
enat
e
Sans
in
Bora
col®
20
-2BD
Control 3:12 4:12 6:12 VISUAL ASSESSMENT SCALE
Pristine or very light fungal growth Moderate fungal growth Significant fungal growth
In our experience Kilz® & Boracol® 20-2BD while okay here after 2 years may not be best long term for fungal growth
Need duplicate samples – slope not a big factor (heartwood vs sapwood is)
73 of 85
Wood Preservative & Fungicide Surface Treatments
The best decay fungicide looked okay in years 1 and 2 – but not in year 3
74 of 85
A Caution with Surface Treatments
75 of 85
A Caution with Surface Treatments
76 of 85
A Caution with Surface Treatments
77 of 85
Summary – Mitigation Strategy Performance
Thermally de-coupling the exposed shingles from the sheathing did not work well Did not significantly increase sheathing temperature at night,
but did reduce drying from solar heat gain Surface treatments appear to be a potentially viable
solution if right product is developed – currently available products not quite effective (nor developed specifically for this application)
Concurrent work by FP Innovations to perform accelerated testing of some new biocides/fungicides
Ongoing monitoring of huts to monitor long-term field performance of next generation treatments
78 of 85
Concurrent Fungicide/Biocide Research – FP Innovations
Developed an accelerated 12 week test method to evaluate new fungicides applied to wood products
Have already tested a handful of newly innovated & proprietary fungicides & coatings
A few promising formulations completely prevented mold growth
Follow-up with field testing Images courtesy FP Innovations
79 of 85
Field Trials & Monitoring of 9 New Treatments – Round 2
80 of 85
Adapting Surface Treatments for Underside Application
81 of 85
Ongoing Monitoring of New Surface Treatments
Most Promising fungicide/biocide is water repelling & contains several “active” ingredients to prevent long term mold growth.
Note it is not a wood preservative it is a fungicide
Currently undergoing environmental testing & available soon?
82 of 85
Relative Risk of Wood-Frame Roof Assemblies
83 of 85
Final Thoughts
Ventilated attics & roof assemblies ‘built to code’ are experiencing mold growth on underside of sheathing (plywood or OSB) Wetting from night sky condensation and may be exacerbated
by air leaks & water leaks Hard to reliably stop night sky condensation Ventilation on its own is not a solution Mold growth may be minor but perceived as risk
Could build other roof assemblies but unlikely to replace ventilated attics any time soon
Need to address durability & sensitivity of wood based sheathings to mold growth, various groups are developing products Just make sure the fungicide is no more harmful to humans
than the mold is…
84 of 85
Additional Resources
RDH Technical Bulletin No. 10 - Mold in Vented Wood-Frame Roofs in the Coastal Pacific Northwest
RDH Blog Article – Re-Thinking Ventilated Attics: How to Stop Mold Growth in Coastal Climates
Why Wood Frame Attics Get Wet & Mouldy in the Pacific Northwest - Conference Paper at 30th RCI International Convention & Tradeshow
Guide to Best Practices for Air Sealing and Insulation Retrofits - Produced by RDH and published by BC Housing
85 of 85
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE VISIT www.rdh.com and www.buildingsciencelabs.com
Lorne Ricketts - [email protected]
Discussion + Questions