62
Microelectronics Technology: Photolithography (Mask Engineering,Manufacturing Methods & Process Modeling)

5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

VLSI

Citation preview

Page 1: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Microelectronics Technology:

Photolithography

(Mask Engineering,Manufacturing Methods & Process Modeling)

Page 2: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Photoresist Exposure: Issues

Ideal Aerial Imag

Exposing Light

• There are often a number of additional issues that arise in exposing resist.

• Resist is applied as a liquid and hence "flows" to fill in the topography.

• Resist thickness may vary across the wafer. This can lead to under or over exposure in some regions and hence linewidth variations.

Page 3: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Photoresist Exposure:IssuesPlanarization Layer Etch Mask layer Imaging Layer

• Multi-layer resists are used to produce a thin, uniform imaging layer in which the aerial image is transformed into a latent image.

• Etching is then used to transfer the latent image down through the planarization layer.

Page 4: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Photoresist Exposure: IssuesAerial Image Exposing Light

• Reflective surfaces below the resist can set up reflections and standing waves and degrade resolution.

• In some cases an antireflective coating (ARC) can help to minimize these effects. Baking the resist after exposure, but before development can also help.

Page 5: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

MASK FABRICATION: TECHNIQUES

Page 6: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

TYPES OF SUBSTRATE

1. Quartz - Ultra Low Thermal Expansion (ULTE)2. Borosilicate Glass – Low Expansion3. Soda Lime Glass - Economical Substrate Typical Properties

Properties Quartz Borosilicate Glass

Soda Lime

Glass Thermal Exp. Coefficient 5.2x10-

7

37x10-7 94x10-7

Refractive Index 1.47 1.53 1.52

Light Transmittance (%) 436 nm 200 nm

9070

90--

90--

Electrical Resistivity (-cm)

1018 1015 1012

Page 7: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Coating for Mask Blanks

• Photo Emulsion (Silver Halide based) • Chromium (Cr)• Chromium Oxide (Cr2Ox)• Iron Oxide (Fe2O3)• Silicon (Si) • Photo Sensitive Resists

Page 8: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Emulsion Vs Chrome

Type Advantages Disadvantages

Emulsion Low CostHigh Photo-sensitivity Easy Processing Good Image Resolution and ContrastEasy Reversal Processing

Tender and Scratch SensitiveLife is Shorter

Chrome Hard Surface CoatingLonger LifeSharp EdgesEasy Mask Cleaning

High Reflectivity

Page 9: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Mask Parameters

• Type of Substrate • Size of Mask Plate • Required Field • Scale Factor/Data Magnification• Image Mirroring/Rotation• Input Data Format (CIF, GDSII, DXF, GURBER…)• Layer ID, Total Number of Layers & Layer Title

Mask Specification: • Minimum Feature Size • Total Area of Design • Step & Repeat -- Array & Stepping Distance

Page 10: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Lay-out PlanningFactors to be considered

• For which Aligner / Stepper the Masks are to be Prepared

Fiducials (if Required for Step & Repeat) Wafer Alignment Marks CD (Critical Dimensions) Structures Layers / Product Identification Marks Dicing Requirements (i) Minimum Scribe Width (ii) Step Size Constraints

Page 11: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Processing

Emulsion Plates

Developing Fixing Water Rinsing

Chrome Plates

Developing Etching Photo Resist Stripping Water Rinsing Cleaning

Page 12: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Mask Quality Inspection

• Visual Inspection

• Measurement

Page 13: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013
Page 14: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

D: Mask Engineering – OPC and Phase Shifting

Page 15: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

D: Mask Engineering – OPC and Phase Shifting

Page 16: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

D: Mask Engineering – OPC and Phase Shifting

Page 17: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

D: Mask Engineering – OPC and Phase Shifting

Page 18: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Manufacturing Methods and Equipments

30

Page 19: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Manufacturing Methods and Equipments

Conceptual diagram of a scanning projection printer

Page 20: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Manufacturing Methods and Equipments

Page 21: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Manufacturing Methods and Equipments

On-axis Illumination

Page 22: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Manufacturing Methods and Equipments

Page 23: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Manufacturing Methods and Equipments

• This further decreases the optical “window” and therefore makes it possible to build higher performance optical systems over a smaller area.

• The most recent “steppers” are step and scan systems.

Page 24: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Electron Beam Lithography

• Process of scanning a beam of electrons in a patterned fashion across a surface covered with a electron resist.

Page 25: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Electron Beam Lithography System

• Electron Gun or Electron Source

• Electron Column

• Mechanical Stage

• Wafer Handling System

• Computer System

Page 26: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Electron Optical System

Electron gun Alignment coil

First condenser lens

Blanking plates

Second condenser lens

Limiting aperture

Final lens, coils

Electron resists Substrate Mechanical stage

Page 27: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

EB Writing Scheme: Raster Scan

Page 28: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Vector Scan

Page 29: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Electron Beam Lithography

• Advantages• Better Resolution

• Disadvantages• Low Throughput• High Cost

Page 30: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Models and Simulation

• Lithography simulation relies on models from two fields of

science:

• Optics to model the formation of the aerial image.

– Water Exposure System Models

• Chemistry to model the formation of the latent image in the

resist.

– Optical Intensity Pattern in the Resist

– Photoresist Exposure

– Photoresist Baking

– Photoresist Developing

Page 31: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

A: Wafer Exposure System Models

Page 32: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

A: Wafer Exposure System Models

Page 33: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

A: Wafer Exposure System Models

Page 34: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

A: Wafer Exposure System Models

Page 35: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

A: Wafer Exposure System Models

Page 36: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

A: Wafer Exposure System Models

ExampleConsider a long rectangular slit. The Fourier transform of t(x) is in standard texts and is sin(x)/x function.

Page 37: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

A: Wafer Exposure System Models

Page 38: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

A: Wafer Exposure System Models

Page 39: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

A: Wafer Exposure System Models

Colors correspond to optical intensity in the aerial image. Exposure system: NA = 0.43, partially coherent g-line illumination ( = 436 nm). No aberrations or defocusing. Minimum feature size is 1 µm.

• ATHENA simulator (Silvaco).

Page 40: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

A: Wafer Exposure System Models

• Same example as previous except that the feature size has been reduced to 0.5 µm. Note the poorer image.

Page 41: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

A: Wafer Exposure System Models

• Same example as previous except that the illuminationwavelength has now been changed to i-line illumination ( = 365

nm) and the NA has been increased to 0.5. Note the improved image.

Page 42: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

B: Optical Intensity Pattern in the Resist

Page 43: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

B: Optical Intensity Pattern in the Resist

Page 44: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

B: Optical Intensity Pattern in the Resist

• Example of calculation of light intensity distribution in a photoresist layer during exposure using the ATHENA simulator. A simple structure is defined with a photoresist layer covering a silicon substrate which has two flat regions and a sloped sidewall.

The simulation shows the [PAC] calculated concentration after an exposure of 200 mJ cm-2. Lower [PAC] values correspond to more exposure. The color contours thus correspond to the integrated light intensity from the exposure.

Page 45: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

C: Photoresist Exposure

Page 46: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

C: Photoresist Exposure

dz

Page 47: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

C: Photoresist Exposure

Page 48: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

C: Photoresist Exposure

Page 49: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

D: Photoresist Baking

Page 50: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

D: Photoresist Baking

• Same simulation example as last one except that a post exposure bake of 45 minutes at 115 °C has now been included. The color contours again correspond to the [PAC] after exposure. Note that the standing wave effects apparent earlier have been “smeared out” by this bake, producing a more uniform [PAC] distribution.

Page 51: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

E: Photoresist Developing

Page 52: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

E: Photoresist Developing

Page 53: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

E: Photoresist Developing

• Example of the calculation of a developed photoresist layer using the ATHENA simulator. The resist was exposed with a dose of 200 mJ cm-2, a post exposure bake of 45 min at 115 °C was used and the pattern was developed for a time of 60 seconds, all normal parameters. The Dill development model was used.

Page 54: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

E: Photoresist Developing

Way through development. Complete development.

Page 55: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Future Trends

• Optical lithography has been extended to the 100 nm generation and it may be extendible up to 70 / 50 nm features.

• Beyond that, there is no general agreement on which approach will work in manufacturing.

• Possibilities include e-beam, e-beam projection, X-ray and EUV.

• New resists will likely be required for these systems.

Page 56: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Summary of Key Ideas

• Lithography is the key pacing item for developing new technology generations.

• Exposure tools today generally use projection optics with diffraction limited performance.

• g and i-line resists are based on DNQ materials and are used down to 0.35 µm dimensions.

• DUV resists use chemical amplification and are generally used for smaller feature sizes.

Page 57: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Summary of Key Ideas

• Lithography simulation tools are based on Fourier optics and do an excellent job of simulating optical system performance. Thus aerial images can be accurately calculated.

• Photoresist modeling (exposure, development, postbake) is less advanced because chemistry is involved which is not as well understood. Thus latent images are less accurately calculated today.

• A new approach to lithography may be required in the next few years.

Page 58: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Photo Resist Spin Coating, Mask Inspection, Wafer & Mask Alignment

Page 59: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Manufacturing Methods and Equipments

This is the photograph of a step and scan projection aligner (Canon FPA-4000ES1). This system is capable of printing 0.25 µm features with a throughput of 80 8” wafers per hour. With 4X reduction, the field size is 25 x 33 mm. It has an alignment capability of ±70 nm. The NA is 0.63 and the illumination source is a KrF excimer laser ( = 248 nm). The system uses an advanced off-axis partially coherent illumination system.

Page 60: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

Electron Beam Lithography System

Page 61: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013

• The most recent “steppers” are step and scan systems.

(Photo taken directly from the Canon website at http://www.usa.canon.com.)

Page 62: 5.2. lithography 3,4,5 final,2013