Upload
rocket-matter-llc
View
1.641
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
In this program, Gary Kinder, of WordRake, answers questions about grammar lawyers have always wanted someone else to ask. He teaches lawyers how to remove unnecessary words to ensure their writing is concise, and shows lawyers how to enliven their sentences.
Citation preview
The 7 All-Time Questions
about Grammar You Always Wanted Someone Else to Ask
7 Lay/Lie
the confusion:
7 Lay/Lie
the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay”
7 Lay/Lie
the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie”
7 Lay/Lie
the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable
7 Lay/Lie
the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable
I lay
7 Lay/Lie
the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable
I lay the brief on the desk.
7 Lay/Lie
the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable
I lay
7 Lay/Lie
the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable
I lay down in the hammock.
7 Lay/Lie
the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable
I lay
7 Lay/Lie
the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable
I lay the brief on the desk.
7 Lay/Lie
the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable
I lay the brief on the desk. Right now.
7 Lay/Lie
the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable
I lay
7 Lay/Lie
the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable
I lay down in the hammock.
7 Lay/Lie
the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable
I lay down in the hammock. Yesterday.
7 Lay/Lie
present tense
7 Lay/Lie
present tense I __ down and ___ my head on the pillow.
7 Lay/Lie
present tense I lie down and ___ my head on the pillow.
7 Lay/Lie
present tense I lie down and lay my head on the pillow.
7 Lay/Lie
past tense
7 Lay/Lie
past tense I ___ down and ____ my head on the pillow.
7 Lay/Lie
past tense I lay down and ____ my head on the pillow.
7 Lay/Lie
past tense I lay down and laid my head on the pillow.
7 Lay/Lie
remember:
7 Lay/Lie
remember: to lay - requires an object
7 Lay/Lie
remember: to lay - requires an object to lie - never has an object
7 Lay/Lie
remember: to lay - requires an object - past tense is laid to lie - never has an object
7 Lay/Lie
remember: to lay - requires an object - past tense is laid to lie - never has an object - past tense is lay
7 Lay/Lie
6
6 Me/Myself
Never use “myself” in place of “I.”
6 Me/Myself
Never use “myself” in place of “I.” My letter to Mr. Gallagher was written after our meeting earlier this year during which myself and the General Manager explained at length why the District should serve as lead agency.
6 Me/Myself
Never use “myself” in place of “I.” My letter to Mr. Gallagher was written after our meeting earlier this year during which myself and the General Manager explained at length why the District should serve as lead agency.
6 Me/Myself
Never use “myself” in place of “I.” My letter to Mr. Gallagher was written after our meeting earlier this year during which I and the General Manager explained at length why the District should serve as lead agency.
6 Me/Myself
Never use “myself” in place of “I.” My letter to Mr. Gallagher was written after our meeting earlier this year during which the General Manager and I explained at length why the District should serve as lead agency.
6 Me/Myself
Never use “myself” in place of “I.” My letter to Mr. Gallagher was written after our meeting earlier this year during which the General Manager and I explained at length why the District should serve as lead agency.
6 Me/Myself
Use “myself” only as an object
6 Me/Myself
Use “myself” only as an object and only if “I” is acting on “myself.”
6 Me/Myself
Use “myself” only as an object and only if “I” is acting on “myself.”
6 Me/Myself
Use “myself” only as an object and only if “I” is acting on “myself.” I have enclosed information related to the relevant areas of practice, as well as profiles on myself and Paul.
6 Me/Myself
Use “myself” only as an object and only if “I” is acting on “myself.” I have enclosed information related to the relevant areas of practice, as well as profiles on myself and Paul.
6 Me/Myself
Use “myself” only as an object and only if “I” is acting on “myself.” I have enclosed information related to the relevant areas of practice, as well as profiles on Paul and myself.
6 Me/Myself
Use “myself” only as an object and only if “I” is acting on “myself.” I have enclosed information related to the relevant areas of practice, as well as profiles on Paul and myself.
6 Me/Myself
5
5 Can/May
can
5 Can/May
can - capability
5 Can/May
can - capability
He can fix a leak with a paper clip.
5 Can/May
can - capability
He can fix a leak with a paper clip. may
5 Can/May
can - capability
He can fix a leak with a paper clip. may - permission
5 Can/May
can - capability
He can fix a leak with a paper clip. may - permission
You may not come in here.
5 Can/May
School Can Deny Funding to Group A public law school in California can deny recognition to a Christian student group that refused to accept gay members, the Supreme Court ruled.
5 Can/May
School Can Deny Funding to Group A public law school in California can deny recognition to a Christian student group that refused to accept gay members, the Supreme Court ruled.
5 Can/May
School May Deny Funding to Group A public law school in California may deny recognition to a Christian student group that refused to accept gay members, the Supreme Court ruled.
5 Can/May
School May Deny Funding to Group A public law school in California may deny recognition to a Christian student group that refused to accept gay members, the Supreme Court ruled.
5 Can/May
4
4 Fewer/Less
fewer
4 Fewer/Less
fewer – numbers
4 Fewer/Less
fewer – numbers – can be separated
4 Fewer/Less
fewer – numbers – can be separated less
4 Fewer/Less
fewer – numbers – can be separated less – measurement
4 Fewer/Less
fewer – numbers – can be separated less – measurement – cannot be separated
4 Fewer/Less
4 Fewer/Less
fewer trees
4 Fewer/Less
fewer trees - less shade
4 Fewer/Less
fewer trees - less shade
fewer drops
4 Fewer/Less
fewer trees - less shade
fewer drops - less water
4 Fewer/Less
Ad for new Ford Escape Hybrid:
4 Fewer/Less
Ad for new Ford Escape Hybrid: That means less trips to the gas station.
4 Fewer/Less
Ad for new Ford Escape Hybrid: That means less trips to the gas station.
4 Fewer/Less
Ad for new Ford Escape Hybrid: That means fewer trips to the gas station.
4 Fewer/Less
Ad for new Ford Escape Hybrid: That means fewer trips to the gas station.
4 Fewer/Less
3
3 Who/Whom
who
3 Who/Whom
who – subject
3 Who/Whom
who – subject whom
3 Who/Whom
who – subject whom – object
3 Who/Whom
who – subject whom – object
Who did you wish to see?
3 Who/Whom
who – subject whom – object
Who did you wish to see?
Whom shall I say is calling?
3 Who/Whom
who – subject whom – object
Who Did you wish to see she?
Whom shall I say is calling?
3 Who/Whom
who – subject whom – object
Who Did you wish to see her?
Whom shall I say is calling?
3 Who/Whom
who – subject whom – object
Whom did you wish to see?
Whom shall I say is calling?
3 Who/Whom
who – subject whom – object
Whom did you wish to see?
Whom shall I say is calling?
3 Who/Whom
who – subject whom – object
Whom did you wish to see?
Whom Shall I say her is calling?
3 Who/Whom
who – subject whom – object
Whom did you wish to see?
Whom Shall I say she is calling?
3 Who/Whom
who – subject whom – object
Whom did you wish to see?
Who shall I say is calling?
3 Who/Whom
who – subject whom – object
Whom did you wish to see?
Who shall I say is calling?
3 Who/Whom
who – subject whom – object
I am writing this to _____ is in charge.
That depends on _____ you want to go.
3 Who/Whom
who – subject whom – object
I am writing this to Him is in charge.
That depends on _____ you want to go.
3 Who/Whom
who – subject whom – object
I am writing this to He is in charge.
That depends on _____ you want to go.
3 Who/Whom
who – subject whom – object
I am writing this to whoever is in charge.
That depends on _____ you want to go.
3 Who/Whom
who – subject whom – object
I am writing this to whoever is in charge.
That depends on _____ you want to go.
3 Who/Whom
who – subject whom – object
I am writing this to whoever is in charge.
That depends on Do you want he to go.
3 Who/Whom
who – subject whom – object
I am writing this to whoever is in charge.
That depends on Do you want him to go.
3 Who/Whom
who – subject whom – object
I am writing this to whoever is in charge.
That depends on whom you want to go.
3 Who/Whom
who – subject whom – object
I am writing this to whoever is in charge.
That depends on whom you want to go.
3 Who/Whom
2
2 Possessives
singular
2 Possessives
singular
add ’s
2 Possessives
singular
add ’s
the plaintiff’s brief
2 Possessives
singular plural
add ’s
the plaintiff’s brief
2 Possessives
singular plural
add ’s add ’
the plaintiff’s brief
2 Possessives
singular plural
add ’s add ’
the plaintiff’s brief the plaintiffs’ brief
2 Possessives
singular
2 Possessives
singular (ending in s)
2 Possessives
singular (ending in s)
add ’s
2 Possessives
singular (ending in s)
add ’s
Andrews’s brief
2 Possessives
singular plural (ending in s)
add ’s
Andrews’s brief
2 Possessives
singular plural (ending in s) (not ending in s)
add ’s
Andrews’s brief
2 Possessives
singular plural (ending in s) (not ending in s)
add ’s add ’s
Andrews’s brief
2 Possessives
singular plural (ending in s) (not ending in s)
add ’s add ’s
Andrews’s brief the people’s rights
2 Possessives
one BIG exception:
2 Possessives
one BIG exception:
its
2 Possessives
one BIG exception:
its (possessive pronoun)
2 Possessives
one BIG exception:
its (possessive pronoun)
it’s
2 Possessives
one BIG exception:
its (possessive pronoun)
it’s
(contraction for “it is”)
2 Possessives
1
1 That/Which
that
1 That/Which
that – restrictive
1 That/Which
that – restrictive which
1 That/Which
that – restrictive which – nonrestrictive
1 That/Which
that – restrictive – essential which – nonrestrictive
1 That/Which
that – restrictive – essential which – nonrestrictive – nonessential
1 That/Which
that – restrictive – essential – distinguishes which – nonrestrictive – nonessential
1 That/Which
that – restrictive – essential – distinguishes which – nonrestrictive – nonessential – merely
adds information
1 That/Which
The Commerce Bank that sits at Fifth and Pine does not charge its customers to use the ATM.
1 That/Which
The Commerce Bank that sits at Fifth and Pine does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks?
1 That/Which
The Commerce Bank that sits at Fifth and Pine does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? More than one.
1 That/Which
The Commerce Bank that sits at Fifth and Pine does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? More than one. Which one are we talking about?
1 That/Which
The Commerce Bank that sits at Fifth and Pine does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? More than one. Which one are we talking about? The one at Fifth and Pine.
1 That/Which
The Commerce Bank that sits at Fifth and Pine does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? More than one. Which one are we talking about? The one at Fifth and Pine. The clause restricts us to that bank.
1 That/Which
The Commerce Bank that sits at Fifth and Pine does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? More than one. Which one are we talking about? The one at Fifth and Pine. The clause restricts us to that bank. This is essential information.
1 That/Which
The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM.
1 That/Which
The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks?
1 That/Which
The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? Only one.
1 That/Which
The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? Only one. Where is it?
1 That/Which
The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? Only one. Where is it? At Fifth and Pine.
1 That/Which
The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? Only one. Where is it? At Fifth and Pine. The clause does not distinguish this Commerce Bank from other Commerce Banks;
1 That/Which
The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? Only one. Where is it? At Fifth and Pine. The clause does not distinguish this Commerce Bank from other Commerce Banks; it merely adds information,
1 That/Which
The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? Only one. Where is it? At Fifth and Pine. The clause does not distinguish this Commerce Bank from other Commerce Banks; it merely adds information, non-essential information.
1 That/Which
7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words
it
7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words
it
that
7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words
it
that in
7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words
it
that in of
7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words
it
that in of .
7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words
it
that in of .
as
7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words
it
that in of .
as or
7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words
It should be noted that the Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.
It should be noted that the Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.
It should be noted that the Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.
It should be noted that the Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.
The Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.
The Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.
The Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.
The Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.
The Appendix does not include the transcripts.
The relevant provisions in Section 604 state in pertinent part:
The relevant provisions in Section 604 state in pertinent part:
The relevant provisions in Section 604 state in pertinent part:
The relevant provisions in Section 604 state:
The relevant provisions in Section 604 state:
The provisions in Section 604 state:
The provisions in Section 604 state:
The provisions in Section 604 state:
The provisions state:
The provisions in Section 604 state:
The provisions in Section 604 state:
Section 604 provides:
Section 604 provides:
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide you with an overview of the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part of the memorandum provides . . . .
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide you with an overview of the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part of the memorandum provides . . . .
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide you with an overview of the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part of the memorandum provides . . . .
This memorandum provides you with an overview of the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part provides . . . .
This memorandum provides you with an overview of the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part provides . . . .
This memorandum summarizes the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part provides . . . .
This memorandum summarizes the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part provides . . . .
This memorandum summarizes the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part provides . . . .
This memorandum summarizes trade law in Germany. The first part provides . . . .
This memorandum summarizes trade law in Germany. The first part provides . . . .
This memorandum summarizes German trade law. The first part provides . . . .
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between the parties as follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between the parties as follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between the parties as follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree:
At or about the same time, Paulson termi-nated his agreement with Vitrex.
At or about the same time, Paulson termi-nated his agreement with Vitrex.
At or about the same time, Paulson termi-nated his agreement with Vitrex.
At the same time, Paulson terminated his agreement with Vitrex.
At or about the same time, Paulson termi-nated his agreement with Vitrex.
At or about the same time, Paulson termi-nated his agreement with Vitrex.
About the same time, Paulson terminated his agreement with Vitrex.
3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations
to be verbs
3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations
to be verbs am
3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations
to be verbs am is
3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations
to be verbs am is
was
3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations
to be verbs am is
was were
3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations
to be verbs am is
was were are
3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations
to be verbs am is
was were are
been
3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations
to be verbs am is
was were are
been be
3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations
to be verbs am is
was were are
been be
being
3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations
to be verbs am is
was were are
been be
being of
3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations
to be verbs am is
was were are
been be
being of
ion
3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations
I wanted to confirm this treatment with you, so we are in agreement on the proper tax allocations.
I wanted to confirm this treatment with you, so we are in agreement on the proper tax allocations.
I wanted to confirm this treatment with you, so we are in agreement on the proper tax allocations.
I wanted to confirm this treatment with you, so we are in agreement on the proper tax allocations.
I wanted to confirm this treatment with you, so we agree on the proper tax allocations.
I wanted to confirm this treatment with you, so we agree on the proper tax allocations.
French law regarding patents does not provide a definition of the term “inventor.”
French law regarding patents does not provide a definition of the term “inventor.”
French law regarding patents does not provide a definition of the term “inventor.”
French law regarding patents does not provide a definition of the term “inventor.”
French law regarding patents does not define the term “inventor.”
French law regarding patents does not define the term “inventor.”
French law regarding patents does not define the term “inventor.”
French law regarding patents does not define the term “inventor.”
French law does not define “inventor.”
By applying for the permit, Arnofsky was in violation of state licensing laws.
By applying for the permit, Arnofsky was in violation of state licensing laws.
By applying for the permit, Arnofsky was in violation of state licensing laws.
By applying for the permit, Arnofsky was in violation of state licensing laws.
By applying for the permit, Arnofsky was in violation of state licensing laws.
By applying for the permit, Arnofsky violated state licensing laws.
By applying for the permit, Arnofsky violated state licensing laws.
This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
Our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.
This memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East to the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.
This memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East to the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.
This memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East to the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.
This memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East to the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.
This memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East to the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.
This memorandum compares Far East’s proposed agreement to Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.
This memorandum compares Far East’s proposed agreement to Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.
This memorandum compares Far East’s proposed agreement to Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.
This memorandum compares each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”).
Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.
This memorandum compares each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”).
Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.
This memorandum compares each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”).
NetRight wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises, an independent contractor in India.
This memorandum compares each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement.
NetRight wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises, an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement.
NetRight wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises, an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement.
NetRight wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises, an independent contractor in India. In this memorandum I compare each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement.
NetRight wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises, an independent contractor in India. In this memorandum I compare each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement.