42
Mid Point Review

Writing context 2011

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

presentation to MA Book Art students at Camberwell - part of a seminar to explore context for research writing around the final essay in relationship to practice

Citation preview

Page 1: Writing context 2011

Mid Point Review

Page 2: Writing context 2011

Camberwell College of ArtsMid Point Review Book Arts: Tuesday 1st March, 11am prompt start in basement studioAll modes to attend & participate in student-led feedbackThe midpoint review is a chance to reflect upon for your professional practice and learning development in

Unit 1. Your peers and tutors will provide feedback of progress to date. Please ‘curate’ your work. Select a piece of work that is part of your project proposal work (in development or

completion) and display it in the basement studio.In a student-led group session, peers will discuss the work and the student whose work is being discussed will

take notes and receive notes from the group.Please complete and email to Susan by 22nd February: Briefly write (500 words max) on the following:1. Evaluation of my project proposal as a part of a self directed programme of study  2. Where I need to develop study plans in relation to the Unit 1 Learning Outcomes(Handbook – pages 22-24) Mid Point ReviewStudent to complete and email to tutorPathway:Name:

Date: Peer Group comments noted from Midpoint review peer session:

Mid Point ReviewTutor to complete Name:Tutor:

Date:Tutor comments from Midpoint review peer discussion session

Page 3: Writing context 2011

contextual practice

Page 4: Writing context 2011

To find – wiki

course doc archive

mid point review briefing sheet

Page 5: Writing context 2011

Practical support

Page 6: Writing context 2011

BRIEF - Research PaperFor this assignment you are asked to write a paper in essay form addressing a research question of your choice. The question should tackle an issue or theoretical concern that is central to your practice although your paper should not refer directly to your work. The research question should relate to the contemporary culture of art and design and may also encompass non-Western traditions. The aim of the paper is to contribute knowledge in your chosen field of research. Consider that your paper is to be published and/or presented at a conference.

Page 7: Writing context 2011

BRIEF - Research PaperFor this assignment you are asked to write a paper in essay form addressing a research question of your choice. The question should tackle an issue or theoretical concern that is central to your practice although your paper should not refer directly to your work. The research question should relate to the contemporary culture of art and design and may also encompass non-Western traditions. The aim of the paper is to contribute knowledge in your chosen field of research. Consider that your paper is to be published and/or presented at a conference.

Page 8: Writing context 2011

BRIEF - Research Paper

The question should tackle an issue or theoretical concern that is central to your practice although

relate to the contemporary culture of art and design and may also encompass non-Western traditions

contribute knowledge in your chosen field of research. Consider that your paper is to be published and/or presented at a conference.

Page 9: Writing context 2011

It is important that your paper demonstrates your ability to formulate a research question and research the issues you have identified. You should aim to write a coherent argument in which you critically contextualise the issue you are addressing, and arrive at a justified and independent conclusion. Your paper should be thoroughly proofread with typos, grammatical mistakes and spelling errors eradicated.

Page 10: Writing context 2011

It is important that your paper demonstrates your ability to formulate a research question and research the issues you have identified. You should aim to write a coherent argument in which you critically contextualise the issue you are addressing, and arrive at a justified and independent conclusion. Your paper should be thoroughly proofread with typos, grammatical mistakes and spelling errors eradicated.

Page 11: Writing context 2011

formulate a research

critically contextualise the issue you are addressing, and arrive at a justified and independent conclusion. Your paper should be thoroughly proofread with typos, grammatical mistakes and spelling errors eradicated.

Page 12: Writing context 2011

You should contextualise your research by using at least 10 citations (from research sources such as books, exhibitions, public lectures, journals, art magazines, web resources…). These citations must conform to the Harvard convention of citation.

Page 13: Writing context 2011

• Tutorial:

• You are required to attend a tutorial in the week beginning 7th March. The date and time have been posted on the VLE.

• Please bring to the tutorial the following: (1) abstract,

(2) research question

(3) case studies for discussion.

Page 14: Writing context 2011

• Your final paper should consist of the following academic structure:

• Title page providing name, course and email address

• The research question• A 300-word abstract, setting out the main points

to be investigated, followed by 5 key words• A detailed contents page• A one-page bibliography constructed according to

the Harvard convention of citation.• The main body of the paper

Page 15: Writing context 2011

• The overall submission must be between 4,000 and 5,000 words in length and include at least 10 citations.

• Please post a digital copy of your submission on Blackboard and also deposit a hard copy at the Wilson Road reception and 2 copies to Susan.

Page 16: Writing context 2011

Learning Outcomes:

Demonstrate a critical engagement with practice-based research.

Articulate a clear understanding of the methodology and context of your creative practice in written form.

These learning outcomes will be evidenced in the following way:

Ability to formulate a specific research question.

Ability to contextualise that question within a critical framework.

Ability to form an independent conclusion.

Professional presentation of the research paper adhering to the academic structure and the Harvard convention.

Page 17: Writing context 2011

Marking:Your papers will be marked in three categories of achievement:

Analysis

Research

Communication

Page 18: Writing context 2011

The Research Question The all-important research question is key to the essay. This will provide you with a starting point and help you develop the structure of the writing. It is sometimes difficult to know what is and what isn’t a research question. Here is an example: It is NOT a review of your favourite artist’s work:

“An account of Bill Viola’s videos from the 1980s” However, it might well be:In what ways did Bill Viola’s videos from the 1980s anticipate the embodied works of the new millennium?”

Page 19: Writing context 2011

• History & Theory It is preferable to map out the theoretical and historical territory of your discussion before you start, signalling where you will develop the argument as you go.

So, taking our example No. 1 of Bill Viola, you might sketch in the history of video art starting with Nam June Paik, mentioning as you go how the body interacts with the technology and then launch into your discussion of Viola’s own work. At the same time as describing the work of the period - in my example, the 1980s - you would enumerate the major theories, of, in this case, the moving image, and then signal those contemporary theories that will inform your discussion of his chosen works.

• If the medium and individual works you are discussing have social or political as well as cultural significance, then weave these themes into your account. If you are drawing on other disciplines, for example, political theory, psychology, anthropology or science, then integrate these into your analysis of your case studies.

Page 20: Writing context 2011

Breadth of Focus Do not cast your net too wide. As a rule of thumb, restrict yourself to no more than 3 case studies – artists or works. The theoretical sources you consult to support your arguments should also be restricted to around 3 and be drawn from books, peer reviewed journals as well as online sources.

Page 21: Writing context 2011

Things Not To Do Do not copy and paste large chunks of other people’s writing. We want to know what you think of the subject you are researching, not just what other people have said.

Do not write at length about your own practice, although you may mention your own concerns, or a particular cultural background that informs your thinking in the context of your research for the paper.

Page 22: Writing context 2011

Things To Do

Do remember to use quotation marks when you are reproducing, word for word, other people’s writings. If you don’t, this constitutes plagiarism.

Do use spell check and pay heed to the green line warning that you are running into grammatical problems.

Do read the paper out loud to yourself. You will hear when the text isn’t making sense.

Do, if you can, get someone else to read your paper. You will soon find out if there are any problems of sense or grammar.

Do copy edit the paper before submission.

Page 23: Writing context 2011

Helpful Hints

No one can read your mind, so do not assume we know what you are thinking. Put it down in writing. Remember to briefly describe each work you want the reader to consider. If you leave out essential information – like the fact that the work is a multiple or is deployed across several screens, then the reader will have trouble following the logic of your discussion.

Page 24: Writing context 2011

Helpful Hints

No one can read your mind, so do not assume we know what you are thinking. Put it down in writing. Remember to briefly describe each work you want the reader to consider. If you leave out essential information – like the fact that the work is a multiple or is deployed across several screens, then the reader will have trouble following the logic of your discussion.

Page 25: Writing context 2011

Hints from Other Students

Finish your essay a good two weeks before the deadline to allow for revisions.

Save multiple copies of your essay file.

Number each new version in the file name.

Email the essay to yourself at the end of each working session.

Page 26: Writing context 2011

ClarityClarity is all-important. There are many pitfalls, one example being confusions about who the subject of the sentence might be: “John saw Pete crossing the road. He was going to the cinema so he asked him to go with him.” Who asked whom to go to the cinema?Say things simply and if you find this difficult, speak the sentence out loud before writing or speak it as you write. You will soon hear any problems.Write short sentences. Avoid long sentences with many sub clauses.

Page 27: Writing context 2011

ClarityClarity is all-important. There are many pitfalls, one example being confusions about who the subject of the sentence might be: “John saw Pete crossing the road. He was going to the cinema so he asked him to go with him.” Who asked whom to go to the cinema?Say things simply and if you find this difficult, speak the sentence out loud before writing or speak it as you write. You will soon hear any problems.Write short sentences. Avoid long sentences with many sub clauses.

Page 28: Writing context 2011

StructureThe classic essay structure dictates that you announce what you are going to say, say it and then sum up your main findings. It is not a hard and fast rule, but it can help if you apply the basic formulation:

Introduction Argument Conclusion

Page 29: Writing context 2011

It can help if you make a visual representation of the essay, showing the different chapters or headings and assigning content to each section. Some people make flow charts on a computer, others write lists, or draw charts freehand.

You could make a list of key points you want to cover and then fit them into the overall design of the essay.

Pay particular attention to how sections will be linked thematically to maintain a flow in the text.

You might find it useful to create headings for each new thought and then group them into larger sections at the end. This provides a shorthand account of the whole essay that is easy to take in at a glance.

Page 30: Writing context 2011

It can help if you make a visual representation of the essay, showing the different chapters or headings and assigning content to each section. Some people make flow charts on a computer, others write lists, or draw charts freehand.

You could make a list of key points you want to cover and then fit them into the overall design of the essay.

Pay particular attention to how sections will be linked thematically to maintain a flow in the text.

You might find it useful to create headings for each new thought and then group them into larger sections at the end. This provides a shorthand account of the whole essay that is easy to take in at a glance.

Page 31: Writing context 2011

make a visual representation of the essay

make a list of key points you want to cover and then

how sections will be linked thematically to maintain

create headings for each new thought and then group them into larger sections at the end. This provides a shorthand account of the whole essay that is easy to take in at a glance.

Page 32: Writing context 2011

Primary Research If you are in a position to interview the artists, designers, theorists or curators you are writing about or quoting, this will be a bonus and the work you do could go forward into further research projects.

Page 33: Writing context 2011

your making - contextual framework

social political

personal

critical/theoretical

historical geographical

institutional cultural

Page 34: Writing context 2011

social context

Making and seeing an image always takes place in a social context. The way it is seen and how it is seen are culturally constructed.

Audience for work - who is included/excluded/implicated on the ways an image is produced, circulated and consumed

Page 35: Writing context 2011

political context

Specific political issue

broad political issue

gender - race - ethnicity - sexual orientation - class - disability - religion

Page 36: Writing context 2011

personal contextBiography - narrative of the selfparticular issues - memoriesWhat motivates/ drives you?Your particular skills as an artist/ designer/writer/photographerWhat strategies do you use when the work is not going well?How do you relate to the forces that in part condition what you know and in which you make things?

Page 37: Writing context 2011

critical/theoretical context

Does your work relate to particular critical debates about contemporary art and design practices?

Is your work informed by/engaging with/contesting particular theoretical frameworks/issues?

Page 38: Writing context 2011

historical context

Understand how/whether your practice relates to a tradition, with a history

How knowledge relates to periods in time.

Page 39: Writing context 2011

geographical contextLocal, regional, national, international, global.

Where do you make your work?

Do you make your work in relation to a particular place?

studio home church city rural cyberspace

Page 40: Writing context 2011

institutional context

MA Course - school of art and design

Your educational background/experience

Your professional background/experience

Your family background/experience

Page 41: Writing context 2011

cultural context

In it’s broadest sense - ‘a whole way of life’ - this relates to all the other categories.

More specifically, what works of artists, designers, writers, filmmakers, photographers, musicians are important to you and your work - why?

Page 42: Writing context 2011

mapping your practice

Any other contexts worth considering?

Importance

Overlapping

change - evolution of practice