44
Designing for the Web vs. Designing for Print AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN FALL 2010 Bruce Clary, McPherson College, McPherson, Kansas

Web vs. Print

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Enumerates some of the differences between designing for print and designing for the Web.

Citation preview

Page 1: Web vs. Print

Designing for the Webvs.Designing for Print

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

Bruce Clary, McPherson College, McPherson, Kansas

Page 2: Web vs. Print

Print designers are control freaks

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

Page 3: Web vs. Print

Print designers are control freaks

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• They wield complete control over all aspects of their design and product

Page 4: Web vs. Print

Print designers are control freaks

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• They wield complete control over all aspects of their design and product

• Among the greatest adjustments print designers must make in coming to the Web are yielding control to end users and accepting the technical limitations of their – and their users’ – technology, hardware, and software

Page 5: Web vs. Print

Print

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

Web

Page 6: Web vs. Print

Print

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

WebDesigner Controlled

Page 7: Web vs. Print

Print

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

WebDesigner Controlled User Determined

Page 8: Web vs. Print

Print

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

Web

Paper stock

Designer Controlled User Determined

Page 9: Web vs. Print

Print

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

Web

Paper stock Monitors, devices

Designer Controlled User Determined

Page 10: Web vs. Print

Print

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

Web

Paper stock Monitors, devices

Choice of 1000s of fonts

Designer Controlled User Determined

Page 11: Web vs. Print

Print

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

Web

Paper stock Monitors, devices

Choice of 1000s of fonts User-limited fonts

Designer Controlled User Determined

Page 12: Web vs. Print

Print

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

Web

Paper stock Monitors, devices

Pinpoint positioning

Choice of 1000s of fonts User-limited fonts

Designer Controlled User Determined

Page 13: Web vs. Print

Print

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

Web

Paper stock Monitors, devices

Pinpoint positioning

Choice of 1000s of fonts

Browser, OS variations

User-limited fonts

Designer Controlled User Determined

Page 14: Web vs. Print

Print

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

Web

Paper stock Monitors, devices

Color proofing

Pinpoint positioning

Choice of 1000s of fonts

Browser, OS variations

User-limited fonts

Designer Controlled User Determined

Page 15: Web vs. Print

Print

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

Web

Paper stock Monitors, devices

Color proofing

Pinpoint positioning

Choice of 1000s of fonts

Inconsistent color

Browser, OS variations

User-limited fonts

Designer Controlled User Determined

Page 16: Web vs. Print

Print

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

Web

Paper stock Monitors, devices

Color proofing

Pinpoint positioning

Choice of 1000s of fonts

Inconsistent color

Browser, OS variations

User-limited fonts

Designer Controlled User Determined

End users can even override the designer’sstylesheet with their own styles.

Page 17: Web vs. Print

Scale & Proportion of Display

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

Page 18: Web vs. Print

Scale & Proportion of Display

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• Scale of monitors used to view Web pages ranges from cell phone and iPod/iPad screens to 30-inch HD cinema displays

Page 19: Web vs. Print

Scale & Proportion of Display

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• Scale of monitors used to view Web pages ranges from cell phone and iPod/iPad screens to 30-inch HD cinema displays

• Monitors may have a 3:2, 4:3 or 16:9 proportion

Page 20: Web vs. Print

Scale & Proportion of Display

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• Scale of monitors used to view Web pages ranges from cell phone and iPod/iPad screens to 30-inch HD cinema displays

• Monitors may have a 3:2, 4:3 or 16:9 proportion

• As a rule, the entire design is not immediately visible!

Page 21: Web vs. Print

Typography on the Web

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

Page 22: Web vs. Print

Typography on the Web

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• There are exciting breakthroughs in Web typography on the immediate horizon…

Page 23: Web vs. Print

Typography on the Web

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• There are exciting breakthroughs in Web typography on the immediate horizon…

• … but display of type is still effectively limited to the fonts the user has installed on her computer

Page 24: Web vs. Print

Typography on the Web

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• There are exciting breakthroughs in Web typography on the immediate horizon…

• … but display of type is still effectively limited to the fonts the user has installed on her computer

• Users can adjust size of type as desired, breaking the designer’s intended layout…

Page 25: Web vs. Print

Typography on the Web

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• There are exciting breakthroughs in Web typography on the immediate horizon…

• … but display of type is still effectively limited to the fonts the user has installed on her computer

• Users can adjust size of type as desired, breaking the designer’s intended layout…

• … although, again, advanced CSS techniques are making it easier and easier to achieve true elastic designs.

Page 26: Web vs. Print

Color on the Web

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

Page 27: Web vs. Print

Color on the Web

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• Backlit display dictates RGB color control instead of CMYK

Page 28: Web vs. Print

Color on the Web

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• Backlit display dictates RGB color control instead of CMYK

• Pixel display requires “dithering”–the smoothing of jagged edges by interpolating colors

Page 29: Web vs. Print

Color on the Web

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• Backlit display dictates RGB color control instead of CMYK

• Pixel display requires “dithering”–the smoothing of jagged edges by interpolating colors

• Inconsistent color reproduction

Page 30: Web vs. Print

Color on the Web

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• Backlit display dictates RGB color control instead of CMYK

• Pixel display requires “dithering”–the smoothing of jagged edges by interpolating colors

• Inconsistent color reproduction

• But, good news: We can put “Web-safe” colors behind us

Page 31: Web vs. Print

Images on the Web

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

Page 32: Web vs. Print

Images on the Web

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• Concern regarding download time dictates

Page 33: Web vs. Print

Images on the Web

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• Concern regarding download time dictates

- Sizing all images to space

Page 34: Web vs. Print

Images on the Web

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• Concern regarding download time dictates

- Sizing all images to space

- Compromising quality to reduce file size

Page 35: Web vs. Print

Images on the Web

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

Page 36: Web vs. Print

Images on the Web

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• Image characteristics determine file format

Page 37: Web vs. Print

Images on the Web

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• Image characteristics determine file format

- .GIFs for flat-color graphics

Page 38: Web vs. Print

Images on the Web

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• Image characteristics determine file format

- .GIFs for flat-color graphics

- .JPGs for photos or images with subtle gradients

Page 39: Web vs. Print

Images on the Web

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• Image characteristics determine file format

- .GIFs for flat-color graphics

- .JPGs for photos or images with subtle gradients

- .PNGs for graphics and gradients requiring transparency

Page 40: Web vs. Print

Images on the Web

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• Image characteristics determine file format

- .GIFs for flat-color graphics

- .JPGs for photos or images with subtle gradients

- .PNGs for graphics and gradients requiring transparency

- But NO .TIFFs or .PSDs or .AIs!

Page 41: Web vs. Print

Other differences

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

Page 42: Web vs. Print

Other differences

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• Measures (pixels rather than picas & points, e.g.)

Page 43: Web vs. Print

Other differences

AR340 WEB-BASED DESIGN ● FALL 2010

• Measures (pixels rather than picas & points, e.g.)

• Accessibility accommodations

Page 44: Web vs. Print