117
libraries and the future of transliteracy lane wilkinson houston, tx april 20, 2012 CPE#535

Tx la conference 2012 final

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation given to

Citation preview

Page 1: Tx la conference 2012 final

libraries and

the future of

transliteracy

lane wilkinson

houston, tx

april 20, 2012

CPE#535

Page 2: Tx la conference 2012 final

Welcome!

Page 3: Tx la conference 2012 final

Blogs

Presentations

Websites

Journals

Conferences

Job descriptions

Job titles

Where you’ll find

transliteracy

Page 4: Tx la conference 2012 final

Social media

Digital literacy

Ebooks

Participatory

Open Access

New librarianship

Library 2.0

Some things

transliteracy is

not…

Page 5: Tx la conference 2012 final

Transliteracy

the ability to read, write, and

interact across a range of

platforms, tools, and media.

Page 6: Tx la conference 2012 final

A brief history of

transliteracy

Page 7: Tx la conference 2012 final

2005

The Transliteracies

Project

“Text has historically

existed as a negotiation

between media,

including oral, written,

print, visual, and…

electronic media.”

(Liu 2006)

Page 8: Tx la conference 2012 final

2005

The Transliteracies

Project

Studying “the zone of

negotiation…by which

the older dialogue

among print, writing,

orality, and audiovisual

media…enters into new

relations with digital

media.”

(Liu 2006)

Page 9: Tx la conference 2012 final

2007

PART: Production

and Research in

Transliteracy

The ability to read, write

and interact across a

range of platforms, tools

and media.

(Thomas, et al., 2007)

Page 10: Tx la conference 2012 final

2007

PART: Production

and Research in

Transliteracy

“Transliteracy is an

umbrella term

encompassing different

literacies and multiple

communication

channels.”

(Andretta 2009)

Page 11: Tx la conference 2012 final

2010

Libraries and

Transliteracy

“Transliteracy began as

a descriptive concept,

designed to understand

how people navigate

their way across various

media.”

(Newman 2011)

Page 12: Tx la conference 2012 final

2010

Libraries and

Transliteracy

“[It is] understanding the

ways various means of

communication interact

and understanding…the

skills necessary to move

effortlessly from one

medium to another.”

(Ipri 2010)

Page 13: Tx la conference 2012 final

What do all of these approaches

have in common?

Page 14: Tx la conference 2012 final

1. Multiple media

Page 15: Tx la conference 2012 final

2. Communication

Page 16: Tx la conference 2012 final

3. Interaction

Page 17: Tx la conference 2012 final

Transliteracy is the ability to

communicate meaning

between media

Page 18: Tx la conference 2012 final

Why is transliteracy relevant to

librarians?

Page 19: Tx la conference 2012 final

Libraries have always

promoted literacy

Page 20: Tx la conference 2012 final

Literacy has always

been mediated by

information

technology

Page 21: Tx la conference 2012 final

So, technology

influences how we

can and should

promote literacy

Page 22: Tx la conference 2012 final

But, a

multiplicity of

technologies

can be a

logistical

nightmare

Page 23: Tx la conference 2012 final

Transliteracy helps us

promote literacy

across technological

barriers

Page 24: Tx la conference 2012 final

The three pillars in more detail

Page 25: Tx la conference 2012 final

Multiple media

Page 26: Tx la conference 2012 final

Once upon a time…

…literacy was simple.

Page 27: Tx la conference 2012 final

Then, something changed…

Page 28: Tx la conference 2012 final

We invented new tools to communicate

Page 29: Tx la conference 2012 final

We found new places to communicate

Page 30: Tx la conference 2012 final

We found new time to communicate

Page 31: Tx la conference 2012 final

We’ve always had choices

Page 32: Tx la conference 2012 final

Just never quite so many

Page 33: Tx la conference 2012 final

literacy critical

visu

al

scientific

print

information media

eco

no

mic

digital

health ora

lity

computer

web

financial

eco

no

mic

so

cia

l

cult

ura

l new

historical

po

st-

fina

ncia

l

numeracy electracy

visua

l sta

tistical

meta

Page 34: Tx la conference 2012 final

There’s got to

be a better

way

Page 35: Tx la conference 2012 final

Communication

Page 36: Tx la conference 2012 final
Page 37: Tx la conference 2012 final

The birth of the web made it necessary for

librarians to shift more towards teaching

search strategies and evaluation of

sources. The tool-focused “bibliographic

instruction” approach was later replaced

by the skill-focused “information literacy”

approach.

Meredith Farkas American Libraries Magazine

11/01/2011

http://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/columns/practice/information-literacy-20

Page 38: Tx la conference 2012 final

The end of the “tool-focused approach”

Page 39: Tx la conference 2012 final

But, information isn’t just evaluated

Page 40: Tx la conference 2012 final

Information is used

Page 41: Tx la conference 2012 final

Information is

communicated

Page 42: Tx la conference 2012 final

But doesn’t

information literacy

cover that?

Page 43: Tx la conference 2012 final

Transliteracy and information literacy

Print

Orality

Signing

Visual

Computer

Digital

Scientific

Health

Economic

Cultural

Critical

Media

Page 44: Tx la conference 2012 final

We can be literate without

being able to evaluate

Page 45: Tx la conference 2012 final

We can be

information

literate

without being

tech-savvy

Page 46: Tx la conference 2012 final

Transliteracy and information literacy

Print

Orality

Signing

Visual

Computer

Digital

Scientific

Health

Economic

Cultural

Critical

Media

Communication Evaluation

Page 47: Tx la conference 2012 final

Transliteracy and information literacy

Print

Orality

Signing

Visual

Computer

Digital

Scientific

Health

Economic

Cultural

Critical

Media

Transliteracy Information Literacy

Page 48: Tx la conference 2012 final

We’ve done a great job with

evaluation

Page 49: Tx la conference 2012 final

Transliteracy is about bringing our

attention back to communication

Page 50: Tx la conference 2012 final

Interaction

Page 51: Tx la conference 2012 final

Transliteracy is also

about asking:

“How are all of

these literacies &

technologies

supposed to

interact?”

Page 52: Tx la conference 2012 final

How have librarians

dealt with

interaction and

integration?

Page 53: Tx la conference 2012 final

Librarians love

compartments

Page 54: Tx la conference 2012 final

But patrons don’t

Page 55: Tx la conference 2012 final

The “versus” mentality

doesn’t cut it

anymore

Page 56: Tx la conference 2012 final

Information

resources are linked

Page 57: Tx la conference 2012 final

Transliteracy is about avoiding silos

Page 58: Tx la conference 2012 final

Caveat:

It’s not just digital

Page 59: Tx la conference 2012 final

Analog to analog

Page 60: Tx la conference 2012 final

Analog to digital

Page 61: Tx la conference 2012 final

Digital to digital

Page 62: Tx la conference 2012 final

Transliteracy is

about

the network

Page 63: Tx la conference 2012 final

Transliteracy is an intersection…

Multiple media

Communication

Interaction

Page 64: Tx la conference 2012 final

Transliteracy and librarianship

Page 65: Tx la conference 2012 final

Librarians encourage transliteracy

by adopting programming and

teaching strategies that promote

skill transfer across media

Page 66: Tx la conference 2012 final

Transliteracy is not something we

teach

Transliteracy is something we take

advantage of

Page 67: Tx la conference 2012 final

1. Effective information use requires

multiple information sources

Page 68: Tx la conference 2012 final

The days of “one medium”

research are over.

Page 69: Tx la conference 2012 final

Yet we tend

to focus on

the resources

that we know

Page 70: Tx la conference 2012 final

we often put

up defensive

walls

To distinguish

ourselves from

the web

Page 71: Tx la conference 2012 final

But, patrons will use

non-library resources

Page 72: Tx la conference 2012 final

And they’re

running right

into the walls

we’ve been

building

Page 73: Tx la conference 2012 final

Get comfortable with non-library

resources

Page 74: Tx la conference 2012 final

Show how the library fits in

Page 75: Tx la conference 2012 final

2. Identify skills that can adapt

Page 76: Tx la conference 2012 final

How are you

preparing your

patrons for

change?

Your staff?

Yourself?

Page 77: Tx la conference 2012 final

An example

Page 78: Tx la conference 2012 final

Can your patrons still use it?

Page 79: Tx la conference 2012 final

Identify skills that will outlast change

Page 80: Tx la conference 2012 final

3. Encourage skills that transfer

across platforms, tools, and media

Page 81: Tx la conference 2012 final

The question posed

by transliteracy is:

“Are we

encouraging

skills that

transfer?”

Page 82: Tx la conference 2012 final

The ability to transfer

cognitive skills

learned in one domain

to a new domain

Transfer of learning

Page 83: Tx la conference 2012 final

Encourage skills that will adjust

Page 84: Tx la conference 2012 final

Start from

patrons’

existing

mental

models of

libraries

(Holman 2011)

Page 85: Tx la conference 2012 final

And teach

the analogy

(Gentner & Colhoun 2010)

1) Candidate inferences

2) Schema abstraction

3) Re-representation

Page 86: Tx la conference 2012 final

Begin with what they know

Page 87: Tx la conference 2012 final

Encourage inference through

analogy

Page 88: Tx la conference 2012 final

Show how it works,

not just how to use it

Page 89: Tx la conference 2012 final

Give ample time for free play

Page 90: Tx la conference 2012 final

The library is reinforced as a

node in the network

Page 91: Tx la conference 2012 final
Page 92: Tx la conference 2012 final

Wikipedia before class

Page 93: Tx la conference 2012 final

Google versus the Library

Page 94: Tx la conference 2012 final

The library is not (always) the answer

A. Off.com B. The Journal of Entomology C. Yahoo! Answers

D. Ask Grandma

You moved off-campus, but now you’ve got roaches! Where’s the best place to find out which bug-spray is most effective?

Page 95: Tx la conference 2012 final

Teaching the analogy

Page 96: Tx la conference 2012 final

The world of information

Page 97: Tx la conference 2012 final

Ample time to experiment

Page 98: Tx la conference 2012 final

Social media training

Page 99: Tx la conference 2012 final
Page 100: Tx la conference 2012 final

Workshops and beyond…

Page 101: Tx la conference 2012 final

We constantly ask:

How can we make

the library a part

of their network?

Page 102: Tx la conference 2012 final

That’s the core of transliteracy

Page 103: Tx la conference 2012 final

It’s not a set of skills

Page 104: Tx la conference 2012 final

It’s a goal

Page 105: Tx la conference 2012 final

Conclusion?

Page 106: Tx la conference 2012 final

The future of transliteracy?

Page 107: Tx la conference 2012 final

There’s still something of value

Page 108: Tx la conference 2012 final

We still have to deal with

multiple media

Page 109: Tx la conference 2012 final

We still have to deal with

communication

Page 110: Tx la conference 2012 final

We still have to deal with

how it all fits together

Page 111: Tx la conference 2012 final

So, how do we get there?

Page 112: Tx la conference 2012 final

Transliteracy is the ability to read,

write and interact across a range of

platforms, tools and media

Page 113: Tx la conference 2012 final

It’s about communicating

meaning across media.

Page 114: Tx la conference 2012 final

The word ‘transliteracy’ may not last

Page 115: Tx la conference 2012 final

But, the need for

transliteracy will

always be around

Page 116: Tx la conference 2012 final

Thank you

senseandreference.wordpress.com

librariesandtransliteracy.wordpress.com

Page 117: Tx la conference 2012 final

References

Andretta, S. (2009). Transliteracy: Take a walk on the wild side. In World Library and Information Congress: 75th IFLA Genreal Conference and Assembly, Milan, Italy: 23-27. http://eprints.rclis.org/handle/10760/14868

Farkas, M. (2011). Information literacy 2.0. American Libraries [Blog post]. November 1, 2011. Available at:

http://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/columns/practice/information-literacy-20

Gentner, D. & Colhoun, J. (2010). Analogical processes in human thinking and learning. In Glatzeder, B.,

Goel, V., and von Muller, A. (2010). Towards a Theory of Thinking. Heidelburg: Springer. 35-48.

Holman, L. (2011). Millennial students’ mental models of search: implications for academic librarians and

database developers. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(1): 19-27.

Ipri, T. (2010) Introducing Transliteracy. College & Research Libraries News, 71(10), 532-567

Liu, A. (2006). Definition of Online Reading. http://transliteracies.english.ucsb.edu/category/research-

project/definition-of-online-reading

Newman, B. (2011). Beginner’s guide to transliteracy. Available online at

http://librariesandtransliteracy.wordpress.com/beginner’s-guide-to-transliteracy/

Thomas, S., et al. (2007) Transliteracy: crossing divides. First Monday, 12(12). Online.

http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2060/1908