Upload
nate-cradit
View
405
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Nate Cradit, MA | Michigan State University ACPA 2015 Annual Convention
Toward a New Model of Self-Authorship for Grieving Undergraduates
2
A look at our presentation outlineToday’s Agenda
OpeningAgenda & outcomes
IntroductionTopic & presenter context
3
Theoretical FrameworkOverview of current theory of self-‐authorship and emerging
adulthood
Student PopulationDiscussion of popula=on characteris=cs for grieving undergraduates
Core QuestionHow is the journey toward
adulthood different for students in the popula=on?
Limitations & FitLimita=ons of current theory for these students
4
SignificanceWhy does this popula=on and
issue maDer?
Practical StepsWays for student affairs educators to assist students in the popula=on.
5
A look at our presentation outline
Today’s Agenda
New ModelProposed new theore=cal
model and visual representa=on
ClosingDiscussion and ques=ons
INTRODUCTIONSWho am I, and where did this topic
originate?
7
What did you value? How did you know?Who were you at 18?And how did that change over 0me? How do you define yourself today?
Please take a moment to consider your personal development, and discuss with colleagues to the degree you feel comfortable.
8
An overview of the existing framework: Key termsSelf-Authorship Theory
Cognitive DevelopmentHow do I come to know what I know? Are my beliefs true and valid? According to whom?
Intrapersonal DevelopmentWho am I, and what do I use to create an acceptable defini=on of myself?
Interpersonal DevelopmentWhat is my place in rela=on to the social world around me? What is the nature of my rela=onships?
Following External FormulasWhat authority figures believe is correct, by virtue of their posi=on. Rela=onships are for seeking approval, and my sense of self is defined by those around me.
Crossroads ExperienceChallenging moment calls external formulas and defini=on of self into ques=on. Am I who I think I am? What do I believe, and who am I becoming?
Authoring One’s LifeRecognizing the need to operate more authen=cally on all three dimensions, individuals begin to choose their own beliefs, values, and iden=ty.
9
Internal Founda<onMy internal belief system is
strong and grounded.
Author of One’s LifeI need to develop
authen=city and choice.
CrossroadsExternal defini=ons for
my life may not be best fit
Defining myself through
others
Following Formulas
The sample was diverse, the methods sound, and the theory
is certainly valuable. It does not, however, fit for all students.
An element is missing for students who have lost a parent.
The exis=ng theory was developed over a
thirty-‐plus year longitudinal study, wherein
individuals were interviewed annually.30+Theoretical Framework
An overview of the existing framework: Visual modelSelf-Authorship Theory
The Popula<onDefining as 18-22, losing a parent during or before college years.
5% of U.S. undergraduate population
11
Key points from the literatureParental Loss Research
Goals, priori=es, and sense of self
become ques=oned, reflected upon,
and possibly changed.
Wheaton & Gotlib1997
A process of benefit-‐finding can
emerge to compensate for a lack of
meaning in the loss
Neimeyer & Anderson 2002
1990s
12
“…witnessing a parent’s death
means witnessing the death of a
part of oneself.”
Umberson2003, p. 17
“…more confronta=onal than
other deaths because children so
strongly iden=fy with parents.”
Umberson 2003, p. 17
Self-‐authorship can actually regress,
especially when young adults
experience marginalizing events.
Pizzolato2004
There is no singular path for this
process to take. It can be isola=ng
and marginalizing for young adults.
Lawrence et al. 2006
13
2015
Con=nued, cul=vated connec=on
to the deceased is a healthy
facilitator of posi=ve adjustment.
Neimeyer2008
Their very understanding of the
world oYen no longer feels valid.
Redefining the rela=onship is key.
Neimemeyer et al. 2008
14
Summary FactorsParental Loss is UniqueAn off-‐=me transi=on, and poten=al source for new marginality and
spotligh=ng or pain. Self authorship may regress as a result (Pizzolato,
2004)
Psychological StressGoals, priori=es, sense of self become ques=oned aYer oYen
significant reflec=on.
Rapid, Jarring Cognitive ChangeImmediate sense of “adulthood” regardless of age
Important NoteNot all who lose a parent have the same rela=onship. For some, this
may be a varied experience.
15
Key limitations for this populationSelf-Authorship Theory
1.Slow, oYen years-‐long process. Most students do not reach the laDer stages during college.
2.Focused on iden=fiable change
3.No accoun=ng for gender
4.Poten=al conflict between posi=ve grieving process and internal defini=ons/external formulas -‐ can the two processes be integrated?
16
Does parental loss fit?The Crossroads Experience
A point at which external formulas are viewed, considered, and
gradually accepted or modified
Baxter Magolda, 2008
Core Ques<onWhat happens when the anchoring reference
point in a young adult’s life is removed instantly, rather than slowly, voluntarily phased out?
?
18
An Integrative ModelSelf-authorship among grieving undergraduates
Entirely externallydependent External
FormulasChallenge
Cultivated Identity Internal Foundation
Childhood
Growth throughyoung adulthood
Erosion has exposed more roots.Cultivation is essential. By whom?
Roots in place, a tree has formed
thanks to instant fertilizer.
Branches begin to take shape,
representing internal voice.
Roots expanded, multiple branches and full leaves
(social relationships).
19
Practical steps for student affairs educatorsKey Recommendations
1.Recognize the immediacy of poten=al change.
2.Meaning making or benefit finding? (Or a brief distrac=on?)
3.Allow for unique individual processes and circumstances.
4.Consider the roots. And the counseling center on your campus.
5.Integra=on {grief + self-‐authorship} is essen=al.