Upload
ranjani-balu
View
143
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
0
To Interpret the SPSS table of Independent sample T-Test, Paired sample T-Test and One way Anova
Assignment III
BYRANJANI B
15AB30MBA (I YEAR)
PSGIM
1. A. Null Hypothesis:There is no significant variance between two batchesAlternate hypothesis:There is a significant variance between two batches
Inter
Levene's Test for Equality of Variances
t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Difference
Std. Error Difference
95% Confidence Interval of the
DifferenceLower Upper
MARKS Equal variances assumed
1.052 .319 -1.454
18 .163 -14.00 9.629 -34.229 6.229
Equal variances not assumed
-1.454
15.320 .166 -14.00 9.629 -34.486 6.486
Interpretation: Using the Levene’s test for equality of variance, the f-test significant value is 0.319 >
0.05. So t-test for equal variance assumed should be considered. Here, the value of t-test is 0.163 > 0.05. So accept null hypothesis.
It is concluded that there is no significant variance between two batches. The variance are equal. But the mean values are different. Batch B has the high average
then Batch A.Therefore, Batch B is the best.
1
Class A
class B
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
16.421
25.64
21.614
33.748
11.228
17.532
Standard deviation and Std. error
Std. deviation positive deviation negative deviation
Mean0
10203040506070
53.967.9
Mean
class AClass B
marks of batch
N Mean Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mean
MARKS A 10 53.90 16.421 5.193B 10 67.90 25.640 8.108
1. B Null hypothesis: The means are of all the batches are equal. That is µ1=µ2=µ3=µ4.
Alternate hypothesis: At least one batch mean value will be different. That is µ1≠µ2≠µ3≠µ4.
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Minimum Maximum
Lower Bound Upper Bound
A 10 53.90 16.421 5.193 42.15 65.65 25 78B 10 67.90 25.640 8.108 49.56 86.24 12 100C 12 43.75 19.786 5.712 31.18 56.32 11 78D 12 42.33 26.756 7.724 25.33 59.33 0 90Total 44 51.16 24.110 3.635 43.83 58.49 0 100
Interpretation: The significant Value is 0.046 < 0.05. So reject null hypothesis and accept alternate
hypothesis. Therefore the means are not equal. To find the highest average, descriptive statistical analysis is done. Batch B has the
highest mean among four batches.
2. Null hypothesis:
2
Mean
Batch ABatch C
53.9
67.9
43.7542.33
meanBatch A Batch B Batch C Batch D
Sum of Squares
df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 4471.170 3 1490.390 2.905 .046Within Groups 20524.717 40 513.118Total 24995.886 43
o The means are of all the sales men are equal. That is µ1=µ2=µ3=µ4.Alternate hypothesis:
o At least one sales man mean will be different. That is µ1≠µ2≠µ3≠µ4.
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Minimum Maximum
Lower Bound Upper Bound
A 4 25.00 4.243 2.121 18.25 31.75 20 29B 4 27.00 4.967 2.483 19.10 34.90 21 32C 4 26.00 7.257 3.629 14.45 37.55 18 35D 4 20.00 4.163 2.082 13.38 26.62 15 25Total 16 24.50 5.502 1.375 21.57 27.43 15 35
- Sum of Squares
df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 116.000 3 38.667 1.373 .298Within Groups 338.000 12 28.167Total 454.000 15
Interpretation: The significant Value is 0.298 > 0.05. So the accept null hypothesis and reject alternate
hypothesis. Therefore the means are equal.
3. Null hypothesis:
3
A B C D0
5
10
15
20
25
30 2527 26
20
Mean
o The means are of all the bags are equal. That is µ1=µ2=µ3=µ4.Alternate hypothesis:
o At least one bags mean will be different. That is µ1≠µ2≠µ3≠µ4.N Mean Std.
DeviationStd. Error
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Minimum Maximum
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Leather bag
5 664.00 61.074 27.313 588.17 739.83 * *
plastic 5 670.00 110.454 49.396 532.85 807.15 * *canvas 5 680.00 115.109 51.478 537.07 822.93 * *Total 15 671.33 91.563 23.642 620.63 722.04 * *
Sum of Squares
df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 653.333 2 326.667 .034 .967Within Groups 116720.00
012 9726.667
Total 117373.333
14
Interpretation: The significant Value is 0.967 > 0.05. So the accept null hypothesis and reject alternate
hypothesis. Therefore the means are equal.
4. Null hypothesis:
The perception of the product before and after trying will be equal. That is µ1=µ2
4
Mean655660665670675680
664670
680
Mean
Leather bag plastic canvas
Alternate hypothesis:
The perception of the product before and after trying will not be equal. That is µ1≠µ2
Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
Pair 1 Perception before
2.20 25 1.323 .265
Perception after
3.76 25 1.508 .302
Since N = 25, we don't have any missing values on the test variables.
As expected, the mean reaction about the perception of the product after trying
(3.76) is higher than before trying it (2.20).
Paired Differences t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mean
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Lower Upper
Pair 1
Perception before - Perception after
-1.56 2.551 .510 -2.61 -.51 -3.058
24 .005
On average, respondents slow down some 1.56.
The p-value denoted by “Sig. (2-tailed)” is 0.005. So if the population means are equal,
there's a 0% chance of finding this result. We therefore reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore the perception of the product get differ after trying it.
5. Null hypothesis:
The performance of the employee before and after the training will be equal. That is
µ1=µ2
5
Alternate hypothesis:
The performance of the employee before and after the training will not be equal. That is
µ1≠µ2
Mean N Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mean
Pair 1 before training
61.80 10 5.073 1.604
after training
61.90 10 6.420 2.030
Since N = 10, we don't have any missing values on the test variables.
As expected, the mean reaction time before a training (61.80 minutes) is slightly lower
than after the training (61.90 minutes).
Sig. (2-tailed
Mean Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mean
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
6
Lower UpperPair 1
before training - after training -.10 5.666 1.792 -4.15 3.95 -.05
6 9 .957
On average, respondents slow down by 0.10.
The p-value denoted by “Sig. (2-tailed)” is 0.957 > 0.05. We therefore accept the null
hypothesis. Therefore the performance before and after the training are almost equal.
7