Upload
dcambrid
View
772
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation to the Quinnapiac Faculty Scholars, August 24, 2010
Citation preview
Essentials of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Darren CambridgeQuinnipiac University
August 24, 2010
Inquiry
• Inquiry is at the heart of all scholarly activity
• SoTL is not a separate activity from teaching but an integral part of doing it in a way that is both effective and continually improving
Provisional Knowledge
• Knowledge about student learning in complex, and situated
• Therefore not the province of any single discipline or universally generalizable
Educational Capital
• “The progressive accumulation, in forms usable by educators, to validate experience and knowledge about successful educational ideas and strategies” - Ray Bachetti and Tom Ehrlich
• Connecting up local knowledge about teaching and learning can reveal larger patterns and stimulate systematic innovation
Inquiry into teaching needs to be something that everyone who teaches does–at differing levels of formality at different
times– in a variety of disciplinary styles– shared and critique by a variety of
means
Shulman’s Definition of Scholarship
• Public• Susceptible to critical review and evaluation• Accessible for exchange and use by other
members of one's scholarly community
CASTL Campus Program Definition
• “Problem posing about an issue of teaching or learning, study of the problem through methods appropriate to the disciplinary epistemologies, applications of results to practice, communication of results, self-reflection, and peer review”
• Customized by each campus team
Educational Research Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Research on practice Research as part of practice
Rigor and originality Impact of practice
What Why
“Significance” Both significance and error
High ground The swamp
Significance and error
Understanding the exceptions in the classroom may tell teachers far more about the learning process than understanding the majority; teachers must be just as concerned with the 30 percent who do not change “significantly” as with the 70% who do.
—Patricia Cross and
Mimi Steadman
Going Into the Swamp
The difficulty is that the problems of the high ground, however great their technical interest, are often relatively unimportant to clients of the larger society, while in the swamp of the problems of the greatest human concern. Shall the practitioner stay on the high, hard, ground where [he or she] can practice rigorously, as he understands rigor, but where [he or she] is constrained to deal with problems of relatively little social importance? Of shall [he or she] descend into the swamp where [he or she] can engage the most important and challenging problems if [he or she] is willing to forsake technical rigor? —Donald Schön
SoTL vs. Reflective Practice
• Scholarship means going public • However, there are multiple levels of
publicness that may be appropriate for a given purpose
DISCIPLINARY STYLESCurrent Trends
Disciplinary Styles
EXPANDING “LEARNING”Current Trends
Evolution of the SOTL: New Questions and Partners
• 1990 Scholarship of Teaching
• Late 90s Scholarship of Teaching &Learning
• 2008 Scholarship of Teaching & Learning
Three curricula
Kathleen Yancey, Reflection in the Writing Classroom
Expanding Participation
LINKS WITH ASSESSMENTCurrent Trends
Scholarship of Learning/Assessment
• Faculty and students generate research questions about NSSE scores
• Student led focus groups and interviews
• Recommendations for curricular and programmatic reform
INTERMEDIARIES, PROTOPUBLIC AND MIDDLE SPACES
Current Trends
Gradations of Going Public
New Gradations of Publicness
Network
Intermediaries, a category of knowledge builders, “can offer the stability, expert depth, and field-wide research to make assembling and circulating elements of educational capital a signal contribution to their constituents. —Ray Bachetti and Tom Ehrlich
Middle Spaces as Intermediaries
To be continued after lunch …
Scholarship Assessed
• Clear goals • Adequate preparation• Appropriate methods• Significant results• Effective presentation• Reflective critique • Rigor• Peer review
Clear Goals
• Audiences? • Communities of practice? (context)
Everything else follows from audience and community
• Clear goals • Adequate preparation• Appropriate methods• Significant results• Effective presentation• Reflective critique • Rigor• Peer review
Everything contingent on impact of practice
INNOVATIONS IS DISSEMANTION
New Genres: The Course PortfolioKnowledge Media Lab Gallery of Teaching and Learning
http://gallery.carnegiefoundation.org/
New Genres: Course portfolios at San Francisco State
New genres: Online “posters”Visible Knowledge Project
http://cndls.georgetown.edu/crossroads/vkp/
Capstone Course Portfolio
• Composed within a faculty learning community focused on the senior capstone experience
• One context for more deliberate collaborative scholarship of teaching and learning
• Working portfolio as a genre and wiki as a tool for collaborative scholarship of teaching and learning
New forms of review: MERLOThttp://merlot.org/
New forms of reuse: OpenEd Practices and CAMELhttp://openedpractices.org/