Upload
daniel-forsman
View
876
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The Discovery Payoff: Are discovery services increasing ROI and the library's prominence in academic institutionsJune 25, 2011ALA Annual, New OrleansDaniel Forsman
Citation preview
The Discovery Payoff: Are discovery services increasing ROI and the library's prominence in academic ins>tu>ons June 25, 2011 ALA Annual, New Orleans Daniel Forsman
The Discovery Payoff: “Summon is the shit, för övrigt”
Hej! Jag är ganska ny på bibliotekssökningar och hi9ade idag e9 examensarbete som jag ville läsa (nr 4340). Därför gick jag Fll biblioteket för a9 låna det. Väl där hi9ade jag det men fick även reda på a9 det fanns som e-‐kopia vilket var vad jag ville ha i första hand. Därför hade jag sparat ca 20 minuter av min Fd om det hade stå9 på sökresultatet jag fick i CHANS a9 den fanns som e-‐kopia. Eller ännu bä9re, en länk Fll e-‐kopians fulltext, precis som det finns i CPL (bibliotekarien visade mig). Summon is the shit, för övrigt! :)
Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg, Sweden Founded in 1829
Sweden
Gothenburg
• 1,751 teaching and research staff • 742 technical support and administrative staff
About 11,000 students (individuals) 2,493 employees (full-time equivalents)
Library • 50 staff • Millennium, SFX, Verde, Scigloo and Summon
”Basic scholarly informa>on use pracFces have shiOed rapidly in recent years, and as a result the academic library is increasingly being disintermediated from the discovery process, risking irrelevance in one of its core funcFonal areas”
-‐ Ithaka S+R 2009 Faculty Survey Report
”The future of libraries? Technology has created a very different context for the missions of academic and research libraries”
-‐ No Brief Candle, Daphnee RenArow
Books
Electronic resources
Journals in print
Media budget divided into print and electronic 1997 – 2009 at Chalmers library
Fulltext downloads, Chalmers library 2003 -‐ 2010
ILL-‐requests Chalmers library 2001 -‐ 2010
Books ArFcles
CirculaFon at Chalmers main library 2004 -‐ 2010
”Implica>ons for libraries which are shared by mul>ple studies • The library serves many consFtuencies, with different needs and behaviours
• Library systems must do be9er at providing seamless access to resources
• Librarians must increasingly consider a greater variety of digital formats and content
• More digital resources of all kinds are be9er
• Library systems and content must be prepared for changing user behaviours
• Library systems need to look and funcFon more like search engines, i.e., Google and Yahoo, and Web services, i.e. Amazon.com, since these are familiar to users who are comfortable and confident in using them
• High-‐quality metadata is becoming more important for discovery of appropriate resources
• The library must adverFse its brand, its value, and its resources be9er within the community”
The digital informaFon seeker: Findings from selected OCLC, RIN and JISC user behaviour projects
Media budget 2010, Chalmers library Books: 1,89% E-‐Books: 8,72% Monograph series: 0,43% Journals: 0,41% E-‐journals: 73,99% Databases: 13,03% ArFcle copies (ILL): 0,99%
Who use a library in 2010? Everything should be on the internet.
Make a search engine where I can search for keywords in all the databases/e-‐journals available instead of having to go through every database/journal with one search word
The digital library is extremely useful
Because we are doing projects and the most quick and effecHve way is to get informaHon is to search on the internet.
I mostly use e-‐journals
An improved search engine on the papers we have access to through chalmers library
Help you to know more about different databases. Difficult to know which ones to use.
I mainly use the e-‐journal/e-‐book resources, which i find excellent. However, the search funcFons are not great, so I usually locate arFcles using google and
use the library proxy to access them.
To be able to search the database! ... Which searches all the good databases that you have on your site. But on the same Fme! … It is also good when you cant
specify which area your ”thing” is located in.
Easier access to published technical reports (I found them very hard to find through the library web page and eventually turned to google instead).
Enter Summon Coverage
ProQuest Millennium
Spreading risks – vendor dependency
Summa
Quick implementa>on
Good deal
Competence IdenFfy workflows
Low upkeep
Summon – Chalmers collecFon (~90% coverage) Newspaper ArFcle (92,246,957) Journal ArFcle (63,489,283) DissertaFon (2,277,990) Trade PublicaFon ArFcle (1,020,110) Conference Proceeding (269,389) Book Review (187,185) Book (141,343) eBook (111,219) Book Chapter (98,902) Student Thesis (19,466) Journal (10,562) Report (1,556) Paper (934) PublicaFon ArFcle (585) Newsle9er (214) Patent (66) Standard (60) Archival Material (7)
Sumo-‐search worked unusually well :D
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
SFX menu 2009-‐2011
2009 2010 2011
On the front-‐end there is a unified discovery layer for our collecFon increasing usage and visibility On the back-‐end …
Summon SFX
Verde
BIBSAM
Chans
LIBRIS
WorldCat
CPL
SwePub/Uppsök
Driver
360 Core EzProxy CMS
S>ll shuffling data from one system to another
Chalmers holdings
ProQuest CPL SFX Meny Chans
360 Core IR
bX
ILL
URI OpenURL
Mill.
Swe Pub
Hathi Trust
LIBRIS DOAJ
Elsevier Springer
6800+
SFX KB
Verde KB
Summon interface / API
Summon Central Index
Daniel Forsman InformaFon resources & Discovery Chalmers Library [email protected]