Upload
steve-blank
View
566
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
QRator+
Rodolfo Luis AmeJosh
# of Customers
M T W TR Total
6 31 34 5 76
Pre-stay ‘eHarmony’: connecting guests with uniquely tailored experiences
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
Customer Loyalty drives $
Knowledge = Service Improvements = Loyalty
QRator+ Delivers loyalty by allowing Hotels to learn about their
customers
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
Customer Development > Broad and deep
Concierge Management Guests Corporate Content/IT
15 10 37 11 3
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
What We THOUGHT What We DID
•Hotel guests want local experiences
•Hotels want to improve their concierge services
•Need not met: Hotels don’t have dedicated concierge services or have underperforming ones
•The best way to deliver local NY content to tourists/users was through real-time “QRators”
•Talked with hotel concierge and hotel managers
•Brainstormed business model pivot: customized solutions (not repeatable or scalable?) -> standard concierge database and platform (satisfy the largest need)
•Segmented market and defined target market as 2nd-tier, urban hotels
Day 0-1 Review: What we Thought -> Did
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
What We THOUGHT What We DID
•Platform opportunity for limited or no concierge hotels instead of competing or complimenting hotels with concierge services
•Guests want local experiences
•2nd tier guests would prefer 1st tier service
•Quality of content was important
•Hotels control their concierge service
•Talked with concierge, managers, guests, corporate
•Pivoted to complement current concierge services
•Allow guests to control the level of concierge service they want before and at the hotel
•Construct loyalty platform to drive recurring revenue and referrals – and allow hotels to improve their service internally by knowing their guests better
•Presented prototype plans to 3 hotels – responded positively
Day 2-4 Review: What we Thought -> Did
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
What We THOUGHT What We DID•Guests in our target market want
local experiences
•Local content provider to chain hotels with many city locations
•Curated content drives customer loyalty
•Customers know what they want to do before arriving at hotel
•Surveyed end users in our target market and hotel management
•Aggregate content from trusted sources: Nymag, TimeOut, Zagat, Ticketmaster
•Value to hotel: retention/referral, customer data, promotions, marketing tool
Day 5: What we Thought -> Did
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
QRator+: Canvas V
Cost structure Revenue streams
Key resources Channels
Key activitiesKey partners Value proposition
Costumer relationships
Costumer segments
Automated Services once a client / personal for initial sale
Marketing and tracking Tool Indirect – White
Label (Web)
SaaS
Tech-Savvy Travelers that are visiting a city and don’t know it well1. Leisure2. Business
Franchise (Mgt. owned properties in Experience rich locations (e.g. Urban areas)
Guest
Content
Hotels
All 3
Tailored experienced based recommendations
Personnel (FC)
IT (FC)
Hotel CRM / CRS / PMS
IT Infrastructure
Knowledge Database
Human Talent
Information Exchange
$
Automated Services – simulating personal relationship
Content ProvidersKnowledge Management Data Analytics
Customer Analytics +Retention + Referral
Owned + Direct
% of Revenue
On-site Staff (Manager + Concierge)
Intellectual – profile matching technology
Analytics (VC)
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
Archetype of Customer
Franchisee of corporate – Management owned properties 20 / 30 properties in urban areas
Decision making tree: On-site staff (Front-desk, Concierge, IT,
Manager) Management Company:
CTO (CEO sign-off; no need for BOD approval)
Metrics: Sales cycle = 3-6 months CAC = TBD LTV = TBD, <5% churn rate
e.g. Marriott
e.g. Hotel REIT, LLC
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
Day 6 (Next Monday) and Beyond: What we will Do•Three scheduled talks with potential Early Evangelist (Testers)
•Plan Minimum Viable Product (Diaper.com approach)
•Finalize TAM, SAM, TM assumptions
•Get CAC and LTV estimates
•Partnership development – CRS, CRM, PMS
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
QRator+ The engine that drives Customer Loyalty at your hotel
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
QRator+: Initial Canvas
Cost structure Revenue streams
Key resources Channels
Key activitiesKey partners Value proposition
Costumer relationships
Costumer segments
•B2B: > 3 Star Hotels w/limited concierge staff
•B2C: Hotel Guest
•Dedicated personal assistance
•Discovery of destination as local
•Customized/tailored guest services
•On-demand service – Efficiency relative to more staff
• Information exchange
• Sourcing of Curators
•Group of Curators (locals in- the-know)
•Payment processors
• IT infrastructure
•Knowledge Database
•Human talent
•Personnel
• IT
•Owned + Direct:•Web• App
•B2B – SaaS
•B2C – App (freemium) + Annual Issue (pay-per-issue)
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
QRator+: Canvas II
Cost structure Revenue streams
Key resources Channels
Key activitiesKey partners Value proposition
Costumer relationships
Costumer segments
> 3 Star Hotels w/limited to no concierge staff
Dedicated personal assistance
On-demand service – Efficiency relative to more staff
Owned + Direct:•Web• App
SaaS
Hotel Guest
Hotel Management:(Corporate + On-site)
App (freemium) + Annual Issue (pay-per-issue)
Curators
Self-Service
Self-Service
Guest
Content
Hotels
All 3
Discovery as local
Customized/tailored guest services
Cache - Recognition
Personnel
IT
Group of Curators (locals in-the-know)
Payment Processors
IT Infrastructure
Knowledge Database
Human Talent
Information Exchange
Sourcing of Curators
$
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
QRator+: Canvas III
Cost structure Revenue streams
Key resources Channels
Key activitiesKey partners Value proposition
Costumer relationships
Costumer segments
> 3 Star Hotels w/limited to no concierge staff
Dedicated
On-demand service – Efficiency relative to more staff
Owned + Direct:•Web• App
SaaS
Hotel Guest
Franchisors
App (freemium) + Annual Issue (pay-per-issue)
Curators
Self-Service
Self-Service
Guest
Content
Hotels
All 3
Face-2-face local Interactions
Up-to-date Content
Cache - Recognition
Personnel
IT
Group of Curators (locals in-the-know)
Payment Processors
IT Infrastructure
Knowledge Database
Human Talent
Information Exchange
Sourcing of Curators
$
Franchisee
On-site Staff
Pay-per-Use
Personalized
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
QRator+: Canvas IV
Cost structure Revenue streams
Key resources Channels
Key activitiesKey partners Value proposition
Costumer relationships
Costumer segments
Dedicated
Marketing and tracking Tool Indirect – White
Label (Web)
SaaS
Hotel Guests Hip, Tech-Savvy Travelers that are visiting a city and don’t know it well1. Leisure2. Business
Hotel Ecosystem of Experience rich locations (e.g. Urban areas)
Indirect – White Label
Guest
Content
Hotels
All 3
Face-2-face local Interactions
Tailored experienced based recommendations
Cache - Recognition
Personnel
IT
Group of Curators (locals in-the-know)
Payment Processors
IT Infrastructure
Knowledge Database
Human Talent
Information Exchange
Sourcing of Curators
$
Pay-per-Use
Personalized
Content Providers
Data AnalyticsCustomer Analytics +Retention + Referral
Owned + Direct
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
Day 5 > Customer Acquisition & CompetitionTypical Customers Acquisition Competition
Hotel:•Franchisee of large
corporate chain•Management-owned
properties•Invests in providing
better service•20-30 properties
Guest:•Business or leisure•Higher income•Enjoys experiences •Wants same activities as
at home (running)•Already member of
loyalty programs•Male & female, 20s-30s
•Acquire franchisee management of hotel chains
•Strategic decision likely made at top management level (CEO), but not full system roll-out
•Fastest to implement: 3 months – design survey to match hotel branding, build technology, train staff
•Access hotel guests through hotel database, not 3rd party booking agent
•Build partnerships with content providers, event managers, restaurants
•In-house, existing loyalty programs
•CRM platforms (Opera, Cendyn)
•Online travel booking (Expedia, Travelocity, Orbitz)
•Outsourced concierge services (Continental)
•Marketing firms
•Free content providers: Zagat, Yelp, Trip Advisor, Time Out, Urban Daddy
•Potential entrants: Facebook, Google
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
Day 5 > Market Sizing
$10.2 billion
$3.1 billion
$229 million
TAM
SAM
TM
TAM = Total marketing for US hotels
SAM = TAM adjusted by:52% of Full Service Hotels58% of Hotel in urban areas
TM = SAM adjusted by:15% of marketing budget we will
charge50% penetration assumption
Note: Market sizing exercise is only for US, if international hotels were included, it would be a much larger market.
Source:STR
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
Day 5 > Selected loyalty programsLoyalty Program Hotel Chain 1865 Langham Hotels InternationalChoice Privileges Choice Hotels Fiesta Rewards Grupo PosadasSwissotel Circle Swissotel Hotels & ResortsHilton HHonors Hilton hotelsHyatt Gold Passport Hyatt Kimpton InTouch Kimpton GroupMarriott Rewards Marriott owned hotelsPan Pacific Privileges Pan Pacific Hotels and Resorts
Priority ClubInterContinental chain hotels (including Holiday Inn)
Starwood Preferred Guest Starwood hotels and resortsShangri-La Hotel Golden Circle Shangri-La and TradersMaS Rewards Sol Melia Hotels & ResortsByRequest Wyndham branded hotelsRitz Carlton Rewards Ritz Carlton
Additional potential target customersAman Resorts Biltmore Hotels Fairmont HotelsGaylord Hotels Grand Hotels Kempinski HotelsLoews Hotels Taj Hotels Rosewood HotelsMandarin Oriental Le Meridian Fontaineblaue ResortsITC Hotels Jumeirah The Luxery CollectionMorgan Hotels Mövenpick Hotels Peninsula HotelsRelais & Châteaux RockResorts
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
What We THOUGHT What We DID What We WILL DO•Guests in our target
market want local experiences
•Local content provider to niche hotels with limited or no concierge hotels
•Curated content drives customer loyalty
•Customers know what they want to do before arriving at hotel
•Surveyed end users in our target market and hotel management
•Aggregate content from trusted sources: Yelp , UrbanDaddy, StubHub, Trip Advisor, TimeOut
•Value to hotel: retention/referral, customer data, promotions, marketing tool
•Build minimum viable product
•How much are hotels willing to pay?
•Develop preliminary pricing and cost assumptions
•Think about who owns customer data
Day 3 Review:What we Thought -> Did -> Will Do
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
Day 3 > Get Out of the Building!
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
Day 3 > Market Sizing
$2.5 billion
$1.5 billion
$743 million
TAM
SAM
TM
Assumption:Hotels would pay $2 per room for customer profiling, recommendations and future “experience matchings”
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
What We THOUGHT What We DID What We WILL DO•Platform opportunity for
limited or no concierge hotels
•Guests want local experiences
•2nd tier guests would prefer 1st tier service
•Hotels control their concierge service
•Talked with 31 people: concierge, managers, guests, corporate
•Budget hotels have basic platforms centered on ticker broking
•Outsourced concierge
•2nd-tier, midtown guests want to see top attractions instead of local experiences
•Focus on niche hotels (i.e. A-Loft) which attracts guests who want local experiences
•Deliver curated content based on hotel location and average guest profile
•Define what are the sources of best content (known, reliable, repeatable)
•Develop unique add-on experiences
Day 2 Review:What we Thought -> Did -> Will Do
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
Day 2 > Get Out of the Building!QR Company Role Key FeedbackCorporateAI Starwood Hotels Director of Sales Already have a platform internally -- would like more content -- price importantAI Choice Hotels Director of Mktg iPad handles most basic customer requestsAI Aloft Harlem Mgmt, Events Great idea but the cost is important -- would like exclusivityAI Aloft Harlem Guests x5 Would use concierge, but use smartphones when no concierge presentAI Columbia Parents x4 No concierge services -- would like knowing where events are locallySite VisitsJW Marriott Junior Mgmt In-house staff curate their own recommendationsJW Best Western Low-end FD/CN No concierge service -- stock flyersJW Courtyard Marriot CN Outsource Outsourced to Continental (ticket broker)JW Double Tree Hilton Guest (FL) Does not use CN -- does own research for ideasJW Double Tree Hilton Drink at bar CN depends on person -- assume there are kickbacksJW Fitzpatrick Hotel 2 FD/CN Have shelf ideas -- Google, Zagat for new requestsLS Residence Inn CN Outsource Old School concierge / will like to connect with younger generationLS Marriot Courtyard PT CN/FD Does feel technology can improve his role, like one-on-oneLS Fairfield Inn FD, no CN Disinterested, rely on tech hardware at hotelLS Hampton Inn FD, no CN Does not see problem, very disinterested with customer servicesLS Comfort Inn General Mgmt Technology has changed the industry for the betterLS Comfort Inn FD, no CN Technology ruined sales that were done at hotel and commissions were lostLS Columbia Club FD, no CN Business guests don’t need much a concierge / know the cityRC Double Tree Hilton CN Outsourcing Prevalent in NYRC Comfort Inn General Mgmt Concierge Services depend on Size (>100 rooms)RC Holiday Inn FD To Break-Even in concierge a property needs high turn-over ratesRC Holiday Inn CN Ticket Broker - not service orientedRC Comfort Inn CN No training / barely spoke EnglishRC Double Tree Hilton General Mgmt High staff turnover / Works only within system
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
Customer Development > Day 2
What we learned
Franchisor / Franchisee
Model
Content is King where Customer
Demographics are aligned
Best Western
(BW) properties
give BW services
Outsourced Concierges
are ‘Distribution
Centers’
NY is a unique market
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
What We THOUGHT What We DID What We WILL DO
•Hotel guests want local experiences
•Hotels want to improve their concierge services
•Need not met: Hotels don’t have dedicated concierge services or have underperforming ones
•The best way to deliver local NY content to tourists/users was through real-time “QRators”
•Talked with hotel concierge and hotel managers
•Brainstormed business model pivot: customized solutions (not repeatable or scalable?) -> standard concierge database and platform (satisfy the largest need)
•Segmented market and defined target market as 2nd-tier, urban hotels
•Develop idea of “in house” services (incremental revenue generation to hotel) to complement “out of house”
•Estimate hotel’s willingness to pay for service
•Define what are the sources of best content (known, reliable, repeatable)
Day 1 Review:What we Thought -> Did -> Will Do
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
Customer Development > Day 1
What we learned
Concierges are moving
towards unions
Concierge Services are ‘Key’ part of
Guest Services
Referral system is Grey, but doesn’t apply
across the board
CRM solutions exist, but limited
tracking of off-site guest
activities
Concierges are Level 3 employees
In-house vs. outsourced Concierges
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
Day 1 > Market Sizing
$1.7 billion
$541 million
$108 million
TAM
SAM
TM
Assumption:Segmented hotels will spend $1 per room in concierge / customer service
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
QRator+ The engine that drives Customer Loyalty at your hotel
Service Mock-Up
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
Customer Loyalty drives $
Delivers loyalty by allowing you to learn about your customers
Knowledge = Service Improvements = Loyalty
QRator+
Service Mock-Up
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
QRator+ in action - Reservation
Link (White Label) to QRator+ smartSurvey
Service Mock-Up
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
QRator+ in action – Confirmation E-mail
Link (White Label) to QRator+ smartSurvey
Service Mock-Up
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
QRator+: smartSurveyWhat image best describes your food taste?
Service Mock-Up
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
stores Mr. Smith’s profile and screens for future activities at locations where Warwick has
properties
QRator+
Service Mock-Up
Have feedback for us? Please e-mail Rod: [email protected]
+
Mr. Smith
QRator+
QRator+ drives Customer Loyalty
May 2013
Targeted promotional communications to customers
+ Superior service
Loyal Customers
Service Mock-Up