Upload
peter-newbury
View
772
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Thinking like experts 1
“Cows,” said the
frog. “Cows! They
have four legs,
horns, eat grass
and carry pink bags
of milk.”
From “Fish is Fish” by Leo Lionni (1970)
How to teach your students
to think like experts
How to Teach Your Students
to Think Like Experts
Peter Newbury
Center for Teaching Development, UC San Diego
Unless otherwise noted, content is licensed under
a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 License.
[email protected] peternewbury.org
@polarisdotca #CSUgrit
March 13, 2015
My goals for you
3
By the end of this workshop, you will be able to
illustrate with examples how effective peer instruction
builds on the key findings of how people learn, in
particular, how it help to develop expertise
recount the “choreography” of peer instruction
critique peer instruction questions, identifying their
strengths and weaknesses
show excitement, not anxiety, when someone suggests
you use “clickers” in your class
walk out with a collection of questions you can adapt to
your own discipline
Why are we here?
Thinking like experts 4
What do you think students are doing in a typical
university class?
A) listening
B) absorbing
C) learning
D) note-taking
E) distracted
How People Learn
Thinking like experts 5
3 Key Findings
3 Implications for Teaching
3 Designs for Classroom Environment
Key Finding 1
Thinking like experts 6
Students come to the classroom with preconceptions about how the world works. If their initial understanding is not engaged, they may fail to grasp the new concepts and information that are taught, or they may learn them for the purposes of a test but revert to their preconceptions outside of the classroom. (How People Learn, p. 14)
Implications for Teaching 1
Thinking like experts 7
Teachers must draw out and work with the preexisting understandings that their students bring with them.
(How People Learn, p. 19)
Schools and classrooms must be learner centered.
(How People Learn, p. 23)
Classroom Environments 1
Key Finding 2
Thinking like experts 8
To develop competence in an area, students must:
a) have a deep foundation of factual knowledge,
b) understand facts and ideas in the context of a conceptual framework, and
c) organize knowledge in ways that facilitate retrieval and application.
(How People Learn, p. 16)
Implications for Teaching 2
Thinking like experts 10
Teachers must teach some subject matter in depth, providing many examples in which the same concept is at work and providing a firm foundation of factual knowledge.
Classroom Environments 2
To provide a knowledge-centered environment, attention must be given to what is taught (information, subject matter), why it is taught (understanding), and what competence or mastery looks like.
(How People Learn, p. 20)
(How People Learn, p 24.)
Key Finding 3
Thinking like experts 11
A “metacognitive” approach to instruction can help students learn to take control of their own learning by defining learning goals and monitoring their progress in achieving them.
(How People Learn, p. 18)
Aside: metacognition
Thinking like experts 12
Metacognition refers to one’s knowledge concerning one’s
own cognitive processes or anything related to them. For
example, I am engaging in metacognition if I notice that I am
having more trouble learning A than B.
([2], [3])
cognition meta
Key Finding 3
Thinking like experts 13
A “metacognitive” approach to instruction can help students learn to take control of their own learning by defining learning goals and monitoring their progress in achieving them.
(How People Learn, p. 18)
Implications for Teaching 3
Thinking like experts 14
The teaching of metacognitive skills should be integrated into the curriculum in a variety of subject areas.
Classroom Environments 3 Formative assessments — ongoing assessments designed to make students’ thinking visible to both teachers and students — are essential.
(How People Learn, p. 21)
(How People Learn, p. 24)
What the best college teachers do
Thinking like experts 15
More than anything else, the best teachers try to create a
natural critical learning environment: natural
because students encounter skills, habits, attitudes, and
information they are trying to learn embedded in questions
and tasks they find fascinating – authentic tasks that arouse
curiosity and become intrinsically interesting, critical
because students learn to think critically, to reason from
evidence, to examine the quality of their reasoning using a
variety of intellectual standards, to make improvements
while thinking, and to ask probing and insightful questions
about the thinking of other people. (Bain, p. 99)
In natural critical learning environments
Thinking like experts 16
students encounter safe yet challenging conditions in
which they can try, fail, receive feedback, and try again
without facing a summative evaluation.
fail receive
feedback
(Bain, p. 108)
try
Introductory Chemistry
Thinking like experts 18
Today, we’ll be learning about changes of state. Remember,
there are 3 states (also called “phases”) of matter:
solid
liquid
gas
Thinking like experts 19
Melt chocolate over low heat. Remove the chocolate
from the heat. What will happen to the chocolate?
A) It will condense.
B) It will evaporate.
C) It will freeze.
(Question: Sujatha Raghu from Braincandy via LearningCatalytics)
(Image: CIM9926 by number657 on flickr CC)
Chemistry learning outcomes
Thinking like experts 20
Students will be able to
name all 6 changes of state
translate back and forth between technical (“melt”) and
plain English (“solid into liquid”)
Imagine… misconception?
PI promotes expert-like thinking
Thinking like experts 21
students teach each other while
they may still hold or remember
their novice preconceptions
students discuss the concepts in
their own (novice) language
each student finds out what s/he does (not) know
the instructor finds out what the students (do not)
know and reacts, building on their initial understanding
and preconceptions.
students practice
how to think and
communicate
like experts
Typical Episode of Peer Instruction
Thinking like experts 22
1. Instructor poses a conceptually-challenging,
multiple-choice question.
2. Students think on their own and vote using clickers,
ABCD cards, PollEverywhere,…
3. The instructor asks students to “turn to your neighbors
convince them you’re right.”
4. After that conversation, students may vote again.
5. The instructor leads a class-wide discussion concluding
with why the right answers are right and the wrong
answers are wrong.
clarity Students waste no effort trying to figure out what’s
being asked.
context Is this topic currently being covered in class?
learning
outcome
Does the question make students do the right things
to demonstrate they grasp the concept?
distractors What do the “wrong” answers tell you about
students’ thinking?
difficulty Is the question too easy? too hard?
stimulates
thoughtful
discussion
Will the question engage the students and spark
thoughtful discussions? Are there openings for you
to continue the discussion?
What makes a good question?
Thinking like experts 24 (Adapted from Stephanie Chasteen, CU Boulder)
Thinking like experts 25
clarity context learning outcome distractors
difficulty stimulates thoughtful discussion
Try it yourself…
Thinking like experts 26
1. Please form groups of 2 or 3 by discipline (look for
colored cards)
2. Critique questions in the collection closest to your
discipline
for pairs of questions, which one is better? Why?
for single questions, is it good or bad? Can you
write a better one?
clarity context learning outcome distractors
difficulty stimulates thoughtful discussion
Thinking like experts 27
clarity context learning outcome distractors
difficulty stimulates thoughtful discussion
Thinking like experts 28
clarity context learning outcome distractors
difficulty stimulates thoughtful discussion
Thinking like experts 29
clarity context learning outcome distractors
difficulty stimulates thoughtful discussion
Thinking like experts 30
clarity context learning outcome distractors
difficulty stimulates thoughtful discussion
Thinking like experts 31
clarity context learning outcome distractors
difficulty stimulates thoughtful discussion
Thinking like experts 32
clarity context learning outcome distractors
difficulty stimulates thoughtful discussion
Thinking like experts 33
clarity context learning outcome distractors
difficulty stimulates thoughtful discussion
Thinking like experts 34
clarity context learning outcome distractors
difficulty stimulates thoughtful discussion
Thinking like experts 35
clarity context learning outcome distractors
difficulty stimulates thoughtful discussion
Thinking like experts 36
clarity context learning outcome distractors
difficulty stimulates thoughtful discussion
Thinking like experts 37
clarity context learning outcome distractors
difficulty stimulates thoughtful discussion
Thinking like experts 38
clarity context learning outcome distractors
difficulty stimulates thoughtful discussion
t h e l e a r n i n g c y c l e
Peer instruction helps students learn...
Thinking like experts 39
BEFORE DURING AFTER
setting up
instruction
developing
knowledge
assessing
learning
Adapted from Rosie Piller, Ian Beatty, Stephanie Chasteen
t h e l e a r n i n g c y c l e
Peer instruction helps students learn...
Thinking like experts 40
BEFORE DURING AFTER
setting up
instruction
developing
knowledge
assessing
learning
Adapted from Rosie Piller, Ian Beatty, Stephanie Chasteen
The students have not
resolved Concept X.
But Concept X has been
activated and they know
why it is interesting.
t h e l e a r n i n g c y c l e
Peer instruction helps students learn...
Thinking like experts 41
BEFORE DURING AFTER
setting up
instruction
developing
knowledge
assessing
learning
Adapted from Rosie Piller, Ian Beatty, Stephanie Chasteen
t h e l e a r n i n g c y c l e
Peer instruction helps students learn...
Thinking like experts 42
BEFORE DURING AFTER
setting up
instruction
developing
knowledge
assessing
learning
Adapted from Rosie Piller, Ian Beatty, Stephanie Chasteen
Peer Instruction - collegeclassroom.ucsd.edu 44
1. identifying key concepts, misconceptions
2. creating multiple-choice questions that
require deeper thinking and learning
3. facilitating episodes of peer instruction that
spark and support expert-like discussion
4. leading a class-wide discussion to clarify
the concept, resolve the misconception
5. reflecting on the question: note curious
things you overheard, how they voted, etc. so
next year’s peer instruction will be better
before
class
during
class
after
class
Effective peer instruction requires
reduce course content by 25%
Effective peer instruction requires
How (you can help) People Learn (using peer instruction) 45
students come to class prepared to engage in
conceptually-challenging discussions
TIME! 5 minutes of student-centered
activity every 10 – 15 minutes
means 25% of class time is
not lecturing.
Where does that time come from?
But I’ve got
material to fill
(more than)
100% of my
lecture!
Traditional classroom
Thinking like experts 46
first exposure to material is in class, content is
transmitted from instructor to student
learning occurs later when student struggles alone to
complete homework, essay, project
learn easy stuff
together
learn hard
stuff alone
transfer assimilate
Flipped classroom
Thinking like experts 47
student learns easy content at home: definitions, basic
skills, simple examples. Frees up class time for...
students are prepared to tackle challenging concepts in
class, with immediate feedback from peers, instructor
learn hard
stuff together
learn easy stuff
alone
transfer assimilate
References
Peer Instruction - collegeclassroom.ucsd.edu 49
1. National Research Council (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School:
Expanded Edition. J.D. Bransford, A.L Brown & R.R. Cocking (Eds.),Washington, DC:
The National Academies Press.
2. Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.),
The nature of intelligence (pp.231-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Brame, C. (2013). Thinking about metacognition. [blog] January, 2013, Available at:
http://cft.vanderbilt.edu/2013/01/thinking-about-metacognition/ [Accessed: 14
Jan 2013].
4. Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
How to Teach Your Students
to Think Like Experts
Peter Newbury
Center for Teaching Development, UC San Diego
Unless otherwise noted, content is licensed under
a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 License.
[email protected] peternewbury.org
@polarisdotca #CSUgrit
March 13, 2015
effective #peerinstruction gives students opps to try,
fail, receive feedback, try again, says @polarisdotca.
Develops expertise. #CSUgrit